In Vivo Selection of Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during Antibiotic Treatment

Yoonjung Kim; Il Kwon Bae; Seok Hoon Jeong; Dongeun Yong; Kyungwon Lee

doi:10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.928

Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.56(4) > 1031801

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

This article has been corrected. See "Erratum to “In Vivo Selection of Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during Antibiotic Treatment” by Kim Y, et al. (Yonsei Med J 2015;56:928-934.)" in Volume 58 on page 474.

TOOLS

Kim, Bae, Jeong, Yong, and Lee: In Vivo Selection of Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during Antibiotic Treatment

Original Article

Infectious Disease

Yonsei Medical Journal 2015; 56(4): 928-934.

Published online: 5 June 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.928

In Vivo Selection of Pan-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during Antibiotic Treatment

Yoonjung Kim¹, Il Kwon Bae², Seok Hoon Jeong³, Dongeun Yong³, Kyungwon Lee³

¹Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

²Department of Dental Hygiene, Silla University, Busan, Korea.

³Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Dr. Seok Hoon Jeong, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-2448, Fax: 82-2-313-0956, kscpjsh@yuhs.ac

Received 16 July 2014 Revised 3 September 2014 Accepted 22 September 2014

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is mediated by a complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production via mutations in lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD gene or lipid A modifications via mutations in the pmrA and pmrB genes. However, the exact mechanism of therapy-induced colistin resistance in A. baumannii is not well understood.

Materials and Methods

We investigated the genotypic and phenotypic changes that underlie pan-drug resistance mechanisms by determining differences between the alterations in extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii (AB001 and AB002) isolates and a pan-drug resistant (PDR) counterpart (AB003) recovered from one patient before and after antibiotic treatment, respectively.

Results

All three clinical isolates shared an identical sequence type (ST138), belonging to the global epidemic clone, clonal complex 92, and all produced OXA-23 carbapenemase. The PDR AB003 showed two genetic differences, acquisition of armA gene and an amino acid substitution (Glu229Asp) in pmrB gene, relative to XDR isolates. No mutations were detected in the pmrA, pmrC, lpxA, lpxC, or lpxD genes in all three isolates. In matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight analysis, the three isolates commonly showed two major peaks at 1728 m/z and 1912 m/z, but peaks at 2034 m/z, 2157 m/z, 2261 m/z, and 2384 m/z were detected only in the PDR A. baumannii AB003 isolate.

Conclusion

Our results show that changes in lipid A structure via a mutation in the pmrB gene and acquisition of armA gene might confer resistance to colistin and aminoglycosides to XDR A. baumannii strains, resulting in appearance of a PDR A. baumannii strain of ST138.

Keywords: pmrB gene, armA gene, colistin, lipid A, Acinetobacter baumannii

INTRODUCTION

The extensive use of antimicrobial agents and the propensity of pathogenic bacteria that accumulate antimicrobial resistance have led to a considerable increase in pathogenic bacteria acquiring resistance to multiple categories of antimicrobial agents. As this problem continues to grow, the definition of terms such as multidrug resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pan-drug resistant (PDR) strains were standardized in order to more specifically define those microorganisms. MDR strains are defined as non-susceptible to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories, XDR strains are defined as non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories, and PDR strains are defined as non-susceptible to all agents in all antimicrobial categories.1

Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is associated with infections including bacteremia, pneumonia, meningitis, and urinary tract infections especially in patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs).2,3 The prevalence of XDR A. baumannii isolates with carbapenem resistance has persistently increased, and most of XDR A. baumannii isolates in Asia belong to the globally-distributed clone, clonal complex 92.4,5,6,7 After the reintroduction of colistin in clinical practice to treat infections caused by XDR A. baumannii due to the lack of applicable antibiotics, the emergence of PDR A. baumannii strains with colistin resistance has repeatedly been reported in many parts of the world.8,9,10,11

According to a few in vitro studies regarding colistin resistance mechanisms in A. baumannii, colistin resistance is mediated by a complete loss of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) production via mutations in LPS producing genes (lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD) or by mutations in the pmrA and pmrB genes that encode a two-component signal transduction system.12,13 However, the exact mechanism of therapy-induced colistin resistance in A. baumannii is not well understood.

