Ultrasonography is the primary screening modality for fetal imaging because of its relative low cost, lack of harmful effects to the fetus or mother, and real time imaging, among other advantages. However, there are limitations, including small field of view, limited soft-tissue acoustic contrast, beam attenuation by adipose tissue, poor image quality in oligohydramnios, and limited visualization of the posterior fossa after 33 weeks' gestation because of calvarial calcification.1-3 In the past, we have needed additional information regarding fetal anatomy or pathology to make a decision in prenatal care and in some cases abnormalities could not be adequately assessed with ultrasound. In such cases, fetal MRI can be the alternative imaging modality. Taking an MRI of a pregnant woman was first described in 1983,4 but the initial obstetric applications were primarily related to maternal and placental abnormalities.5 Fetal MRI was first introduced to Korea in the early 1990s but was rarely used due to image degradation by fetal motion on a standard sequence and the relatively long acquisition time.6 Since the late 1990s, with ultrafast MRI techniques such as single-shot fast-spin echo and half-Fourier acquisition turbo spin echo (HASTE), fetal motion artifacts are minimized and fetal MRI is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities.7 Fetal MRI provides diagnostic accuracy in evaluating fetal brain, spine, neck, chest, abdomen, and urinary tract and it provides important anatomic information that can be helpful in planning antenatal care and surgical procedures.8 Despite the effectiveness of fetal MRI, there has been little study in Korea about the indications and the usefulness of fetal MRI; thus, in this study we chose to evaluate the usefulness of fetal MRI for prenatal diagnosis.

We retrospectively reviewed 56 cases in which fetal MRIs were taken from January 2001 to December 2004 with the intent to make more accurate diagnoses and to detect more fetal abnormalities following abnormal prenatal ultrasonographic findings. The fetal MRIs were performed with informed consent. We selected 30 cases of which final diagnoses were confirmed. We analyzed the 30 cases according to the systems affected and compared the official reading from each modality to the final diagnosis. We excluded cases with cardiac abnormalities because it is a well known fact that fetal MRI is inappropriate for evaluating those cases. In cases where two or more abnormalities coexisted in antenatal ultrasonography, we chose the one associated with the reason for taking fetal MRI. We used Aloka SSD 5500 and Acuson Sequoia for antenatal ultrasonography. A 1.5-Tesla superconductive MR imaging unit was used to obtain HASTE images. The final diagnosis was confirmed by postoperative biopsy, postnatal MRI, and other modalities including ultrasonography, esophagogram, and others.

We were able to confirm the final diagnosis in 30 out of 56 cases. Twenty-two cases were lost in follow-up; in four cases, an autopsy after intrauterine fetal death was denied by the parents. In 56 cases total, fetal MRI was performed for 26 possible cases of intracranial abnormalities, 17 intraabdominal abnormality cases, six intrathoracic abnormality cases, six head and neck abnormality cases, and two cases of other abnormalities (Fig. 1). The most common indication in the intracranial abnormality group for taking fetal MRI was agenesis of the corpus callosum and Dandy-Walker variant and malformation (seven cases each), followed by ventriculomegaly, and then arachnoid cyst (Table 1). As for the time of MRI examination, the fetal MRI was taken between 32 and 35 gestational weeks in 19 cases, between 24 and 27 gestational weeks in 16 cases, and between 28 and 31 gestational weeks in 11 cases. The earliest case was taken at 22 gestational weeks. Among the 30 cases of which the final diagnoses were confirmed, intraabdominal abnormalities were the most common (12 cases), followed by intracranial abnormalities (9 cases), intrathoracic abnormalities (5 cases), head and neck abnormalities (2 cases), and other (2 cases). In 6 out of the 30 cases, the official readings of antenatal ultrasonography differed from those of the fetal MRI (Table 2). Out of those six cases, fetal MRI readings were coincident with the final diagnosis in five cases. In the remaining case, the official readings of both modalities were different from the final diagnosis.

Ultrasonography has been the modality of choice in evaluating fetal well-being and detecting fetal structural abnormality, but has shown several shortcomings in some cases. In such cases, fetal MRI can provide useful information that ultrasonography cannot provide for making a therapeutic plan. Nowadays, we use fetal MRI to evaluate some fetal abnormalities such as complete or partial ACC, malformation of posterior fossa, bilateral renal agenesis, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia.9 Since the impact of taking fetal MRI on fetal organogenesis was not fully known, the modality has been usually applied after the 2^nd trimester, with little adverse effect reported.10-13 The Safety Committee of the Society for MR imaging concluded that prenatal MR imaging is indicated when other non-ionizing methods are inadequate or when the MR examinations will provide critical information that would otherwise require the use of ionizing radiation.14 As for the intravenous contrast media, since there is no proven level of safety, its use is prohibited.15 The effectiveness of fetal MRI as an optional modality of detecting fetal abnormalities, which was already well known, was reaffirmed by this study. In this study, in 6 out of 30 cases with confirmed final diagnosis, the final diagnosis was changed after taking a fetal MRI. Moreover, in five cases, the outcome of fetal MRI turned out to be true. However, there is little statistical evidence supporting the accuracy of fetal MRI, because of follow-up losses, including pregnancy termination and transferal to other hospitals. The same is true in this study, for we were able to obtain only 30 cases with confirmed final diagnosis out of 56 cases with fetal MRI data available (54%). Fetal MRI has an advantage over ultrasonography in evaluating and diagnosing posterior fossa abnormalities, brain development according to neuronal migration, gyral formation, and myelination.16 In intracranial abnormalities, it is known that the common indication for taking fetal MRI includes ventriculomegaly, agenesis corpus callosum, Dandy-Walker malformation or variant, arachnoid cyst, and holoprosencephaly.17 In cases of ventriculomegaly, the prognosis is poor because the fetuses with ventriculomegaly are usually (in 70-84% of cases) associated with other malformations in the central nervous system and with mental retardation.18-22 The most common reason for taking fetal MRI in this study was also agenesis corpus callosum, Dandy-Walker malformation or variant, and ventriculomegaly. This study shows the usefulness of taking fetal MRI. In three out of nine cases with suspicious intracranial abnormalities, the final diagnoses were changed and those changes were consistent with the results of the fetal MRI. As for intrathoracic abnormalities, the results of ultrasonography and fetal MRI were not so different from each other in this study, but the cases of intrathoracic abnormalities were too small to determine the usefulness of taking a fetal MRI. It is known that fetal MRI is superior to ultrasonography in calculating lung volume and herniated liver volume so as to predict postnatal prognosis and in diagnosing atypical intrathoracic mass.23 Fetal MRI is also known to be useful for evaluating the location of a bowel obstruction and intraabdominal tumors, identifying the different portions of the bowel, and diagnosing renal agenesis.24 In this study, the diagnosis was changed in two cases of intraabdominal abnormalities after taking a fetal MRI, which was coincident with the final diagnosis. The most common neck masses are cystic hygromas, teratomas, and goiters. A fetal MRI characterizes the lesion and defines the relationship to the airway and major neck vessels.25 But, in this study, fetal MRI did not provide additional information above the sonogram in diagnosing cystic hygroma of the neck.

Although ultrasonography provides abundant information in evaluating fetal structural abnormalities and fetal well-being, the ultrasonographic findings are occasionally inconclusive or insufficient for choosing proper management and prenatal counseling. In these cases, alternative imaging with magnetic resonance can be helpful. So, in this study, we suggest that fetal MRI is useful for the evaluation of intracranial and intraabdominal abnormalities in some cases but not in diagnosing other abnormalities. Further studies are needed, however, to decide the proper indications for fetal MRI. In the future, improvements in MRI and ultrasonographic technology will improve our ability to assess fetuses.