Increasing Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Korea: KONSAR Study in 2001

Kyungwon Lee; Sook-Jin Jang; Hee Joo Lee; Namhee Ryoo; Myungshin Kim; Seong Geun Hong; Yunsop Chong

doi:10.3346/jkms.2004.19.1.8

Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.19(1) > 1019853

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Jang, Lee, Ryoo, Kim, Hong, Chong, and the Korean Nationwide Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance Group: Increasing Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Korea: KONSAR Study in 2001

Original Article

Journal of Korean Medical Science

Journal of Korean Medical Science 2004; 19(1): 8-14.

Published online: 28 February 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2004.19.1.8

Increasing Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, Expanded-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Korea: KONSAR Study in 2001

Kyungwon Lee, Sook-Jin Jang^*, Hee Joo Lee^†, Namhee Ryoo^‡, Myungshin Kim^§, Seong Geun Hong^∥, Yunsop Chong; the Korean Nationwide Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance Group

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

^*Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.

^†Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

^‡Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.

^§Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

^∥Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pundang CHA General Hospital, Pochon CHA University, Sungnam, Korea.

Address for correspondence: Yunsop Chong, Ph.D. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. Tel: +82.2-361-5866, Fax: 82.2-313-0908, whonetkor@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Received 20 August 2003 Accepted 6 November 2003

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The 5th year KONSAR surveillance in 2001 was based on routine test data at 30 participating hospitals. It was of particular interest to find a trend in the resistances of enterococci to vancomycin, of Enterobacteriaceae to the 3rd generation cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone, and of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and acinetobacters to carbapenem. Resistance rates of Gram-positive cocci were: 70% of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin; 88% and 16% of Enterococcus faecium to ampicillin and vancomycin, respectively. Seventy-two percent of pneumococci were nonsusceptible to penicillin. The resistance rates of Enterobacteriaceae were: Escherichia coli, 28% to fluoroquinolone; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 27% to ceftazidime, and 20% to cefoxitin; and Enterobacter cloacae, ≥40% to cefotaxime and ceftazidime. The resistance rates of P. aeruginosa were 21% to ceftazidime, 17% to imipenem, and those of the acinetobacters were ≥61% to ceftazidime, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolone and cotrimoxazole. Thirty-five percent of non-typhoidal salmonellae were ampicillin resistant, and 66% of Haemophilus influenzae were β-lactamase producers. Notable changes over the 1997-2001 period were: increases in vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, and amikacin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant acinetobacters. With the increasing prevalence of resistant bacteria, nationwide surveillance has become more important for optimal patient management, for the control of nosocomial infection, and for the conservation of the newer antimicrobial agents.

Keywords: Drug Resistance, Microbial, Korea, Vancomycin Resistance, Enterococcus faecium, ESBL, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to antimicrobial resistant bacteria are difficult to cure (1). Antimicrobial resistance can also lead to a delay in the administration of appropriate drugs, and the drugs required to treat resistant pathogens can be toxic (2). Antimicrobial resistance has become a worldwide problem with the exception of a few countries in northern Europe (3). However, even in Sweden, where resistant bacteria are rare, increases of ciprofloxacin- resistant Escherichia coli and imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been reported (4).

The prevalence of resistant bacteria varies significantly in different countries as it is influenced by the amount of antimicrobial agents used. The major reasons for performing surveillance are to determine the size of the problem, to see whether resistance is increasing or not, to detect any previously unknown types of resistance, and to determine whether any particular type of resistance is spreading or is associated with an outbreak (1).

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance became increasingly important given the wide spread dissemination of resistant bacteria. Analysis of routine susceptibility data has some limitations, which include its inaccuracy, but it does not require much resource. Longitudinal studies of resistance trends are considered most beneficial for the detection of subtle changes in resistance (5). A previous nationwide surveillance in Korea showed increasing resistance rates of Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin, Enterobacteriaceae to fluoroquinolones, the 3rd generation cephalosporins, cephamycins and fluoroquinolones, and P. aeruginosa and acinetobacters to carbapenems (6). It is hoped that the Korean National Health Insurance Program, which in 2001 abolished over-the-counter sales of antimicrobial agents and started to scrutinize proper use of antimicrobial agents at hospitals, has had some impact upon reducing resistant bacteria.

The aim of the surveillance in 2001was: to determine any changing trends in the above-mentioned serious resistances in particular, besides the common resistances at Korean Nationwide Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (KONSAR) hospitals in different locations, and to determine possible emergence of new resistances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data Collection

Routine susceptibility test data for major aerobic pathogenic bacteria in 2001 were collected from 31 hospitals located in 8 cities/provinces in Korea. However, the data obtained from 30 hospitals were analyzed, excluding one hospital with poor performance versus the WHO/CDC quality control program. As did in the previous study (6), less than 20 isolates of a species from a hospital was excluded from the analysis.

Main methods of susceptibility testing used were, the NCCLS disk diffusion test (7) by 21 hospitals and commercial broth microdilution systems, i.e., Vitek (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) or MicroScan (Dade MicroScan Inc., West Sacramento, CA, U.S.A.) by 9 hospitals. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci were tested using oxacillin, and penicillin G-nonsusceptible pneumococci were screened mainly by the oxacillin-disk method (7).

Data analysis

Hospitals were divided into three groups according to location and bed capacity (≥1,000 beds countrywide, <1,000 beds in Seoul, and <1,000 beds in non-Seoul). Resistance rates did not include intermediates. The mean resistance rate in each hospital group was calculated from the mean resistance rates at each hospital, to minimize the influence of a large number of isolates at some hospitals (8).

The resistance rates of some important organisms to certain antimicrobial agents were compared to those of previous years. However, the statistical significances of changes in resistance were not determined, because this depends on the statistical method used (8), and because the purpose of surveillance includes the detection of outbreaks of resistant infections (9).

RESULTS

The susceptibility data analyzed were of 169,032 isolates, which consisted of 79,167 (46.8%) isolates of Gram-positive cocci, and 89,865 (53.2%) isolates of Gram-negative bacilli. Proportions of the organisms were: Staphylococcus aureus 24.1%, coagulase-negative staphylococci 11.1%, Enterococcus faecalis 6.0%, E. faecium 3.8%, pneumococci 1.8%, E. coli 12.0%, Klebsiella pneumoniae 7.0%, Enterobacter cloacae 3.8%, Serratia marcescens 3.4%, non-typhoidal salmonellae 0.6%, acinetobacters 9.4%, P. aeruginosa 16.5%, and Haemophilus influenzae 0.4%.

The resistance rates of Gram-positive cocci are shown in Table 1. Those of S. aureus to oxacillin, erythromycin, and gentamicin were ≥70%, but the rates of coagulase-negative staphylococci to these antimicrobial agents were somewhat lower. The resistance rates of S. aureus to cotrimoxazole were lower than that of coagulase-negative staphylococci (12% vs. 42%), but were higher to ciprofloxacin (64% vs. 34%) and to tetracycline (63% vs. 43%). Vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant staphylococci were not present.

The rate of penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci was 72%, and that of ciprofloxacin-resistance was 6%. The resistance rates of E. faecium were much higher than those of E. faecalis to ampicillin (88% vs. 2%), and to ciprofloxacin (88% vs. 43%), but lower to tetracycline (23% vs. 81%). The vancomycin resistance rates of E. faecium and E. faecalis were 16% and 1%, respectively.

The resistance rates of Gram-negative bacilli are shown in Table 2. Resistance rate of E. coli to ampicillin was 75%, and to both piperacillin and cotrimoxazole ≥50%. Resistance rates to other antimicrobial agents were: 9% to ceftazidime, 11% to cefoxitin, 30% to gentamicin, and 28% to fluoroquinolone. Twenty-seven per cent and 20% of K. pneumoniae were resistant to ceftazidime and cefoxitin, respectively, and 12% were resistant to amikacin. Of the E. cloacae isolates, ≥40% were resistant to cefotaxime and ceftazidime, and 40% were to tobramycin. Imipenem resistance rates of E. cloacae and S. marcescens were 0.4% and 0.6%, respectively. The resistance rates of S. marcescens to cefoperazone-sulbactam and amikacin, at 15% and 22%, respectively, were the highest among Enterobacteriaceae species analyzed. The resistance rates of P. aeruginosa to ceftazidime and cefotaxime were 21% and 57%, respectively. The resistance rates to imipenem and amikacin 17% and 26%, respectively. Of the acinetobacters, ≥65% were resistant to piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam. Cefepime resistance rate of 52% was the highest among Gram-negative bacilli. Also, ≥61% of the isolates were resistant to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolone and cotrimoxazole. The imipenem resistance rate of all isolates was 6%.

Among the 990 isolates of non-typhoidal salmonellae, 35% were resistant to ampicillin, and 4% to cotrimoxazole, but none were resistant to fluoroquinolone. In the case of H. influenzae, some hospitals tested ampicillin susceptibility, while others tested β-lactamase production, and still others tested both. Among the 699 isolates of H. influenzae, 64% were ampicillin resistant and 66% were β-lactamase producers.

During the period 1997-2001, the resistance rates of S. aureus to oxacillin and erythromycin remained similar (Fig. 1). Penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci declined slightly from 75% to 72%, whereas ampicillin-resistant E. faecium increased steadily from 70% to 88%. Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates increased at all hospital groups: from 2% to 16% at large hospital group, from 2% to 19% at the Seoul medium hospital group, and from 7% to 13% at the non-Seoul medium hospital group (Fig. 2).

During the 1997-2001 period, cefoxitin-resistant K. pneumoniae increased from 16% to 20%, and ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae from 58% to 64% (Fig. 3). The amikacin resistance rate of P. aeruginosa declined slightly from 33% to 26%, while that of acinetobacters gradually increased from 50% to 61%. The resistance rates of acinetobacters to fluoroquinolone rose from 56% to 65% (Fig. 4), while the rates to imipenem remained to be 5% to 6% (Fig. 3). Ceftazidime- and imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were present in all hospital groups (Fig. 5).

DISCUSSION

The surveillance of resistance is an important part of modern clinical microbiology (5), but surveillance methods are considered often inappropriate (1). The surveillance, which is based on collecting data from each laboratory has many problems due to the different methods used for species identification and for susceptibility testing. More accurate results can be obtained if isolates are collected and tested at a central laboratory (5), but this method is very expensive.

Current KONSAR program consists of two different forms of surveillance: one is the analysis of routine susceptibility test data, which were determined by individual participating hospitals, i.e., this study, and the other is the determination of the prevalence of certain resistances in isolates collected from participants, e.g., the study on metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains (10).

Both the necessity and the limitations of surveillance were discussed in a previous study (6). It is difficult to distinguish between community- and nosocomially-acquired pathogens, although their resistance rates differ markedly. However, some organisms, such as methicillin-resistant staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, P. aeruginosa and acinetobacters are typical nosocomial pathogens, while non-typhoidal salmonellae are mostly community-acquired pathogens.

The high proportion of S. aureus (24.1%) among the isolates tested in the present study indicates its continued importance. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of the typical nosocomial pathogens (11). The proportion of MRSA and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, 70% and 69%, respectively, were similar to those reported for 1999 and 2000 (Fig. 1). MRSA is also prevalent in Japan. Surveillance in 1998-2000 in Kinki, Japan, showed the proportion of MRSA was approximately 60% (12).

The more active drug against MRSA remained to be cotrimoxazole except for vancomycin, but the rate of 12% was much higher one than the 1% found in Japan. Two isolates of true vancomycin-resistant S. aureus were reported in the United States in 2002 (13, 14). No vancomycin-resistant S. aureus were recognized in the present study.

The penicillin-nonsusceptible rate of pneumococci decreased slightly from 78% in 1999 to 72% in 2001. A reduction in penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates may be the result of the abolition of over-the-counter sales of common antimicrobial agents in 2001. It will be interesting to observe whether this declining trend continues. In Japan, the proportion of penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci, by the broth microdilution method, was 65% in 1998 and 81% in 2000 (12). We should know that the proportions were based on breakpoint for the treatment of meningitis (7). Therefore, pneumonia caused by penicillin-intermediate isolates may respond to penicillin therapy (15). Pneumococci cause community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections more frequently than meningitis.

The ampicillin-resistant rate of E. faecalis, 1%, was slightly lower than the 2% found in 2000, though still higher than the <1% found at the coordinating laboratory of the KONSAR program. It was considered that ampicillin-resistant E. faecalis was due to misidentification of the species (1). These indicate the need to retest the species when an E. faecalis isolate shows resistance to ampicillin.

Vancomycin resistance rate of E. faecium in 2001 remained similar to those in 2000 at large- and medium-hospital groups in Seoul. Although the rate at the non-Seoul medium-hospital group declined from 24% in 2000 to 13% in 2001 (Fig. 2), vancomycin-resistant E. faecium seemed to be established in all hospital groups, as was at the coordinating hospital (16). It is a concern that once a resistance gene has became accumulated to an environment, it is impossible to eliminate them (17).

The ampicillin resistance rate of E. coli did increase further and that of H. influenzae increased only slightly. Ampicillin had been a commonly used drug because it was available without prescription, but currently no antimicrobial agent can be bought without a prescription since 2001. It is interesting to see the future surveillance could show a downward trend again. In the present study, 64% of the H. influenzae isolates were resistant to ampicillin and the proportion of β-lactamase producers was similar. The proportion of β-lactamase-producing isolates in the United States was 36%, while that was only 3% in Japan. In a European study (18), the prevalence of β-lactamase producers varied from 8.1% to 34.8% depending on countries. It is interesting that in Japan 39.6% of the isolates were β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains (19).

The resistance rates of non-typhoidal salmonellae, i.e., 35% to ampicillin, 4% to cotrimoxazole and none to ciprofloxacin, were similar to those reported in 2000 (6). When empirical antimicrobial treatment of non-typhoidal salmonellae infection is required (20), cotrimoxazole or ciprofloxacin should be appropriate first-line drugs in Korea. In the present study, 0.4% of non-typhoidal salmonellae were resistant to the 3rd generation cephalosporin. Further study is required to determine whether extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates are present. In a Korean hospital, ESBL-producing non-typhoidal salmonellae were detected as early as 1995 (21).

Fluoroquinolones are increasingly used, as they are one of the three major broad-spectrum classes of antimicrobial agents (22). Fluoroquinolone resistance rate of E. coli gradually rose from 24% in 1997 to 28% in 2001. The rate of acinetobacters, 65% was only slightly lower than that of the 70% in 2000 (6).

Expanded-spectrum cephalosporins are ineffective for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL-producing isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae, although they may be inhibited by low concentrations of these drugs (23). It was reported that bacteremic patients with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae had higher initial treatment failure rates than those with non-ESBL-producing isolates (24). Also, the cefoxitin resistance rate 20% of K. pneumoniae suggests plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase production (25). Therefore, ceftazidime resistance rates cannot reflect the proportion of ESBL producers, although high prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae has been reported in Korea (26). Cephamycins, such as cefoxitin, are active against ESBL-producing isolates, but plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase-producing isolates are resistant not only to all cephalosporins but also to cephamycins.

Carbapenems are very useful drugs as they are stable to hydrolysis even to ESBL- and AmpC β-lactamases (27). Although VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase-producing S. marcescens and E. cloacae have been reported (28, 29), the imipenem resistance rates of E. cloacae and S. marcescens were low (0.4% and 0.6%, respectively), suggesting that carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are rare. The imipenem resistance rates of P. aeruginosa to ceftazidime and imipenem remained similar in all hospital groups (Fig. 5). In another study about 9% of imipenemresistant P. aeruginosa were due to the production of acquired metallo-β-lactamases (30). Acinetobacters are often multidrug resistant. At a hospital in India, 29% of acinetobacters isolated in 1996-1998 were resistant to imipenem, though the hospital did not use imipenem at that time (31). In our present study, the imipenem resistance rate of acinetobacters remained similar (Fig. 3). However, the imipenem resistance rate rose to 13% in 2002 at the coordinating laboratory. Another study showed that approximately 11.4% and 14.2% of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates possessed the VIM-2 or the IMP-1 metallo-β-lactamase gene (10). We consider that close observation of this trend is necessary.

Given the increase in the prevalence of resistant bacteria, the empirical selection of antimicrobial agents becomes increasingly difficult and rapid microbiological testing increasingly crucial. As was found in the previous study, some laboratories tested susceptibility to too few antimicrobial classes (data not shown). Diagnostic bacteriology results cannot be obtained immediately, but clinical microbiologists should remember that early results only can aid the appropriate management of patients, and consequently reduce emergence and the spread of resistance. It was reported that early preliminary microbiology results of blood stream infection had a greater impact on antimicrobial management than susceptibility data (32).

In conclusion, methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci, ampicillin-resistant E. faecium and H. influenzae, and expanded-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli remain prevalent. Vancomycin-resistant E. faecium, fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, and imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa are increasing at all groups of hospitals. Given this increasing resistance, not only rapid and accurate routine susceptibility testing, but also the nationwide resistance surveillance become even more important for optimal patient management, the control of nosocomial infection, and eventually to conserve newer antimicrobial agents.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

The trend of resistance of Staphylococcus isolates to oxacillin and erythromycin, and Enterococcus to ampicillin, and of penicillin G-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae. OXA, oxacillin; ERY, erythromycin; AMP, ampicillin; PEN, penicillin G; R, resistant; NS, nonsusceptible; SAU, S. aureus; CNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; EFM, E. faecium; SPN, S. pneumoniae.

