Abstract
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is commonly used in cases of exophytic, small renal tumors. The aim of our study was to compare the treatment outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with endophytic renal tumors with exophytic lesions. Fifty-two patients (31 males; 21 females; mean age, 55.5 years) who had consecutively undergone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a renal tumor were the subjects of the study. An outgrowing mass of greater than half the total tumor volume was considered an exophytic tumor with less than half the volume being endophytic on the basis of a CT scan[jen1]. A total of 29 exophytic and 23 endophytic tumors were compared according to patient characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative surgical outcomes. Two cases of exophytic tumors were converted to open partial surgery, and the total kidney was excised in one case of an endophytic tumor. Endophytic tumors were associated with a longer operation time (198.68±54.92 minutes vs 165.15±39.5 minutes, p=0.021) and increased mean blood loss (453.14±48.2 ml vs 270.74±264.57 ml, p=0.049). Both exophytic and endophytic tumors were comparable in terms of warm ischemic time (35.33±13.04 minutes vs 43.55±15.18 minutes, respectively, p=0.051), hospital stay, duration of fast, and bed rest. Endophytic renal tumors were more likely to take a longer operation time and bleed more in the setting of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. However, laparoscopic partial excision of endophytic renal tumors was safely performed with reliable warm ischemic times and few complications. Our study showed the role of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in managing endophytic renal tumors.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Novick AC. Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004. 10:S6322–S6327.
2. McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Elashry OM. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: The Washington university experience. J Urol. 1996. 155:1180–1185.
3. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol. 2002. 167:469–477.
4. McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Kerbl K, Stone AM, Wick MR, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model. J Urol. 1993. 149:1633–1636.
5. Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol. 1993. 7:521–526.
6. Gill IS, Delworth MG, Munch LC. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 1994. 152:1539–1542.
7. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001. 166:6–18.
8. Shikanov S, Lifshitz DA, Deklaj T, Katz MH, Shalhav AL. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for technically challenging tumours. BJU Int. 2009.
9. Venkatesh R, Weld K, Ames CD, Figenshau SR, Sundaram CP, Andriole GL, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses: effects of tumor location. Urology. 2006. 67:1169–1174.
10. Bang JK, Song CR, Hong BS, Park HK, Kim CS, Ahn HJ. The effectiveness of simultaneous renal artery-vein clamping during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on the surgical outcome. Korean J Urol. 2007. 48:897–902.
11. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standarized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009. 182:844–853.
12. McAllister M, Bhayani SB, Ong A, Jaffe W, Malkowicz SB, VanArsdalen K, et al. Vena caval transection during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. J Urol. 2004. 172:183–185.
13. Wright JL, Porter JR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Urol. 2005. 174:841–845.
14. Choi HS, Shin BS, Nam DH, Im CM, Jung SI, Kwon DD, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy and open adrenalectomy. Chonnam Med J. 2009. 45:116–121.
15. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Streem SB, Klein E, Licht M. Complications of nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors. J Urol. 1994. 151:1177–1180.
16. Steinbach F, Stöckle M, Muller SC, Thuroff JW, Melchior SW, Stein R, et al. Conservative surgery of renal cell tumors in 140 patients: 21 years of experience. J Urol. 1992. 148:24–29.
17. Jeschke K, Peschel R, Wakonig J, Schellander L, Bartsch G, Henning K. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors. Urology. 2001. 58:688–692.
18. Bove P, Bhayani SB, Rha KH, Allaf ME, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Necessity of ureteral catheter during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004. 172:458–460.
19. Novick AC. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, editors. Surgery of the kidney. Campbell's urology. 2002. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;3602–3613.
20. Duchene DA, Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Sagalowsky AI, Koeneman KS. Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series. Urology. 2003. 62:827–830.
21. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an anlysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol. 2003. 170:2217–2220.