Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.27(6) > 1021926

Cho, Park, Kang, Han, Lee, Cha, and Kim: Unilateral Hydronephrosis and Hydroureter by Foreign Body in Urinary Bladder: A Case Report

Abstract

Foreign bodies inserted through the urethra are often found in the urinary bladder. We presently report the first case of hydronephrosis and hydroureter due to direct compression in the urinary bladder by silicon, which had been introduced by the patient himself 2 yr prior to presentation with severe right flank pain. Computed tomography indicated a convoluted, high-attenuation mass in the urinary bladder; unilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter were also present due to direct compression by the mass. The foreign body was removed using a cystoscope. This foreign body was proven to be silicon.

INTRODUCTION

Foreign bodies inserted through the urethra are often found in the urinary bladder, and various cases have been reported up to date (1-8). We presently describe a case of hydronephrosis and hydroureter caused by silicon introduced into the urinary bladder by the patient 2 yr prior to presentation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 42-yr-old man reported to the hospital with severe right flank pain; the patient reported waking up at night due to the pain. The patient had a history of drug treatment for cystitis 2 yr previously, and had used an anti-inflammatory agent for discomfort in the lower abdomen 1 month prior to presentation. The flank pain first commenced 10 days prior to presentation, but suddenly became acute on the day of the visit. During physical examination, there was right costovertebral angle tenderness as well as tenderness in the right abdomen.
A simple pelvic radiography indicated a large radio-opaque lesion approximately 7 cm in diameter in the lower pelvic cavity (Fig. 1A). In order to investigate the possibility of bladder and/or ureteral stone, computed tomography (CT) was performed without a contrast agent. Abdominal and pelvic CT showed a high-attenuation lesion inside the urinary bladder. The lesion was tubular and the thickness was relatively uniform. The lesion blocked the right ureterovesical junction, which was accompanied by right hydronephrosis and hydroureter (Fig. 1B, C).
We considered the possibility that this might be a foreign body of an unknown nature in the urinary bladder, and recommended that the patient's history be re-taken. Subsequently, the patient confessed that he had injected silicon into his urethra 2 yr ago using an injector.
The patient's flank pain eased after a day in the absence of any treatment. CT performed 5 days after the first visit showed improvement of the hydronephrosis and hydroureter. Next day, the foreign body was removed using a cystoscope. The foreign body was brown, approximately 1 m long and 7 mm thick; further analysis indicated that it was silicon (Fig. 1D). After removal of the mass, the patient has not experienced further symptoms associated with cystitis or other urinary tract infections.

DISCUSSION

Patients who have a foreign body in the urinary bladder exhibit atypical symptoms of urinary tract infection, such as repeated urinary tract infection, voiding pain, hematuria, frequent urination, and voiding difficulty (1-3). The cases of hydronephrosis or hydroureter induced by a foreign body in the urinary bladder are so rare that only 3 cases have been reported so far (6-8). However, these cases were not caused directly by a foreign body in the urinary bladder, but secondarily by stones (6-8). To our knowledge, there has been no previous report of a case such as this, where hydronephrosis and hydroureter occurred due to a foreign body in the urinary bladder temporarily blocking the ureterovesical junction. We believe that the hydronephrosis and hydroureter in this case occurred because the foreign body in the urinary bladder was relatively large.
To date, various kinds of foreign bodies in the urinary bladder have been reported, including electric wire, a ballpoint pen, a thermometer, and a pencil (1-8). Foreign bodies inserted through the urethra are often found in the urinary bladder (4). In men, these foreign bodies move to the urinary bladder through the 20-25 cm long urethra, but the mechanism for this remains unclear (1, 2). In the present case, the patient used an injector to inject himself with silicon, which is usually used to fill gaps in window or door frames. To our knowledge, no case of intravesical injection of silicon has been reported previously.
Silicon is known to show relatively high attenuation in radiological examinations using radiation, and silicon implanted into breasts can be readily observed during imaging (9). In the present case, high attenuation was observed in both simple Radiography and CT images. The lesion appeared to be a calcified mass, visualized as a lump in the simple pelvic Radiography (Fig. 1A) but appearing as a tubular lesion with a relatively uniform thickness of several millimeters in the CT scan (Fig. 1B). This is believed to be a consequence of using an injector, and suggests that CT should be used during examination of similar cases.
If there is a high-attenuation tubular lesion inside the urinary bladder, different types of foreign bodies, such as electric wire and vinyl, should be considered for differential diagnosis (3, 4). Diseases that should be differentiated from foreign body intrusion include fungal balls and parasitic infections. However, although an intravesical fungal ball (bezoar) caused by Candida albicans may be a large mass, it can be invisible in simple Radiography or show up only as very mild calcification; thus, its features on imaging are very different from those of foreign bodies (10, 11). In addition, Schistosoma haematobium is known as an intravesical parasite, but it can be differentiated from foreign bodies because it is known to cause thickening of the bladder wall, or nodules or calcification in the bladder wall (11-13).
In conclusion, detailed history taking is required for patients complaining of flank pain suggestive of a urinary or ureteral stone, and imaging examinations such as simple radiography and CT should be performed with consideration of the possibility of foreign bodies in the urinary bladder. If such imaging indicates a high-attenuation tubular lesion inside the bladder, it is possible that the foreign body is silicon.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Intravesical foreign body (silicon) in a 42-yr-old man. (A) Simple pelvic radiograph showing a high-attenuation mass (arrows) in the pelvic area. (B) Axial computed tomography (CT) image demonstrating a convoluted, high-attenuation lesion in the urinary bladder. Dilatation of the distal ureter can also be observed (arrows). (C) Axial CT image showing hydronephrosis of the right kidney. (D) Photograph of the foreign body: it was brown, approximately 1 m long and 7 mm thick. It was identified as silicon.
jkms-27-704-g001

References

1. Aliabadi H, Cass AS, Gleich P, Johnson CF. Self-inflicted foreign bodies involving lower urinary tract and male genitals. Urology. 1985. 26:12–16.
2. Rafique M. Intravesical foreign bodies: review and current management strategies. Urol J. 2008. 5:223–231.
3. Rahman NU, Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Self-inflicted male urethral foreign body insertion: endoscopic management and complications. BJU Int. 2004. 94:1051–1053.
4. Imai A, Suzuki Y, Hashimoto Y, Sasaki A, Saitoh H, Ohyama C. A very long foreign body in the bladder. Adv Urol. 2011. 2011:323197.
5. Moon SJ, Kim DH, Chung JH, Jo JK, Son YW, Choi HY, Moon HS. Unusual foreign bodies in the urinary bladder and urethra due to autoerotism. Int Neurourol J. 2010. 14:186–189.
6. Saito S, Izumitani M, Shiroki R, Ishiguro K, Fujioka T, Nagakubo I. Prolonged exposure to intravesical foreign body induces a giant calculus with attendant renal dysfunction. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1994. 85:1777–1780.
7. Bapat RD, Kamdar MS, Bhaktiani K, Jathar H. Obstructive uropathy due to a vesical calculus around a foreign body. J Postgrad Med. 1981. 27:51–52.
8. Sood S, Gupta HL. Foreign body calculus in urinary bladder with hydronephrosis. J Indian Med Assoc. 1970. 55:19–20.
9. Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Cutter G, Barlow WE, Rosenberg R, Weaver DL, Taplin SH, Ballard-Barbash R, Carney PA, et al. Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics. JAMA. 2004. 291:442–450.
10. Morton KM, Robertson AJ, McIntyre J. Urinary bladder fungus ball. J Clin Pathol. 1988. 41:1243–1244.
11. McAleer SJ, Johnson CW, Johnson WD Jr. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Tuberculosis and parasitic and fungal infections of the genitourinary system. Campbell-Walsh urology. 2007. vol 1:9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Science Health Science Div;448–468.
12. Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Woodward PJ, Manning MA, Davis CJ. From the archives of the AFIP: inflammatory and nonneoplastic bladder masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2006. 26:1847–1868.
13. Ekwunife CA, Okafor FC, Nwaorgu OC. Ultrasonographic screening of urinary schistosomiasis infected patients in Agulu community, Anambra state, southeast Nigeria. Int Arch Med. 2009. 2:34.
TOOLS
Similar articles