Fig. 2

The trend of resistance of Enterococcus isolates to vancomycin at large (≥1,000 beds), and medium (<1,000 beds) hospitals. S, Seoul; NS, non-Seoul; Med, medium.

Fig. 3

Trend of resistance of E. coli and H. influenzae isolates to ampicillin, K. pneumoniae to cefoxitin, P. aeruginosa to amikacin, and Acinetobacter spp. to amikacin and imipenem. AMP, ampicillin; AMK, amikacin; FOX, cefoxitin; IMP, imipenem; ECO, E. coli; KPN, K. pneumoniae; ACI, Acinetobacter spp.; PAE, P. aeruginosa; HIN, H. influenzae.

Fig. 4

Trend of resistance of Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter isolates to fluoroquinolone. ECO, E. coli; KPN, K. pneumoniae; ECL, E. cloacae; SMA, S. marcescens; PAE, P. aeruginosa; ACI, Acinetobacter spp.

Fig. 5

Trend of resistance of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter isolates to ceftazidime and imipenem at large and medium hospitals. S, Seoul; NS, non-Seoul; Med, medium.

Table 1

Antimicrobial resistance rates of Staphylococcu species, S. pneumoniae and Enterococcus species

^*Not tested.

Table 2

Antimicrobial resistance rates of Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp.

^*Not tested. ^†Mostly tested by using ciprofloxacin, but some hospitals used ofloxacin or levofloxacin.

Notes

OTHER MEMBERS OF THE KONSAR GROUP: Jae Seok Kim, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul; Moon-Yeun Kim, Dongguk University, Pohang Hospital, Pohang; Gyoung-Yim Ha, Dongguk University, Kyongju Hospital, Kyongju; Nam Yong Lee, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul; Mi-Na Kim, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul; Wee Gyo Lee, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon; Chae Hoon Lee, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu; Kyung Soon Song, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Seoul; Young-Ae Hong, Ulsan Dong-Kang General Hospital, Ulsan; In Ki Paik, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul; Yeonsook Moon, Inha University Hospital, Incheon; Hye Soo Lee, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Chonju; Ae Ja Park, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul; Young Jin Choi, Soonchunhyang Chunan Hospital, Chunan; Myung Hee Lee, Korea Veterans Hospital, Seoul; Wonkeun Song, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul; Jung Oak Kang, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Kuri; Yeon Joon Park, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul; Jong Hee Shin, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju; Young Kyu Sun, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Goyang; Hee Joo Lee, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul; Hwan Sub Lim, Kwandong University, Myunggi Hospital, Goyang; Yoon Hee Kang, National Cancer Center, Goyang; Miae Lee, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

References

1. Hunter PA, Reeves DS. The current status of surveillance of resistance to antimicrobial agents: report on a meeting. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002. 49:17–23.

2. Cosgrove SE, Carmeli Y. The impact of antimicrobial resistance on health and economic outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2003. 36:1433–1437.

3. Voss A, Milatovic D, Wallrauch-Schwarz C, Rosdahl VT, Braveny I. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994. 13:50–55.

4. Sorberg M, Farra A, Ransjo U, Gardlund B, Rylander M, Settergren B, Kalin M, Kronvall G. Different trends in antibiotic resistance rates at a university teaching hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003. 9:388–396.

5. Morris AK, Masterton RG. Antibiotic resistance surveillance: action for international studies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002. 49:7–10.

6. Lee K, Kim MY, Kang SH, Kang JO, Kim EC, Chong Y. KONSAR group. Korean nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in 2000 with special reference to vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and imipenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Yonsei Med J. 2003. 44:571–578.

7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: tenth informational supplement. 2000. Wayne, PA: NCCLS.

8. Fridkin SK, Hill HA, Volkova NV, Edwards JR, Lawton RM, Gaynes RP, McGowan JE Jr. Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology (ICARE) Project Hospitals. Temporal changes in prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in 23 US hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002. 8:697–701.

9. Bax R, Bywater R, Cornaglia G, Goossens H, Hunter P, Isham V, Jarlier V, Jones R, Phillips I, Sahm D, Senn S, Struelens M, Taylor D, White A. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance- what, how and whither? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001. 7:316–325.

10. Lee K, Lee WG, Uh Y, Ha GY, Cho J, Chong Y. KONSAR Group. VIM- and IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. in Korean hospitals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003. 9:868–871.

11. Chambers HF. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997. 10:781–791.

12. Sunada A, Asari S. Report of questionnaire survey for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae between 1998 and 2000 in the Kinki district. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2003. 77:331–339.

13. Sievert DM, Boulton ML, Stoltman G, Johnson D, Stobierski MG, Downes FP, Somsel PA, Rudrick JT, Brown W, Hafeezx W, Lundstrom T, Flangan E, Johnson R, Mitchell J, Chang S. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin in United States. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report. 2002. 521:565–567.

14. Miller D, Urdaneta V, Weltman A. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus- Pennsylvania, 2002. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report. 2002. 51:902–903.

15. Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell LA, File TM Jr. Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. Clin Infect Dis. 1998. 26:811–838.

16. Shin JW, Yong D, Kim MS, Chang KH, Lee K, Kim JM, Chong Y. Sudden increase of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections in a Korean tertiary care hospital: possible consequences of increased use of oral vancomycin. J Infect Chemother. 2003. 9:62–67.

17. Davies J. Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science. 1994. 264:375–382.

18. Blosser-Middleton R, Sahm DF, Thornsberry C, Jones ME, Hogan PA, Critchley IA, Karlowsky JA. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 840 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae collected in four European countries in 2000-2001. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003. 9:431–436.

19. Hasegawa K, Yamamoto K, Chiba N, Kobayashi R, Nagai K, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC, Sunakawa K, Ubukata K. Diversity of ampicillin-resistance genes in Haemophilus influenzae in Japan and the United States. Microb Drug Resist. 2003. 9:39–46.

20. Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, Thielman NM, Slutsker L, Tauxe RV, Hennessy T, Griffin PM, DuPont H, Sack RB, Tarr P, Neill M, Nachamkin I, Reller LB, Osterholm MT, Bennish ML, Pickering LK. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2001. 32:331–351.

21. Lee K, Yong D, Yum JH, Kim HH, Chong Y. Diversity of TEM-52 Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003. 52:493–496.

22. Hooper DC. The future of the quinolones. APUA Newsletter. 2001. 19:1–5.

23. Paterson DL, Ko W-C, Von Gottberg A, Casellas JM, Mulazimoglu L, Klugman KP, Bonomo RA, Rice LB, McCormack JG, Yu VL. Outcome of cephalosporin treatment for serious infections due to apparently susceptible organisms producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases: implications for clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. 39:2206–2212.

24. Kang C, Kim S, Kim H, Park S, Choe Y, Oh M, Kim E, Choe K. The clinical outcome of blood stream infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a case control study. Abstract O257. Eur Cong Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003. 9:S47.

25. Bauernfeind A, Chong Y, Lee K. Plasmid-encoded AmpC β-lactamases: how far have we gone 10 years after the discovery? Yonsei Med J. 1998. 39:520–525.

26. Park JH, Lee SH, Jeong SH, Kim BN, Kim KB, Yoon JD, Jeon BC. Characterization and prevalence of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing an entended-spectrum β-lactamase from Korean hospitals. Korean J Lab Med. 2003. 23:18–24.

27. Rasmussen BA, Bush K. Carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997. 41:223–232.

28. Jeong SH, Lee K, Chong Y, Yum JH, Lee SH, Choi HJ, Kim JM, Park KH, Han BH, Lee SW, Jeong TS. Characterization of a new integron containing VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase gene cassette, in a clinical isolate of Enterobacter cloacae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003. 51:397–400.

29. Yum JH, Yong D, Lee K, Kim H-S, Chong Y. A new integron carrying VIM-2 metallo-beta-lactamase gene cassette in a Serratia marcescens isolate. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002. 42:217–219.

30. Lee K, Lim JB, Yum JH, Yong D, Chong Y, Kim JM, Livermore DM. bla_VIM-2 cassette-containing novel integrons in metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida isolates disseminated in a Korean hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002. 46:1053–1058.

31. Joshi SG, Litake GM, Niphadkar KB, Ghole VS. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a teaching hospital. J Infect Chemother. 2003. 9:187–190.

32. Munson EL, Diekema DJ, Beekmann SE, Chapin KC, Doern GV. Detection and treatment of bloodstream infection: laboratory reporting and antimicrobial management. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. 41:495–497.

TOOLS

Similar articles