Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.22(1) > 1020373

Shim, Lee, Lee, Shin, Kyhm, Park, Chung, and Cho: A De Novo Centric Fission of Chromosome 11 in a Patient with Recurrent Miscarriages

Abstract

We report on a de novo centric fission of chromosome 11 in a healthy female referred for chromosome analysis due to recurrent miscarriages. Both fission products were mitotically stable. This centric fission of chromosome 11 appears to have no clinical significance for this patient other than recurrent miscarriages.

INTRODUCTION

Centric fission results when a metacentric or submetacentric chromosome splits at the centromere, giving rise to two stable telocentric products, isochromosomes, or ring chromosomes. Stable fission chromosomes in human were first described by Sinha et al. (1) and have subsequently been observed in several pedigrees (2, 3), in a few individuals (4-8), and in amniotic fluid cultures (7, 9). The heterozygous individuals may have a balanced complement of genetic material and thus be phenotypically normal. But they appear to be at increased risk for production of unbalanced gametes which consequently increased risks for spontaneous abortion, still-birth and live born infants with clinical effects from unbalanced genotypes.
In this paper we report the first case of de novo centric fission of chromosome 11 detected in blood lymphocyte chromosome analysis.

CASE REPORT

A 25-yr-old female patient visited the habitual abortion clinic in Hanyang University Hospital because of her history of recurrent abortions. She had been pregnant 3 times and all pregnancies were resulted in spontaneous abortions during 8-10 weeks of gestation. All of the 30 metaphases analyzed showed karyotype of 47,XX,-11,+fis(11)(p10),+fis(11)(q10) (Fig. 1). Both arms of the broken chromosome 11 appeared to be telocentric chromosomes. Chromosome studies on all her family members (father, mother and a younger brother) revealed normal karyotypes.
Six months later, she became pregnant. A prenatal cytogenetic test was performed by chorionic villus sampling at 10th week of pregnancy. The fetus had normal female karyotype, 46,XX, and she delivered a healthy female baby. The karyotype of the baby was reconfirmed by peripheral blood chromosome analysis.

Cytogenetic analysis

Chromosome analysis of 72 hr lymphocyte cultures was performed with conventional GTG-banding techniques. To confirm the chromosome aberration of fis (11), primed in situ labeling (PRINS) with the oligonucleotide primer specific for centromere of chromosome 11 (9) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with whole chromosome painting probe for chromosome 11 (Chromoprobe TM-M11, Cytocell, Cambridge, U.K.) were studied. In all the metaphases scored (more than 30), 47 chromosomes were found. Chromosome 11 was divided into one smaller and one larger telocentric chromosome (Fig. 1). FISH analyses showed that no other chromosomes were involved (Fig. 2). It was evident that both fragments possessed centromeric heterochromatins in different amounts of the FISH positive band, i.e. the telocentric 11p has much larger centromeric heterochromatin than that of the telocentric 11q (Fig. 3). Centric fission of chromosome 11 has resulted in two stable telocentrics. There was no tendency to fuse again or to associate with acrocentrics as verified in 50 additional metaphases. Three distinct fluorescent spots were detected with the PRINS reaction in more than 100 interphase nuclei.

DISCUSSION

Individuals with stable centric fission products have rarely been documented in human, and to our knowledge this is the first report on centric fission of chromosome 11. In this case, the centric fission does not cause any significant dysmorphic features and mental handicap except for reproduction failures.
For many years, karyotype evolution was thought to occur via chromosome fission, fusion, translocation, and inversion. Both centric fission and centric fusion have been considered as an explanation of the diverse range of chromosome numbers among species (11).
Two major mechanisms have been proposed for the generation of chromosome fission (12, 13). One is the simple centric fission which is a simple transverse split at the centromere to result in two stable C-banded and α-satellite-positive centric fission products. The other mechanism is more complex including the pre-duplication of a centromere or the activation of a new centromere. To retain a mitotically stable status of fission products, the end may be protected by adding telomeric sequences or recombination resulting in a formation of isochromosome or ring chromosome (14, 15).
In our case, the fission products were apparently generated by simple centric fission mechanism. In PRINS result, the signals of the fission products were smaller than the signal of the normal chromosome 11. This may support the simple centric fission mechanism in our case. However, even between homologous chromosomes, the size of centromeres is different from each other, so a further study is required to understand the detail mechanism of this case.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Routine GTG-banding patterns of centric fission of chromosome 11. The karyotype according to ISCN (1995) is 47,XX,-11, +fis(11)(p10),+fis(11)(q10).
jkms-22-146-g001
Fig. 2
A whole chromosome painting probe was applied to a metaphase spread of centric fission of chromosome 11. A white and a red arrow indicate a short arm and a long arm of chromosome 11, respectively.
jkms-22-146-g002
Fig. 3
The PRINS (primed in situ labeling) reaction with a oligonucleotide primer specific for the centromere of chromosome 11 reveals three distinct fluorescent spots on the centromeres of chromosome 11. The fluorescent signal on the short arm fragment of fis (11) was stronger than that of long arm.
jkms-22-146-g003

Notes

This work was supported by Hanyang University, Korea, made in the program year of 2001.

References

1. Sinha AK, Pathak S, Nora JJ. A human family suggesting evidence for centric fission and stability of a telocentric chromosome. Hum Hered. 1972. 22:423–429.
crossref
2. Janke D. Centric fission of chromosome no. 7 in three generations. Hum Genet. 1982. 60:200–201.
crossref
3. Del Porto G, Di Fusco C, Baldi M, Grammatico P, D'Alessandro E. Familial centric fission of chromosome 4. J Med Genet. 1984. 21:388–391.
crossref
4. Hansen S. A case of centric fission in man. Humangenetik. 1975. 26:257–259.
5. Dallapiccola B, Mastroiacovo P, Grandini E. Centric fission of chromosome no.4 in the mother of two patients with trisomy 4p. Hum Genet. 1976. 31:121–125.
6. Fryns JP, Bulcke J, Hens L, Van den Berghe H. Balanced transmission of centromeric fission products in man. Hum Genet. 1980. 54:127–128.
crossref
7. Bogart MH, Fujita N, Serles L, Hsia YE. Prenatal Diagnosis of a stable de novo centric fission: A case report. Am J Med Genet. 1995. 59:36–37.
crossref
8. Bakshi SR, Roy SK, Patel SJ, Trivedi PJ, Brahmbhatt M, Patel SM, Shah PM, Patel DD. Centromeric transverse fission of chromosome 1 in a case of acute myelocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003. 146:173–175.
crossref
9. Nucaro A, Falchi AM, Monni G, Cao A. Pseudomosaic centric fission of chromosome 4 in amniotic cells. Prenat Diagn. 1988. 8:629–631.
crossref
10. Koch J, Hindkær J, Kølvraa S, Bolund L. Construction of a panel of chromosome-specific oligonucleotide probes (PRINS-primers) useful for the identification of individual human chromosomes in situ. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1995. 71:142–147.
crossref
11. Kolnicki RL. Kinetochore reproduction in animal evolution: cell biological explanation of karyotypic fission theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000. 97:9493–9497.
crossref
12. Perry J, Slater HR, Choo KH. Centric fission-simple and complex mechanisms. Chromosome Res. 2004. 12:627–640.
13. Perry J, Nouri S, La P, Daniel A, Wu Z, Purvis-Smith S, Northrop E, Choo KH, Slater HR. Molecular distinction between true centric fission and pericentric duplication-fission. Hum Genet. 2005. 116:300–310.
crossref
14. Melek M, Shippen DE. Chromosome healing: spontaneous and programmed de novo telomere formation by telomerase. Bioessays. 1996. 18:301–308.
15. Dunham MA, Neumann AA, Fasching CL, Reddel RR. Telomere maintenance by recombination in human cells. Nat Genet. 2000. 26:447–450.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles