Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.57(3) > 1031990

Yonsei Med J. 2016 May;57(3):674-680. English.
Published online March 15, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.3.674
© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016
Visceral Fat Mass Has Stronger Associations with Diabetes and Prediabetes than Other Anthropometric Obesity Indicators among Korean Adults
Suk Hwa Jung,1 Kyoung Hwa Ha,2,3 and Dae Jung Kim2,3
1Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
3Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Etiology Research Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Corresponding author: Dr. Dae Jung Kim, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea. Tel: 82-31-219-5128, Fax: 82-31-219-4497, Email: djkim@ajou.ac.kr
Received September 22, 2015; Revised December 21, 2015; Accepted January 04, 2016.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Purpose

This study determined which obesity measurement correlates the best with diabetes and prediabetes.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study enrolled 1603 subjects (611 men, 992 women; age 30–64 years) at the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center. Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-height ratio, waist-hip ratio, waist-thigh ratio, and visceral fat were used as measures of obesity. Visceral fat was acquired using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The prevalences of diabetes and prediabetes were defined using the criteria in the American Diabetes Association 2015 guidelines.

Results

After adjusting for age and other potential confounding factors, participants with a visceral fat mass in the upper 10th percentile had a higher odds ratio (OR) for diabetes and prediabetes than the upper 10th percentile of other adiposity indices [men, OR=15.9, 95% confidence interval (CI)=6.4–39.2; women, OR=6.9, 95% CI=3.5–13.7]. Visceral fat mass also had the highest area under the curve with diabetes and prediabetes in both men (0.69, 95% CI=0.64–0.73) and women (0.70, 95% CI=0.67–0.74) compared to other anthropometric measurements of obesity.

Conclusion

Visceral fat mass measured using DXA is an indicator of diabetes or prediabetes, due to its ability to differentiate between abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; obesity; visceral fat

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes characterized by hyperglycemia results from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Globally, the prevalence of diabetes is increasing, and the same trend is occurring in Korea.1 This increase is largely explained by the obesity epidemic: the expected prevalence of overweight [body mass index (BMI) of 25–30 kg/m2] or obese (BMI of ≥30 kg/m2) individuals will be 57.8% in 2030 in the global adult population.2 Although the detailed mechanisms remain unclear, numerous studies have emphasized the link between overall and abdominal obesity and the increased risk of metabolic conditions such as diabetes.3, 4, 5

Obesity indicators include BMI, waist circumference, and the waist-to-height, waist-to-hip, and waist-to-thigh ratios. These indicators reflect different aspects of body composition: BMI represents the total body mass, and waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio reflect abdominal obesity. Interestingly, a larger hip and thigh circumference is associated with a lower risk of diabetes, due to the protective effects of the muscle mass in those areas.6, 7 A meta-analysis showed that waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio were more strongly correlated with the development of diabetes than BMI, although the additional benefits of measuring height in addition to waist circumference remain controversial.8

There is increasing evidence that the type of excess fat is an important predictor of disease risk. Visceral fat is more dangerous than subcutaneous fat because visceral fat cells release proteins that contribute to inflammation, atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Consequently, visceral adipose tissue may be more closely associated with type 2 diabetes than other indices of obesity.9, 10, 11 Although computed tomography (CT) is currently considered the gold standard for quantifying visceral fat, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can also be used to accurately measure visceral fat.12, 13 However, which of these predictors is more closely associated with diabetes and prediabetes states remains controversial.

We compared the associations of diabetes and prediabetes with anthropometric obesity indicators, such as waist circumference, as well as visceral fat mass (measured using DXA). We also determined which of the indices has the strongest correlation with diabetes and prediabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and participants

Participants were recruited from a multicenter population-based prospective cohort study called the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Etiology Research Center, established in 2013 to improve models predicting cardiovascular and metabolic disease, discover new risk factors and biomarkers, consider new preventative strategies, and collect direct evidence relevant to the prevention of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The details of the study design and procedures have been described previously.14

The study was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data collected for an ongoing prospective cohort study that included participants who completed baseline health examinations (adults aged 30–64 years residing in Suwon, Yongin, and Hwa-seong, Korea) between December 2013 and May 2015. These subjects had no history of malignant tumors, myocardial infarction, stroke, or other cardiovascular disease. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Ajou University Institutional Review Board (IRB; No. AJIRB-BMR-SUR-13-272).

