Journal List > J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc > v.57(1) > 1017868

Seo: Neuropsychological Assessment of Dementia and Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Neuropsychological assessment is concerned with the behavioral expression of brain function through a series of cognitive testing tools. These results provide the objective identification of cognitive deficits, and play a key role in the detection of dementia and related cognitive disorders. New diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD biomarker models suggest that cognitive declines are evidence of advanced neurodegenerative disease. Accordingly, the traditional contribution of neuropsychological assessment in early detection and diagnosis has been brought into question. In this review, the utility of neuropsychological assessment concerning dementia and cognitive disorders has been revisited. Neuropsychological assessment still plays a role in differential diagnosis as well as diagnosis. It is also useful to document cognitive changes along the dementia trajectory and to predict progression. Neuropsychological performance can estimate functional status and predict functional changes in everyday life. Identification of cognitive strengths and weaknesses can assist in intervention planning. However, the utility of neuropsychological assessment is not guaranteed if the neuropsychological tests have insufficient reliability, validity, and normative information. Commonly used cognitive screening tests and neuropsychological test batteries were examined. Lastly, several special considerations in the assessment of older adults were discussed.

REFERENCES

1). Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;2012.
2). Hampel H, Frank R, Broich K, Teipel SJ, Katz RG, Hardy J, et al. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010; 9:560–574.
crossref
3). Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7:270–279.
crossref
4). Jack CR Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, McKhann GM, Sperling RA, Carrillo MC, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7:257–262.
crossref
5). McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7:263–269.
crossref
6). Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7:280–292.
crossref
7). Lee DY, Sohn BK. New diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: NIA-AA diagnostic guidelines. J Korean Geriatr Psythiatry. 2012; 16:7–12.
8). Stuss DT, Knight RT. Principles of frontal lobe function. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;2013.
9). American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Pub;2013.
10). Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991; 82:239–259.
crossref
11). Salmon DP, Bondi MW. Neuropsychological assessment of dementia. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009; 60:257–282.
crossref
12). Salmon DP, Thomas RG, Pay MM, Booth A, Hofstetter CR, Thal LJ, et al. Alzheimer's disease can be accurately diagnosed in very mildly impaired individuals. Neurology. 2002; 59:1022–1028.
crossref
13). Desmond DW. The neuropsychology of vascular cognitive impairment: is there a specific cognitive deficit? J Neurol Sci. 2004; 226:3–7.
crossref
14). Reed BR, Mungas DM, Kramer JH, Ellis W, Vinters HV, Zarow C, et al. Profiles of neuropsychological impairment in autopsy-defined Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease. Brain. 2007; 130(Pt 3):731–739.
crossref
15). Marui W, Iseki E, Kato M, Akatsu H, Kosaka K. Pathological entity of dementia with Lewy bodies and its differentiation from Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2004; 108:121–128.
crossref
16). Rascovsky K, Salmon DP, Hansen LA, Thal LJ, Galasko D. Disparate letter and semantic category fluency deficits in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology. 2007; 21:20–30.
crossref
17). Karantzoulis S, Galvin JE. Distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from other major forms of dementia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011; 11:1579–1591.
crossref
18). Fields JA, Ferman TJ, Boeve BF, Smith GE. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with dementing illness. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011; 7:677–687.
crossref
19). Smith GE, Pankratz VS, Negash S, Machulda MM, Petersen RC, Boeve BF, et al. A plateau in pre-Alzheimer memory decline: evidence for compensatory mechanisms? Neurology. 2007; 69:133–139.
crossref
20). Grady CL, McIntosh AR, Beig S, Keightley ML, Burian H, Black SE. Evidence from functional neuroimaging of a compensatory prefrontal network in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:986–993.
crossref
21). Bilgel M, Koscik RL, An Y, Prince JL, Resnick SM, Johnson SC, et al. Temporal order of Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive marker changes in BLSA and WRAP longitudinal studies. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 59:1335–1347.
crossref
22). Seo EH, Kim H, Lee KH, Choo IH. Altered executive function in pre-mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016; 54:933–940.
