Journal List > J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc > v.55(2) > 1017838

Jung, Cho, Park, Kwak, and Kim: The Effect of Behavior Inhibition System on Smart-Phone Addiction : The Mediation Roll of Depression

Abstract

Objectives

This study was conducted to examine the mediating effect of depression on the relationship between behavior inhibition system (BIS) and smart-phone addiction (SA) in Korea.

Methods

An online survey was conducted including 5003 adult participants. Except for people without a smartphone, participants consisted of 2573 men and 2281 women, including a 20s group, 1611, 30s group, 2133, and 40s group, 1110. For evaluation of psychiatric symptoms and personal characteristics, participants were asked to complete self-reports, including BIS scale, depression scale of SCL-90-R (Dep), and SA scale.

Results

The BIS predicted both variance of depression and SA (BIS→Dep : β=0.374, p<0.001 ; BIS→SA : β=0.268, p<0.001), and depression predicted SA (β=0.386, p<0.001). The result of hierarchial regression analysis showed that depression mediated the relationship between behavior inhibition system and SA. Thus the effects between behavior inhibition system and smartphone decreased (β=0.268→0.144).

Conclusion

Depression mediates the influence of behavior inhibition system on SA. This result indicates that biological traits and negative emotions, such as depression, have an important influence on behavioral addiction.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Demographic profiles of the subjects (n=4854)

jkna-55-97-i001

SA : Smart-phone addiction Group

Table 2

Descriptive statistics and correlation of variances

jkna-55-97-i002

** : p<0.01. BIS : Behavior inhibition system, Dep : Depression, SA : Smart-phone addiction, SD : Standard deviation

Table 3

Association of smartphone addiction with BIS and Dep

jkna-55-97-i003

*** : p<0.001. BIS : Behavior inhibition system, Dep : Depression

Table 4

Association of smartphone addiction with BIS and Dep

jkna-55-97-i004

*** : p<0.001. BIS : Behavior inhibition system, Dep : Depression

Notes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Kim DI, Chung YJ, Lee JY, Kim MC, Lee YH, Kang EB, et al. Development of Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for adults: self-report. Korean J Couns. 2012; 13:629–644.
crossref
2. Young K. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychol Behav. 1996; 1:237–244.
crossref
3. Kwon JH. Effect of Sensation Seeking Tendency, Stress Coping Strategies, Social Support to Addictive use of Internet. In : Korea Psychology Conference; 2000 Jun 19-21; Seoul. Seoul: Riss;2000. p. 270–271.
4. Kim HK, Davis KE. Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic Internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities. Comput Human Behav. 2009; 25:490–500.
crossref
5. Jeon HS, Jang SO. A study on the influence of depression and stress on smartphone addiction among university students: focused on moderating effect of gender. Korean J Youth Stud. 2014; 21:103–129.
6. Park KW, Kim KS. A study on smartphone addiction level of middle school students and effects of related variables. J Fam Relat. 2015; 20:51–74.
7. Gray JA. A critique of eysenck's theory of personality. In : Eysenck HJ, editor. A model for personality. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg;1981. p. 246–276.
8. Giles G, Price IR. Adolescent computer use: approach, avoidance, and parental control. Australian J Psychol. 2008; 60:63–71.
crossref
9. Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, Chen CS, Chen CC. The association between harmful alcohol use and Internet addiction among college students: comparison of personality. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009; 63:218–224.
crossref
10. Meerkerk GJ, van den Eijnden RJ, Franken IH, Garretsen HF. Is compulsive internet use related to sensitivity to reward and punishment, and impulsivity? Comput Human Behav. 2010; 26:729–735.
crossref
11. Zuckerman M. Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2005.
12. Larsen RJ, Ketelaar T. Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 61:132–140.
crossref
13. Corr PJ. Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST): introduction. In : Corr PJ, editor. The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2008. p. 1–43.
14. Meyer B, Johnson SL, Winters R. Responsiveness to threat and incentive in bipolar disorder: relations of the BIS/BAS Scales with symptoms. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2001; 23:133–143.
15. Kasch KL, Rottenberg J, Arnow BA, Gotlib IH. Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111:589–597.
crossref
16. Muris P, Meesters C, Smulders L, Mayer B. Threat perception distortions and psychopathological symptoms in typically developing children. Infant Child Dev. 2005; 14:273–285.
crossref
17. Pinto-Meza A, Caseras X, Soler J, Puigdemont D, Pérez V, Torrubia R. Behavioural Inhibition and behavioural activation systems in current and recovered major depression participants. Pers Individ Differ. 2006; 40:215–226.
crossref
18. No AY, Jeong M. Depression mediated predictors of college students' internet addiction. Korean J Couns. 2011; 12:355–371.
crossref
19. Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS Scales. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1994; 69:319–333.
crossref
20. Kim GH, Kim WS. Korean Behavior Activation System/Behavior Inhibition System Scale. Korean J Health Psychol. 2001; 6:19–37.
21. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale-preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973; 9:13–28.
22. Kim KI, Kim JH, Won HT. Korean manual of symptom checklist-90-revision. Seoul: Choong Ang Aptitude Publishing Co;1984.
23. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51:1173–1182.
crossref
24. Kim MK. The influence of adolescents' psychological variables and attachment with parents upon internet game addicts and cellular phone addicts. Korean J Hum Dev. 2012; 19:1–22.
25. Sportel BE, de Hullu E, de Jong PJ, Nauta MH. Cognitive bias modification versus CBT in reducing adolescent social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e64355.
crossref
26. Park SM, Park YA, Lee HW, Jung HY, Lee JY, Choi JS. The effects of behavioral inhibition/approach system as predictors of Internet addiction in adolescents. Pers Individ Dif. 2013; 54:7–11.
crossref
27. Kimbrel NA. A model of the development and maintenance of generalized social phobia. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008; 28:592–612.
crossref
28. Amiel T, Sargent SL. Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Comput Human Behav. 2004; 20:711–726.
crossref
29. Gray JA. Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cogn Emot. 1990; 4:269–288.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles