1. Morrow DA, Braunwald E. Future of biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes: moving toward a multimarker strategy. Circulation. 2003. 108:250–252.
2. Lindahl B, Toss H, Siegbahn A, Venge P, Wallentin L. Markers of myo-cardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2000. 343:1139–1147.
3. Bjorklund E, Lindahl B, Johanson P, et al. Admission Troponin T and measurement of ST-segment resolution at 60 min improve early risk stratification in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2004. 25:113–120.
4. Choe HM, Yoo BS, Ryu HY, et al. The early changing pattern of the B-type natriuretic peptide concentration and its significance as a prognostic marker after acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J. 2006. 36:526–534.
5. Foussas SG, Zairis MN, Lyras AG, et al. Early prognostic usefulness of C-reactive protein added to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarc-tion risk score in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2005. 96:533–537.
6. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Park OY, et al. The role of C-reactive protein on the long-term clinical outcome after primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean J Intern Med. 2003. 18:29–34.
7. Bae EH, Lim SY, Jeong MH, et al. Long-term predictive factors of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Korean J Intern Med. 2005. 20:8–14.
8. Mega JL, Morrow DA, De Lemos JA, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide at presentation and prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an ENTIRE-TIMI-23 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. 44:335–339.
9. Staub D, Nusbaumer C, Zellweger MJ, et al. Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Am Heart J. 2006. 151:1223–1230.
10. Schroder R, Dissmann R, Bruggemann T, et al. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994. 24:384–391.
11. McLaughlin MG, Stone GW, Aymong E, et al. Prognostic utility of comparative methods for assessment of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Com-plications (CADILLAC) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. 44:1215–1223.
12. De Luca G, Maas AC, Suryapranata H, et al. Prognostic significance of residual cumulative ST-segment deviation after mechanical reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2005. 150:1248–1254.
13. Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Fragmin in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) Study Group. Troponin T identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit from long-term antithrombotic protection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997. 29:43–48.
14. Omland T, Persson A, Ng L, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002. 106:2913–2918.
15. Cameron SJ, Sokoll LJ, Laterza OF, Shah S, Green GB. A multi-marker approach for the prediction of adverse events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chim Acta. 2007. 376:168–173.
16. Tomoda H, Aoki N. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein levels within six hours after the onset of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2000. 140:324–328.
17. Nikfardjam M, Mullner M, Schreiber W, et al. The association between C-reactive protein on admission and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Intern Med. 2000. 247:341–345.
18. Zairis MN, Manousakis SJ, Stefanidis AS, et al. C-reactive protein levels on admission are associated with response to thrombolysis and prognosis after ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2002. 144:782–789.