Trauma due to urethral catheterization is rarely encountered in women. Herein, we report a very rare complication of urethral catheterization. A 14-Fr Foley catheter was accidentally placed into the right ureter in a 38-yr-old woman.

A 38-yr-old paraplegic woman was referred to a hospital emergency room due to lower abdominal pain following a urethral catheter change. She had no tactile sensation below the level of the umbilicus. Five years before, she had developed neurogenic bladder as a result of a 10th thoracic spinal cord injury. Her bladder was being drained using a urethral Foley catheter. She had no evidence of vesicoureteral reflux. On the day of admission, a catheter change had been performed by the nursing staff, using 14-Fr Foley catheter without undue events. In order to determine the location of the tube and rule out bladder rupture, cystography was performed. There was considerable leakage of contrast media around the midureter, and the Foley catheter tip was observed to be located at the right lower ureter (Fig. 1). After removal of the Foley catheter, cystoscopy was performed. The bladder mucosa was intact and both ureteral orifices were in a typical position and normal shape. Ureteral stenting failed because guide wires could not be passed over the injured site. A new urethral catheter was properly inserted and percutaneous nephrostomy was performed (Fig. 2A). Two weeks later, antegrade urography showed that the injured ureter had healed without leakage or obstruction (Fig. 2B).

Urethral catheterization is commonly performed and is usually safe, although complications, such as infection, bleeding, injury to the urethra or bladder, or catheter malfunction can ensue (1). The two most common complications related to Foley catheters, particularly in males, are urethral trauma and retention of the catheter balloon in the urethra (2). Serious complications such as bladder perforation and/or peritonitis (3) and rectovesical fistula (4) have been reported. Traumatic urethral catheterization is rarely encountered in women. To our knowledge, injury to the ureter as a result of urethral catheterization is very rare. The authors cannot explain the cause of the present complication. Because the ureteral orifice was orthotopically located, direct insertion of a 14-Fr catheter, a large device, into the ureter through the ureteral orifice without pretreatment or mechanical dilatation is completely unexpected. It is unclear whether the right ureteric orifice was patulous at the time of catheterization. Urethral catheterization into the ureter is more common when the patient is catheterized on an empty bladder (5). The only way to avoid such injury would be adherence to the basic principles of catheterization, e.g., to confirm the location of the balloon before inflation, by the aspiration of urine.

In conclusion, although the current case is an extremely rare example, we should perform urethral catheterization with particular care.