Here, we studied colistin resistance mechanisms by evaluating the genetic alterations between two colistin-susceptible XDR A. baumannii clinical isolates and a colistin-resistant counterpart isolated from one patient before and after colistin therapy, respectively. Furthermore, we investigated the genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance to various antibiotics and the molecular epidemiology of the clinical isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient characteristics and bacterial strains

A 72-year-old man with a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus was admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary-care hospital in Seoul, Korea, on August 29th, 2011 due to abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an impending thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, and a graft replacement of the abdominal aorta was performed. After emergency surgery, he was admitted to the ICU and was mechanically ventilated from day one. He was treated with ciprofloxacin (400 mg/day) and piperacillin+tazobactam (6.75 g/day). An XDR A. baumannii isolate (AB001) was first recovered from a respiratory tract specimen on day five, and it was then serially recovered from respiratory tract specimens. And an XDR A. baumannii isolate (AB002) was recovered from a urinary specimen on day six. Intravenous administration of colistimethate sodium (150 mg/day) was started on day six. After five days of colistin therapy, a colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolate (AB003) was recovered from a blood specimen, which prompted the physicians to change antibiotics to tigecycline. However, urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, atelectasis at both lungs, and sepsis were not controlled. On day 17, the patient was transferred to a local hospital near the patient's home for continuation of treatment. In this study, we included the two colistin-susceptible XDR A. baumannii isolates (AB001 and AB002), which were recovered from the respiratory tract and urinary specimens, respectively, and their colistin-resistant counterpart (AB003). The isolates were identified as A. baumannii using the Vitek GNI system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) and sequence analysis of the RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) gene.14 A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was used as the reference strain.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using antibiotic-containing disks (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem and imipenem were determined using the agar dilution method, and the MIC of colistin was determined by the E-test (bioMérieux) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.15

Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST)

PCR and sequencing experiments were performed on seven housekeeping genes encoding citrate synthase (gltA), DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrB), glucose dehydrogenase B (gdhB), homologous recombination factor (recA), 60-kDa chaperonin (cpn60), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (gpi), and RNA polymerase sigma factor (rpoD), as described previously.6,16 Nucleotide sequences of both strands were determined. Allelic profiles of the seven housekeeping genes and STs of the strains were analyzed using the Acinetobacter MLST database (http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/genopole/PF8/mlst/).

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed with SmaI-digested genomic DNA extracted from the three isolates using a CHEF-DRII device (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The conditions of PFGE were 6 V/cm for 20 h with pulse times of 3-10 seconds at a temperature of 11℃. SmaI-digested band patterns were analyzed using Molecular Analyst Fingerprinting Software Ver. 3.2 (Bio-Rad). The PFGE patterns were interpreted using the criteria of Tenover, et al.17

Characterization of antimicrobial resistance determinants

PCR and sequence analysis of antimicrobial resistance determinants including bla_OXA51-like, bla_OXA-23, bla_AmpC, gyrA, parC, and armA genes were performed according to methods described in previous studies.18,19,20,21 The presence of IS Aba1 upstream of the bla_OXA51-like, bla_OXA-23, and bla_AmpC genes was also evaluated.22 LPS-producing genes (lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD) and pmrA and pmrB genes encoding a two-component signal transduction system were sought by PCR and sequencing.13,23 Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After PCR, amplicons were purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced using an ABI 3500dx system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences for all antimicrobial resistance determinant loci in A. baumannii isolates were compared using the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) with reference sequences of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 (GenBank accession number CP000 521).

Analysis of lipid A structure

LPS and lipid A were extracted from whole bacterial cells using Tri-Reagent extraction and mild acid hydrolysis methods, and were then subjected to negative-ion matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) analysis in the negative reflective mode.24

RESULTS

Antimicrobial susceptibilities and antimicrobial resistance determinants

The antimicrobial resistance determinants of the two colistin-susceptible XDR A. baumannii isolates (AB001 and AB002) and a PDR A. baumannii isolate (AB003) were evaluated. All three isolates showed resistance to ciprofloxacin, and they contained the gyrA gene with an amino acid substitution (Ser83Leu). While isolates AB001 and AB002 showed susceptibility to amikacin and gentamicin, the AB003 isolate showed resistance to these aminoglycosides and harbored the armA gene. All three isolates showed resistance to ceftazidime and cefepime, and they carried and the ISAba1-bla_AmpC structure. MICs of imipenem and meropenem for all three isolates were greater than 32 mg/L, and they carried the bla_OXA-23 gene with an insertion sequence ISAba1 upstream of the gene. The MIC of colistin for both AB001 and AB002 isolates was 0.25 mg/L, while that for AB003 isolate was 16 mg/L (Table 1 and 2).

Strain type

All three isolates were identified as an identical ST, ST 138 (1-3-3-2-2-50-3), and they showed identical SmaI-macrorestriction patterns by PFGE (Fig. 1).

Molecular analysis of the colistin-susceptible/resistant isogenic clinical isolates

The sequences of the pmrB gene in the two colistin-susceptible AB001 and AB002 isolates were identical to those of the reference A. baumannii ATCC 17978, whereas the PDR A. baumannii AB003 isolate harbored a novel mutation (encoding a Glu229Asp change) in the pmrB gene (Table 2). No mutations were detected in the pmrA, pmrC, lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD genes in all three isolates.

Analysis of lipid A structure

The two colistin-susceptible AB001 and AB002 isolates and the PDR A. baumannii AB003 isolate all showed two major peaks at 1729 m/z and 1911 m/z in negative-ion MALDI-TOF mass spectra. These two major peaks most likely correspond to bis-phosphorylated hexa- and hepta-acylated lipid A, respectively. Spectra for the lipid A structure from the PDR A. baumannii AB003 isolate were distinct from those of AB001 and AB002, as it showed additional peaks at 2034 m/z, 2157 m/z, 2261 m/z, and 2384 m/z (Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

The extensive use of antimicrobial agents has led to a considerable increase in MDR, XDR, and PDR pathogenic bacteria. Colistin has resurfaced as effective last resort for treatment of infections caused by XDR A. baumannii. Many studies evaluated the resistance mechanisms against polymyxins, and analysed effectiveness of colistin monotherapy as well as the combination therapy to reduce the colistin resistance and toxicity of colistin.8,10,25 Despite the efforts, colistin therapy-related colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains have been isolated.10,26,27 A complete loss of LPS production via mutations in LPS-producing genes (lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD) and the modification of lipid A components via mutations in the pmrAB gene have been evaluated in various studies with in vitro manipulated colisitn-resistant A. baumannii.12,13 Between two colistin-resistance mechanisms, only mutations in the pmrA (Met12Ile; Met12Lys) or pmrB gene (Gln270Pro; Gln277Lys) were found in clinical isolates from patient who has been treated with colistin. In our study, AB003 harbored Glu229Asp mutation in the pmrB gene, while the isolate carried wild-type LPS-producing genes (lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD). The mutant pmrAB genes are involved in LPS modification by adding 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose (Ara4N) and/or phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) to lipid A.23,28,29 In MALDI-TOF analysis, we observed the expected spectra ion peaks of 1728 m/z and 1912 m/z in all three isolates, AB001, AB002, and AB003. However, the peaks of 2034 m/z, 2157 m/z, 2261 m/z, and 2384 m/z were detected only in the AB003 strain, which contained the pmrB mutation. Possibly, these peaks were generated by the addition of one or two pEtN (123 m/z) residues to bis-phosphorylated hepta- and octa-acylated lipid A molecules. These modifications should affect the electrostatic interaction of certain cationic antimicrobial-peptide resistance determinants with the bacterial cell surface, and act as one of the colistin-resistant mechanisms.30,31

In our study, the AB003 acquired a mutation in the pmrB gene after five days of colistin therapy. It should be a short period of time to obtain a resistance, but colistin resistant A. baumannii were collected from patients who received colistin therapy for 7-19 days.26,32

The AB003 strain also harbored the armA gene and showed resistance to amikacin (<9 mm of disk diffusion test). After admission, the patient did not received aminoglycoside agents, such as tobramycin and amikacin. Therefore, it is highly likely that the armA is located on plasmids was incidentally transferred from another A. baumannii clone.18,33

In our study, all three isolates showed identical SmaI-macrorestriction patterns by PFGE and identified as an identical ST, ST 138 (1-3-3-2-2-50-3), indicating that they are a clone. All three isolates shared the gyrA gene with a same mutation, and they carried identical resistance genes IS Aba1-bla_AmpC and ISAba1-bla_OXA-23. However, AB003 carried only the pmrB gene with a mutation of Glu229Asp and the armA gene. Therefore, AB003 might acquire resistance to colistin and aminoglycosides by in vivo selection during colistin treatment from the XDR parental strains (AB001 and AB002).

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

SmaI-macrorestiction patterns of two colistin-susceptible isolates (AB001 and AB002) and a colistin-resistant isolate (AB003). All three isolates showed 100% of similarity.

Fig. 2

Mass spectrometry of lipid A extracted from the colistin-susceptible isolates (A) AB001 and (B) AB002 and their colistin-resistant counterpart (C) AB003 with Glu229Asp in pmrB gene. In MALDI-TOF analysis, AB001, AB002, and AB003 isolates all showed two major peaks at 1728 m/z and 1912 m/z, but peaks at 2034 m/z, 2157 m/z, 2261 m/z, and 2384 m/z were detected only in the PDR A. baumannii AB003 isolate. MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight; PDR, pan-drug resistant.

Table 1

Characteristics of A. baumannii Clinical Isolates Included in This Study

Isolate^*	Antimicrobial susceptibilities (inhibition zone diameter, mm)						MIC (mg/mL)			MLST
Isolate^*	CAZ	CTX	FEP	AN	GM	CIP	CL	MEM	IPM	ST
AB001	R (9)	R (9)	R (10)	S (24)	S (18)	R (9)	0.25	256	64	138
AB002	R (9)	R (9)	R (10)	S (23)	S (17)	R (9)	0.25	256	64	138
AB003	R (9)	R (9)	R (11)	R (9)	R (9)	R (9)	16	256	64	138

AN, amikacin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CL, colistin; CTX, cefotaxime; FEP, cefepime; GM, gentamicin; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; MLST, multi-locus sequence typing; R, resistance; S, susceptible; ST, sequence type.

^*AB001 and AB002 are colistin-susceptible isolates and AB003 is the colistin-resistant counterpart.

Table 2

Antibiotic Resistance Genes of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

Strain^†	Detected antimicrobial resistance determinants				Detected mutations
Strain^†	bla_OXA-51-like^*	ISAba1-bla_OXA-23	ISAba1-bla_AmpC	armA	gyrA	parC	pmrB	pmrA and C	lpxA, C, and D
AB001	+	+	+	ND	Ser83Leu	Ser80Leu	WT	WT	WT
AB002	+	+	+	ND	Ser83Leu	Ser80Leu	WT	WT	WT
AB003	+	+	+	+	Ser83Leu	Ser80Leu	Glu229Asp (A → T substitution at nt687)	WT	WT

ND, not detected; WT, wild type.

^*ISAba1 upstream of bla_OXA-51-like was not detected in all isolates.

^†Genes detected by PCR and sequencing.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Research Program funded by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014E4700200#).

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18:268–281.

2. Chang HL, Tang CH, Hsu YM, Wan L, Chang YF, Lin CT, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of infection with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a medical center in Taiwan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30:34–38.

3. Maragakis LL, Perl TM. Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment options. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46:1254–1263.

4. Cho HH, Kwon KC, Sung JY, Koo SH. Spread and genetic characterization of ST137 and ST138 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from a tertiary hospital in Korea. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2013; 43:145–150.

5. Endo S, Yano H, Hirakata Y, Arai K, Kanamori H, Ogawa M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67:1623–1626.

6. Lee Y, Lee J, Jeong SH, Lee J, Bae IK, Lee K. Carbapenem-non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii of sequence type 92 or its single-locus variants with a G428T substitution in zone 2 of the rpoB gene. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66:66–72.

7. Wang X, Qiao F, Yu R, Gao Y, Zong Z. Clonal diversity of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates revealed by a snapshot study. BMC Microbiol. 2013; 13:234.

8. Cai Y, Chai D, Wang R, Liang B, Bai N. Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: clinical reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012; 67:1607–1615.

9. Lee K, Yong D, Jeong SH, Chong Y. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.: increasingly problematic nosocomial pathogens. Yonsei Med J. 2011; 52:879–891.

