Journal List > Chonnam Med J > v.45(2) > 1017940

Lim, Jeong, Sim, Hong, Kim, Ahn, Cho, Park, Kang, Moon, and Byun: Inhibitory Effect of Double Coating with Echinomycin and Hydrophobic Heparin in a Porcine Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Model

Abstract

Stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis are still major limitations of coronary stenting. Here, we report on a new type of drug-eluting stent (DES) aimed to prevent restenosis and thrombosis. The DES was prepared by coating a bare metal stent with echinomycin (an anti-proliferative drug) and hydrophobic heparin. The echinomycin-hydrophobic heparin double-coating stents were compared with control stents in a porcine coronary stent restenosis model. Stent overdilation injury (stent : artery=1.1 : 1.0) was compared in porcine coronary arteries between 4 groups: bare stent group (Group I, n=3), 1% echinomycin-heparin coating stent group (Group II, n=3), 5% echinomycin-heparin coating stent group (Group III, n=3), and 10% echinomycin-heparin coating stent group (Group IV, n=3). Follow-up quantitative coronary angiography was performed 4 weeks after the stents were inserted. The histopathologic assessments of the stented porcine coronary arteries were compared between the 4 groups. The neointimal areas of the stented arteries were 4.3±1.3 mm2 in Group I, 5.7±1.3 mm2 in Group II, 3.7±1.0 mm2 in Group III, and 2.7±1.1 mm2 in Group IV; the neointimal area was significantly larger in Group II than in the other groups (p<0.001). The histopathologic areas of stenosis were 61.4±18.1% in Group I, 79.8±24.0% in Group II, 52.0±18.5% in Group III, and 30.9±14.6% in Group IV; the histopathologic area was significantly smaller in Group IV than in the other groups (p<0.001). In conclusion, echinomycin-hydrophobic heparin double-coating stents effectively inhibit neointimal proliferation at a relatively high level.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Histopathology of pigs coronary arteries 4 weeks after stents implantation, Hematoxyline and eosin stain. (A) Group I: control (bare stent) group, (B) Group II: 1% echinomycin, (C) Group III: 5% echinomycin, (D) Group IV: 10% echinomycin, respectively.
cmj-45-87-g001
Table 1
Quantitative coronary angiographic findings of porcine coronary arteries
cmj-45-87-i001
Table 2
Histopathologic assessment of porcine coronary arteries after 4 weeks of stent implantation
cmj-45-87-i002

IEL, internal elastic lamina.

References

1. Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Moses JW, Popma JJ, Cutlip D, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation. 2004. 109:634–640.
crossref
2. Salam AM, al Suwaidi J, Holmes DR Jr. Drug-eluting coronary stents. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2006. 31:8–119.
crossref
3. Leon MB, Bakhai A. Drug-eluting stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: combination therapy for the future. Am Heart J. 2003. 146(4):Suppl. S13–S17.
crossref
4. Mintz GS, Tinana A, Hong MK, Lee CW, Kim JJ, Fearnot NE, et al. Impact of preinterventional arterial remodeling on neointimal hyperplasia after implantation of (non-polymer-encapsulated) paclitaxel-coated stents: a serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the ASian Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Clinical Trial (ASPECT). Circulation. 2003. 108:1295–1298.
crossref
5. Nebeker JR, Virmani R, Bennett CL, Hoffman JM, Samore MH, Alvarez J, et al. Hypersensitivity cases associated with drug-eluting coronary stents: a review of available cases from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47:175–181.
6. Virmani R, Farb A, Guagliumi G, Kolodgie FD. Drug-eluting stents: caution and concerns for long-term outcome. Coron Artery Dis. 2004. 15:313–318.
crossref
7. Azarbal B, Currier JW. Allergic reactions after the implantation of drug-eluting stents: is it the pill or the polymer? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47:182–183.
8. Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H, Legrand V, Garcia E, Macaya C, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet. 1998. 352:673–681.
crossref
9. de Scheerder I, Wang K, Wilczek K, Meuleman D, vanAmsterdam R, Vogel G, et al. Experimental study of thrombogenicity and foreign body reaction induced by heparin-coated coronary stents. Circulation. 1997. 95:1549–1553.
crossref
10. Ragosta M, Karve M, Brezynski D, Humphries J, Sanders JM, Sarembock IJ, et al. Effectiveness of heparin in preventing thrombin generation and thrombin activity in patients undergoing coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 1999. 137:250–257.
crossref
11. Ahn YK, Jeong MH, Kim JW, Kim SH, Cho JH, Cho JG, et al. Preventive effects of the heparin-coated stent on restenosis in the porcine model. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999. 48:324–330.
crossref
12. Park HW, Jeong MH, Jang YS, Kim YR, Kim W, Park WS, et al. The effects of the heparin-coated maximum arterial re-creation(MAC) stent on porcine coronary stent restenosis. Korean Circ J. 1999. 29:498–506.
crossref
13. Park HW, Jeong MH, Park OY, Kim IS, Choi MJ, Lee SH, et al. The long-term clinical effects of heparin-coated coronary stent. Korean Circ J. 2002. 32:773–780.
crossref
14. Morice MC, Serruy PW, Sousa JE, Fajadet J, Ban Hayashi E, Perin M, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002. 346:1773–1780.
crossref
15. Abizaid A, Costa MA, Blanchard D, Albertal M, Eltchaninoff H, Guagliumi G, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit neointimal hyperplasia in diabetic patients: insights from the RAVEL Trial. Eur Heart J. 2004. 25:107–112.
crossref
16. Kang WC, Han SH, Ahn TH, Son MS, Son JW, Shin EK. The long-term clinical outcomes of primary PTCA with heparincoated stent in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J. 2004. 34:540–547.
crossref
17. Park HW, Jeong MH, Park OY, Kim IS, Choi MJ, Lee SH, et al. The Long-term clinical effects of heparin-coated coronary stent. Korean Circ J. 2002. 32:773–780.
crossref
18. Kim W, Jeong MH, Lim SY, Lee SR, Kim KH, Sohn IS, et al. The first clinical trial of antioxidant, carvedilol-eluting stent in coronary artery diseases. Korean Circ J. 2006. 36:115–120.
crossref
19. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Kim W, Lim SY, Lee SH, Hong SN, et al. Effect of abciximab-coated stent on in-stent intimal hyperplasia in human coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2004. 94:1050–1054.
crossref
20. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Kim W, Lim SY, Hong SN, Lee SH, et al. The effects of abciximab(ReoPro®)-coated stents on extracellular matrix synthesis and apoptosis. Korean Circ J. 2005. 35:290–301.
crossref
21. Kim W, Jeong MH, Kim KH, Sohn IS, Hong YJ, Park HW, et al. The clinical results of a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker (Abciximab: ReoPro®)-coated stent in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47:933–938.
crossref
22. Lim SY, Bae EH, Jeong MH, Kim JH, Kim JH, Joo SY, et al. The Effect of Alpha Lipoic Acid in Porcine In-Stent Restenosis Model. Korean Circulation J. 2006. 36:495–502.
23. Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H, Legrand V, Garcia E, Macaya C, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet. 1998. 352:673–681.
crossref
24. Kong D, Park EJ, Stephen AG, Calvani M, Cardellina JH, Monks A, et al. Echinomycin, a small-molecule inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 DNA-binding activity. Cancer Res. 2005. 65:9047–9055.
crossref
25. Leng F, Chaires JB, Waring MJ. Energetics of echinomycin binding to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003. 31:6191–6197.
crossref
26. Laughner E, Taghavi P, Chiles K, Mahon PC, Semenza GL. HER2(neu) signaling increases the rate of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a (HIF-1a) synthesis: novel mechanism for HIF-1-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2001. 21:3995–4004.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles