Abstract
Purpose
Materials and Methods
Results
Figures and Tables
![]() | Fig. 1Effect of EP on I/R-induced translocation of NF-κB. Representative illustration of NF-NF-κB expression in the cytosolic and nuclear fractions of rat ischemic myocardium by Western blotting. Sham + LR, sham-operated rats in which no tightening of the left coronary artery was performed; sham + EP50, sham-operated rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + LR, rats in which 4 mL LR was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP50, rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult. NF-NF-κB, nucl-ear factor-NF-κB; NE, nuclear extraction; CE, cytosolic extraction; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; EP, ethyl pyruvate; LR, lactated Ringer's solution. *p < 0.05 vs. sham + LR. †p < 0.05 vs. sham + EP50. ‡p < 0.05 vs. I/R + LR. |
![]() | Fig. 2Cardiac production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Plasma levels of TNF-α and IL-1β at 2 hours post-reperfusion in each group. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 6 in each group). Sham + LR, sham-operated rats in which no tightening of the left coronary artery was performed; sham + EP50, sham-operated rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + LR, rats in which 4 mL LR was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP50, rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; EP, ethyl pyruvate; LR, lactated Ringer's solution. *p < 0.05 vs. sham + LR. †p < 0.05 vs. sham + EP50. ‡p < 0.05 vs. I/R + LR. |
![]() | Fig. 3MPO activity was expressed as U/g area at risk (AAR) obtained from the sham + LR, sham + EP50, I/R + LR, and I/R + EP50 groups. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 6 in each group). Sham + LR, sham-operated rats in which no tightening of the left coronary artery was performed; sham + EP50, sham-operated rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + LR, rats in which 4 mL LR was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP50, rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult. MPO activity, myeloperoxidase activity; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion.; EP, ethyl pyruvate; LR, lactated Ringer's solution. *p < 0.05 vs. sham + LR. †p < 0.05 vs. sham + EP50. ‡p < 0.05 vs. I/R + LR. |
![]() | Fig. 4Comparison of myocardial infarct size in the I/R + LR, I/R + EP25, and I/R + EP50 groups. Values are means ± SD (n = 15 in each group). I/R + LR, rats in which 4 mL LR was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP25, rats in which 25 mg/kg EP was administrated intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP50, rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult. I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; LR, lactated Ringer's solution; EP, ethyl pyruvate; AAR, area at risk; LV, left ventricle; IA, infracted area. *p < 0.05 compared to the I/R + LR group. |
Table 1

Values are the mean ± SD. Sham + LR, sham-operated rats in which no tightening of the left coronary artery was performed; I/R + LR, rats in which 4 mL LR was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP25, rats in which 25 mg/kg EP was administrated intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult; I/R + EP50, rats in which 50 mg/kg EP was administered intraperitoneally 1 hour before ischemic insult.
LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end diastolic pressure; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; EP, ethyl pyruvate; LR, lactated Ringer's solution.
*p < 0.05 vs. sham + LR.
†p < 0.05 vs. I/R + LR.
‡p < 0.05 vs. I/R + EP25.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
References



















