Journal List > J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc > v.54(3) > 1017743

Kim, Yu, Kim, Choi, Lee, Lee, Choi, and Park: Gender Differences in the Formal Thought Disorder in Patients with Schizophrenia

Abstract

Objectives

Formal thought disorder has been regarded as an essential symptom in the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia. The aim of our study was to present gender differences in the formal thought disorder among patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

We tested for potential gender differences in the formal thought disorder among 167 inpatients with schizophrenia (86 men and 81 women). The Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language and Communication (TLC scale), Clinical Language Disorder Rating Scale (CLANG), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia were used for evaluation of thought disorder, language disorder, overall symptoms, manic symptoms, and depressive symptoms, respectively. Using the analysis of covariance for continuous variables and logistic regression analysis for discrete variables, gender differences in the formal thought disorder were evaluated.

Results

After adjusting for the effects of marital status and religious affiliation, men showed a significantly higher score on the perseveration (TLC scale ; F=7.538, p=0.007), blocking (TLC scale ; F=8.956, p=0.003), stilted speech (TLC scale ; F=6.921, p=0.009), lack of details (CLANG ; F=7.375, p=0.007), dysfluency (CLANG ; F=21.250, p<0.0001), and dysarthria (CLANG ; F=31.198, p<0.0001) items than women.

Conclusion

Our study has a virtue of exploring gender differences in the formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia. Based on our findings, further study might enlighten regarding neural correlates (namely, cerebral asymmetry/lateralization) for gender-differed patterns of the formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Gender differences in the baseline variables and assessment scale scores in patients with schizophrenia

jkna-54-291-i001

*: Adjusted for the effects of marital status and religious affiliation, : n=131. SD : Standard deviation

Table 2

Gender differences in the formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia (i)

jkna-54-291-i002

*: p<0.01, : Adjusted for the effects of marital status and religious affiliation. SD: Standard deviation

Table 3

Gender differences in the formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia (ii)

jkna-54-291-i003

*: p<0.01, : Adjusted for the effects of marital status and religious affiliation. SD: Standard deviation

Acknowledgments

Our study was supported by the Choi Shin-Hai Neuropsychiatry Research Fund (2013) of the Korean Foundation of Neuropsychiatry Research. The funding source had no further role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Andia AM, Zisook S, Heaton RK, Hesselink J, Jernigan T, Kuck J, et al. Gender differences in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1995; 183:522–528.
crossref
2. Leung A, Chue P. Sex differences in schizophrenia, a review of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2000; 401:3–38.
3. McGlashan TH, Bardenstein KK. Gender differences in affective, schizoaffective, and schizophrenic disorders. Schizophr Bull. 1990; 16:319–329.
crossref
4. Häfner H. Gender differences in schizophrenia. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003; 28:Suppl 2. 17–54.
crossref
5. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie. 6th ed. Leipzig: Barth;1899.
6. Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. New York: International Universities Press;1958.
7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;1980.
8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;1994.
9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;2013.
10. Park SC. Wittgensteinian philosophy and phenomenological psychopathology. Bull Yong-In Psychiatr Inst. 2012; 19:45–54.
11. Lee YS, Kim JJ, Kwon JS. Renaming schizophrenia in South Korea. Lancet. 2013; 382:683–684.
crossref
12. Lee YS, Park IH, Park SC, Kim JJ, Kwon JS. Johyeonbyung (attunement disorder): renaming mind splitting disorder as a way to reduce stigma of patients with schizophrenia in Korea. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014; 8:118–120.
crossref
13. Haas GL, Sweeney JA, Hien DA, Goldman D, Deck M. Gender differences in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1991; 4:277.
crossref
14. Andreasen NC. Scale for the assessment of thought, language, and communication (TLC). Schizophr Bull. 1986; 12:473–482.
crossref
15. Andreasen NC. Scale for the assessment of thought, language, and communication disorders: I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986; 12:473–482.
16. Chen EYH, Lam LCW, Chan CKY, Kwok CL, Nguyen DGH, Chen RYL. Language disorganisation in schizophrenia: validation and assessment with a new clinical rating instrument. Hong Kong J Psychiatry. 1966; 6:4–13.
17. Park SC, Jang EY, Lee KU, Lee K, Lee HY, Choi J. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication. Compr Psychiatry. 2015; 61:122–130.
crossref
18. Park SC, Jang EY, Lee KU, Lee KS, Lee HY, Choi JH. Psychometric properties of Korean version of the clinical language rating scale. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2015; (in press).
19. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep. 1962; 10:799–812.
crossref
20. Leucht S, Kane JM, Etschel E, Kissling W, Hamann J, Engel RR. Linking the PANSS, BPRS, and CGI: clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006; 31:2318–2325.
crossref
21. Yi JS, Ahn YM, Shin HK, An SK, Joo YH, Kim SH, et al. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the positive and negative syndrome scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2001; 40:1090–1105.
22. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978; 133:429–435.
crossref
23. Jung HY, Cho HS, Joo YH, Shin HK, Yi JS, Hwang S, et al. A validation study of the Korean-version of the Young Mania Rating Scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2003; 42:263–269.
24. Addington D, Addington J, Schissel B. A depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophr Res. 1990; 3:247–251.
crossref
25. Kim YK, Won SD, Lee KM, Choi HS, Jang HS, Lee BH, et al. A study on the reliability and validity of the Korean Version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia(K-CDSS). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2005; 44:446–455.
26. Andreasen NC, Grove WM. Thought, language, and communication in schizophrenia: diagnosis and prognosis. Schizophr Bull. 1986; 12:348–359.
crossref
27. Pandurangi AK, Sax KW, Pelonero AL, Goldberg SC. Sustained attention and positive formal thought disorder in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1994; 13:109–116.
crossref
28. Xu JQ, Hui CL, Longenecker J, Lee EH, Chang WC, Chan SK, et al. Executive function as predictors of persistent thought disorder in first-episode schizophrenia: a one-year follow-up study. Schizophr Res. 2014; 159:465–470.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles