Severity Staging of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Differences in Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Spirometry

Sheng-Hsiang Lin; Ping-Hung Kuo; Sow-Hsong Kuo; Pan-Chyr Yang

doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.672

Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.50(5) > 1030531

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lin, Kuo, Kuo, and Yang: Severity Staging of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Differences in Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Spirometry

Original Article

Yonsei Medical Journal

Yonsei Medical Journal 2009; 50(5): 672-676.

Published online: 21 October 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.672

Severity Staging of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Differences in Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Spirometry

Sheng-Hsiang Lin¹, Ping-Hung Kuo², Sow-Hsong Kuo³, Pan-Chyr Yang²

¹Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei County Hospital, Taipei County, Taiwan.

²Department of Internal, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

³Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Corresponding author: Dr. Ping-Hung Kuo, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan. Tel: 886-2-2312-3456, Fax: 886-2-2358-2867, kph712@ntuh.gov.tw

Received 26 September 2008 Revised 6 January 2009 Accepted 6 January 2009

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) uses the post-bronchodilator spirometry for diagnosis and severity staging. We evaluated differences in the severity classification of COPD, based on pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry.

Materials and Methods

From 2000 to 2004, 207 COPD patients who underwent spirometry before and after inhalation of 400 µg of fenoterol were analyzed. A responder to the bronchodilator test (BDT) was defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) as an increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) or forced vital capacity ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL, and by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) as an increase in FEV₁ ≥ 10% of the predicted value. COPD severity was classified according to the 2008 GOLD guidelines.

Results

For the entire study population, the FEV₁ increased by 11.8 ± 12.5% of baseline after BDT and 41.1% and 27.1% of subjects were classified as responders using the ATS and ERS criteria, respectively. Based on pre-BDT spirometry, 55, 85, 58, and 9 patients were classified as Stage I-IV COPD, respectively. Sixty-seven (32.4%) patients changed severity staging after BDT, including 20.0%, 28.2%, 44.8%, and 66.7% of pre-BDT patients Stages I through IV, respectively. More ATS or ERS BDT-responders had a change in severity staging than non-responders (52.9% vs. 18.9% and 62.5% vs. 21.2%, both p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the severity staging of COPD using pre-BDT spirometry might lead to significant differences as compared to staging, based on post-BDT spirometry, as recommended by the current GOLD guidelines.

Keywords: Bronchodilator test, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severity staging

INTRODUCTION

Spirometry is essential for the diagnosis and severity staging of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 2008 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines1 recommended a simple classification of disease severity into four stages, using forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) of the predicted value, and where all values refer to post-bronchodilator FEV₁. Bronchodilator test (BDT), however, is not always performed in clinical practice and the staging of COPD severity is frequently based on pre-bronchodilator spirometry.

For the past few years, an increasing number of articles on COPD have used the GOLD guidelines for severity staging. Although there were studies apparently using the post-BDT spirometry for COPD staging,2-4 a number of previous studies have also used pre-bronchodilator values, or did not specify which one was used when applying the GOLD guidelines.5-8 While irreversible airflow obstruction is the hallmark of COPD, many patients with COPD have a reversible component.9 It must be acknowledged, however, that in COPD patients, the staging of severity using pre-BDT spirometry tends to be overestimated due to some limitation of airflow reversibility in COPD. In the absence of such measurements, it may not be possible to classify subjects into the COPD severity stages.10

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in COPD severity staging by comparing pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometric data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient selection

From 2000 to 2004, consecutive patients with a physician diagnosis of COPD and referred to the Lung Function Laboratory of the National Taiwan University Hospital for BDT were recruited. The diagnosis of COPD was based on the medical history, symptoms, chest radiograph and spirometry. The diagnosis was confirmed by the lung function criteria of the GOLD guideline.1 Patients with other chronic respiratory diseases (occupational lung disorder, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, tuberculosis, or malignancy), previous thoracic surgery, or a history of asthma were excluded. Patients who had used an inhaled short-acting bronchodilator within the previous 12 hours or an inhaled/oral long-acting bronchodilator within the previous 24 hours were likewise excluded.

Measurements

Spirometry was performed with a computerized spirometer (MST-PFT, Germany) by a trained technician according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria.11 The tests were performed with the patient seated in an upright position, and using a nose-clip and breathing through a non-compressible mouthpiece. After taking baseline measurements, all of the patients inhaled 400 µg of fenoterol (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Burlington, Ontorio, Canada). Spirometry was repeated 30 minutes after inhalation of the bronchodilator.

A positive BDT was based on the criteria set by the ATS12 [increase in either FEV₁ or forced vital capacity (FVC) by 12% of baseline, and at least 200 mL] and by the European Respiratory Society13 (ERS, increase in FEV₁ by 10% of predicted values). Using both the pre- and post-BDT FEV₁ percentage of predicted value14 when the FEV₁/FVC ratio was < 70%, the severity of COPD was classified into: Stage I (mild; ≥ 80%), Stage II (moderate; 50 to 79%); Stage III (severe; 30 to 49%); and Stage IV (very severe; < 30%) according to 2008 GOLD guidelines.1 Non-COPD was noted when the FEV₁/FVC ratio was ≥ 70%.

Measurements before and after BDT were compared, including spirometric parameters (FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/FVC ratio), with the severity staging of COPD. The correlation between bronchodilator response and pre- or post-BDT FEV₁ were analyzed. Finally, the differences in severity staging by pre- and post-BDT spirometry in responders and non-responders were compared.

Analysis

The clinical variables recorded included age, gender, body mass index, and smoking status. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables or number (percentage) for categorical variables. Categorical variables were analyzed by the χ² test. The paired-sample t-test was applied to compare pre- and post-BDT spirometry. In order to investigate the dependence of continuous variables, linear regression analysis was applied and the Pearson correlation coefficient was used as a measure of the extent of the relationship. p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All of the statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software SPSS Version 10.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

The demographic data of the 207 patients in this study are shown in Table 1. All of the following data had normal distribution, as checked by the D'Agostino-Pearson test: body mass index (p = 0.287), FEV₁ percentage of predicted value (pre-BDT: p = 0.076; post-BDT: p = 0.201), and FVC percentage of predicted value (pre-BDT: p = 0.312; post-BDT: p = 0.324). The mean changes of FEV₁ and FVC after BDT, expressed by absolute value, percentage of baseline, and percentage of predicted value, were 0.13 ± 0.14 and 0.20 ± 0.25 liter, 11.8 ± 12.5% and 8.9 ± 11.5%, and 6.3 ± 6.3% and 7.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The changes in FEV₁ during BDT were weakly correlated with the pre-BDT FEV₁ (r = -0.2, p = 0.004) but not with post-BDT FEV₁ (p = 0.26) values. Of the 207 patients, 85 (41.1%) and 56 (27.1%) were classified as responders by the ATS and ERS criteria, respectively.

The results of COPD severity staging using pre- and post-BDT FEV₁ are demonstrated in Table 2. Fifty-five (26.6%), 85 (41.1%), 58 (28.0%), and 9 (4.3%) patients were classified as Stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively, using pre-BDT spirometry, and 12 (5.8%), 66 (31.9%), 88 (42.5%), 38 (18.4%), and 3 (1.4%) patients were classified as non-COPD, and Stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively, using post-BDT spirometry. The 12 patients classified as non-COPD after BDT either came from pre-BDT Stages I or II. As a whole, 67 (32.4%) patients had pre-BDT stages different from post-BDT stages. In patients with pre-BDT Stage I to IV, 11 (20.0%), 24 (28.2%), 26 (44.8%), and 6 (66.7%) patients changed their severity staging after BDT (Fig. 1). The relation between percentage and pre-BDT stage was statistically significant (p = 0.004). Among the responders according to both the ATS and ERS criteria, more patients changed their severity staging after BDT than the non-responders.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we demonstrated a significant difference in the severity staging of COPD patients by pre-BDT spirometry instead of post-BDT spirometry. We also observed that patients with a higher pre-BDT severity staging were more likely to change their staging based on post-BDT spirometry. Furthermore, even in the so-called "non-responders", changes in severity staging accounted for a substantial proportion of COPD patients.

In our study population, the mean bronchodilator response in FEV₁ was 0.13 liter (11.8% of baseline) while 85 (41.1%) and 56 (27.1%) of all COPD patients were classified as responders according to the ATS and ERS criteria, respectively. These data were comparable with previous reports.15,16 In the study by Perng and co-workers,15 48 (55%) among 88 smoking-related COPD patients were classified as responders according to the ATS criteria, with a mean change in FEV₁ of 0.18 liter (14.4%). In another series,16 the mean bronchodilator response among 123 COPD patients with a mean FEV₁ of 48.9% was 0.15 liter (10%), and 58 (47%) and 19 (15%) patients were classified as responders according to the ATS and ERS criteria, respectively. Therefore, a significant change in staging could not simply be attributed to a more "asthmatic" COPD population in the study.

We observed that the possibilities of changing severity staging after BDT were associated with pre-BDT stages. It seemed that the more severe the pre-BDT stage, the higher the probability of difference. It could be partially explained by the weak and inverse correlation between pre-BDT FEV₁ and changes in FEV₁ percentage of predicted values after BDT. This association was also demonstrated by Perng, et al.,15 but not by Quadrelli, et al.17 and Calverley, et al.18

Another explanation of the stage-related incidence is the diverse FEV₁ intervals of the severity stages. In Stage III COPD, the narrower FEV₁ interval (30% to 49%) resulted in a higher incidence of staging difference than Stage II COPD. Furthermore, in Stage IV COPD, the FEV₁ actually ranged from 23% to 29% in our study, leading to the highest percentage of staging difference.

In our study, 12 of the patients with pre-BDT Stages I-II had an FEV₁/FVC ratio ≥ 70% after BDT (Table 2). Since COPD, by definition, is never completely reversible, the question arises on whether or not the diagnosis of COPD is accurate. In view of the facts that the pre-BDT FEV₁/FVC ratio (68.1 ± 1.7%) approximated the cut-off value in these patients and that the increase of FEV₁ in most (75%) did not exceed the 95% confidence interval after placebo inhalation,19 caution should be exercised in interpreting these results.

Of special interest was a 79-year-old man whose FEV₁ values decreased from 81.5% to 75.3% of predicted value after BDT, leading to a shift in COPD severity from stage I to stage II. This might result from a paradoxical response to inhaled fenoterol with a chlorofluorocarbon metered dose inhaler (CFC-MDI). In a study involving 679 patients with chronic airway obstruction, the incidence of paradoxical reaction (defined as a fall in FEV₁ of > 15% following inhalations of ipratropium/fenoterol with CFC-MDIs) was 1.2%.20 In an another study,21 the incidence of asymptomatic drop in FEV₁ > 15% in 1,538 COPD patients was 1.8%. Another possibility for the decrease in FEV₁ is that bronchoconstriction might be triggered by repeated maximum respiratory maneuvers during spirometry.22

In the current GOLD guidelines,1 patients with FEV₁ < 50% of predicted plus the presence of chronic respiratory failure should be classified as Stage IV COPD, even if the FEV₁ is > 30% of predicted value. In our study population, only three patients were in GOLD stage IV, and none of the patients with FEV₁ < 50% had chronic respiratory failure. One of the possible reasons for this is that these patients usually cannot tolerate the procedure of spirometry. Another explanation is that results of arterial blood gases were not available in the majority of our patients.

We observed in this study that more than half of BDT responders, defined either by the ATS or the ERS criteria, had a different severity staging after BDT. It was noteworthy that changes in staging even among non-responders were observed in about one-fifth. Since the criteria are arbitrarily set, the use of pre-BDT spirometry for COPD severity staging in non-responders is also inappropriate.

Regular treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids is recommended for Stage III and IV COPD patients with repeated exacerbation to reduce the frequency of exacerbations.1 In our study, 44.8% of pre-BDT Stage III patients became Stage II after BDT, suggesting that selection of pre- or post-BDT FEV₁ might have a significant impact on the indication of ICS in COPD patients which were shown to be a risk factor for fracture.23,24

It is well recognized that day-to-day variation of bronchodilator response to β2-agonist exists,25 and that the maximal attainable FEV₁ is the best spirometry index in survival prediction.15 The past work has shown that eosinophilic inflammation may play a substantial role in COPD.26 Hence, a real ceiling of spirometry by a course of steroid may be achieved in some COPD patients. However, the benefits of such measures remain unclear.

In conclusion, the use of pre-BDT spirometry for COPD severity staging may lead to significantly different results from those based on post-BDT spirometry. It seems that a stricter application of the GOLD or the ATS guidelines, using post-BDT spirometry, should be emphasized, even in so-called "non-responders".

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Percentage of patients changed in severity class after BDT. The relation between percentage and pre-BDT stage was statistically significant (p= 0.004).

BDT, bronchodilator test.

Table 1

Demographic and Spirometric Characteristics of the 207 Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BMI, body mass index; ATS, American Thoracic Society; ERS, European Respiratory Society; FEV₁, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity. Data are presented as n (%) and mean ± SD.