crossref
23). Gallucci M, Di Battista ME, Battistella G, Falcone C, Bisiacchi PS, Di Giorgi E. Neuropsychological tools to predict conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to dementia. The TREDEM Registry. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017. 1–11.
crossref
24). Li K, Chan W, Doody RS, Quinn J, Luo S. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Prediction of conversion to Alzheimer's disease with longitudinal measures and time-to-event data. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 58:361–371.
crossref
25). Clark DG, McLaughlin PM, Woo E, Hwang K, Hurtz S, Ramirez L, et al. Novel verbal fluency scores and structural brain imaging for prediction of cognitive outcome in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016; 2:113–122.
crossref
26). Mazzeo S, Santangelo R, Bernasconi MP, Cecchetti G, Fiorino A, Pinto P, et al. Combining cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and neuropsychological assessment: a simple and cost-effective algorithm to predict the progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016; 54:1495–1508.
27). Jang H, Ye BS, Woo S, Kim SW, Chin J, Choi SH, et al. Prediction model of conversion to dementia risk in subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a longitudinal, multicenter clinic-based study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 60:1579–1587.
crossref
28). Blacker D, Lee H, Muzikansky A, Martin EC, Tanzi R, McArdle JJ, et al. Neuropsychological measures in normal individuals that predict subsequent cognitive decline. Arch Neurol. 2007; 64:862–871.
crossref
29). Oulhaj A, Wilcock GK, Smith AD, de Jager CA. Predicting the time of conversion to MCI in the elderly: role of verbal expression and learning. Neurology. 2009; 73:1436–1442.
crossref
30). Chen Y, Denny KG, Harvey D, Farias ST, Mungas D, DeCarli C, et al. Progression from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment in a diverse clinic-based and community-based elderly cohort. Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13:399–405.
crossref
31). Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Parsey C, Cook DJ. Cognitive correlates of functional performance in older adults: comparison of self-report, direct observation, and performance-based measures. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011; 17:853–864.
crossref
32). Fields JA, Machulda M, Aakre J, Ivnik RJ, Boeve BF, Knopman DS, et al. Utility of the DRS for predicting problems in day-to-day functioning. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24:1167–1180.
crossref
33). Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 69:89–95.
34). Ritchie K, Ropacki M, Albala B, Harrison J, Kaye J, Kramer J, et al. Recommended cognitive outcomes in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: consensus statement from the European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia project. Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13:186–195.
crossref
35). Weintraub S, Randolph C, Bain L, Hendrix JA, Carrillo MC. Is cognitive decline measurable in preclinical Alzheimer's disease? Alzheimers Dement. 2017; 13:322–323.
crossref
36). Weston PSJ, Nicholas JM, Henley SMD, Liang Y, Macpherson K, Donnachie E, et al. Accelerated longterm forgetting in presymptomatic autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17:123–132.
crossref
37). American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurment in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Amer Educational Research Assn. 2014.
38). Stein J, Luppa M, Brähler E, König HH, Riedel-Heller SG. The assessment of changes in cognitive functioning: reliable change indices for neuropsychological instruments in the elderly - a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010; 29:275–286.
crossref
39). Stuart-Hamilton I (Lee DY, Seo EH, Woo JI, translated). The Psychology of Ageing. Seoul: Seoul National University Press;2017.
40). Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press;2006.
41). O'Connell ME, Tuokko H. Age corrections and dementia classification accuracy. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 25:126–138.
42). Chey J, Na DR, Park S, Park E, Lee S. Effects of education in dementia assessment: evidence from standardizing the Korean-Dementia Rating Scale. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999; 13:293–302.
crossref
43). Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. Development of the Korean version of the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease assessment packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57:47–53.
crossref
44). Kang Y, Na D. Seoul neuropsychological screening battery. Incheon: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.;2003.
45). Lee DY, Lee KU, Lee JH, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim SY, et al. A normative study of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery in the Korean elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10:72–81.
crossref
46). Ahn HJ, Chin J, Park A, Lee BH, Suh MK, Seo SW, et al. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-dementia version (SNSB-D): a useful tool for assessing and monitoring cognitive impairments in dementia patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2010; 25:1071–1076.
crossref
47). Seo EH, Lee DY, Kim KW, Lee JH, Jhoo JH, Youn JC, et al. A normative study of the Trail Making Test in Korean elders. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006; 21:844–852.
crossref
48). Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12:189–198.
