Abstract
Objectives
This study was conducted in order to determine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11-Revised (K-BIS-11-R) in Nonclinical Adult Subjects.
Methods
The K-BIS-11-R was tested in non-clinical (n=270) native Korean-speakers. Internal consistency reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability was measured using Pearson correlations. To see external validity, we performed confirmatory factor analysis for determination of whether the three-factor model, proposed by the previous report, fit the data.
Results
According to the results, the K-BIS-11-R had an acceptable test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability. In addition, the K-BIS-11-R total score and second-order subscale score showed significant correlation with Conners' Adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder Rating Scale-Korean and Buss & Durkee Hostility Inventory. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the K-BIS-11-R total score and demographic variables. Thus, the K-BIS-11-R total score was transformed to standard score.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Fossati A, Di Ceglie A, Acquarini E, Barratt ES. Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11) in nonclinical subjects. J Clin Psychol. 2001. 57:815–828.


2. Eysenck SB, Eysenck HJ. The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1977. 16:57–68.


3. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987. 44:573–588.


4. Barratt ES. McCowan W, Shure M, editors. Impulsivity: Integrating, cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment. 1993. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association;39–56.


5. Barratt ES. Monahan J, Steadman HJ, editors. Impulsiveness and aggression. Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. 1994. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995. 51:768–774.
7. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann AC. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry. 2001. 158:1783–1793.


8. Luengo MA, Carrillo de la Peña MT, Otero JM. The components of impulsiveness: a comparison of the 1.7 Impulsiveness Questionnaire and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Pers Individ Dif. 1991. 12:657–667.


9. Someya T, Sakado K, Seki T, Kojima M, Reist C, Tang SW, et al. The Japanese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version (BIS-11): its reliability and validity. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001. 55:111–114.


10. Baylé FJ, Bourdel MC, Caci H, Gorwood P, Chignon JM, Adés J, et al. [Factor analysis of french translation of the Barratt impulsivity scale (BIS-10)]. Can J Psychiatry. 2000. 45:156–165.
11. Giotakos O, Markianos M, Vaidakis N, Christodoulou GN. Aggression, impulsivity, plasma sex hormones, and biogenic amine turnover in a forensic population of rapists. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003. 29:215–225.


12. Oquendo MA, Baca-Garcia E, Graver R, Morales M, Montalban V, Mann JJ. Spanish adaption of the Barratt impulsiveness scale (BIS). Eur J Psychiatry. 2001. 15:147–155.
13. Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, De Beurs E, Van Den Brink W. The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers. Psychol Med. 2008. 38:41–50.


14. Stanford MS, Mathias CW, Dougherty DM, Lake SL, Anderson NE, Patton JH. Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: an update and review. Pers Individ Dif. 2009. 47:385–395.


15. Swann AC, Pazzaglia P, Nicholls A, Dougherty DM, Moeller FG. Impulsivity and phase of illness in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2003. 73:105–111.


16. Westheide J, Wagner M, Quednow BB, Hoppe C, Cooper-Mahkorn D, Strater B, et al. Neuropsychological performance in partly remitted unipolar depressive patients: focus on executive functioning. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007. 257:389–395.


17. Dom G, Hulstijn W, Sabbe B. Differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking between early- and late-onset alcoholics. Addict Behav. 2006. 31:298–308.


18. Cherek DR, Lane SD. Fenfluramine effects on impulsivity in a sample of adults with and without history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000. 152:149–156.


19. Nasser JA, Gluck ME, Geliebter A. Impulsivity and test meal intake in obese binge eating women. Appetite. 2004. 43:303–307.


20. Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Avila C, Jimenez-Arriero MA, Ponce G, Monasor R, Jimenez M, et al. Impulsivity and sustained attention in pathological gamblers: influence of childhood ADHD history. J Gambl Stud. 2006. 22:451–461.


21. Dougherty DM, Mathias CW, Marsh DM, Papageorgiou TD, Swann AC, Moeller FG. Laboratory measured behavioral impulsivity relates to suicide attempt history. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004. 34:374–385.


22. Lee HS. Impulsivity Scale. 1996. Seoul: Korean Guidance.
23. Chung YO, Lee CW. A study of factor structures of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in Korean university students. Korean J Clin Psychol. 1997. 16:117–129.
24. Barratt ES. Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiency. Percept Mot Skills. 1959. 9:191–198.


25. Conners CK, Erhardt D, Sparrow E. Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales; Technical manual. 1999. New York: Multi Health System.
26. Kim HY, Lee JY, Cho SS, Lee IS, Kim JH. A preliminary study on reliability and validity of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Korean version in college students. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2005. 24:171–185.
27. Buss AH, Durkee A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J Consult Psychol. 1957. 21:343–349.


28. Ko YI. The Relation of Anger Expression Modes, Depression and Aggression in College Students. 1994. Busan: Pusan National Univ;[dissertation].
29. Kim JH, Hong SH, Kim MG. Writing A paper using Structural Equation Modeling. 2009. Seoul: Communication Books;74.
30. Hong SH. The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2000. 19:161–177.