Abstract
Thyroid ultrasonography (US) plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of thyroid-related diseases. The aim of this article was to illustrate various pitfalls that can occur in utilizing thyroid US and techniques to prevent them. In this article, we present cases demonstrating the common pitfalls associated with US equipment, performance, normal thyroid structures, misinterpretations, and surrounding structures. Knowledge of these areas is essential to avoid misdiagnosis or improper disease management.
Ultrasonography (US) plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of thyroid-related diseases. The development of high resolution US equipment has greatly influenced the management of thyroid nodules; indeed, currently US is frequently used as a first-line diagnostic tool, in both guidance of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and for post-operative follow-up imaging. Since 1985, there have been numerous reports about thyroid US. However, most reports focus on the information gained from the actual imaging itself, such as results from assessment of the nodule, FNAB, or volumetry (1-10). To our knowledge, there is currently a paucity of articles presenting tips or pitfalls related to utilizing this modality (11, 12).
The intent of this pictorial review was to provide a framework for sharing interpretative and technical recommendations regarding thyroid US. We will detail normal thyroid and peri-thyroid anatomy, and then attempt to address common pitfalls associated with US equipment, examination skills, anatomy, interpretation, and extrathyroidal abnormalities (Table 1).
The thyroid gland is a butterfly-shaped organ located in the midline of the anterior neck. It has two elongated lateral lobes (right and left), and is connected by the isthmus (Fig. 1). Approximately 40% of individuals have a pyramidal lobe arising from the isthmus that extends towards the hyoid bone (8, 13); this may be misinterpreted as a mass when it is enlarged (Fig. 2).
The length of the lateral lobes is approximately 4-5 cm, with the transverse and antero-posterior diameter of the lateral lobes being approximately 2 cm and the thickness of the isthmus being less than 0.5 cm (8, 13, 14). The parenchymal echogenicity of a normal thyroid gland is homogeneous and higher than the overlying strap muscles of the neck. On a cross-sectional image, common carotid arteries and the internal jugular veins are typically visualized laterally adjacent to both thyroid lobes (Fig. 1). The esophagus is usually located to the left of the trachea. The parathyroid glands lie close to the deep surface of the thyroid gland but are generally unseen on US when they are normal. Some level VI lymph nodes can be seen adjacent to the lower poles.
For proper thyroid examination, a high frequency (10-15 MHz, at minimum more than 7.5 MHz) linear transducer is recommended (8, 15, 16). During thyroid US, transverse and longitudinal images should be obtained, while color Doppler images may be useful in selective cases (6). The convex transducer may be used in particular cases such as intrathoracic goiter.
When performing thyroid US, proper compression is essential: insufficient force may lead to imaging artifacts due to the round, protruding structure of the neck. The first such artifact discovered that can be linked to morphologic change is caused by inadequate pressure of the probe and it is associated with lesion location (Fig. 3). Failure to apply adequate pressure results in deeper lesions appearing more indistinct because of ultrasound attenuation. The attenuation is in proportion to frequency and is mainly caused by absorption (17). This can be controlled with time-gain-compensation (TGC) and gentle but proper probing pressure. Thus, the US performer should apply more force to the transducer and trim the focusing or TGC curve.
The second type of artifact commonly encountered is posterior shadowing related to muscle interface. The shadowing is associated with sound transmission and different sound attenuation causes shadowing and enhancement. Unfortunately, artificial acoustic shadowing can result from the critical angle created by a steeply obliquely oriented tissue plane but it can be eradicated with firmer compression (18, 19). Such a shadow, mistakenly deemed a lesion, is sometimes referred to as a pseudolesion (Fig. 4). In the case of thyroid US, the interface between the sternocleidomastoid muscle and infrahyoid muscles may mimic an ill-defined hypoechoic lesion. To avoid misdiagnosis, the US performer must compress the transducer appropriately and confirm lesions on both transverse and longitudinal scan views.
"Satisfaction of search (SOS)" is a subset of under-reading errors (false-negative responses) and it occurs when one or more lesions remain undetected after the detection of others (20). In thyroid US, when multiple nodules are seen on US, some nodules might be missed (Fig. 5). Commonly overlooked sites are the four tips of the thyroid upper and lower poles. To avoid error, the US technician must examine the thyroid gland from tip-to-tip in its entirety, while paying special attention to each tip's triangular shape (Fig. 6). This is particularly important for novices; using a checklist form is recommended to avoid SOS errors.
There are several normal structures within the neck that may influence examination and can potentially mimic pathologic lesions. The first structure of issue is: the echogenic septum within the thyroid gland (Fig. 7). This septum makes a posterior shadow resulting in a posterior dark region that may resemble a hypoechoic lesion. In patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis, echogenic septa may be the cause of multiple hypoechoic lesions termed pseudo-nodules (8). When these septa are visualized, it is imperative to turn the transducer and confirm the lesion on both transverse and longitudinal scans.
The second normal structure often mistaken for a pathologic lesion is the blood vessel. The thyroid gland is supplied by superior and inferior thyroid arteries and drains into superior, middle, and inferior thyroid veins. The superior thyroid artery primarily supplies the anterior aspect of the thyroid lobe, while the inferior thyroid artery supplies the posterior aspect. In some patients, these vascular structures mimic a suspicious elongated nodule at the posterior aspect of the thyroid gland (Fig. 8). Occasionally, the inferior thyroid artery or vein appears like a nodule on US (Fig. 9). In these cases, color Doppler images with graded compression become useful in ruling out vascular structures.
Finally, the transverse vertebral processes of the cervical spine or a cervical rib may also present opportunity for misidentification by mimicking calcified jugular chain lymph nodes. These structures show up as echogenic lesions with an intense posterior shadowing on US (Fig. 10). This diagnostic dilemma may be particularly important in patients who have previously undergone thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer. According to previous reports (21, 22), intranodal calcifications have been noted in 46% to 69% of metastatic lymph nodes from thyroid papillary carcinoma (Fig. 11). Intranodal calcifications may also be seen in tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, treated lymphoma, and following radiation or chemotherapy (21-23). Thus, the US technician should be alert to these similarities, and attempt to differentiate the transverse processes from metastatic lymph nodes when evaluating the lateral neck. In this instance, however, if the examiner were to perform FNAB of the transverse process, normal soft tissue smears would result (24).
Myriad criteria have already been established for differentiating benign thyroid lesions from malignant lesions (6, 25-29). One of the well-known findings associated with thyroid cancer is microcalcification associated with psammoma bodies. This proves to be an important diagnostic factor because of its high specificity (1, 29, 30). Although microcalcification is often confused with colloid crystal as both are seen as echogenic dots on US, a follow-up with US alone is sufficient in an anechoic cyst with the characteristic "comet-tail artifact" (Fig. 12) (31).
Certain types of thyroiditis may be misdiagnosed as thyroid malignancy: in particular, subacute and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis. Park et al. (32) reported the presence of ill-defined hypoechoic lesions without a discrete round to oval shape as a US finding associated with subacute thyroiditis and that clinically, subacute thyroiditis was also associated with painful neck swelling and/or fever (Fig. 13). The thyroiditis tend to show geographical changes on different US views unlike true focal masses and some patients may have a recent upper respiratory infection history (32). Langer et al. (33) reported that focal thyroiditis is associated with solid hyperechoic nodules with ill-defined margins. Some of these nodules are seen as ill-defined, irregular, geographically patterned hypo- to marked hypo-echoic lesions with relatively decreased vascularity compared to surrounding tissues (Fig. 14). These lesions may mimic malignancy; thus, further work-up is warranted. However, results of FNAB are typically consistent with benign lesions such as benign follicular cells being found with or without the presence of macrophages.
A well-known example of an extrathyroidal lesion masquerading as thyroid pathology is a small pharyngoesophageal diverticulum. It has the appearance of a hypoechoic mass with internal echogenic dots on US; thus, it is often misdiagnosed as a suspicious nodule (Fig. 15). However, the shape of diverticulum may change by peristalsis during scanning (12). Rarely, a paratracheal air cyst may also mimic a suspicious thyroid lesion. Indeed, it is similar in appearance to a pharyngoesophageal diverticulum but is usually located near the right inferoposterior aspect of the thyroid gland with a narrow stalk (Fig. 16) (12, 34). A third structure also commonly seen is the parathyroid lesion. Although the normal parathyroid gland is not typically seen on US, parathyroid lesions such as hyperplasia, adenomas or cysts may be seen near the posterior or inferior aspect of the thyroid gland (Fig. 17). Typically, the parathyroid adenoma appears as a well-circumscribed, round or oval, hypoechoic nodule. Not frequently, the parathyroid adenoma may develop cystic degeneration and contain calcifications (Fig. 18), and if this type of pathology is also present, it may lead to misdiagnosis (14, 15).
In conclusion, the diagnostic performance of thyroid US can be limited by various imaging pitfalls associated with US techniques, performance, and misinterpretation of normal structures, or non-thyroidal lesions. A familiarity of these pitfalls may help clinicians and patients avoid further unnecessary evaluation and misdiagnosis.
References
1. Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Kim DI, Lee JT, et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178:687–691. PMID: 11856699.
2. Mazzaferri EL. Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:553–559. PMID: 8426623.
3. Rosen IB, Azadian A, Walfish PG, Salem S, Lansdown E, Bedard YC. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the management of thyroid disease. Am J Surg. 1993; 166:346–349. PMID: 8214289.
4. Yokozawa T, Miyauchi A, Kuma K, Sugawara M. Accurate and simple method of diagnosing thyroid nodules the modified technique of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. Thyroid. 1995; 5:141–145. PMID: 7647575.
5. Koike E, Yamashita H, Noguchi S, Murakami T, Ohshima A, Maruta J, et al. Effect of combining ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy findings for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Eur J Surg. 2001; 167:656–661. PMID: 11759733.
6. Peccin S, de Castsro JA, Furlanetto TW, Furtado AP, Brasil BA, Czepielewski MA. Ultrasonography: is it useful in the diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules? J Endocrinol Invest. 2002; 25:39–43. PMID: 11885575.
7. Butch RJ, Simeone JF, Mueller PR. Thyroid and parathyroid ultrasonography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1985; 23:57–71. PMID: 3883407.
8. Khati N, Adamson T, Johnson KS, Hill MC. Ultrasound of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Ultrasound Q. 2003; 19:162–176. PMID: 14730259.
9. Barraclough BM, Barraclough BH. Ultrasound of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. World J Surg. 2000; 24:158–165. PMID: 10633142.
10. Slapa RZ, Slowinska-Srzednicka J, Szopinski KT, Jakubowski W. Gray-scale three-dimensional sonography of thyroid nodules: feasibility of the method and preliminary studies. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16:428–436. PMID: 16155720.
11. Hoang JK, Lee WK, Lee M, Johnson D, Farrell S. US Features of thyroid malignancy: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2007; 27:847–860. discussion 861-865. PMID: 17495296.
12. Kwak JY, Kim EK, Park SY, Kim MJ, Moon WJ, Choi SH, et al. Findings of extrathyroid lesions encountered with thyroid sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26:1747–1759. PMID: 18029927.
13. Macdonald AJ. Diagnostic and surgical imaging anatomy. Brain, head & neck, spine. Salt Lake City: Amirsys;2006. p. II-230.
14. Gritzmann N, Koischwitz D, Rettenbacher T. Sonography of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000; 38:1131–1145. xiiPMID: 11054973.
15. Desser TS, Kamaya A. Ultrasound of thyroid nodules. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008; 18:463–478. viiPMID: 18656028.
16. Kamaya A, Quon A, Jeffrey RB. Sonography of the abnormal parathyroid gland. Ultrasound Q. 2006; 22:253–262. PMID: 17146333.
18. Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D. Diagnostic ultrasound. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby;2011. p. 20–21. p. 798–800.
19. Stavros AT. Breast ultrasound. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2004. p. 488–494.
20. Berbaum KS, Franken EA Jr, Dorfman DD, Rooholamini SA, Kathol MH, Barloon TJ, et al. Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol. 1990; 25:133–140. PMID: 2312249.
21. Langer JE, Mandel SJ. Sonographic imaging of cervical lymph nodes in patients with thyroid cancer. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2008; 18:479–489. vii–viii. PMID: 18656029.
22. Leboulleux S, Girard E, Rose M, Travagli JP, Sabbah N, Caillou B, et al. Ultrasound criteria of malignancy for cervical lymph nodes in patients followed up for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92:3590–3594. PMID: 17609301.
23. Kuna SK, Bracic I, Tesic V, Kuna K, Herceg GH, Dodig D. Ultrasonographic differentiation of benign from malignant neck lymphadenopathy in thyroid cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2006; 25:1531–1537. quiz 1538-1540. PMID: 17121947.
24. Stanley MW, Knoedler JP. Skeletal structures that clinically simulate lymph nodes: encounters during fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol. 1993; 9:86–88. PMID: 8458291.
25. Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Taccogna S, Nardi F, et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87:1941–1946. PMID: 11994321.
26. Cappelli C, Castellano M, Pirola I, Cumetti D, Agosti B, Gandossi E, et al. The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules. QJM. 2007; 100:29–35. PMID: 17178736.
27. Ito Y, Kobayashi K, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, et al. Ill-defined edge on ultrasonographic examination can be a marker of aggressive characteristic of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. World J Surg. 2005; 29:1007–1011. discussion 1011-1012. PMID: 15981041.
28. Cappelli C, Castellano M, Pirola I, Gandossi E, De Martino E, Cumetti D, et al. Thyroid nodule shape suggests malignancy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006; 155:27–31. PMID: 16793946.
29. Moon WJ, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim DW, Kim EK, Kim JY, et al. Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations. Korean J Radiol. 2011; 12:1–14. PMID: 21228935.
30. Khoo ML, Asa SL, Witterick IJ, Freeman JL. Thyroid calcification and its association with thyroid carcinoma. Head Neck. 2002; 24:651–655. PMID: 12112538.
31. Ahuja A, Chick W, King W, Metreweli C. Clinical significance of the comet-tail artifact in thyroid ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996; 24:129–133. PMID: 8838301.
32. Park SY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Kim BM, Oh KK, Hong SW, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of subacute granulomatous thyroiditis. Korean J Radiol. 2006; 7:229–234. PMID: 17143025.
33. Langer JE, Khan A, Nisenbaum HL, Baloch ZW, Horii SC, Coleman BG, et al. Sonographic appearance of focal thyroiditis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176:751–754. PMID: 11222219.
34. Goo JM, Im JG, Ahn JM, Moon WK, Chung JW, Park JH, et al. Right paratracheal air cysts in the thoracic inlet: clinical and radiologic significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173:65–70. PMID: 10397101.