Expression of Heat Shock Protein 60 kDa Is Upregulated in Cervical Cancer

You Jin Hwang; Soon Pyo Lee; Suk Young Kim; Young Hwan Choi; Min Ji Kim; Choong Ho Lee; Joo Young Lee; Dae Young Kim

doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.399

Journal List > Yonsei Med J > v.50(3) > 1030483

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Hwang, Lee, Kim, Choi, Kim, Lee, Lee, and Kim: Expression of Heat Shock Protein 60 kDa Is Upregulated in Cervical Cancer

Original Article

Yonsei Medical Journal

Yonsei Medical Journal 2009; 50(3): 399-406.

Published online: 23 June 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.399

Expression of Heat Shock Protein 60 kDa Is Upregulated in Cervical Cancer

You Jin Hwang¹, Soon Pyo Lee², Suk Young Kim², Young Hwan Choi¹, Min Ji Kim¹, Choong Ho Lee¹, Joo Young Lee³, Dae Young Kim¹

¹Division of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.

²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.

³Department of Pharmacology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Dr. Dae Young Kim, Divison of Biological Science, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, 534-2 Yeonsu-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-799, Korea. Tel: 82-32-820-4544, Fax: 82-32-821-2734, davekim@gachon.ac.kr

Received 22 May 2008 Revised 4 September 2008 Accepted 1 October 2008

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical cancer caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV) continues to be the cause of yearly death among women. However, it is a curable disease when diagnosed at an early stage. Recently, several researches have reported that heat shock protein (HSP) 60, a chaperone protein of molecular weight of 60 kDa, is involved in carcinogenesis and apoptosis. In order to evaluate the prognostic significance of HSP60 in cervical cancer, we examined differences in the HSP60 expression between cervical cancer and normal tissues in women.

Materials and Methods

Tissue samples were collected from 20 cervical cancer patients and 20 normal controls. HSP60 expression of cervical cancer and normal tissues were verified by the 2D gel proteomics, semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot analyses.

Results

In 2D proteomic analysis, an increase of HSP60 expression was detected in cervical cancer tissues and confirmed by Western blot analysis (p < 0.05). However, messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of HSP60 did not display any significant differences between cervical cancer and normal tissues.

Conclusion

These results suggest that HSP60 may be involved in the development of cervical cancer and have profound biological and prognostic significance.

Keywords: Heak shock protein, cervical cancer, prognostic marker

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is a virus-induced disease that is caused by the integration of a human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA into the host's genome.1-3 Infection with HPV causes disruption of the host's E2 gene, resulting in expression of viral oncogenes, E6 and E7. The E6 and E7 products inhibit the activities of tumor suppressors, p53 and retinoblastoma protein, respectively. This then eventually leads to the accumulation of damaged DNA and the development of cervical cancer.4-5 Although cervical cancer is 1 of the causes of highest mortality in female cancer patients worldwide, it is a curable disease when diagnosed at an early stage.6 However, clear prognostic factors for cervical cancer development are not yet in existence.

Mitochondria, which are cell organelles involved in the processes of cell life and death and in tumoral transformation, appear to have prominent dysfunction in cancer cells. Mitochondrial failure induces abnormal ultrastructures, deregulated metabolism, altered biochemistry and mutation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in cells.7 Mitochondrial molecular chaperones play important roles in protein transport, protein complex assembly, refolding of misfolded proteins and triggering of protein degradation by proteosomes.8-9 Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones that are classified into families according to their molecular weight (i.e., HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, and small HPSs). HSPs, an evolutionary conserved protein, are ubiquitous and have multiple functions in cellular homeo-stasis including gene expression regulation, DNA replication, signal transduction, differentiation, apoptosis, and cellular senescence or immortalization. They also protect cells from various stresses such as hypoxia or ischemia, as well as sudden increases in temperature.10-12 In normal cells, HSP60 is mostly localized in the mitochondrial matrix and outer mitochondrial membrane, constitutively expressed under normal condition, and induced by heat shock, mitochondrial damage, and mtDNA depletion.13,14 Recently, other molecular roles for mammalian HSP60 have been reported. For example, human HSP60 may trigger apoptosis through caspase cascade activation by an association between HSP60/HSP10 complex and pro-caspase-3 inside the mitochondria, resulting in a subsequent release of the HSP60 into the cytoplasm.15

Overexpression of HSP60 has been reported in various tumors or cancers, such as adrenal Cushing tumors, human breast, large bowel, bronchial, exocervical, ovarian and prostate cancers.16-23 Recently, an upregulation of HSP60 in preinvasive lesions of the cervix has been shown by immuhistochemistry.24 Although HSP60 plays important roles in various biological events, the exact molecular roles of HSP60 are still poorly understood, and the relationship between HSP60 and invasive cervical cancer has not been reported yet. In this study, we investigated the HSP60 expression in invasive cervical cancer tissues and evaluated any prognostic significance of HSP60 in cervical cancer using proteomics, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue preparation

The cervical cancer patients were recruited at the outpatient clinic of the Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea. Tissue samples were collected from 20 cervical cancer patients (mean age, 47.95 ± 16.1 years) and 20 normal controls (mean age, 46.80 ± 12.9 years). Cervical biopsies were obtained from patients with a diagnosis of cervical cancer or uterine myoma as described previously.25 The specimens were brought to clinicopathology department immediately after resection, and parts of the tissues were subsequently dissected, divided into several tubes, placed in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80℃ until analyzed. Cancer samples were characterized according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage as fellows: stage I, 6 case (30%); stage II, 10 case (50%); stage III, 2 case (10%); and stage IV, 2 case (10%). Histopathology of cancer samples was evaluated as fellows: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 16 cases (80%); adenocarcinoma, 3 cases (15%); and malignant mixed müllerian tumor (MMMT), 1 case (5%). Patients with cervical cancer underwent radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy after biopsy. Normal cervical tissues came from uterine myoma obtained from women diagnosed benign condition by Pap smear test. Our study was approved by the International Review Board on the experimental studies.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Biopsy tissues were homogenized in a R/S buffer {9 M Urea, 2% 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate, 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.4% ampholyte} containing 0.5% each of protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, and then ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 hour (h) at 20℃. Protein contents of the supernatants were determined using a protein assay kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), and then the samples were prepared at 1 mg/350 µL concentration with R/S buffer and stored at -80℃. One milligram (mg) of the protein sample was loaded on an immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strip (pH 4-7) in PROTEAN IEF CELL (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the strip was then covered with mineral oil and rehydrated at 50 V for 12 h. Moist wicks were placed at both ends of the strip to avoid salt contamination while the protein samples were separated by their isoelectric points (IP) at 10 KV for 15 h. The IPG strip was then soaked in equilibration buffer [(375 mM Tris, 6 M Urea, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 20% glycerol, 2.5% iodoacetamide)] for 10 minutes (min), and then the samples which had previously been separated by IP were separated again on a 2-dimensional SDS-polyacrylamide gel (2D-PAG) [4.0 mL of 30% acrylamide/Bis, 2.5 mL of 1.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 0.1 mL of 10% SDS (w/v), 50 µL of 10% ammonium persulfate, 5 µL of N,N,N'-tetramethylethylenediamine in 10 mL of 12% 2D-PAG] by their molecular weights at 20 mA/gel for 16 h. Protein spots on 2D-gel were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue for 24-48 h,26 de-stained in double distilled water (ddH₂O), and then the stained protein spot images were analyzed using PDQuest software (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The protein spots that showed an increased staining density of up to two fold compared with their controls were selected for further analysis.

Selected protein spots were individually excised into new tubes, and the Coomassie blue staining was destained with 50% acetonitrile/25 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Gel slices containing protein spots were treated with 10 mM DTT at 56℃ for 30 min, and with 55 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 25 min in dark. They were then digested with trypsin at 37℃ for 16 h with shaking. After pooling the supernatant into new tubes, peptide samples were dried completely using SpeedVac system for 4 h. Samples were dissolved in 50% acetonitrile/ 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), co-crystallized by mixing with matrix (α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid saturated with 0.1% TFA/50% acetonitrile) and loaded on the silcon-coated 96 well microtiter sample plate (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA).

Peptides masses were analyzed using Voyager DE Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-Time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Mass spectra were obtained by averaging 100 to 150 individual laser shots. Calibration of spectra was performed externally by 2 standard peptide, angiotensin 1 (m/z 1296.6853) and adrenocorticoptrophic hormone (18-39 clip) (m/z 2465. 1989). A database search for protein sequence for homology was performed using MS-Fit search algorithm (http://prospector.ucsf.edu/prospector/4.0.8/html/msfit.htm). Mass tolerance for the monoisotopic peptide masses were set to 50 ppm.

Proteomic analysis (i.e., two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF analysis) was carried out twice with different 2 samples in each group in order to confirm the peptide profiles analyzed.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted from cervical cancer or normal tissues with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The yield of total RNA was determined by measuring the absorption at 260 nm. Reverse transcription with 1 µg of total RNA was performed in a final volume of 20 µL using 200 U of Superscript II reverse transcriptase, 0.5 µg oligo dT_12-18 as a primer, 0.5 mM dNTP Mix, 10 mM DTT, and first strand buffer (Invitrogen, Carsbad, CA, USA). The mixture of oligo dT_12-18 primer, total RNA and diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) treated ddH₂O was heated at 70℃ for 10 min initially, and other components were then added and incubated at 42℃ for 1 h. Subsequent incubation at 70℃ for 15 min was carried to inactivate the reverse transcriptase.

To determine the relative levels of HSP60 messenger RNA (mRNA), PCR of complementory DNA (cDNA) was carried out in 20 µL mixture containing 1 µL of cDNA, 10X reaction buffer, 2.5 mM decxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mix, 6 pmol each of 5' and 3' primer, and 1U of G-Taq DNA polymerase (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea); Sense: 5'-AGA TGG AGT GGC TGT GCT GA-3', Antisense: 5'-CAT CAT AAC CAA CTT CTG AG-3'. The reactions were started at 94℃ for 5 min and amplified for 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94℃, 30 sec at 58℃ and 30 sec at 72℃. Final extensions were done for 7 min at 72℃ to compete polymerization. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control to confirm equal loading of the samples. The PCR products were separated on 2.5% agarose gel using NeSieve GTG agarose (FMC, Rockland, ME, USA), and analyzed by a digital image analysis system.

Western blot

For Western blot analysis, cervical tissues were removed immediately, transferred to LN₂ and stored at -80℃. The tissues were homogenized in a single detergent lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0; 150 mM NaCl; 1% Triton X-100; each of 0.5% protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail) and then centrifuged at 13,000 g for 20 min at 4℃. The supernatants transferred into new tubes were measured for protein contents using a protein assay kit (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA), aliquoted at an 5 µg/20 µL concentration in lysis buffer, and stored at -80℃. Otherwise, they were used in the same day. The samples were mixed with loading buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 6.8; 200 mM DTT; 4% SDS; 20% glycerol; 0.2% bromophenol blue) at 1 : 1 dilution, boiled for 5 min, quickly chilled on ice, and then separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide Tris-glycine gels. The proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C, Amersham, Bucks, UK) and treated with 5% nonfat dry milk in 1X phosphate buffered saline-Tween (PBST) (1.46 mM NaH₂PO₄H₂O; 8.05 mM Na₂HPO₄; 144.72 mM NaCl; 5% Tween 20) overnight at 4℃. The membranes were reacted with rabbit anti-HSP60 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) at 1 : 1000 dilution for 1 h, and then reacted with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (1 : 1000 dilution; Amersham, Bucks, UK) for 1 h at room temperature. The bound antibodies were detected with chemilu-minescence according to the manufacturer's instructions (NEN Life Science, MA, USA), and quantified using a digital image analysis system.

Statistical analysis

A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the expression of HSP60 in cervical cancer and normal tissues. RT-PCR and Western blot data were subjected to post-hoc Fisher's protected least significant difference (PLSD) test and presented by means ± SEM. For all comparisons, the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

We performed 2D proteomic analysis to evaluate the differences in protein expression between human cervical cancers and normal cervical tissues. Protein spots on the 2D gels were stained with Coomassie blue, and the staining densities of the spots were analyzed with PDQuest software. Proteomic analysis was carried out twice with different 2 samples from each group in order to confirm the peptide profiles analyzed and one of them is presented (Figs. 1 and 2). In 2D gel analysis of normal cervical tissue, 11 spots with higher staining densities then cancer tissue were selected for MALDI-TOF assay (Fig. 1) and identified (Table 1). Fig. 2 reveals the 2D gel image of the cervical cancer tissue. Nineteen spots of cervical cancer tissue samples that showed up to 2 fold increased staining density compared with their normal control were selected and identified (Table 2). Specifically, HSP60 protein (Spot 6) which was overexpressed on cervical cancer gel displayed dramatically high 98.2% of sequence and corresponded to its intact molecular size (60 kDa) (Table 2).

In order to ascertain the increase of HSP60 expression in cervical cancer tissues, we investigated HSP60 mRNA expression in cervical cancer and normal cervical tissues obtained from twenty cancer patients and twenty normal controls, using semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 3A). All samples were quantified and corrected for total input RNA by normalizing the expression value of GAPDH. Although HSP60 mRNA was detected in both groups, no statistically significant differences between cervical cancer and normal cervical tissues were noted (Fig. 3B).

To examine the expression levels of HSP60 (60 kDa) protein, we carried out Western blot analysis in both groups (Fig. 4A). Anti-actin (43 kDa) was used as an internal control and expression of HSP60 was normalized by actin protein. The results obtained from twenty cases of each group showed that the expression of HSP60 protein in cervical cancer tissues was significantly increased compared to cervical normal tissues (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4B).

DISCUSSION

The immunohostochemical evaluation of HSP60 in precancer of the cervix has recently been reported,24 however the relationship between HSP60 and invasive cervical cancer has not yet been reported. In this study, we compared expression levels of HSP60 mRNA or protein between invasive cervical cancers and cervical normal tissues.

2D gel proteomic analysis revealed that the expression of HSP60 was increased in cervical cancer tissues compared to normal tissues (Figs. 1 and 2). It is generally accepted that DNA damages which cause cancer induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis or DNA mutation, resulting from changes in protein expression. In the present study, protein spots on the 2D gels showed different expression patterns between cervical cancer and normal cervical tissues, indicating that the protein expression of normal cervical tissues was changed by induction or inhibition of genes, and/or by degeneration or modification of proteins during carcinogenesis. HSP60 protein of cervical cancer tissues was markedly elevated, revealed by 2D gel proteomics and validated by Western blot (Fig. 4). However, there was no difference in HSP60 mRNA levels between cancer and normal tissues (Fig. 3). These findings suggest that serial processes after transcription become important step in cervical cancer development. Indeed, differences of HSP60 expression were detected in both 2D gels and Western blot, indicating difference in protein level, but not in mRNA level.

It has been known that HSP60 is constitutively expressed under normal conditions, and its expression is induced by stressful conditions such as heat shock, mitochondrial damage, and mtDNA depletion.14 Although the expression of HSP60, which is localized in mitochondria, is directly related to mitochondrial regeneration after cell division or the increase of mitochondrial activity during normal conditions, and HSP60 is significantly less expressed in normal tissues.13,18,27 On the other hand, the present study found that HSP60 was significantly overexpressed in cervical cancer tissues compared to normal cervical tissues. The overexpression of HSP60 in cervical cancer tissues suggests that this protein might play a different role in cervical carcinogenesis. Cappello et al.22 reported that elevated expression of HSP60 may be a protective upregulation against cancer development (i.e. the blockade of apoptotic machinery that usually takes place during cancer progression). The involvement of HSP60 in the process of apoptosis and tumorigenesis is still in dispute. An antiapoptotic effect of HSP60 and down-regulation of HSP60 have been reported in cardiac myocytes and bronchial cancer, respectively.28,29 On the other hand, overexpression of HSP60 has been reported in breast and ovarian carcinomas and myeloid leukemia.30-32 Moreover, recent studies showed upregulation of HSP60 during carcinogenesis of the large bowel and the uterine exocervix.18,22 Specifically, overexpression of HSP60 has been demonstrated in early cervical carcinogenesis as well as in prostate and squamous cervical cancers of both early and advanced grades.18,24,27 These results support the possibility that the expression of HSP60 may play a role as a prognostic factor of cancer development. By employing immunohistochemistry, Castle et al.24 showed up-regulation of HSPs in response to HPV infection and early cervical carcinogenesis, and discussed the role of HSP60 and HSP70 as surrogate marker for precancer development. However, the present study found the presence of HPV type 16 in 75% of our cervical cancer samples, demonstrated by PCR (data not shown) and they were shown to be invasive cancer stage I to IV, suggesting that HSP60 expression is also upregulated in invasive cervical cancer stages as well as precancer stage.

In conclusion, we compared HSP60 mRNA level and protein expression in cervical tissues diagnosed as normal and invasive cervical cancer, and confirmed upregulation of HSP60 protein in invasive cervical cancer tissues. It suggests that HSP60 is involved in cervical carcinogenesis, and can be used as a useful prognostic tool. Since the role of HSP60 in cancer progression and mechanisms involved in the regulation of HSP60 expression remain unclear, more studies are needed to elucidate the relationship between HSP60 and cancer development.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Proteome pattern of normal cervical tissue. Eleven protein spots on the gel were marked with arrows. Numbered spots were excised from the normal tissue gel, in-gel digested with trypsin, and identified by MALDI-TOF assay. The results are listed in Table 1. MALDI-TOF, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-Time of flight mass spectrometry.

Fig. 2

Proteome pattern of cervical cancer tissue. Nineteen protein spots on the gel were marked with arrows. Numbered spots were excised from the cancer tissue gel, in-gel digested with trypsin, and identified by MALDI-TOF assay. The results are listed in Table 2. MALDI-TOF, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-Time of flight mass spectrometry.

Fig. 3

(A) RT-PCR analysis of HSP60 mRNA in normal (lane 1-8) and cervical cancer (lane 9-16) tissues. (B) RT-PCR was performed using 1 µg of total RNA and separated on 2.5% agarose gel. The size of PCR products was 320 base pairs. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control to confirm equal loading of the samples. HSP60 mRNA levels were quantified as a percentage of relative optical density. Results are mean ± S.E.M. of 20 samples per group. RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; mRNA, messenger RNA; HSP60, heat shock protein.

Fig. 4

(A) Western blot analysis of HSP60 protein in normal controls (lane N1-N20) and cervical cancers (lane C1-C20) tissues. (B) Anti-actin protein was used as a control. HSP60 protein levels were quantified as a percentage of relative optical density. Results are mean ± S.E.M. of 20 samples per group. Expression level of HSP60 protein in cervical cancer tissues was significantly higher than in normal tissues (p < 0.05). HSP60, heat shock protein.

Table 1

List of the Peptides Identified by MALDI-TOF Analysis in Human Normal Cervical Tissue

MALDI-TOF, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-Time of flight mass spectrometry.

Eleven protein spots selected were individually analyzed. The spot number (Spot No.) corresponds to the position marked on the gel (Fig. 1). Identified proteins and accession numbers were derived from the MS-Fit search algorithm.

^*MW (kDa) represents molecular size of protein.

^†pI is an isoelectric point, where the net charge is zero.

^‡D means the value obtained from the database.

^§E indicates the value estimated from spots on the SDS gel.

^∥Sequence coverage (%) is defined as the ratio of the portion of peptide sequence covered by the matched protein to the whole length of peptide sequence of the spot.

Table 2

List of the Peptides Identified by MALDI-TOF Analysis in Human Cervical Cancer Tissue

MALDI-TOF, matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-Time of flight mass spectrometry.

Nineteen selected protein spots were individually analyzed. The spot number (Spot No.) corresponds to the position marked on the gel (Fig. 2). Identified proteins and accession numbers were derived from the MS-Fit search algorithm.

^*MW (kDa) represents the molecular size of protein.

^†pI is the isoelectric point, where the net charge is 0.

^‡D means the value obtained from the database.

^§E indicates the value estimated from spots on the SDS gel.

^∥Sequence coverage (%) is defined as the ratio of the portion of peptide sequence covered by the matched protein to the whole length of peptide sequence of the spot.

References

1. Bosch FX, Manos MM, Muhoz N, Sherman M, Jansen AM, Peto J, et al. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) Study Group. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995. 87:796–802.

2. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999. 189:12–19.

3. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Shah KV, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:518–527.

4. Klaes R, Woerner SM, Ridder R, Wentzensen N, Duerst M, Schneider A, et al. Detection of high-risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer by amplification of transcripts derived from integrated papillomavirus oncogenes. Cancer Res. 1999. 59:6132–6136.

5. Furumoto H, Irahara M. Human papilloma virus (HPV) and cervical cancer. J Med Invest. 2002. 49:124–133.

6. Charvet I, Meda P, Genet M, Pelte MF, Vlastos AT. [Optical diagnosis of cervical dysplasia]. Bull Cancer. 2004. 91:45–53.

7. Czarnecka AM, Campanella C, Zummo G, Cappello F. Mitochondrial chaperones in cancer: from molecular biology to clinical diagnostics. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006. 5:714–720.

8. Höhfeld J, Cyr DM, Patterson C. From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation. EMBO Rep. 2001. 2:885–890.

9. Eng C, Kiuru M, Fernandez MJ, Aaltonen LA. A role for mitochondrial enzymes in inherited neoplasia and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003. 3:193–202.

10. Srivastava PK, Maki RG. Stress-induced proteins in immune response to cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1991. 167:109–123.

11. Ellis RJ. Molecular chaperones: pathways and networks. Curr Biol. 1999. 9:R137–R139.

12. Jolly C, Morimoto RI. Role of the heat shock response and molecular chaperones in oncogenesis and cell death. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000. 92:1564–1572.

13. Soltys BJ, Gupta RS. Mitochondrial-matrix proteins at unexpected locations: are they exported? Trends Biochem Sci. 1999. 24:174–177.

14. Hansen JJ, Bross P, Westergaard M, Nielsen MN, Eiberg H, Børglum AD, et al. Genomic structure of the human mitochondrial chaperonin genes: HSP60 and HSP10 are localised head to head on chromosome 2 separated by a bidirectional promoter. Hum Genet. 2003. 112:71–77.

15. Samali A, Cai J, Zhivotovsky B, Jones DP, Orrenius S. Presence of a pre-apototic complex of pro-caspase-3, Hsp60 and Hsp10 in the mitochondrial fraction of jurkat cells. EMBO J. 1999. 18:2040–2048.

16. Bini L, Magi B, Marzocchi B, Arcuri F, Tripodi S, Cintorino M, et al. Protein expression profiles in human breast ductal carcinoma and histologically normal tissue. Electrophoresis. 1997. 18:2832–2841.

17. Schneidér J, Jimenez E, Marenbach K, Romero H, Mark D, Meden H. Immunohistochemical detection of HSP60-expression in human ovarian cancer. Correlation with survival in a series of 247 patients. Anticancer Res. 1999. 19:2141–2146.

18. Cappello F, Bellafiore M, Palma A, Marciano V, Martorana G, Belfiore P, et al. Expression of 60-kD heat shock protein increases during carcinogenesis in the uterine exocervix. Pathobiology. 2002-2003. 70:83–88.

19. Cappello F, Bellafiore M, Palma A, David S, Marcianó V, Bartolotta T, et al. 60KDa chaperonin (HSP60) is over-expressed during colorectal carcinogenesis. Eur J Histochem. 2003. 47:105–110.

20. Cappello F, Rappa F, David S, Anzalone R, Zummo G. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PCNA, p53, HSP60, HSP10 and MUC-2 presence and expression in prostate carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res. 2003. 23:1325–1331.

21. Pignatelli D, Ferreira J, Soares P, Costa MJ, Magalhaes MC. Immunohistochemical study of heat shock proteins 27, 60 and 70 in the normal human adrenal and in adrenal tumors with suppressed ACTH production. Microsc Res Tech. 2003. 61:315–323.

22. Cappello F, David S, Rappa F, Bucchieri F, Marasá L, Bartolotta TE, et al. The expression of HSP60 and HSP10 in large bowel carcinomas with lymph node metastase. BMC Cancer. 2005. 5:139.

23. Cappello F, Di Stefano A, D'Anna SE, Donner CF, Zummo G. Immunopositivity of heat shock protein 60 as a biomarker of bronchial carcinogenesis. Lancet Oncol. 2005. 6:816.

24. Castle PE, Ashfaq R, Ansari F, Muller CY. Immunohistochemical evaluation of heat shock proteins in normal and preinvasive lesions of the cervix. Cancer Lett. 2005. 229:245–252.

25. Kim JY, Shin HJ, Kim TH, Cho KH, Shin KH, Kim BK, et al. Tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases are linked to metastases in primary cervical cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006. 132:302–308.

26. Matsui NM, Smith-Beckerman DM, Epstein LB. Staining of preparative 2-D gels. Coomassie blue and imidazole-zinc negative staining. Methods Mol Biol. 1999. 112:307–311.

27. Cornford PA, Dodson AR, Parsons KF, Desmond AD, Woolfenden A, Fordham M, et al. Heat Shock Protein Expression Independently predicts clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2000. 60:7099–7105.

28. Kirchhoff SR, Gupta S, Knowlton AA. Cytosolic heat shock protein 60, apoptosis, and myocardial injury. Circulation. 2002. 105:2899–2904.

29. Cappello F, Di Stefano A, David S, Rappa F, Anzalone R, La Rocca G, et al. Hsp60 and Hsp10 down-regulation predicts bronchial epithelial carcinogenesis in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cancer. 2006. 107:2417–2424.

30. Kimura E, Enns RE, Alcaraz JE, Arboleda J, Slamon DJ, Howell SB. Correlation of the survival of ovarian cancer patients with mRNA expression of the 60-kD heat-shock protein HSP-60. J Clin Oncol. 1993. 11:891–898.

31. Chant ID, Rose PE, Morris AG. Analysis of heat-shock protein expression in myeloid leukemia cells by flow cytometry. Br J Haematol. 1995. 90:163–168.

32. Franzén B, Linder S, Alaiya AA, Eriksson E, Fujioka K, Berman AC, et al. Analysis of polypeptide expression in benign and malignant human breast lesions. Electrophoresis. 1997. 18:582–587.

TOOLS

Similar articles