For this analysis, we excluded one man in whom visceral fat mass was not measured using DXA from the 1604 participants, leaving 1603 subjects (611 males, 992 females) in the study.

Measurements

Trained interviewers ascertained basic demographic data, medical history, and information about personal habits, such as smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity. For these analyses, the level of education was classified into high school graduates or lower and college graduates or higher. Smoking status was classified into three categories: smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers. Alcohol consumption was calculated in grams per day, as the sum of the average alcohol content per type of alcoholic beverage consumed multiplied by the daily number of drinks. Physical exercise was divided into three categories based on standard scoring criteria using the international physical activity questionnaire short form instrument: low, moderate, and high physical activity. Subjects who answered "yes" or "no" to the question "Do you menstruate?" were allotted to premenopausal and postmenopausal groups, respectively.

Anthropometric measures were obtained using a standardized protocol. Height (cm) and weight (kg) were measured on an automatic height-weight scale (BSM330; InBody, Seoul, Korea). BMI was calculated using the formula weight/height2 (kg/m2). A measuring tape (seca, Hamburg, Germany) was used to measure the waist, hip, and thigh circumferences to the nearest 0.1 cm. Waist circumference (cm) was measured midway between the bottom edge of the last rib and the iliac crest in the mid-axillary plane. Hip circumference (cm) was measured at the level of the widest circumference over the buttocks. Thigh circumference (cm) was measured at mid-thigh on the right side, defined as the midpoint between the superior ridge of the patella and the crease of the groin. Waist-height, waist-hip, and waist-thigh ratios were calculated as the waist circumference divided by height, hip circumference, and thigh circumference, respectively.

Whole-body DXA scans were acquired using a Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) and analyzed with enCORE software (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA). Daily quality-control scans were obtained during the study period. All subjects were scanned using standard methods by trained operators. Visceral adipose tissue mass was computed automatically for the DXA android region-of-interest, with the caudal limit at the top of the iliac crest and the cephalad limit at 20% of the distance from the iliac crest to the base of the skull.15 Fat mass data were transformed into CT adipose tissue volume using a constant correction factor (0.94 g/cm3).12

Blood pressure was measured three times at 2-min intervals using an automated blood pressure monitor (HEM-7080IC; Omron Healthcare, Lake Forest, IL, USA) with the participants sitting; the last two of the three measurements were averaged.

All blood samples were obtained in the morning after an 8-h overnight fast, and biochemical assays were performed at a central laboratory (Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul, Korea). For an accurate diagnosis of diabetes, an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed after sampling the blood. The levels of glucose in serum while fasting and after a glucose load were obtained using a colorimetric method; total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in serum were determined using enzymatic methods; and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was obtained using a turbidimetric immunoassay method with an autoanalyzer (ADVIA 1800 Auto Analyzer; Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, USA). The insulin level in serum was obtained using a radioimmunoassay (SR 300; STRATEC, Birkenfeld, Germany), and HbA1c levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with a Variant II Turbo analyzer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Diabetes status was defined using the criteria in the American Diabetes Association 2015 guidelines: diabetes [fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L), 2-h glucose ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during the OGTT (75 g), HbA1c level ≥6.5%, or use of hypoglycemic medication], prediabetes [fasting glucose 100–125 mg/dL (5.6–6.9 mmol/L), 2-h glucose 140–199 mg/dL (7.8–11.0 mmol/L), or HbA1c levels of 5.7–6.4%], and normal glucose tolerance [fasting glucose <100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L), 2-h glucose <140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L), and HbA1c level <5.7%].16

Statistical analyses

Normally distributed data are presented as mean±standard deviation; non-normally distributed data were log-transformed and are presented as median and interquartile range. Data for diabetes status, smoking status, physical exercise, menopause status, and education were categorized.

Using multivariate logistic regression, we quantified the association between adiposity indices (BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-thigh ratio, and visceral fat mass) and the risk of having diabetes or prediabetes. This model compared risk across gender-specific adiposity indices for 10 quantiles. Our primary model was adjusted for age, and the multivariate model was adjusted for the primary model plus smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, education, and menopause status (for females).

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the accuracy of predictions for diabetes or prediabetes. The accuracy was measured using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and the sensitivity and specificity of each adiposity index as a predictor of diabetes or prediabetes. To determine the appropriate gender-specific cut-off point for each adiposity index, the score with the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity (Youden's index, sensitivity+specificity-1) was considered the optimal cut-off score.

