Abstract
Objectives
This study was conducted in order to determine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11-Revised (K-BIS-11-R) in Nonclinical Adult Subjects.
Methods
The K-BIS-11-R was tested in non-clinical (n=270) native Korean-speakers. Internal consistency reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability was measured using Pearson correlations. To see external validity, we performed confirmatory factor analysis for determination of whether the three-factor model, proposed by the previous report, fit the data.
Results
According to the results, the K-BIS-11-R had an acceptable test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability. In addition, the K-BIS-11-R total score and second-order subscale score showed significant correlation with Conners' Adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder Rating Scale-Korean and Buss & Durkee Hostility Inventory. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the K-BIS-11-R total score and demographic variables. Thus, the K-BIS-11-R total score was transformed to standard score.
References
1. Fossati A, Di Ceglie A, Acquarini E, Barratt ES. Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) in nonclinical subjects. J Clin Psychol. 2001. 57:815–828.
2. Eysenck SB, Eysenck HJ. The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1977. 16:57–68.
3. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987. 44:573–588.
4. Barratt ES. McCowan W, Shure M, editors. Impulsivity: Integrating, cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment. 1993. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association;39–56.
5. Barratt ES. Monahan J, Steadman HJ, editors. Impulsiveness and aggression. Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. 1994. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995. 51:768–774.
7. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann AC. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry. 2001. 158:1783–1793.
8. Luengo MA, Carrillo de la Peña MT, Otero JM. The components of impulsiveness: a comparison of the 1.7 Impulsiveness Questionnaire and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Pers Individ Dif. 1991. 12:657–667.
9. Someya T, Sakado K, Seki T, Kojima M, Reist C, Tang SW, et al. The Japanese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version (BIS-11): its reliability and validity. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001. 55:111–114.
10. Baylé FJ, Bourdel MC, Caci H, Gorwood P, Chignon JM, Adés J, et al. [Factor analysis of french translation of the Barratt impulsivity scale (BIS-10)]. Can J Psychiatry. 2000. 45:156–165.
11. Giotakos O, Markianos M, Vaidakis N, Christodoulou GN. Aggression, impulsivity, plasma sex hormones, and biogenic amine turnover in a forensic population of rapists. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003. 29:215–225.
12. Oquendo MA, Baca-Garcia E, Graver R, Morales M, Montalban V, Mann JJ. Spanish adaption of the Barratt impulsiveness scale (BIS). Eur J Psychiatry. 2001. 15:147–155.
13. Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, De Beurs E, Van Den Brink W. The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers. Psychol Med. 2008. 38:41–50.
14. Stanford MS, Mathias CW, Dougherty DM, Lake SL, Anderson NE, Patton JH. Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: an update and review. Pers Individ Dif. 2009. 47:385–395.
15. Swann AC, Pazzaglia P, Nicholls A, Dougherty DM, Moeller FG. Impulsivity and phase of illness in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2003. 73:105–111.
16. Westheide J, Wagner M, Quednow BB, Hoppe C, Cooper-Mahkorn D, Strater B, et al. Neuropsychological performance in partly remitted unipolar depressive patients: focus on executive functioning. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007. 257:389–395.
17. Dom G, Hulstijn W, Sabbe B. Differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking between early- and late-onset alcoholics. Addict Behav. 2006. 31:298–308.
18. Cherek DR, Lane SD. Fenfluramine effects on impulsivity in a sample of adults with and without history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000. 152:149–156.
19. Nasser JA, Gluck ME, Geliebter A. Impulsivity and test meal intake in obese binge eating women. Appetite. 2004. 43:303–307.
20. Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Avila C, Jimenez-Arriero MA, Ponce G, Monasor R, Jimenez M, et al. Impulsivity and sustained attention in pathological gamblers: influence of childhood ADHD history. J Gambl Stud. 2006. 22:451–461.
21. Dougherty DM, Mathias CW, Marsh DM, Papageorgiou TD, Swann AC, Moeller FG. Laboratory measured behavioral impulsivity relates to suicide attempt history. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004. 34:374–385.
22. Lee HS. Impulsivity Scale. 1996. Seoul: Korean Guidance.
23. Chung YO, Lee CW. A study of factor structures of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in Korean university students. Korean J Clin Psychol. 1997. 16:117–129.
24. Barratt ES. Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiency. Percept Mot Skills. 1959. 9:191–198.
25. Conners CK, Erhardt D, Sparrow E. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales; Technical manual. 1999. New York: Multi Health System.
26. Kim HY, Lee JY, Cho SS, Lee IS, Kim JH. A preliminary study on reliability and validity of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Korean version in college students. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2005. 24:171–185.
27. Buss AH, Durkee A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J Consult Psychol. 1957. 21:343–349.
28. Ko YI. The Relation of Anger Expression Modes, Depression and Aggression in College Students. 1994. Busan: Pusan National Univ;[dissertation].
29. Kim JH, Hong SH, Kim MG. Writing A paper using Structural Equation Modeling. 2009. Seoul: Communication Books;74.
30. Hong SH. The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2000. 19:161–177.