10. O'Hara JA, Ambe LA, Casella LG, Townsend BM, Pelletier MR, Ernst RK, et al. Activities of vancomycin-containing regimens against colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57:2103–2108.

11. Valencia R, Arroyo LA, Conde M, Aldana JM, Torres MJ, Fernández-Cuenca F, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of infection with pan-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a tertiary care university hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30:257–263.

12. Adams MD, Nickel GC, Bajaksouzian S, Lavender H, Murthy AR, Jacobs MR, et al. Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53:3628–3634.

13. Moffatt JH, Harper M, Harrison P, Hale JD, Vinogradov E, Seemann T, et al. Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54:4971–4977.

14. La Scola B, Gundi VA, Khamis A, Raoult D. Sequencing of the rpoB gene and flanking spacers for molecular identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44:827–832.

15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-second informational supplement, M100-S22. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;2012.

16. Bartual SG, Seifert H, Hippler C, Luzon MA, Wisplinghoff H, Rodríguez-Valera F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:4382–4390.

17. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33:2233–2239.

18. Cho YJ, Moon DC, Jin JS, Choi CH, Lee YC, Lee JC. Genetic basis of resistance to aminoglycosides in Acinetobacter spp. and spread of armA in Acinetobacter baumannii sequence group 1 in Korean hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 64:185–190.

19. Vila J, Ruiz J, Goñi P, Jimenez de Anta T. Quinolone-resistance mutations in the topoisomerase IV parC gene of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997; 39:757–762.

20. Vila J, Ruiz J, Goñi P, Marcos A, Jimenez de Anta T. Mutation in the gyrA gene of quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39:1201–1203.

21. Woodford N, Ellington MJ, Coelho JM, Turton JF, Ward ME, Brown S, et al. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006; 27:351–353.

22. Lin YC, Hsia KC, Chen YC, Sheng WH, Chang SC, Liao MH, et al. Genetic basis of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter clinical isolates in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54:2078–2084.

23. Beceiro A, Llobet E, Aranda J, Bengoechea JA, Doumith M, Hornsey M, et al. Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011; 55:3370–3379.

24. Yi EC, Hackett M. Rapid isolation method for lipopolysaccharide and lipid A from gram-negative bacteria. Analyst. 2000; 125:651–656.

25. Petrosillo N, Ioannidou E, Falagas ME. Colistin monotherapy vs. combination therapy: evidence from microbiological, animal and clinical studies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008; 14:816–827.

26. López-Rojas R, Jiménez-Mejías ME, Lepe JA, Pachón J. Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to colistin alters its antibiotic resistance profile: a case report from Spain. J Infect Dis. 2011; 204:1147–1148.

27. López-Rojas R, McConnell MJ, Jiménez-Mejías ME, Domínguez-Herrera J, Fernández-Cuenca F, Pachón J. Colistin resistance in a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strain appearing after colistin treatment: effect on virulence and bacterial fitness. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57:4587–4589.

28. Arroyo LA, Herrera CM, Fernandez L, Hankins JV, Trent MS, Hancock RE. The pmrCAB operon mediates polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978 and clinical isolates through phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011; 55:3743–3751.

29. Gunn JS. The Salmonella PmrAB regulon: lipopolysaccharide modifications, antimicrobial peptide resistance and more. Trends Microbiol. 2008; 16:284–290.

30. Gunn JS, Lim KB, Krueger J, Kim K, Guo L, Hackett M, et al. PmrA-PmrB-regulated genes necessary for 4-aminoarabinose lipid A modification and polymyxin resistance. Mol Microbiol. 1998; 27:1171–1182.

31. Zhou Z, Ribeiro AA, Lin S, Cotter RJ, Miller SI, Raetz CR. Lipid A modifications in polymyxin-resistant Salmonella typhimurium: PMRA-dependent 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose, and phosphoethanolamine incorporation. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:43111–43121.

32. Kim Y, Bae IK, Lee H, Jeong SH, Yong D, Lee K. In vivo emergence of colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates of sequence type 357 during colistin treatment. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 79:362–366.

33. Gordon NC, Wareham DW. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms of virulence and resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010; 35:219–226.

TOOLS

Similar articles