The analyses were carried out using SAS ver. 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), SPSS ver. 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and MedCalc Statistical Software ver. 13.2.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium; http://www.medcalc.org; 2014).

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics and anthropometric indices of the subjects. Of the 1603 participants, 611 (38.1%) were men and 992 (61.9%) were women, and the mean age was 49.3±8.3 years. Overall, 625 (39.0%) participants were classified as having prediabetes and 159 (9.9%) as being diabetic.


Table 1
Characteristics of Study Participants: the CMERC Study
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file

Fig. 1 shows the risk of diabetes or prediabetes for the 10th percentile of adiposity indices in men and women. In the multivariate model [including age, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, education, and menopause status (for females)] the odds ratios (ORs) tended to increase with the values of these indices. Of note, among men, those with a high visceral fat mass had by far the highest association (OR=15.9, 95% CI=6.4–39.2). In contrast, a high waist-to-thigh ratio showed a lower association compared to the values of the other indices (OR=3.7, 95% CI=1.7–8.2) (Supplementary Table 1, only online). In women, similar to the results for men, those with a high visceral fat mass had by far the highest association (OR=6.9, 95% CI=3.5–13.7), whereas having a high waist-to-thigh ratio had a relatively low OR compared to the values for the other indices (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.1–3.7) (Supplementary Table 2, only online).


Fig. 1
The risk of diabetes or prediabetes for 10 percentile of adiposity indices in men (A) and women (B). Adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, menopause status (only women), and education levels.
Click for larger imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Fig. 2 compares the accuracy of the six adiposity indices for predicting diabetes or prediabetes. All of the adiposity indices were positively correlated with diabetes and prediabetes, although visceral fat mass was by far the strongest predictor of diabetes or prediabetes for both men and women.


Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve of adiposity indices for identifying diabetes or prediabetes.
Click for larger imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Table 2 summarizes the ability of the six indices to predict diabetes or prediabetes. In men and women, visceral fat mass again had the highest AUC value (0.69, 95% CI=0.64–0.73 and 0.70, 95% CI=0.67–0.74, respectively). In both men and women, BMI had lower AUC values than the other adiposity indices. The cut-off values of visceral fat mass were 0.8 and 0.5 kg for men and women, respectively.


Table 2
Results from Measurements of Adiposity Indices in the Diagnosis of Diabetes or Prediabetes
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file

DISCUSSION

This study attempted to clarify which measurement of obesity correlates best with diabetes and prediabetes, by assessing the predictive value of numerous adiposity indices, including visceral fat mass measured by DXA. We showed the superiority of visceral fat mass measured by DXA as a predictor of diabetes and prediabetes over traditional anthropometric measurements of obesity, such as waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio. We also established cut-off values for the risk stratification of diabetes and prediabetes for each of the adiposity indices and for visceral fat mass for Korean men and women in particular.

Adiposity indices such as BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio are correlated with diabetes and prediabetes, although it is not clear which measurement correlates the best.17, 18 Although there are reports that the association between BMI and type 2 diabetes may be stronger than that of other adiposity indices, a recent meta-analysis indicated that waist-to-height ratio and waist circumference were more strongly associated with the development of diabetes than BMI or waist-to hip ratio.8, 19, 20, 21 This is probably due to the fact that waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio correlate more closely with abdominal obesity than does BMI. It has long been assumed that diabetes is associated with abdominal obesity and anthropometric measurements such as waist circumference that correlate with regional body fat distribution more so than BMI. This is more obvious in some racial groups, especially Asians. Rajpathak and Wylie-Rosett22 reported a high prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among Chinese immigrants with a normal BMI, especially among those with larger waist circumferences.

Many recent studies have suggested that the waist-to-height ratio is the best measure of obesity, compared to anthropometric measures, as this ratio corrects the waist circumference for the height of the individual.23, 24 However, it is controversial as to whether height affects the relationship between waist circumference and visceral fat.8, 25

The correlation of intra-abdominal visceral fat with waist circumference is thought to be the biological explanation for the superiority of waist circumference as a predictor of diabetes compared to BMI. Kim, et al.26 reported that insulin resistance is caused by not only absolute fat mass but also the relative distribution of fat within the body. Other studies have suggested that the accumulation of visceral fat stores affects insulin metabolism by releasing free fatty acids.27, 28 It is believed that the elevated levels of free fatty acids can induce hepatic insulin resistance, particularly by enhancing gluconeogenesis.10, 29 This hypothesis is supported by the fact that gluconeogenesis increases in proportion to visceral fat.30

