Coronary Flow Reserve in Non-Infarcted Myocardium Predicts Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Rongchao Cheng; Xiaoming Zhu; Yunling Li; Xiuping Bai; Li Xue; Li Wei

doi:10.3349/ymj.2018.59.2.252

Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.59(2) > 1032256

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Cheng, Zhu, Li, Bai, Xue, and Wei: Coronary Flow Reserve in Non-Infarcted Myocardium Predicts Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Original Article

Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Yonsei Medical Journal 2018; 59(2): 252-257.

Published online: 5 February 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.2.252

Coronary Flow Reserve in Non-Infarcted Myocardium Predicts Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Rongchao Cheng¹

, Xiaoming Zhu², Yunling Li¹, Xiuping Bai¹, Li Xue¹, Li Wei¹

¹Department of Cardiology, the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

²Department of Economic Management, Heilongjiang Nongken Vocational College, Harbin, China.

Corresponding author: Dr. Li Wei, Department of Cardiology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No. 37, YiYuan Street, NanGang District, Harbin 150001, China. Tel: 86-451-8593-9357, Fax: 86-451-8593-9357, chengrongchao@163.com

Received 1 August 2017 Revised 20 November 2017 Accepted 26 November 2017

Yonsei University College of Medicine

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is recognized as an indicator of myocardial perfusion. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).

Materials and Methods

100 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled in the present study, and divided into MACE and non-MACE groups according to the incidence of 12-month MACEs. Left ventricular function and CFR were analyzed using two-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography at one week after PCI. Cardiac troponin I levels were assayed to estimate peak concentrations thereof.

Results

The MACE group was associated with lower CFR, compared to the non-MACE group (2.41 vs. 2.77, p<0.001). In the multivariable model, CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium was an independent predictor of 12-month MACE (hazard ratio: 0.093, 95% confidence interval: 0.020–0.426, p=0.002) after adjustment for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.

Conclusion

CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium is a useful marker for predicting 12-month MACEs in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI.

Go to :

Keywords: Myocardial infarction, microvascular dysfunction, coronary flow reserve, myocardial contrast echocardiography

INTRODUCTION

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is defined as the magnitude of increased coronary flow from the basal state to that achieved following maximal coronary vasodilation, and is recognized as an indicator of myocardial perfusion.1 Poor clinical outcomes have been found to be closely related with dysfunction of microcirculation perfusion, both in patients with satisfactory and those with unsatisfactory revascularization of the infarct-related artery.2 3 4 A large number of experiments have shown that myocardial infarction (MI) area and left ventricular function are largely affected by microcirculation function, which is closely related to recovery of left ventricular function and long-term left ventricular remodeling.5 6 7 About 25% of patients who have successfully undergone angioplasty still suffer from microvascular dysfunction.8 9 10 It has been shown that microvascular dysfunction is not only in the infarcted myocardium but also in the non-infarcted myocardium. However, the clinical importance thereof has not been fully elucidated.11 12

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and long-term clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to analyze factors influencing the value of CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium.

Go to :

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

A total of 100 patients (74 males and 26 females) with first AMI and single-vessel disease who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 12 hours after symptom onset were enrolled in the study and followed up for 12 months. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Patients under unstable condition, severe extracardiac disease, or severe valve disease were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Serum parameter

As the levels of creatinine kinase or cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in serum are important parameters to diagnose AMI, cTnI levels were chosen for assay in this study, and were measured on admission and every six hours during the first 24 hours.

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PCI was performed with standard techniques and the stent was placed in all patients. All patients received aspirin (300 mg loading dose) and ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose) prior to PCI. A regimen of 180 mg ticagrelor per day was continued for at least 12 months after PCI, and 100 mg aspirin daily was prescribed indefinitely. Successful primary angioplasty was defined as a final thrombolysis in MI flow grade 3 in the infarctrelated artery and residual stenosis of <20%.

Two-dimensional echocardiography

Two-dimensional echocardiography (Philips iE33, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) was performed one week after PCI to measure left ventricular end diastolic volume, left ventricular end systolic volume, and calculated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Myocardial contrast echocardiography

Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was performed one week after PCI, using intravenous injection of sonovue at baseline and during hyperemia. Meanwhile, dobutamine was injected by intravenous infusion during hyperemia (at a starting dose of 5 µg/kg/min, followed by an increasing dose of 10 µg/kg/min up to a dose of 20 µg/kg/min in 3-minute stages). MCE images were acquired both at baseline and hyperemia. Sonovue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) was used as the intravenous contrast agent and administered by an infusion syringe-pump.13

CFR measurement

The left ventricular was divided into 17 segments. The non-infarcted myocardium far away from the infarcted myocardium was selected to ensure that there was no interaction between these two. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed and tracked manually within the myocardium at baseline and after hyperemia. The software package automatically calculated the mean acoustic intensity of each ROI and generated time-intensity curves that were subsequently fitted to a monoexponentially function: y=A(1-e^-βt)(q). Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was calculated as the product of A×β. Basal and hyperemic MBF was derived, and CFR (MBF at hyperemia/MBF at baseline) was calculated for each patient.14 15 16 All images were independently analyzed by two experienced observers, who were blinded to the clinical data, angiographic results, and other respective imaging.

Clinical outcomes and definitions

The primary endpoint of this study was the 12-month commutative incidence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE). MACE comprised all causes of death, non-fatal MI, advanced heart failure, repeat target vessel revascularization, and ischemic stroke. All patients were divided into MACE and non-MACE groups according to the incidence of 12-month MACE.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as means±standard deviations, and were analyzed by Student's t-tests. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages and counts, and were analyzed by the chi square test. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Variables with a p value <0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate cox regression model, and results are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariate cox regression analysis was performed to assess the independent predictors of MACE. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic value of CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and peak cTnI in MACE and to determine the optimum cutoff level for CFR. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test.

Go to :

RESULTS

Patients

Among all patients in our study, MACEs occurred in 15 patients (15%) (all causes of death, n=4; non-fatal MI, n=2; advanced heart failure, n=8; repeat target vessel revascularization, n=1; and ischemic stroke, n=0)(Table 1).

Table 1

Distribution of Patients with MACE

Type of MACE	n=15
Death	4
Non-fatal MI	2
Advanced heart failure	8
Repeat target vessel revascularization	1
Ischemic stroke	0

MACE, major adverse cardiac event; MI, myocardial infarction.

Clinical variables in the MACE and non-MACE groups

Mean peak cTnI in the MACE group was significantly higher than that in the non-MACE group (23.67 vs. 12.71 µg/mL, p<0.001). Mean CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium in the MACE group was significantly lower than that in the non-MACE group (2.412 vs. 2.771, p<0.001)(Table 2). There were no differences in the other variables between these two groups.

Table 2

Comparison of the Two Study Groups according to Clinical Variables (n=100)

Variables	MACE group (n=15)	Non-MACE group (n=85)	p value
Age (yr)	59.131±7.049	58.004±7.784	0.600
Gender (M/F)	12/3	62/23	0.798
Risk factors, n (%)
Hypertension	6 (40.0)	23 (27.1)	0.478
Diabetes mellitus	4 (26.7)	14 (16.5)	0.560
Hypercholesterolemia	4 (26.7)	24 (28.2)	1.000
Smoking	7 (46.1)	27 (31.8)	0.261
Culprit lesion, n (%)			0.797
Left anterior descending	9 (53.3)	38 (44.7)
Left circumflex	2 (13.3)	16 (18.8)
Right coronary artery	5 (33.3)	31 (36.5)
Peak cTnI (µg/mL)	23.669±7.844	12.713±3.380	<0.001
CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium	2.412±0.160	2.771±0.262	<0.001
LVEF (%)	0.473±0.034	0.480±0.031	0.328

MACE, major adverse cardiac event; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; CFR, coronary flow reserve; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

ROC curve and cut-off values

When predicting MACE by ROC curves, the sensitivity and specificity of CFR <2.305 were 91% and 86%, respectively [area under the curve (AUC)=0.958], and the sensitivity and specificity of peak cTnI >18.50 were 80% and 94%, respectively (AUC=0.935)(Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

The best cut-off values of CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and peak cTnI were analyzed using ROC curves. CFR in the non-infarcted region (AUC=0.958), cut-off=2.305, sensitivity=0.91, specificity=0.86). Peak cTnI (AUC=0.935), cut-off=18.50, senstivity=0.80, specificity=0.94. CFR, coronary flow reserve; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; ROC, receiver-operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.

Predictive value of CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium on 12-month MACE

In univariate analysis, CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and peak cTnI showed a significant association with 12-month MACE (p<0.001). These two factors with a p<0.05 were included in a multivariate cox regression analysis, and the interaction between the two factors was corrected. Therein, the risk of MACE in patients with high CFR (CFR≥2.305) was lower than that in patients with low CFR (CFR<2.305) (HR=0.093, 95% CI: 0.020–0.426, p=0.002)(Table 3).

Table 3

Factors Associated with Major Adverse Cardiac Event in Univariate and Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis

Variables	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
Variables	HR	95% CI	p value	HR	95% CI	p value
Age (≥55 vs. <55)	1.119	0.356–3.513	0.848
Gender (male vs. female)	1.401	0.395–4.968	0.601
Hypertension (yes vs. no)	1.601	0.570–4.499	0.372
Diabetes mellitus (yes vs. no)	1.563	0.498–4.911	0.444
Hypercholesterolemia (yes vs. no)	0.939	0.299–2.950	0.914
Smoking (yes vs. no)	1.677	0.608–4.626	0.318
Peak cTnI (≥18.50 vs. <18.50)	26.363	7.350–94.562	<0.001	7.698	1.685–35.161	0.008
CFR in the non-infarcted region (≥2.305 vs. <2.305)	0.031	0.009–0.114	<0.001	0.093	0.020–0.426	0.002

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CFR, coronary flow reserve; cTnI, cardiac troponin I.

Kaplan-Meier curves of cumulative survival rate (one-year survival)

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed median survival times of 7.353 ±0.802 months in the CFR <2.305 group and 11.795±0.133 months in the CFR ≥2.305 group (p<0.001)(Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves of cumulative survival (one-year survival). The results showed median survival times of 7.353±0.802 months in the CFR <2.305 group and 11.795±0.133 months in the CFR ≥2.305 group (p<0.001). MACE, major adverse cardiac event; CFR, coronary flow reserve.

The impact factors of CFR

According to the CFR cut-off value of 2.305 in the non-infarcted myocardium, all patients were divided into two subgroups: Group I (CFR<2.305) and Group II (CFR≥2.305). Peak cTnI was higher in Group I than in Group II (p<0.001), while LVEF was lower in Group I than in Group II (p=0.001)(Table 4).

Table 4

Comparison of Clinical Variables (n=100)

Variables	Group I (CFR<2.305)	Group II (CFR≥2.305)	p value
Age (yr)	59.063±7.013	57.987±7.808	0.602
Gender (M/F)	14/3	60/23	0.577
Risk factors, n (%)
Hypertension	5 (29.4)	24 (28.9)	0.967
Diabetes mellitus	2 (11.8)	16 (19.3)	0.698
Hypercholesterolemia	5 (29.4)	23 (27.7)	0.887
Smoking	7 (41.2)	27 (32.5)	0.493
Culprit lesion, n (%)			0.741
Left anterior descending	8 (47.1)	38 (45.8)
Left circumflex	4 (23.5)	14 (16.9)
Right coronary artery	5 (29.4)	31 (37.3)
Peak cTnI (µg/mL)	20.351±7.541	13.120±4.559	<0.001
LVEF (%)	0.454±0.029	0.488±0.030	0.001

CFR, coronary flow reserve; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

Go to :

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and 12-month adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. The non-MACE group was more likely to have lower peak cTnI and higher CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium than the MACE group. Multivariate analysis identified CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium as an independent predictor of 12-month MACE after adjusting for multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, we found the mean survival time of the low CFR group (CFR<2.305) to be significantly shorter than that of the high CFR group (CFR≥2.305). Moreover, we further analyzed factors related with CFR value, among which only peak cTnI and LVEF were statistically significant. Thus, we inferred that CFR value is closely associated with the MI size and left ventricular function.

MCE is the gold standard method to assess myocardial microcirculation.17 The predictive value of CFR measured by MCE for no reflow phenomenon and left ventricular remodeling after PCI has been revealed by several clinical studies.6 18 Decrease in CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium was correlated with an increase in the extent of ischemia. Alterations in CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium had important clinical implications after revascularization.19 Furthermore, some relevant biomarkers and other easily available clinical parameters have also been studied to predict the incidence of MACE, such as mean platelet volume and neutrophil counts.20

Microvascular dysfunction is found not only in the infarcted region but also in the remote region, which has been discovered long before. In MI animal models, CFR and coronary resistance changes were found in the non-infarcted areas, which were independent of changes in hemodynamic parameters.21 Similar studies in humans also verified that coronary vasodilator responses decreased in patients with non-infarcted myocardium after PCI.22 23 However, the etiology and clinical importance of microvascular dysfunction in the non-infarcted myocardium are not fully understood.

Several mechanisms for CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium seem to have a correlation with MACE. The decrease of CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium is representative of more extensive necrosis and deterioration of cardiac function, which was also proved in our study.24 Microvascular dysfunction in the non-infarct area is an indicator of enlargement of the ischemic range, which can reduce myocardial collateral circulation to the infarction area and increase the area of MI. Also, the cardiospecific overexpression of angiotensin II type I receptor and decrease in microvessel density in the non-infarcted myocardium may lead to some cardiovascular events, mainly cardiac remodeling and heart failure.25 Moreover, investigators have also suggested that alterations in CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium also could be attributed to increased sympathetic nervous system activity, leading to coronary vasoconstriction and decreased vasodilator reserve.26 Furthermore, some scholars indicate that microvascular dysfunction after MI is associated with impaired sympathetic innervation and function even in the non-infarcted myocardial tissues. Impaired sympathetic innervation might be associated with electrical instability. Adverse structural and electrophysiological remodeling at non-infarcted regions after MI are responsible for clinically ventricular arrhythmias, leading to sudden cardiac death eventually. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are life threatening cardiac arrhythmias and the most common causes of sudden cardiac death.27

In our study, the incidence of MACE after PCI was 15%, slightly higher than that in other studies, which may be related to the small sample size of patients selected. Moreover, CFR was measured only once after PCI, and we could not evaluate changes in microvascular perfusion. Also, some problems in the examination of MCE are still difficult to figure out at present, such as a number of segments appearing as acoustic shadow and artifacts.28 In addition, the relevant mechanism between CFR in the non-infarcted myocardium and MACE is planned to be explored in future study. We should also draw more attention to apparently “normal” non-infarction regions for further understanding of the mechanism of sudden cardiac death.

In conclusion, our results clearly show that CFR in the noninfarcted myocardium is associated with prognostic significance for 12-month MACE in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI. The use of CFR is advised in contemporary clinical practice.

Go to :

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Department of Medical Ultrasonics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. We also thank Dr. Xueqi Li (the Forth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University) for providing amendment opinions.

Go to :

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Go to :

References

1. Bowers TR, O'Neill WW. Coronary rotablation and reserve: can they occur together. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995; 36:277. PMID: 8542642.

2. Bierig SM, Mikolajczak P, Herrmann SC, Elmore N, Kern M, Labovitz AJ. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography derived myocardial perfusion reserve with invasive determination of coronary flow reserve. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009; 10:250–255. PMID: 18723849.

3. Kisanuki A, Yuasa T, Kuwahara E, Takasaki K, Yoshifuku S, Otsuji Y, et al. Reproducibility of intravenous intermittent triggered myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy subjects. Jpn Heart J. 2004; 45:461–473. PMID: 15240966.

4. Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: basic principles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001; 44:1–11. PMID: 11533923.

5. Wita K, Filipecki A, Lelek M, Bochenek T, Elžbieciak M, Wróbel W, et al. Prediction of left ventricular remodeling in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI: use of quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography. Coron Artery Dis. 2011; 22:171–178. PMID: 21394026.

6. Porter TR, D’Sa A, Turner C, Jones LA, Minisi AJ, Mohanty PK, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the assessment of coronary blood flow reserve: validation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21:349–355. PMID: 8425997.

7. Swinburn JM, Lahiri A, Senior R. Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysynergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38:19–25. PMID: 11451273.

8. Mengozzi G, Rossini R, Palagi C, Musumeci G, Petronio A, Limbruno U, et al. Usefulness of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in the early left ventricular remodeling in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90:713–719. PMID: 12356383.

9. Yamamuro A, Akasaka T, Tamita K, Yamabe K, Katayama M, Takagi T, et al. Coronary flow velocity pattern immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention as a predictor of complications and in-hospital survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106:3051–3056. PMID: 12473550.

10. Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:830–840. PMID: 17314342.

11. Wu JC, Yun JJ, Dione DP, Heller EN, Deckelbaum LI, Sinusas AJ. Severe regional ischemia alters coronary flow reserve in the remote perfusion area. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000; 7:43–52. PMID: 10698234.

12. Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ, Caracciolo EA, Aguirre FV, Miller LW, et al. Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 28:1154–1160. PMID: 8890809.

13. Bokor D. Diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86:19–24.

14. Eliasen P, Amtorp O. Effect of intracoronary adenosine upon regional blood flow, microvascular blood volume and hematocrit in canine myocardium. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp. 1984; 3:3–12. PMID: 6480228.

15. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, Linka A, Skyba DM, Kaul S. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation. 1998; 97:473–483. PMID: 9490243.

16. Tiemann K, Pohl C, Schlosser T, Goenechea J, Bruce M, Veltmann C, et al. Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-Doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26:1161–1167. PMID: 11053751.

17. Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography: 15 years of research and development. Circulation. 1997; 96:3745–3760. PMID: 9396479.

18. Galiuto L, Garramone B, Scarà A, Rebuzzi AG, Crea F, La Torre G, et al. The extent of microvascular damage during myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known indexes of post-infarct reperfusion in predicting left ventricular remodeling: results of the multicenter AMICI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51:552–559. PMID: 18237684.

19. Yang L, Xia C, Mu Y, Guan L, Wang C, Tang Q, et al. Prognostic value of real time myocardial contrast echocardiography after percutaneous coronary intervention. Echocardiography. 2016; 33:421–430. PMID: 26411872.

20. Duffy BK, Gurm HS, Rajagopal V, Gupta R, Ellis SG, Bhatt DL. Usefulness of an elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97:993–996. PMID: 16563903.

21. Aoki H, Matsunari I, Nomura Y, Fujita W, Komatsu R, Miyazaki Y, et al. Myocardial sympathetic innervation, function, and oxidative metabolism in non-infarcted myocardium in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Ann Nucl Med. 2013; 27:523–531. PMID: 23494212.

22. Feldman RL, Macdonald RG, Nichols WW, Conti CR, Pepine CJ. Effects of acute coronary occlusion on hemodynamics in an adjacent coronary artery in dogs. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54:1103–1107. PMID: 6496331.

23. Uren NG, Crake T, Lefroy DC, de Silva R, Davies GJ, Maseri A. Reduced coronary vasodilator function in infarcted and normal myocardium after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:222–227. PMID: 7832835.

24. Neizel M, Futterer S, Steen H, Giannitsis E, Reinhardt L, Lossnitzer D, et al. Predicting microvascular obstruction with cardiac troponin T after acute myocardial infarction: a correlative study with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009; 98:555–562. PMID: 19582365.

25. de Boer RA, Pinto YM, Suurmeijer AJ, Pokharel S, Scholtens E, Humler M, et al. Increased expression of cardiac angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptors decreases myocardial microvessel density after experimental myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 57:434–442. PMID: 12566116.

26. Tsai CF, Ueng KC, Wu DJ, Tsai TP, Lin CS. Remodeled left ventricular myocardium remote to infarction sites is the arrhythmogenic substrate for sudden cardiac death. Med Hypotheses. 2010; 75:368–371. PMID: 20399566.

27. Bekkers SC, Yazdani SK, Virmani R, Waltenberger J. Microvascular obstruction: underlying pathophysiology and clinical diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55:1649–1660. PMID: 20394867.

28. Mayer S, Grayburn PA. Myocardial contrast agents: recent advances and future directions. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001; 44:33–44. PMID: 11533925.

Go to :

TOOLS

Similar articles