49). Park JH, Kwon YC. Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K). Part I: development of the test for the elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989; 28:125–135.
50). Kang YW, Na DL, Hahn SH. A validity study on the korean mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 1997; 15:300–308.
51). Lee DY, Lee KU, Lee JH, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Youn JC, et al. A normative study of the mini-mental state examination in the Korean elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2002; 41:508–525.
52). Kim TH, Jhoo JH, Park JH, Kim JL, Ryu SH, Moon SW, et al. Korean version of mini mental status examination for dementia screening and its' short form. Psychiatry Investig. 2010; 7:102–108.
crossref
53). Johnson JK, Lui LY, Yaffe K. Executive function, more than global cognition, predicts functional decline and mortality in elderly women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62:1134–1141.
crossref
54). Wouters H, van Gool WA, Schmand B, Zwinderman AH, Lindeboom R. Three sides of the same coin: measuring global cognitive impairment with the MMSE, ADAS-cog and CAMCOG. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010; 25:770–779.
crossref
55). Kang IW, Beom IG, Cho JY, Son HR. Accuracy of Korean-Mini-Mental Status Examination based on Seoul Neuro-Psychological Screening Battery II results. Korean J Fam Med. 2016; 37:177–181.
crossref
56). Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987; 48:314–318.
57). Sohn EH, Lee AY, Park HJ. The validity and reliability of the Korean Modified Mini-Mental State (K-3MS) examination. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2003; 21:346–356.
58). Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53:695–699.
crossref
59). Kang YW, Park JS, Yu KH, Lee BC. A reliability validity, and normative study of the Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (K-MoCA) as an instrument for screening of Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI). Korean J Clin Psychol. 2009; 28:549–562.
60). Lee JY, Lee DW, Cho SJ, Na DL, Jeon HJ, Kim SK, et al. Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2008; 21:104–110.
crossref
61). Gluhm S, Goldstein J, Loc K, Colt A, Liew CV, Corey-Bloom J. Cognitive performance on the mini-mental state examination and the montreal cognitive assessment across the healthy adult lifespan. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2013; 26:1–5.
crossref
62). Woo JI, Lee DY, Lee JH, Lee KU, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, et al. The Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K). 2nd ed.Seoul: Seoul National University Press;2015.
63). Seo EH, Lee DY, Lee JH, Choo IH, Kim JW, Kim SG, et al. Total scores of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery: validation for mild cognitive impairment and dementia patients with diverse etiologies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010; 18:801–809.
crossref
64). Kang Y, Jahng S, Na DL. Seoul neuropsychological screening battery. 2nd ed (SNSB-II). Seoul: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.;2012.
65). Jahng S, Na DL, Kang Y. Constructing a composite score for the Seoul neuropsychological screening battery-core. Dement Neurocognitive Disord. 2015; 14:137–142.
crossref
66). Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources;1988.
67). Suk J, Chey J, Kim H. An additional normative study of the Korean-dementia rating scale. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2010; 29:559–572.
68). Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984; 141:1356–1364.
69). Cano SJ, Posner HB, Moline ML, Hurt SW, Swartz J, Hsu T, et al. The ADAS-cog in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: psychometric evaluation of the sum and its parts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81:1363–1368.
crossref
70). Youn JC, Lee DY, Kim KW, Lee JH, Jhoo JH, Lee KU, et al. Development of the Korean version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-K). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002; 17:797–803.
crossref
71). Nelson HE, O'Connell A. Dementia: the estimation of premorbid intelligence levels using the new adult reading test. Cortex. 1978; 14:234–244.
crossref
72). Yi D, Seo EH, Han JY, Sohn BK, Byun MS, Lee JH, et al. Development of the Korean Adult Reading Test (KART) to estimate premorbid intelligence in dementia patients. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0181523.
crossref
73). Holden UP. Neuropsychology and aging: definitions, explanations, and practical approaches. New York, NY: New York University Press;1988.
TOOLS
Similar articles