However, there is no consensus on a standard site for measuring waist circumference. Furthermore, waist circumference is more closely related to abdominal subcutaneous fat, which is not as strongly correlated with insulin resistance, than to abdominal visceral fat.31, 32 We found that, by using DXA, we were able to measure the visceral fat mass of the participants, and these values gave the highest AUC values and Youden's index values among all adiposity indices. There are many methods for measuring abdominal visceral fat, and CT is currently considered the gold standard.13, 33 However, the costs and radiation exposure may not justify its use as a screening tool. A study in Korea showed that the Lunar DXA visceral fat could be used to measure visceral fat with results comparable to CT, despite being a relatively rapid, inexpensive method with minimal radiation dosage.12

This study had several strengths, including a well-characterized cohort, a standardized protocol, its large sample size, and the adjustment for known and potential confounders. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to establish diagnostic thresholds for visceral fat mass as an indicator for diabetes or prediabetes. However, this study also had several limitations. First, due to its cross-sectional design, the direction of causality was unclear. Second, we depended on a single measurement of the adiposity indices for each participant; thus, we were unable to examine inter-individual variation. In addition, the prevalence of obesity has changed rapidly, and the changing patterns in particular can differ greatly depending on age and gender in Korea.34 Therefore, adiposity indices used as independent variables in our study are also likely to change over time. However, we did not measure the change in adiposity indices, which may have resulted in an underestimation of risk. This limitation is inherent in cohort studies, as it is difficult to measure risk factors repeatedly based on changes.

Third, adiposity indices were divided into deciles; thus, on the whole, the change in odds ratios was both linear and constant in each section. However, for visceral fat, the odds ratios increased rapidly in each specific section. This suggests that the measurement of visceral fat via DXA had high specificity yet low sensitivity for the diagnosis of diabetes.

Finally, several studies have reported that diabetic medications induce weight loss.35 However, we do not have any information about this kind of antidiabetic medication. Nevertheless, 77 participants (4.8%) were taking anti-diabetes medications (men, 5.9%; women, 4.1%), although after excluding such patients, our results were maintained.

In conclusion, our data indicate that visceral fat mass, measured via DXA, is associated more closely with diabetes and prediabetes than other traditional adiposity indices, such as waist circumference, due to the ability of DXA to differentiate between abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplementary Table 1

Risk of Diabetes or Prediabetes for 10 Percentile of Adiposity Indices in Men

Click here to view.(63K, pdf)
Supplementary Table 2

Risk of Diabetes or Prediabetes for 10 Percentile of Adiposity Indices in Women

Click here to view.(63K, pdf)

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (No. HI13C0715).

References
1. Kim DJ. The epidemiology of diabetes in Korea. Diabetes Metab J 2011;35:303–308.
2. Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:1431–1437.
3. Seidell JC. The impact of obesity on health status: some implications for health care costs. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19 Suppl 6:S13–S16.
4. Taylor AE, Ebrahim S, Ben-Shlomo Y, Martin RM, Whincup PH, Yarnell JW, et al. Comparison of the associations of body mass index and measures of central adiposity and fat mass with coronary heart disease, diabetes, and all-cause mortality: a study using data from 4 UK cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:547–556.
5. Wang Y, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. Comparison of abdominal adiposity and overall obesity in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes among men. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:555–563.
6. Snijder MB, Zimmet PZ, Visser M, Dekker JM, Seidell JC, Shaw JE. Independent and opposite associations of waist and hip circumferences with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia: the AusDiab Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28:402–409.
7. Snijder MB, Dekker JM, Visser M, Bouter LM, Stehouwer CD, Kostense PJ, et al. Associations of hip and thigh circumferences independent of waist circumference with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1192–1197.
8. Kodama S, Horikawa C, Fujihara K, Heianza Y, Hirasawa R, Yachi Y, et al. Comparisons of the strength of associations with future type 2 diabetes risk among anthropometric obesity indicators, including waist-to-height ratio: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:959–969.
9. Bouchard C. BMI, fat mass, abdominal adiposity and visceral fat: where is the 'beef'? Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:1552–1553.
10. Després JP, Lemieux S, Lamarche B, Prud'homme D, Moorjani S, Brun LD, et al. The insulin resistance-dyslipidemic syndrome: contribution of visceral obesity and therapeutic implications. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995;19 Suppl 1:S76–S86.
11. Hayashi T, Boyko EJ, Leonetti DL, McNeely MJ, Newell-Morris L, Kahn SE, et al. Visceral adiposity and the risk of impaired glucose tolerance: a prospective study among Japanese Americans. Diabetes Care 2003;26:650–655.
12. Choi YJ, Seo YK, Lee EJ, Chung YS. Quantification of visceral fat using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and its reliability according to the amount of visceral fat in Korean adults. J Clin Densitom 2015;18:192–197.
13. Maurovich-Horvat P, Massaro J, Fox CS, Moselewski F, O'Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U. Comparison of anthropometric, area- and volume-based assessment of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes using multi-detector computed tomography. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:500–506.
14. Kim HJ, Kim YG, Park JS, Ahn YH, Ha KH, Kim DJ. Association between blood glucose level derived using the oral glucose tolerance test and hemoglobin A1C level. Korean J Intern Med. 2015
in press.
15. Kaul S, Rothney MP, Peters DM, Wacker WK, Davis CE, Shapiro MD, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:1313–1318.
16. American Diabetes Association. (2) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38 Suppl:S8–S16.
17. Freedman DS, Rimm AA. The relation of body fat distribution, as assessed by six girth measurements, to diabetes mellitus in women. Am J Public Health 1989;79:715–720.
18. Qian Y, Lin Y, Zhang T, Bai J, Chen F, Zhang Y, et al. The characteristics of impaired fasting glucose associated with obesity and dyslipidaemia in a Chinese population. BMC Public Health 2010;10:139.
19. Lee YH, Bang H, Kim HC, Kim HM, Park SW, Kim DJ. A simple screening score for diabetes for the Korean population: development, validation, and comparison with other scores. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1723–1730.
20. Tulloch-Reid MK, Williams DE, Looker HC, Hanson RL, Knowler WC. Do measures of body fat distribution provide information on the risk of type 2 diabetes in addition to measures of general obesity? Comparison of anthropometric predictors of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2556–2561.
21. Vazquez G, Duval S, Jacobs DR Jr, Silventoinen K. Comparison of body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio in predicting incident diabetes: a meta-analysis. Epidemiol Rev 2007;29:115–128.
22. Rajpathak SN, Wylie-Rosett J. High prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among Chinese immigrants in New York City. J Immigr Minor Health 2011;13:181–183.
23. Garnett SP, Baur LA, Cowell CT. Waist-to-height ratio: a simple option for determining excess central adiposity in young people. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:1028–1030.
24. Xu Z, Qi X, Dahl AK, Xu W. Waist-to-height ratio is the best indicator for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:e201–e207.
25. Han TS, McNeill G, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of stature. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997;21:587–593.
26. Kim YL, Kim TK, Cheong ES, Shin DG, Choi GS, Jung J, et al. Relation of absolute or relative adiposity to insulin resistance, retinol binding protein-4, leptin, and adiponectin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab J 2012;36:415–421.
27. Després JP. Is visceral obesity the cause of the metabolic syndrome? Ann Med 2006;38:52–63.
28. Kahn BB, Flier JS. Obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 2000;106:473–481.
29. Boden G. Free fatty acids, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 1999;111:241–248.
30. Nielsen S, Guo Z, Johnson CM, Hensrud DD, Jensen MD. Splanchnic lipolysis in human obesity. J Clin Invest 2004;113:1582–1588.
31. Oka R, Miura K, Sakurai M, Nakamura K, Yagi K, Miyamoto S, et al. Comparison of waist circumference with body mass index for predicting abdominal adipose tissue. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;83:100–105.
32. Preis SR, Massaro JM, Robins SJ, Hoffmann U, Vasan RS, Irlbeck T, et al. Abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue and insulin resistance in the Framingham heart study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18:2191–2198.
33. Han JH, Park HS, Kim SM, Lee SY, Kim DJ, Choi WH. Visceral adipose tissue as a predictor for metabolic risk factors in the Korean population. Diabet Med 2008;25:106–110.
34. Rhee SY, Park SW, Kim DJ, Woo J. Gender disparity in the secular trends for obesity prevalence in Korea: analyses based on the KNHANES 1998-2009. Korean J Intern Med 2013;28:29–34.
35. Malin SK, Kashyap SR. Effects of metformin on weight loss: potential mechanisms. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2014;21:323–329.