Quantitative Assessment of Global and Regional Air Trappings Using Non-Rigid Registration and Regional Specific Volume Change of Inspiratory/Expiratory CT Scans: Studies on Healthy Volunteers and Asthmatics

Eunsol Lee; Joon Beom Seo; Hyun Joo Lee; Eun Jin Chae; Sang Min Lee; Sang Young Oh; Namkug Kim

doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.632

Journal List > Korean J Radiol > v.16(3) > 1027135

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Seo, Lee, Chae, Lee, Oh, and Kim: Quantitative Assessment of Global and Regional Air Trappings Using Non-Rigid Registration and Regional Specific Volume Change of Inspiratory/Expiratory CT Scans: Studies on Healthy Volunteers and Asthmatics

Thoracic Imaging

Original Article

Korean Journal of Radiology 2015; 16(3): 632-640.

Published online: 13 May 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.632

Quantitative Assessment of Global and Regional Air Trappings Using Non-Rigid Registration and Regional Specific Volume Change of Inspiratory/Expiratory CT Scans: Studies on Healthy Volunteers and Asthmatics

Eunsol Lee, MD, Joon Beom Seo, MD, PhD, Hyun Joo Lee, MD, Eun Jin Chae, MD, PhD, Sang Min Lee, MD, Sang Young Oh, MD, Namkug Kim, PhD

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

Corresponding author: Joon Beom Seo, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: (822) 3010-4355, Fax: (822) 476-0090, seojb@amc.seoul.kr

Received 15 August 2014 Accepted 12 February 2015

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare air trapping in healthy volunteers with asthmatics using pulmonary function test and quantitative data, such as specific volume change from paired inspiratory CT and registered expiratory CT.

Materials and Methods

Sixteen healthy volunteers and 9 asthmatics underwent paired inspiratory/expiratory CT. ΔSV, which represents the ratio of air fraction released after exhalation, was measured with paired inspiratory and anatomically registered expiratory CT scans. Air trapping indexes, ΔSV_0.4 and ΔSV_0.5, were defined as volume fraction of lung below 0.4 and 0.5 ΔSV, respectively. To assess the gravity effect of air-trapping, ΔSV values of anterior and posterior lung at three different levels were measured and ΔSV ratio of anterior lung to posterior lung was calculated. Color-coded ΔSV map of the whole lung was generated and visually assessed. Mean ΔSV, ΔSV_0.4, and ΔSV_0.5 were compared between healthy volunteers and asthmatics. In asthmatics, correlation between air trapping indexes and clinical parameters were assessed.

Results

Mean ΔSV, ΔSV_0.4, and ΔSV_0.5 in asthmatics were significantly higher than those in healthy volunteer group (all p < 0.05). ΔSV values in posterior lung in asthmatics were significantly higher than those in healthy volunteer group (p = 0.049). In asthmatics, air trapping indexes, such as ΔSV_0.5 and ΔSV_0.4, showed negative strong correlation with FEF_25-75, FEV₁, and FEV₁/FVC. ΔSV map of asthmatics showed abnormal geographic pattern in 5 patients (55.6%) and disappearance of anterior-posterior gradient in 3 patients (33.3%).

Conclusion

Quantitative assessment of ΔSV (the ratio of air fraction released after exhalation) shows the difference in extent of air trapping between health volunteers and asthmatics.

Keywords: Air trapping, Specific volume change, Quantitative assessment, Registration, Asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common chronic disorder of the airways that involves a complex interaction of airflow obstruction, bronchial hyper-responsiveness, and an underlying inflammation (1). Prevalence of asthma have increased significantly since 1960s, and asthma has been recognized as a major public health problem (2, 3, 4). These facts elevate the need for more comprehensive understanding about asthma.

Air trapping is a pathophysiologic term indicating retention of excess gas in all or part of the lung during expiration, and it is a hallmark of small airway dysfunction on imaging (5, 6, 7). Positive relationship between the severity of asthma and the extent of air trapping is well known, especially in the case of severe asthma (8, 9, 10). Regional air trapping can be readily seen on expiratory CT as areas of low attenuation, compared to inspiratory CT and other regions (7, 11, 12, 13, 14). However, mainly due to the complex respiratory motions of the lungs, it is difficult to find the corresponding area. Therefore, automatic lung registration methods that match and deform inspiratory CT to expiratory CT are much helpful in finding areas of regional air trapping (15, 16). This method allows quantification of air trapping and evaluation of regional progression after treatment (17).

For the quantitative assessment of air trapping, the subtraction density value between inspiratory CT and expiratory CT was usually suggested (16, 18). But this parameter misses information on inspiratory CT density and is not physiologic. Specific volume change was originally defined as regional ventilation parameter during inhalation in the patients with respiratory failure (19). One benefit of this parameter reflects original inspiratory CT density and expiratory CT density (19). Applying this advantage to evaluate air trapping during expiration, we might be able to expect more physiologic results.

The purpose of this preliminary study was to compare the extent of air trapping in healthy volunteers with those of asthmatics using pulmonary function test (PFT), quantitative data such as subtraction value, and specific volume change from corresponsive voxels of paired inspiratory CT and registered expiratory CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Sixteen healthy volunteers (10 men, 6 women; age [mean ± standard deviation], 51.9 ± 11.6 years [range = 39-81 years]) and nine asthmatics (3 men, 6 women; age [mean ± standard deviation], 51.0 ± 5.8 years [range = 43-58 years]) were enrolled. Asthmatics were enrolled prospectively among patients who have stable asthma without viable emphysema or other combined diseases. All subjects had paired inspiratory and expiratory CT scans and performed a PFT on the same day or within one week after CT scans were obtained.

CT Protocol

Volumetric paired inspiratory and expiratory CT scans were performed in all patients. Inspiratory CT scans were obtained at the end of full inspiration, and expiratory CT scans were obtained at the end of forced expiration. All CT scans were obtained using 16-multidetector CT scanner (Somatom Sensation; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Scan parameters included 16 × 0.75 mm collimation, 100 effective mAs, 140 kVp, and pitch 1.0. Both scans were performed in a supine position. All CT scans were performed without contrast medium. The images were reconstructed using standard soft tissue kernel (B30f; Siemens Medical Systems) with 0.75 mm of thickness and 0.7 mm of increment.

Automatic Image Registration

We developed an automatic non-rigid registration system to match inspiration and expiration CT (15, 17). Using this in-house software, volumetric paired inspiratory and expiratory CT images were automatically matched in every voxels. Method of automatic image registration consists of several steps. First of all, background, airway, lung parenchyma, and vessels were extracted using threshold range of Hounsfield unit (HU). The background area was removed in the threshold range of -1024 to -200 HU, and the airway was extracted in the threshold range of -1024 HU to -950 HU. The lung parenchyma was extracted by subtracting the airway. After segmentation and for the registration, the program aligned the two lung surfaces by using affine transformation algorithm. After that, locally deformable transformation model was developed for the subsequent non-rigid registration. Finally, expiration CT image was transformed to match paired inspiration CT (Fig. 1A, 1B, 1C) (15, 17).

Specific Volume Change and Quantitative Image Analysis

CT-measured regional specific lung volume change was introduced as an efficient surrogate for measuring regional ventilation (19). Originally, specific lung volume change was defined as regional ventilation during inhalation (ΔV, volume increase: V_ai, V_ae; air volume of region-of-interest [ROI] at end-inspiration and end-expiration: F_i, F_e; air fraction of ROI at end-inspiration and end-expiration: H_i, H_e; CT density of ROI at end-inspiration and end-expiration, respectively) (19).

sVol = \frac{Δ V}{V_{ae}} = \frac{F_{i} - F_{e}}{F_{e} (1 - F_{i})} = \frac{1000 (H_{i} - H_{e})}{H_{e} (H_{i} + 1000)}

To evaluate air trapping during exhalation, we simply modified and redefined specific volume change using the following equation with the new symbol, ΔSV:

ΔSV = \frac{ΔV}{V_{a i}} = \frac{F_{i} - F_{e}}{F_{i} (1 - F_{e})} = \frac{1000 (H_{i} - H_{e})}{H_{i} (H_{e} + 1000)}

This redefined specific volume change (ΔSV) as regional volume change ratio during exhalation. Large amount of air was released during forced exhalation, but trapped air remained in the lungs. ΔSV was redefined for quantification of air trapping. In the case of complete air trapping, the volume, air fraction, and CT density of ROI at end-inspiration and end-expiration are theoretically the same value; so ΔSV would be 0. If all air was exhaled, H_e would be similar to 0 and ΔSV would be about 1. In the case of partial air trapping, ΔSV would range from 0 to 1. This indicates that the greater air trapping would produce the smaller ΔSV. Using this redefined ΔSV, in-house software calculated ΔSV value and generated color map using paired inspiratory and registered expiratory CT.

Mean lung density (MLD) of inspiratory CT and registered expiratory CT were calculated using HUs. Subtraction density value (Fig. 1D), which is HU difference between inspiratory CT and registered expiratory CT, was also calculated automatically. From the inspiratory CT data, the volume fraction below -950 HU (V_i950) and from the expiratory CT data, and the volume fraction below -856 HU (V_e856) were calculated for assessing the known threshold parameter for emphysema and air trapping (20). To assess air trapping, volume fraction of ΔSV below 0.4 (ΔSV_0.4) and 0.5 (ΔSV_0.5) and subtraction density value below 50 HU (ATI₅₀) and 100 HU (ATI₁₀₀) were calculated.

Using specific volume change, mean value was also calculated. As air trapping parameters, ΔSV_0.4 and ΔSV_0.5 were defined as volume fraction of lungs below 0.4 and 0.5 specific volume change, respectively.

For regional quantitative analysis, six areas of circle ROI of a 5 pixel radius were sampled from each healthy volunteers and asthmatics. A radiologist with 4 years of experience placed ROI on inspiration CT. Six sampled areas consisted of anterior and posterior areas at three different levels (aortic arch, left main bronchus, right inferior pulmonary vein level) of the right lung. Each location of the sampled area was defined as the center of area or structure; anterior and posterior sampled areas were located in the center of the anterior or posterior half right lung. In these anterior and posterior sampled areas, subtraction density and specific volume change were calculated. The subtraction value was calculated by subtracting the posterior sampled subtraction density from anterior sampled subtraction density. Ratio of ΔSV values of anterior to posterior lung was also calculated.

Visual Assessment of CT Images

In all healthy volunteers and asthmatics, ΔSV map was generated by the in-house software as color map using rainbow spectrum. In asthmatics, color map pattern was visually assessed by two radiologists (with 20 years of experience in radiology). They were blinded to the results of PFT and asthma grade. If two radiologists had different opinions, conclusion was reached by consensus (Fig. 2). Visual pattern was classified into three patterns as follows: normal, disappearance of anterior-posterior gradient and geographic shaped defect patterns (Fig. 2).

Pulmonary Function Test and Asthma Severity

The spirometry was performed for evaluating following values: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), ratio of FEV₁ to FVC (FEV₁/FVC), and mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF_25-75%). All PFT values were expressed as a percentage of the measured to the predicted value for age, sex, and height.

In asthmatics, severity of asthma was scored from 1 to 3 as follows: mild persistent asthma, moderate persistent asthma, and severe persistent asthma. The severity of asthma was evaluated by physicians at the time of CT scanning and was classified as mild, moderate, or severe based primarily on the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines (21).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using well-known statistical software (PASW Statistics 18; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were expressed as mean and standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate CT data and specific volume change of paired inspiratory and registered expiratory CT. The Spearman test was used to evaluate correlation between clinical parameters of pulmonary function and air trapping indexes such as ATI₁₀₀ and ΔSV_0.5. A value of p less than 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

Global Quantitative Analysis

Table 1 gives summary of CT volume data and the specific volume change of paired inspiratory and registered expiratory CT between healthy volunteers and asthmatics. MLD_i and V_i950 did not show significant difference. However, the parameters related to the expiratory CT and those obtained between inspiratory CT and registered expiratory CT, including air trapping indexes, showed significant difference between healthy volunteers and asthmatics. The values related to specific volume change, such as mean value of ΔSV, and air trapping indexes, such as ΔSV_0.4, also showed significant difference.

Regional Quantitative Analysis

Table 2 gives the results of regional sampled CT data and specific volume change comparison between healthy volunteers and asthmatics. Only the posterior sampled ΔSV showed significant difference between healthy volunteers and asthmatics (p = 0.049). Other values such as anterior and posterior sampled subtraction density, difference value between anterior sampled subtraction density and posterior sampled subtraction density, and ratio of ΔSV values of anterior to the posterior lung did not showed significant difference.

Visual Assessment

Healthy volunteers showed normal anterior-posterior gradient. Of 9 asthmatics, 8 (88.9%) asthmatics' ΔSV map showed disappearance of anterior-posterior gradient. Five (55.6%) asthmatics' ΔSV map not only showed the disappearance of normal anterior-posterior gradient, but it also showed an abnormal geographic wedge shaped defect pattern (Fig. 3).

Correlation of Indexes with Pulmonary Function Test

ATI100, ΔSV_0.4, and ΔSV_0.5 showed strong negative correlation and clinical significance with FEF_25-75, FEV₁, and FEV₁/FVC. ATI₅₀ showed strong positive correlation and clinical significance with FEF_25-75 and FEV₁/FVC, but not with FEV₁. No indexes correlated with asthma severity. ΔSV_0.4 and ΔSV_0.5 showed completely same result and value (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study demonstrate that specific volume change based on automatic image registration could quantitatively show and evaluate regional air trapping in asthmatics.

CT findings of asthma have been well known as bronchial wall thickening, bronchial luminal narrowing, and mosaic perfusion (22, 23, 24). Presence of air trapping involving more than a pulmonary segment on expiratory CT scans is also common and important in asthmatics (22, 24). One known method for evaluating CT air trapping is defined as the percentage of voxels below -856 HU in expiratory CT (14, 25). Another method of evaluating CT air trapping is using two-phase xenon-enhanced CT (26). Because these methods do not reflect the extent of hyperinflation on inspiratory CT, the ideal method of air trapping evaluation should be density change between paired inspiratory and expiratory CT. Due to the changes in body posture, complex respiratory motions of the lungs, and heart beating, the evaluation of paired inspiratory and expiratory CT has been difficult (15). Recently, an image registration method of aligning paired inspiratory and expiratory CT was proposed to overcome this problem, and our group also developed image registration method and applied to this study (15, 27, 28). There was no significant difference in evaluating the air trapping by visual assessment between with and without registration method. However, registration method allowed various parameters. In this study, we could quantify and measure the air trapping. It is a prospective method for the evaluation of regional or heterogeneous progression of air trapping, especially in the case of estimating treatment effects (17).

The limitation in subtracting expiratory CT density from inspiratory CT density is that it does not reflect baseline density or degree of lung expansion on inspiratory CT (14). One solution to this problem is assessment of change in regional specific volume (19, 29). Originally, this method was suggested for the evaluation of lung inspiration degrees with adult respiratory distress syndrome patients (29). In this study, we modified the originally defined regional specific volume change and the redefined parameter to evaluate the degree of lung expiration in asthma patients. The results were fairly promising.

One characteristic of CT of the lung was shown in the CT scans obtained from the patient in supine position, which was influenced by gravity effect (30, 31, 32). According to the gravity effect, regional ventilation was greater in the posterior, dependent part of the lung (33, 34). In our study, most of the asthmatics showed disappearance of gradient effect of ventilation. This suggests that more air trapping occurs in the posterior lung, as compared with normal volunteers who showed gravity effect in all cases. This result is consistent with those of Bankier et al. (32), which suggests the necessity for the evaluation of posterior lung in mild asthmatics. The parameters of regional anterior or whole lung would not be different in mild asthmatics, but posterior lung could be different due to regional air trapping. However, regional quantitative analysis showed that only ΔSV in posterior lung is statistically different. Other values representing the gravity effect, such as difference value between anterior sampled subtraction density and posterior sampled subtraction density and the ratio of ΔSV values for anterior to the posterior lung, failed to show statistical significance, although there is a consistent trend of more air trapping present in posterior lung in asthmatics. We speculate that it is probably due to the small sample size and sampling method. Further study with more patients and better sampling method is awaited.

As is well known, asthma is chronic inflammatory and obstructive disorder of the airways, and air trapping is locally heterogeneous (1, 35, 36). Therefore, air trapping could be more severe in distal area of the obstructive branch of airways. Interestingly, this study shows wedge-shaped areas of air trapping in three asthmatics. This result is a promising finding, and it is corresponding to the results of studies using helium ventilation MR or xenon-ventilation CT (37, 38).

There are several limitations in this study. First, a small number of patients might have decreased the statistical strength. However, this study reports preliminary results for the redefined specific volume change. In spite of the small number of patients, this study showed fully meaningful results. Second, in regional quantitative assessment, the definition of anterior, posterior, upper, middle, and lower lung was not clear. To objectify region selection, we defined standard position as the centers of anterior and posterior lung and the centers of standard structures. Small-circle ROI is another limitation. To avoid containing vessels and airway, choosing a large ROI was difficult. Third, threshold of indexs-ΔSV_0.4, ΔSV_0.5, ATI₅₀, ATI₁₀₀-were set arbitrarily. But in this study, these values were subjected to the availability of specific volume change and showed meaningful results. In spite of these limitations, this study clearly showed regional difference. In the future study, clearer definition of indexes threshold would show better results.

In conclusion, quantitative assessment of specific volume change shows the difference in the extent of air trapping between healthy volunteers and asthmatics, and it is correlated with PFT.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Automatic non-rigid lung registration and subtraction map.

Original CT scans of paired inspiratory (A) and expiratory (B) CT show different volumes of lung parenchyma. After non-rigid registration, expiratory CT is expanded and matched to inspiratory CT (C). Using inspiratory CT scan and registered expiratory CT scan data, subtraction color map (D) was generated.

Fig. 2

ΔSV color map of healthy volunteer.

Transverse and sagittal plane maps (B, C) show anterior-posterior gradient of ΔSV. Coronal map (A) also shows difference between upper and lower lung. Rainbow color scale: red and yellow represent high values of ΔSV - large air fraction difference between paired inspiratory and registered expiratory CT. Purple, blue, and green represent low values of ΔSV - small air fraction difference between paired inspiratory and registered expiratory CT.

Fig. 3

ΔSV color map of asthmatic.

Transverse and sagittal plane maps (B, C) show disappeared normal anterior posterior gradient of ΔSV, and all plane maps (A-C) show multifocal wedge-shaped air trapping areas (arrows).

Table 1

Summary of CT Volume Data, Specific Volume Change of Paired Inspiratory, and Registered Expiratory CT Comparison between Healthy Volunteers and Asthmatics

	Healthy Volunteers Mean ± SD	Asthmatics Mean ± SD	P
Number of group	16	9
MLD_i (HU)	-870.1 ± 16.7	-876.1 ± 27.3	0.229
MLD_e (HU)	-706.2 ± 34.3	-752.9 ± 52.9	0.008
V_i950 (%)	3.8 ± 2.9	6.2 ± 4.2	0.065
V_e856 (%)	6.9 ± 5.3	19.5 ± 13.6	0.017
Subtraction density mean (HU)	-163.8 ± 32.7	-123.2 ± 36.5	0.027
ATI₅₀ (%)	13.8 ± 7.9	24.6 ± 14.2	0.020
ATI₁₀₀ (%)	33.5 ± 12.9	50.3 ± 18.1	0.023
ΔSV mean	-0.59 ± 0.08	-0.51 ± 0.10	0.032
ΔSV_0.4 (%)	19.0 ± 9.3	28.7 ± 13.7	0.032
ΔSV_0.5 (%)	28.6 ± 12.0	40.6 ± 15.2	0.049

ATI₅₀ = volume fraction of lung below 50 subtraction density value, ATI₁₀₀ = volume fraction of lung below 100 subtraction density value, HU = Hounsfield units, MLD_e = mean lung density of registered expiratory CT, MLD_i = mean lung density of inspiratory CT, SD = standard deviation, V_e856 = volume fraction of lung below -856 HU of registered expiratory CT, V_i950 = volume fraction of lung below -950 HU of inspiratory CT, Subtraction density mean = mean value subtract registered expiratory CT from inspiratory CT, ΔSV mean = mean value of CT-measured regional specific lung volume change, ΔSV_0.4 = volume fraction of lung below 0.4 specific volume change value, ΔSV_0.5 = volume fraction of lung below 0.5 specific volume change value

Table 2

Summary of Regional Sampled CT Data and Specific Volume Change Comparison between Healthy Volunteers and Asthmatics

	Healthy Volunteers Mean ± SD	Asthmatics Mean ± SD	P
Number of group	16	9
SD_ant (HU)	-122.93 ± 22.82	-115.47 ± 42.73	0.207
SD_post (HU)	-274.09 ± 73.17	-214.96 ± 88.36	0.084
SD_ap (HU)	151.17 ± 58.34	99.49 ± 72.33	0.095
ΔSV_ant	0.60 ± 0.09	0.56 ± 0.09	0.169
ΔSV_post	0.76 ± 0.09	0.66 ± 0.13	0.049
ΔSV_ap	0.79 ± 0.09	0.86 ± 0.12	0.136

HU = Hounsfield unit, SD = standard deviation, SD_ant = anterior sampled subtraction density, SD_ap = SD_ant - SD_post, SD_post = posterior sampled subtraction density, ΔSV_ant = anterior sampled specific volume change, ΔSV_ap = ratio of ΔSV values of anterior to posterior lung at three different levels, ΔSV_post = anterior sampled specific volume change

Table 3

Summary of Correlation between Clinical Parameters and Air Trapping Indexes

Variables	ATI₅₀	ATI₁₀₀	ΔSV_0.4	ΔSV_0.5
FEF_25-75	-0.733	-0.833	-0.767	-0.767
FEF_25-75	0.025	0.005	0.016	0.016
FEV₁	-0.650	-0.750	-0.683	-0.683
FEV₁	0.058	0.020	0.042	0.042
FEV₁/FVC	-0.883	-0.917	-0.833	-0.833
FEV₁/FVC	0.002	0.001	0.005	0.005
Asthma severity	0.258	0.129	0.323	0.323
Asthma severity	0.502	0.741	0.397	0.397

Values given are R values on top and p values beneath. All PFT values expressed as percentage of those predicted for age, sex, and height. ATI₅₀ = volume fraction of lung below 50 subtraction density value, ATI₁₀₀ = volume fraction of lung below 100 subtraction density value, FEF_25-75 = mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC, FEV₁ = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity, ΔSV_0.4 = volume fraction of lung below 0.4 specific volume change value, ΔSV_0.5 = volume fraction of lung below 0.5 specific volume change value

Notes

This study was supported by a grant of the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (A111599).

References

1. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 120:5 Suppl. S94–S138.

2. Grant EN, Wagner R, Weiss KB. Observations on emerging patterns of asthma in our society. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104(2 Pt 2):S1–S9.

3. Anandan C, Nurmatov U, van Schayck OC, Sheikh A. Is the prevalence of asthma declining? Systematic review of epidemiological studies. Allergy. 2010; 65:152–167.

4. Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Bailey C, Zahran HS, King M, Johnson CA, et al. Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001-2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012; (94):1–8.

5. Austin JH, Müller NL, Friedman PJ, Hansell DM, Naidich DP, Remy-Jardin M, et al. Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 1996; 200:327–331.

6. Stern EJ, Frank MS. Small-airway diseases of the lungs: findings at expiratory CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163:37–41.

7. Arakawa H, Webb WR. Air trapping on expiratory high-resolution CT scans in the absence of inspiratory scan abnormalities: correlation with pulmonary function tests and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170:1349–1353.

8. Laurent F, Latrabe V, Raherison C, Marthan R, Tunon-de-Lara JM. Functional significance of air trapping detected in moderate asthma. Eur Radiol. 2000; 10:1404–1410.

9. Park SW, Park JS, Jeong SH, Lee YN, Hwangbo Y, Park JS, et al. Air trapping is a major determinant of persistent airway obstruction in asthmatics. Respir Med. 2012; 106:786–793.

10. Sorkness RL, Bleecker ER, Busse WW, Calhoun WJ, Castro M, Chung KF, et al. Lung function in adults with stable but severe asthma: air trapping and incomplete reversal of obstruction with bronchodilation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 104:394–403.

11. Matsuoka S, Kurihara Y, Yagihashi K, Hoshino M, Watanabe N, Nakajima Y. Quantitative assessment of air trapping in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using inspiratory and expiratory volumetric MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190:762–769.

12. Lee YK, Oh YM, Lee JH, Kim EK, Lee JH, Kim N, et al. Quantitative assessment of emphysema, air trapping, and airway thickening on computed tomography. Lung. 2008; 186:157–165.

13. Mets OM, Isgum I, Mol CP, Gietema HA, Zanen P, Prokop M, et al. Variation in quantitative CT air trapping in heavy smokers on repeat CT examinations. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22:2710–2717.

14. Mets OM, van Hulst RA, Jacobs C, van Ginneken B, de Jong PA. Normal range of emphysema and air trapping on CT in young men. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199:336–340.

15. Lee J, Kim N, Seo JB, Lee H, Shin YG. Automatic non-rigid lung registration method for the visualization of regional air trapping in chest CT scans. New York: The First International Workshop on Pulmonary Image Processing;2008. p. 195–201.

16. Barbosa EM Jr, Song G, Tustison N, Kreider M, Gee JC, Gefter WB, et al. Computational analysis of thoracic multidetector row HRCT for segmentation and quantification of small airway air trapping and emphysema in obstructive pulmonary disease. Acad Radiol. 2011; 18:1258–1269.

17. Kim EY, Seo JB, Lee HJ, Kim N, Lee E, Lee SM, et al. Detailed analysis of the density change on chest CT of COPD using non-rigid registration of inspiration/expiration CT scans. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25:541–549.

18. Tanaka N, Matsumoto T, Miura G, Emoto T, Matsunaga N, Ueda K, et al. Air trapping at CT: high prevalence in asymptomatic subjects with normal pulmonary function. Radiology. 2003; 227:776–785.

19. Fuld MK, Easley RB, Saba OI, Chon D, Reinhardt JM, Hoffman EA, et al. CT-measured regional specific volume change reflects regional ventilation in supine sheep. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 104:1177–1184.

20. Gevenois PA, de Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, Zanen J, Yernault JC. Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995; 152:653–657.

21. Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ, Bousquet J, Drazen JM, FitzGerald M, et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur Respir J. 2008; 31:143–178.

22. Silva CI, Colby TV, Müller NL. Asthma and associated conditions: high-resolution CT and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183:817–824.

23. Lynch DA, Newell JD, Tschomper BA, Cink TM, Newman LS, Bethel R. Uncomplicated asthma in adults: comparison of CT appearance of the lungs in asthmatic and healthy subjects. Radiology. 1993; 188:829–833.

24. Park CS, Müller NL, Worthy SA, Kim JS, Awadh N, Fitzgerald M. Airway obstruction in asthmatic and healthy individuals: inspiratory and expiratory thin-section CT findings. Radiology. 1997; 203:361–367.

25. Regan EA, Hokanson JE, Murphy JR, Make B, Lynch DA, Beaty TH, et al. Genetic epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study design. COPD. 2010; 7:32–43.

26. Yoon SH, Goo JM, Jung J, Hong H, Park EA, Lee CH, et al. Computer-aided classification of visual ventilation patterns in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at two-phase xenon-enhanced CT. Korean J Radiol. 2014; 15:386–396.

27. Yin Y, Hoffman EA, Lin CL. Mass preserving nonrigid registration of CT lung images using cubic B-spline. Med Phys. 2009; 36:4213–4222.

28. Torigian DA, Gefter WB, Affuso JD, Emami K, Dougherty L. Application of an optical flow method to inspiratory and expiratory lung MDCT to assess regional air trapping: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188:W276–W280.

29. Simon BA. Non-invasive imaging of regional lung function using x-ray computed tomography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000; 16:433–442.

30. Fujita H, Morita M, Kusaka M. [Study of a CT scanning method that improves gravity effects to enable differentiation of inflammatory diseases in chest CT]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008; 64:707–713.

31. Volpe J, Storto ML, Lee K, Webb WR. High-resolution CT of the lung: determination of the usefulness of CT scans obtained with the patient prone based on plain radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 169:369–374.

32. Bankier AA, Estenne M, Kienzl D, Müller-Mang C, Van Muylem A, Gevenois PA. Gravitational gradients in expiratory computed tomography examinations of patients with small airways disease: effect of body position on extent of air trapping. J Thorac Imaging. 2010; 25:311–319.

33. West JB, Dollery CT. Distribution of blood flow and ventilation-perfusion ratio in the lung, measured with radioactive carbon dioxide. J Appl Physiol. 1960; 15:405–410.

34. Galvin I, Drummond GB, Nirmalan M. Distribution of blood flow and ventilation in the lung: gravity is not the only factor. Br J Anaesth. 2007; 98:420–428.

35. Moore WC, Bleecker ER, Curran-Everett D, Erzurum SC, Ameredes BT, Bacharier L, et al. Characterization of the severe asthma phenotype by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Severe Asthma Research Program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 119:405–413.

36. Tgavalekos NT, Musch G, Harris RS, Vidal Melo MF, Winkler T, Schroeder T, et al. Relationship between airway narrowing, patchy ventilation and lung mechanics in asthmatics. Eur Respir J. 2007; 29:1174–1181.

37. Boon AW, Ward-McQuaid JM, Milner AD, Hopkin IE. Thoracic gas volume, helium functional residual capacity and air-trapping in the first six hours of life: the effect of oxygen administration. Early Hum Dev. 1981; 5:157–166.

38. Chae EJ, Seo JB, Lee J, Kim N, Goo HW, Lee HJ, et al. Xenon ventilation imaging using dual-energy computed tomography in asthmatics: initial experience. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45:354–361.

TOOLS

Similar articles