^*p < 0.01 versus pre-bronchodilator value.

Table 2

Severity Staging of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Test (BDT) Spirometry

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Workshop report: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Update 2008.

2. Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, Casanova C, Montes de Oca M, Mendez RA, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004. 350:1005–1012.

3. O'Donnell RA, Peebles C, Ward JA, Daraker A, Angco G, Broberg P, et al. Relationship between peripheral airway dysfunction, airway obstruction, and neutrophilic inflammation in COPD. Thorax. 2004. 59:837–842.

4. Lapperre TS, Snoeck-Stroband JB, Gosman MM, Stolk J, Sont JK, Jansen DF, et al. Dissociation of lung function and airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004. 170:499–504.

5. Doi M, Nakano K, Hiramoto T, Kohno N. Significance of pulmonary artery pressure in emphysema patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia. Respir Med. 2003. 97:915–920.

6. Antonelli-Incalzi R, Imperiale C, Bellia V, Catalano F, Scichilone N, Pistelli R, et al. Do GOLD stages of COPD severity really correspond to differences in health status? Eur Respir J. 2003. 22:444–449.

7. Morris A, Sciurba FC, Lebedeva IP, Githaiga A, Elliott WM, Hogg JC, et al. Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and Pneumocystis colonization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004. 170:408–413.

8. Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, Elliott WM, Buzatu L, et al. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004. 350:2645–2653.

9. Donohue JF. Therapeutic responses in asthma and COPD. Bronchodilators. Chest. 2004. 126:125S–137S.

10. Sterk PJ. Let's not forget: the GOLD criteria for COPD are based on post-bronchodilator FEV1. Eur Respir J. 2004. 23:497–498.

11. Standardization of spirometry--1987 update. Statement of the American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987. 136:1285–1298.

12. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991. 144:1202–1218.

13. Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, Paoletti P, Gibson J, Howard P, et al. The European Respiratory Society Task Force. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Eur Respir J. 1995. 8:1398–1420.

14. Yang SC. [Re-evaluation of the ventilatory function in a normal Chinese: comparison with the results of a survey conducted 15 years ago]. J Formos Med Assoc. 1993. 92:Suppl 3. S152–S159.

15. Perng DW, Huang HY, Chen HM, Lee YC, Perng RP. Characteristics of airway inflammation and bronchodilator reversibility in COPD: a potential guide to treatment. Chest. 2004. 126:375–381.

16. Reid DW, Soltani A, Johns DP, Bish R, Williams TJ, Burns GP, et al. Bronchodilator reversibility in Australian adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intern Med J. 2003. 33:572–577.

17. Quadrelli SA, Roncoroni AJ, Montiel GC. Evaluation of bronchodilator response in patients with airway obstruction. Respir Med. 1999. 93:630–636.

18. Calverley PM, Burge PS, Spencer S, Anderson JA, Jones PW. Bronchodilator reversibility testing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2003. 58:659–664.

19. Sourk RL, Nugent KM. Bronchodilator testing: confidence intervals derived from placebo inhalations. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983. 128:153–157.

20. Huchon G, Hofbauer P, Cannizzaro G, Iacono P, Wald F. Comparison of the safety of drug delivery via HFA- and CFC-metered dose inhalers in CAO. Eur Respir J. 2000. 15:663–669.

21. Hodder R, Pavia D, Dewberry H, Alexander K, Iacono P, Ponitz H, et al. Low incidence of paradoxical bronchoconstriction in asthma and COPD patients during chronic use of Respimat soft mist inhaler. Respir Med. 2005. 99:1087–1095.

22. Roncoroni AJ, Goldman E, Puy RJ, Mancino M. Bronchoconstriction induced by repeated forced vital capacity manoeuvres. Acta Allergol. 1975. 30:375–389.

23. Hubbard R, Tattersfield A, Smith C, West J, Smeeth L, Fletcher A. Use of inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of fracture. Chest. 2006. 130:1082–1088.

24. Lee TA, Weiss KB. Fracture risk associated with inhaled corticosteroid use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004. 169:855–859.

25. Hansen EF, Phanareth K, Laursen LC, Kok-Jensen A, Dirksen A. Reversible and irreversible airflow obstruction as predictor of overall mortality in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999. 159:1267–1271.

26. Chanez P, Vignola AM, O'Shaugnessy T, Enander I, Li D, Jeffery PK, et al. Corticosteroid reversibility in COPD is related to features of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997. 155:1529–1534.

TOOLS

Similar articles