Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.53(2) > 1030983

Qi, Sui, Yang, Chen, and Dai: CpG Array Analysis of Histone H3 Lysine 4 Trimethylation by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Linked to Microarrays Analysis in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of IgA Nephropathy Patients

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the aberrance of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) in patients with IgA Nephropathy (IgAN).

Materials and Methods

In this study, H3K4me3 variations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 15 IgAN patients and 15 healthy subjects were analyzed using chromatin immunoprecipitation linked to microarrays analysis (ChIP-chip). ChIP real-time PCR was used to validate the microarray results. Expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed correlations between mRNA and H3K4me3 levels. DNA methylation status was analyzed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR.

Results

We found that 321 probes displayed significant H3K4me3 differences in IgAN patients compared with healthy controls. Among these probes, 154 probes displayed increased H3K4me3 and 167 probes demonstrated decreased H3K4me3. For further validation, we selected 4 key relevant genes (FCRL4, GALK2, PTPRN2 and IL1RAPL1) to study. The results of ChIP real-time PCR coincided well with the microarray data. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed the correlations between the mRNA expression and the methylation levels of H3K4me3. Different degrees of DNA methylation alterations appeared on the selected positive genes.

Conclusion

Our studies indicated that there were significant alterations in H3K4me3 in IgAN patients. These findings may help to explain the disturbed immunity and abnormal glycosylation involved in IgAN patients.

INTRODUCTION

IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) is defined immunohistologically by predominant mesangial deposition of IgA.1 The immunochemical nature of the IgA molecule and its mesangial uptake command a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IgAN.2,3 Many patients with IgAN have elevated levels of aberrantly glycosylated IgA1 in circulating immune complexes.4,5 Aberrant IgA1 O-glycosylation results from the abnormal function or expression of several specific glycosyltransferases, which may be one of the key pathogenetic mechanisms of IgAN.6 It was also thought that the pathogenic potential of frequently colocalized IgG deposits depends on polarized T-helper cytokines that modulate Fcα receptors of infiltrating macrophages, leading to either activation or inhibition that determines glomerular injury.7 How this kind of immune dysregulation and over-production of aberrantly glycosylated IgA1 develops remain obscure.8 Histone lysine methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism for gene silencing, which may confer tumor cells of growth advantage.9 Many cellular pathways are inactivated by this epigenetic event, including DNA repair, cell cycle, apoptosis, cell adherence, and detoxification.10 Lysine can accept 3 methyl groups, and therefore can be monomethylated, dimethylated or trimethylated. Methylation of histone H3 on lysine 4 (H3K4) plays an important role in the association with active chromatin and gene expression.11-14 Trimethylated H3K4 is preferentially detected at active genes and proposed to promote gene expression through recognition by transcription-activating effector molecules.13 Aberrant alterations in histone lysine methylation patterns implicate in multiple biological processes, such as changing the chromatin structure, regulating gene transcription.15,16 Therefore, it is of significant interest to discuss the aberrance of H3K4me3 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of IgAN patients and explore its pathogenic mechanisms.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation linked to microarrays analysis (ChIP-chip), with high-throughput capability, is a useful technology to study histone modifications at a genome-wide level.17,18 Ren, et al.19 first adopted this method to monitor binding of gene-specific transcription activators in yeast. In humans, Weinmann, et al.20 first utilized chromatin immunoprecipitation and CpG microarrays to identify target genes for transcription factors. Recently, this approach has been employed successfully to elucidate the profiles of H3K9 and H3K27 methylation in human disease.21-23
Promoter methylation profiling is quickly becoming a powerful diagnostic tool for the early detection, prognosis, and even prediction of a clinical response to treatments of various diseases. Among the theories concerning the etiology of IgAN, little is known about the epigenetic alterations that occur.
Hence, in this study, we used ChIP-chip technology to profile the variations in H3K4me3 at a genome-wide level of PBMCs from IgAN patients and healthy controls. Our aim was to gain better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms in IgAN. Meanwhile, we also researched the relevance between H3K4me3 and DNA methylation under this disease condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and controls

IgAN patients (n=15) and healthy volunteers (n=15) were recruited for this study. Patients were diagnosed and treated in the Kidney Transplantation and Hemopurification Center of the 181th Hospital of Guangzhou Military Area of PLA, from January 2006 to May 2009. Diagnostic criteria of IgAN were based on the manifestation of generalized glomerular mesangial proliferation, with the presence of IgA as the sole or predominant immunoglobulin deposited in the mesangial area of the glomeruli. All of the patients had undergone a renal biopsy for an exact histological diagnosis. Renal biopsy specimens were graded as Haas I-V according to the pathological scheme of IgAN proposed by Haas.24 Age-, race- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited through advertising. Urinalysis results of the healthy controls were negative and their serum creatinine was within the normal range. The clinical features of the patients and healthy subjects are shown in Table 1. The Ethics Committee of the Chongqing Medical University approved the study, and peripheral blood samples were obtained with the informed consent of all participating individuals. The Helsinki Declaration was adhered to throughout the study.

Isolation of PBMCs

Approximately 10 mL heparinized venous blood samples from IgAN patients and healthy volunteers were collected. Blood samples were treated according to the Ficoll-Paque Plus (Cedarlane Laboratoryies Ltd., Ontario, Canada) instructions and reference.25 Each sample was diluted with equal volumes of phosphate-buffered saline. The diluted blood was overlaid on the equal volume of Ficoll-Paque Plus medium, followed by centrifuged at 800 g for 25 min at 22℃. After being washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, the collected PBMC layer was stored at -80℃ until assayed.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray

The ChIP-chip analysis was performed according to described protocols26,27 with some modifications. Firstly, PBMCs were allowed to crosslink with 1% formaldehyde (final concentration) for 10 min at 37℃, adding glycine (0.125 M) for 5 min at 37℃ to stop the crosslink. Secondly, the cell pellets were eluted twice with 10 mL of ice-cold 1×PBS and then resuspended with 300 µL lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0; NaCl 100 mM; EDTA 1 mM pH 8.0; Na-Deoxycholate 0.1% and Protease inhibitors) and incubated on ice for 30 min. Finally, the cell suspension was sonicated for 4 min (30 seconds "ON" & 30 seconds "OFF") DNA lengths were decreased to between 200 and 1000 bp. Each ChIP sample was incubated with 555 µL of dilution buffer containing a protease inhibitor cocktail, and the lysate was then divided into three parts. The first lysate was incubated with anti-K4 trimethylated histone H3 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY, USA) at 4℃ overnight. The remaining two parts served as the input control and negative control, respectively. Fifty microlitres of magnetic beads (Bangs Laboratories. Inc., Fishers, IN, USA) were added and incubated for 1 h at 4℃ to harvest immunoprecipitated complexes. Pellet beads were adsorbed to the bottom of the tube by a magnetic separation rack for 2 min at 4℃, and then discard the supernatant. The magnetic beads were sequentially washed in low salt, high salt, LiCl salt, and TE buffers. The protein/DNA complexes were eluted, and heated at 65℃ for 5 hr to reverse formaldehyde crosslink. Samples were mixed with RNase for 20 min at 37℃ prior to treatment with proteinase K overnight. DNA was extracted according to the phenol/chloroform method. PCR amplification of DNA was carried out on diluted DNA aliquots as recommended by the whole genome amplification kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) instructions, followed by DNA purification using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Cy5TM-dUTP and Cy3TM-dUTP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) labeled methylated K4 precipitated DNA and input DNA, respectively; and the products thereof were then cohybridized to the human 12K CpG-island array (UNH Microarray Centre, Toronto, Canada). The hybridized microarray slides were then scanned using a GenePix 4000B scanner (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). GenePix pro version 6.0 was used to read the raw intensity of the image. The resulting text files were imported into the Agilent GeneSpring GX software for further analysis. The two microarray data sets were normalized in GeneSpring GX using the Agilent Two-color scenario (mainly LOWESS normalization), and then CpGs marked present ("All Targets Value") were chosen for further analysis. The differences between the test and control samples were identified using 2-fold change. The sequences of CpG islands on the array and alignment data are available at http://data.microarrays.ca/. The experiments were done in duplicate.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR

ChIP was conducted in the same way as in ChIP-chip. The DNA pool from ChIP, input control and negative control, was used for quantitative PCR which was performed on an ABI 7700 Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial step of 95℃ for 5 min, followed by 95℃ for 15 sec, 59℃ for 20 sec, 72℃ for 20 sec repeated for 40 cycles, and a final 10 min extension at 72℃. In order to evaluate ChIP on chip data, four genes were selected and their corresponding primers are displayed in Table 2. Threshold cycle (CT) values of serially diluted input DNA were determined to generate a standard curve for each amplification. The H3K4me3 changes were determined using the 2-ΔΔCT method28 and each reaction was performed with melting curve analysis to ensure a single peak. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and average value was calculated for each sample.

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from PBMCs using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in light of the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration and quality of RNA was analyzed spectroscopically using UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280 ratio), and visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis individually. For RT-PCR, 2 µg total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with M-MLV reverse transcriptase by using oligo-dT as a primer. Real-time PCR utilized SYBR green dye and Taq polymerase. One-tenth of the resulting cDNA template was used for the subsequent DNA amplification on a 7700 real-time PCR system apparatus.
PCR conditions were 95℃ for 15 min, followed by 95℃ for 10 sec, 58℃ for 30 sec, 72℃ for 1 min repeated for 35 cycles, and finally a 7-min incubation at 72℃. Serial dilutions of the amplified product standard with a predefined known concentration were used to create a standard curve. The PCR primers for each gene in this analysis are given in Table 3. GADPH gene mRNA was used as the internal control. The primers for GAPDH were 5'-CCA TGG AGA AGG CTG GGG-3' (sense), and 5'-CAA AGT TGT CAT GGA TGA CC-3' (antisense) (250 bp). The thermal cycles were 94℃ for 6 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94℃ for 60 sec 58℃ for 60 sec and 72℃ for 60 sec, and finally 72℃ for 10 min for extension. Expression was assessed by evaluating CT values. The relative quantity of expressed mRNA was determined by the 2-ΔΔCT method.28 The experiment was performed in triplicate, and average value was calculated for each sample.

DNA extraction and real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR

Genomic DNA from 15 IgAN patients and 15 healthy controls were treated by overnight proteinase K incubation, phenol-chloroform extraction, recovered by ethanol precipitation and RNase digestion. Sodium bisulfite conversion of unmethylated (but not methylated) cytosine residues to uracil was performed as previously described.29 Briefly, 4 µg of genomic DNA were denatured in NaOH (0.3 M) for 20 min at 50℃, and then diluted with 450 µL of a freshly prepared solution of hydroquinone (125 mM) and sodium bisulfite (2.5 M). After incubation for 3 hr at 70℃, modified DNA samples were desalted and purified through a column (Wizard DNA Clean-Up System, Promega, Madison, WI, USA), incubated with sodium hydroxide for 10 min at room temperature, precipitated with 100% ethanol, resuspended in 240 µL of water and stored at -80℃ for real-time Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR.
The specific PCR was then used to distinguish between methylated and unmethylated DNA sequences. The primer sequences for the methylated form and unmethylated form are given in Table 4. The PCR conditions comprised one incubation of 10 min at 95℃, followed by 35 cycles of 94℃ for 40 sec, 60℃ for 30 sec, and 72℃ for 30 sec, and a final extension at 72℃ for 10 min. Relative enrichment of DNA methylation for each gene was determined by the same method described above. The experiment was performed in triplicate and obtained CT values to calculate methylation index (MI=methylated copy number/(methylated copy number+unmethylated copy number).30

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 11.5 (SPSS Company, Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative data were expressed as means±SD, and p values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant for all statistic tests.

RESULTS

Identification of CpG island methylation profiles between IgAN patients and healthy subjects

Two steps were adopted to analyze this data to avoid false positive results. First, genes that showed significant differences (the ratio >2 or <0.5) between IgAN and control groups were regarded as H3K4me3 candidates. Second, genes with significant methylation alterations were excluded in the target list if they were not identified as H3K4me3 targets. As a result, 321 probes displayed significant H3K4me3 differences in IgAN patients compared with healthy subjects. Among these probes, 154 probes displayed increased H3K4me3 and 167 probes showed decreased H3K4me3. The H3K4me3 alterations of the 20 selected genes are presented in Table 5. Among these were genes that are involved in many cellular pathways and critical biological functions including protein transcription and synthesis, transport, cell apoptosis, etc.

Validation for CpG microarray data

To validate the microarray results, two genes that displayed increased H3K4me3 (FCRL4 and GALK2) and two decreased H3K4me3 (PTPRN2 and IL1RAPL1) were selected and verified by ChIP-qPCR. The data showed FCRL4 (1.56±0.02 versus 1.0; p<0.05) and GALK2 (2.53±0.03 versus 1.0; p<0.05) were significantly higher in IgAN patients than those in healthy controls, while PTPRN2 (0.68±0.03 versus 1.0; p<0.05) and IL1RAPL1 (0.52±0.03 versus 1.0; p<0.05) were significantly lower in IgAN patients than those in healthy controls (Fig. 1). All these results together supported the accuracy of the array data.

H3K4me3 alterations and gene expression

The mRNA expressions of the four selected H3K4me3 candidates were examined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2, FCRL4 (1.86±0.03 versus 1.0; p<0.05), GALK2 (1.73±0.04 versus 1.0; p<0.05) and IL-1RAPL1 (1.55±0.03 versus 1.0; p<0.05) mRNA expression levels in PBMCs were significantly higher than in corresponding normal subjects. In addition, PTPRN2 (0.74±0.03 versus 1.0; p<0.05) displayed lower mRNA expression levels. According to our previous understanding, the high levels of H3K4me3 are associated with active genes,11,31 but the high expression of IL1RAPL1 was contrary to its low H3K4me3.

H3K4me3 alterations and DNA methylation

We further assessed the association of H3K4me3 and DNA methylation. As shown in Fig. 3, the levels of DNA methylation in PTPRN2 (0.75±0.04 versus 0.26±0.01; p<0.05) and IL1RAPL1 (0.59±0.04 versus 0.34±0.01; p<0.05) were higher than in normal subjects. FCRL4 (0.46±0.02 versus 0.71±0.09; p<0.05) was lower than in normal subjects. However, GALK2 (0.38±0.03 versus 0.44±0.104; p>0.05) showed no distinct difference in DNA methylation between IgAN and normal subjects.

DISCUSSION

More than one-half of human genes have cytosineguanine (CpG) islands which are important regulatory elements of transcription.32 In this study, we used human 12K CpG island arrays to identify H3K4me3 variations. The human 12K CpG island contains a significant percentage of the CpG islands found in the human genome and approximately 68% were located near a transcription start site.33 Among the genes identified in the CpG array, FCRL4 and GALK2 displaying increased H3K4me3 were selected for further study. The FCRL4 gene encodes a member of the immunoglobulin receptor superfamily and is one of several Fc receptor-like glycoproteins clustered on the long arm of chromosome 1. Data indirectly suggest that FcalphaRI (Fc alpha receptor I) activation mediates IgAN development by initiating a cytokine/chemokine cascade.34 The encoded protein by FCRL4 may have a similar function as the FcalphaRI in the pathogenetic progress. As for the Fc receptor-like glycoproteins, we conjecture that they take part in the undergalactosylation of IgA in some way.
The abnormalities of galactosylation and sialylation in IgA1 play an important role in the development of IgA nephropathy. Mesangial deposits of IgA contains high concentrations of abnormally glycosylated IgA1, characterized by undergalactosylation.35 The GALK2 gene plays a key role in normal galactose metabolism by catalyzing the conversion of α-d-galactose to galactose 1-phosphate.36 Our results showed its high expression of mRNA, and we may hypothesize that the increase in GALK2 induces the low concentration of galactose and results in the undergalactosylation of IgA.
Two other genes, PTPRN2 and IL1RAPL1, demonstrated decreased H3K4me3. The protein encoded by PTPRN2 is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. PTPs are known to be signaling molecules that regulate a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation.37 Protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) can promote renal podocytes to produce vascular endothelial growth factor by a signaling pathway and increase urine protein.38 In our results, PTPRN2 displayed decreased H3K4me3 and mRNA expression. It has been elucidated that PTP can oppose PTK actions.39 Perhaps the depression of PTP could not inhibit the activity of PTK and exacerbate the progression of IgAN. PTPRN2 has been a sensitive and specific DNA methylation marker panel for squamous cell lung cancer.40 In our study, PTPRN2 gene also showed high DNA methylation.
The protein encoded by the IL1RAPL1 gene is a member of the interleukin 1 receptor family and is similar to the interleukin 1 accessory proteins. The IL-1 cytokine family is considered to play important roles in the progression of IgAN, and IL-1 is expressed in the glomeruli of IgAN patients.41 Generally, cytokines fulfill their biological processes by combination with their receptor. IL1RAPL1 showed low methylation of H3K4me3, enhanced DNA methylation and increased mRNA expression. We feel that the high expression can encode for more interleukin 1 receptors and deteriorate the disease. The low levels of H3K4me3 and high level DNA methylation are generally associated with inactive genes; nevertheless, IL1RAPL1 displayed high mRNA expression. We assumed that there are other epigenetic modifications to promote this gene expression.
DNA methylation and histone modification may act synergistically or antagonistically on gene expression.42,43 High levels of DNA methylation detected in IL1RAPL1 and PTPRN2 suggested an inverse relationship between low H3K4me3 and high DNA methylation in IgAN patients. However, GALK2 did not show significant DNA methylation. We will have to carry out further research to study the correlation between alterant H3K4me3 and local changes in DNA methylation in IgAN.
In summary, we systematically and initially profiled H3K4me3 in PBMCs of IgAN patients. The present study suggests that H3K4me3 alterations of promoters might contribute to the pathogenesis of IgAN.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Quantitative real-time PCR verification of ChIP-chip result. Real-time PCR values are expressed as the mean±SD compared to the healthy group. Quantitative data was calculated by 2-ΔΔCT. Assays were done in triplicate. *p<0.05 was considered statistically significant (independent samples t-test). Microarray changes of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation are presented as upregulated (U) or downregulated (D) compared to the healthy group. ChIP-chip, chromatin immunoprecipitation linked to microarrays analysis; IgAN, IgA Nephropathy.
ymj-53-377-g001
Fig. 2
H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) variations and mRNA expression levels with real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Relative mRNA values are expressed as the mean±SD compared to the healthy group. Quantitative data was calculated by 2-ΔΔCT. Assays were done in triplicate. *p<0.05 was considered statistically significant (independent samples t-test). Microarray changes of histone H3K4me3 are presented as upregulated (U) or downregulated (D) compared to the healthy group. IgAN, IgA Nephropathy.
ymj-53-377-g002
Fig. 3
The relationship between H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) alterations and DNA methylation levels. DNA methylation index values are expressed as the mean±SD compared to the healthy group. Assays were done in triplicate. *p<0.05 was considered statistically significant (independent samples t-test). Microarray changes of histone H3K4me3 are presented as upregulated (U) or downregulated (D) compared to the healthy group. IgAN, IgA Nephropathy.
ymj-53-377-g003
Table 1
Characteristics of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy Patients and Healthy Controls
ymj-53-377-i001

IgAN, IgA Nephropathy.

Values are expressed as means±SD.

Table 2
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Real-Time Quantitative PCR Primers Used for Validation of the CpG Array Data
ymj-53-377-i002

F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

Table 3
Primers Used in Real-Time Quantitative PCR for mRNA Expression
ymj-53-377-i003

F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

Table 4
Primers Used for Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR
ymj-53-377-i004

F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.

Table 5
The 20 Selected Probes with H3K4me3 Alterations between Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy Patients and Healthy Subjects, Identified by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-CpG Microarray Analysis
ymj-53-377-i005

H3K4me3, H3 lysine 4 trimethylation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are deeply grateful to all the volunteers who donated blood.
This study was financially supported by Natural Science Fund of Guangxi, People's Republic of China (Grant No: 2010GXNSFA013273).

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Eijgenraam JW, van Kooten C. IgA1 glycosylation in IgA nephropathy: as sweet as it can be. Kidney Int. 2008. 73:1106–1108.
crossref
2. Lai KN. Pathogenic IgA in IgA nephropathy: still the blind men and the elephant? Kidney Int. 2006. 69:1102–1103.
crossref
3. Julian BA, Novak J. IgA nephropathy: an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2004. 13:171–179.
crossref
4. Novak J, Julian BA, Tomana M, Mestecky J. IgA glycosylation and IgA immune complexes in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. 2008. 28:78–87.
crossref
5. Zhu L, Tang W, Li G, Lv J, Ding J, Yu L, et al. Interaction between variants of two glycosyltransferase genes in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2009. 76:190–198.
crossref
6. Narita I, Gejyo F. Pathogenetic significance of aberrant glycosylation of IgA1 in IgA nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2008. 12:332–338.
crossref
7. Rifai A. IgA nephropathy: immune mechanisms beyond IgA mesangial deposition. Kidney Int. 2007. 72:239–241.
crossref
8. Barratt J, Smith AC, Molyneux K, Feehally J. Immunopathogenesis of IgAN. Semin Immunopathol. 2007. 29:427–443.
crossref
9. Baylin SB, Herman JG. DNA hypermethylation in tumorigenesis: epigenetics joins genetics. Trends Genet. 2000. 16:168–174.
crossref
10. Esteller M. CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future. Oncogene. 2002. 21:5427–5440.
crossref
11. Santos-Rosa H, Schneider R, Bannister AJ, Sherriff J, Bernstein BE, Emre NC, et al. Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3. Nature. 2002. 419:407–411.
crossref
12. Schneider R, Bannister AJ, Myers FA, Thorne AW, Crane-Robinson C, Kouzarides T. Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation patterns in higher eukaryotic genes. Nat Cell Biol. 2004. 6:73–77.
crossref
13. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Histone methylation: recognizing the methyl mark. Methods Enzymol. 2004. 376:269–288.
crossref
14. Bernstein BE, Kamal M, Lindblad-Toh K, Bekiranov S, Bailey DK, Huebert DJ, et al. Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse. Cell. 2005. 120:169–181.
crossref
15. Martin C, Zhang Y. The diverse functions of histone lysine methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005. 6:838–849.
crossref
16. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Villar-Garea A, Boix-Chornet M, Espada J, Schotta G, et al. Loss of acetylation at Lys16 and trimethylation at Lys20 of histone H4 is a common hallmark of human cancer. Nat Genet. 2005. 37:391–400.
crossref
17. Wu J, Smith LT, Plass C, Huang TH. ChIP-chip comes of age for genome-wide functional analysis. Cancer Res. 2006. 66:6899–6902.
crossref
18. Opel M, Lando D, Bonilla C, Trewick SC, Boukaba A, Walfridsson J, et al. Genome-wide studies of histone demethylation catalysed by the fission yeast homologues of mammalian LSD1. PLoS One. 2007. 2:e386.
crossref
19. Ren B, Robert F, Wyrick JJ, Aparicio O, Jennings EG, Simon I, et al. Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science. 2000. 290:2306–2309.
crossref
20. Weinmann AS, Yan PS, Oberley MJ, Huang TH, Farnham PJ. Isolating human transcription factor targets by coupling chromatin immunoprecipitation and CpG island microarray analysis. Genes Dev. 2002. 16:235–244.
crossref
21. Miao F, Wu X, Zhang L, Yuan YC, Riggs AD, Natarajan R. Genome-wide analysis of histone lysine methylation variations caused by diabetic conditions in human monocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007. 282:13854–13863.
crossref
22. Zhang L, Zhong K, Dai Y, Zhou H. Genome-wide analysis of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation by ChIP-chip in gastric cancer patients. J Gastroenterol. 2009. 44:305–312.
crossref
23. Kondo Y, Shen L, Cheng AS, Ahmed S, Boumber Y, Charo C, et al. Gene silencing in cancer by histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation independent of promoter DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2008. 40:741–750.
crossref
24. Haas M. Histologic subclassification of IgA nephropathy: a clinicopathologic study of 244 cases. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997. 29:829–842.
crossref
25. Lan K, Verma SC, Murakami M, Bajaj B, Robertson ES. Isolation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2007. Appendix 4:Appendix 4C.
crossref
26. Wu H, Ji H. JAMIE: joint analysis of multiple ChIP-chip experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010. 26:1864–1870.
crossref
27. Kim S, Hu J, Oh Y, Park J, Choi J, Lee YH, et al. Combining ChIP-chip and expression profiling to model the MoCRZ1 mediated circuit for Ca/calcineurin signaling in the rice blast fungus. PLoS Pathog. 2010. 6:e1000909.
28. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001. 25:402–408.
crossref
29. Luszczek W, Cheriyath V, Mekhail TM, Borden EC. Combinations of DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors induce DNA damage in small cell lung cancer cells: correlation of resistance with IFN-stimulated gene expression. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010. 9:2309–2321.
crossref
30. Durr ML, Mydlarz WK, Shao C, Zahurak ML, Chuang AY, Hoque MO, et al. Quantitative methylation profiles for multiple tumor suppressor gene promoters in salivary gland tumors. PLoS One. 2010. 5:e10828.
crossref
31. Liu Q, Gong Z. The coupling of epigenome replication with DNA replication. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011. 14:187–194.
crossref
32. Roh TY, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Zhao K. The genomic landscape of histone modifications in human T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006. 103:15782–15787.
crossref
33. Heisler LE, Torti D, Boutros PC, Watson J, Chan C, Winegarden N, et al. CpG Island microarray probe sequences derived from a physical library are representative of CpG Islands annotated on the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005. 33:2952–2961.
crossref
34. Kanamaru Y, Arcos-Fajardo M, Moura IC, Tsuge T, Cohen H, Essig M, et al. Fc alpha receptor I activation induces leukocyte recruitment and promotes aggravation of glomerulonephritis through the FcR gamma adaptor. Eur J Immunol. 2007. 37:1116–1128.
crossref
35. Ding JX, Xu LX, Zhu L, Lv JC, Zhao MH, Zhang H, et al. Activity of alpha2,6-sialyltransferase and its gene expression in peripheral B lymphocytes in patients with IgA nephropathy. Scand J Immunol. 2009. 69:174–180.
crossref
36. Thoden JB, Holden HM. The molecular architecture of human N-acetylgalactosamine kinase. J Biol Chem. 2005. 280:32784–32791.
crossref
37. Fuchs M, Müller T, Lerch MM, Ullrich A. Association of human protein-tyrosine phosphatase kappa with members of the armadillo family. J Biol Chem. 1996. 271:16712–16719.
crossref
38. Bukowski RM. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced renal cell carcinoma: the evolving treatment paradigm. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2009. 7:9–10.
crossref
39. Navis AC, van den Eijnden M, Schepens JT, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, Wesseling P, Hendriks WJ. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in glioma biology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010. 119:157–175.
crossref
40. Guz J, Foksiński M, Oliński R. [Global DNA hipomethylation--the meaning in carcinogenesis]. Postepy Biochem. 2010. 56:16–21.
41. Hahn WH, Cho BS, Kim SD, Kim SK, Kang S. Interleukin-1 cluster gene polymorphisms in childhood IgA nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009. 24:1329–1336.
crossref
42. Maunakea AK, Nagarajan RP, Bilenky M, Ballinger TJ, D'Souza C, Fouse SD, et al. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature. 2010. 466:253–257.
crossref
43. Kim DS, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Kim YZ, Kim EJ, Park JY. Aberrant methylation of E-cadherin and H-cadherin genes in nonsmall cell lung cancer and its relation to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2007. 110:2785–2792.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles