We read with great interest the article titled "Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer: Optimal B Value at 3T" by Ji Hyun Koo et al. (1), published in the Korean Journal of Radiology (DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.1.61). This article will be a useful diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) guide for radiologists in assessing prostatic cancer. In the paper, the authors compared 4 different b values and suggested them for predicting prostate cancer; the optimal b value for 3T DWI was found to be 1000 s/mm².

However, even with high b values, the overlap of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) limits the accuracy of DWI in cancer detection, particularly in the transitional zone tissue, due to its lower ADC compared to the peripheral zone tissue (2). Therefore, we aimed to mention that, with any b value, the assessment of the diffusion restriction should only be performed as a part routine multiparametric radiologic evaluation of the prostate gland. In addition, in lesions with small diameters, we suggest evaluating the diffusion restriction by a visual assessment of ADC maps instead of measuring ADC values, which can be challenging.

The authors also mentioned that they used T1 weighted images for lymph node detection. In our practice, we simply use DWIs in the detection of metastatic lymph nodes. In high b values, such as 1000 s/mm², all lymph nodes appear to be hyperintense in contrast to the adjacent vessels. DWIs can also provide additional information in bone metastases and invasion of the adjacent tissues (3-5).

For optimal DWI, it is crucially important to determine the optimal values for factors in DWI, especially the b value, which is essential for developing high-quality apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps that affect the accuracy of ADC measurements and visual imaging interpretations (2). For ADC analysis, by using two-point b-values (0 and each b value of 300, 700, 1000 and 2000 s/mm²) in predicting the cancer location, our results suggested that the optimal b value at 3T DWI was 1000 s/mm². However, considering the performance of different MR scanners in clinical practice, we recommend the use of higher b values with 800-1000 s/mm² instead of the use of any b values as you mentioned. If radiologists want to use multi-point b-values on DWI, b-values of 0, 100 and 800-1000 s/mm² can be used as the minimal requirements (3). In addition, a careful selection of several DWI parameters is also recommended in order to obtain high-quality ADC maps: single-shot versus multi-shot EPI technique, adequate size of field of view to acquire better signal-to-noise ratio, fat-saturation techniques (spectral presaturation inversion recovery, short T1 inversion recovery, or spectral presaturation attenuated inversion recovery), mono-exponential versus bi-exponential model to fit the data, etc.

For evaluating nodal or bone metastasis, we agree that the DWI or diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) can be a powerful tool (4). DWI or DWIBS can be used in conjunction with anatomical MR images (Figs. 1, 2). Metastatic nodes may have increased the cellular density or necrotic areas, which can further restrict or increase diffusion, respectively (5). Compared with soft tissue tumors, metastatic bone disease can be detected as an area of increased diffusivity relative to the restricted diffusion of normal fatty marrow (6). Thus, DWI or DWIBS has the potential to decrease the number of imaging studies required (from plain radiography to PET/CT).