Journal List > Korean Circ J > v.38(4) > 1016326

Kim, Kim, Park, Park, Kim, Jang, Kim, Jung, Baek, Seung, and Choi: Effect of High Dose External Irradiation on the Matrix Metalloprotease-2 Expression in a Rat Carotid Artery Injury Model

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Remodeling of the injured arterial wall is dependent on the action of several extracellular proteases, including matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP-2), and this protein is associated with the migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. The effect of a high dose of external irradiation (20 Gy) on the MMP-2 expression in neointimal hyperplasia is not known.

Materials and Methods

Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to balloon injury to the common carotid artery. At 24 hours after injury, 20 Gy external irradiation was done for the irradiated group (n=25) and this was not done for the control group (n=25). The percent area stenosis, the maximal intimal thickness, the intima/media area ratio on H-E staining and the MMP-2 positivity on the immunohistochemical staining were measured. Western blotting and a gelatin zymogram for determining the MMP-2 protein expression were also performed after the injury.

Results

The parameters of neointimal hyperplasia such as the percent area stenosis, the maximal intimal thickness and the intima/media area ratio were 40.2±12.1%, 0.30±0.12 mm and 1.27±0.32, respectively, at 14 days after injury, and these parameters were maintained as a hyperplastic state at 28 days after injury in the control group. There was undetectable neointimal hyperplasia in the irradiated group compared with the control group (p<0.01). Western blotting demonstrated an increase in the MMP-2 protein level beginning 2 to 4 days after injury in the control group, but there was only a transient increase in the MMP-2 level at day 2 after injury in the irradiated group. The gelatin zymogram and immunohistochemical staining also showed the expression of MMP-2 in the control group, but not in the irradiated group.

Conclusion

These findings suggest the suppressed expression of MMP-2 is associated with reduced neointimal hyperplasia in the balloon injury-rat model.

References

1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:489–95.
crossref
2. Bhargava B, Karthikeyan G, Abizaid AS, Mehran R. New approaches to preventing restenosis. BMJ. 2003; 327:274–9.
crossref
3. Fingerle J, Johnson R, Clowes AW, Majesky MW, Reidy MA. Role of platelets in smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration after vascular injury in rat carotid artery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86:8412–6.
crossref
4. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM. Mechanisms of stenosis after arterial injury. Lab Invest. 1983; 49:208–15.
5. Dollery CM, McEwan JR, Henny AM. Matrix metalloproteinases and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 1995; 77:863–8.
crossref
6. Pauly RR, Passaniti A, Bilato C, et al. Migration of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells through a basement membrane barrier requires type IV collagenase activity and is inhibited by cellular differentiation. Circ Res. 1994; 75:41–54.
crossref
7. vom Dahl J, Dietz U, Haager PK, et al. Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST). Circulation. 2002; 105:583–8.
8. Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, et al. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42:796–805.
9. Albiero R, Nishida T, Karvouni E, et al. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 50:452–9.
crossref
10. Waksman R, Raizner AE, Yeung AC, Lansky AJ, Vandertie L. Use of localised intracoronary beta-radiation in treatment of in-stent restenosis. Lancet. 2002; 359:551–7.
11. Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses JW, et al. Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:250–6.
crossref
12. Bae JW, Kang HJ, Kim KI, et al. Long-term effect of repeated brachytherapy in intracoronary brachytherapy failed lesions. Korean Circ J. 2004; 34:937–44.
crossref
13. Shimotakahara S, Mayberg MR. Gamma irradiation inhibits neointimal hyperplasia in rats after arterial injury. Stroke. 1994; 25:424–8.
crossref
14. Verin V, Popowski Y, Urban P, et al. Intra-arterial beta irradiation prevents neointimal hyperplasia in a hypercholesterolemic rabbit restenosis model. Circulation. 1995; 92:2284–90.
crossref
15. Wiedermann JG, Marboe C, Amols H, Schwartz A, Weinberger J. Intracoronary irradiation markedly reduces neointimal proliferation after balloon angioplasty in swine: persistent benefit at 6-month follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:1451–6.
crossref
16. Verin V, Popowski Y, de Bruyne B, et al. Endoluminal beta-radiation therapy for the prevention of coronary restenosis after balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344:243–9.
crossref
17. Zeymer U, Fishbein MC, Forrester JS, Cercek B. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemisty in rat aorta after balloon denudation. Am J Pathol. 1992; 141:685–90.
18. Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents. JAMA. 2006; 295:1253–63.
crossref
19. Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents. JAMA. 2006; 295:1264–73.
crossref
20. Liu MW, Roubin GS, King SB 3rd. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: potential biologic determinants and role of intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 1989; 79:1374–87.
21. Hong YJ, Jeong MH. New methods of vascular brachytherapy for coronary stent restenosis. Korean Circ J. 2003; 33:967–76.
crossref
22. Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:2584–91.
23. Park DW, Park SW, Park KH, et al. Frequency of and risk factors for stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation during longterm follow up. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98:352–6.
24. Powers BE, Thames HD, Gillette EL. Long-term adverse effects of radiation inhibiton of restenosis: radiation injury to the aorta and branch arteries in a canine model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 45:753–9.
25. Weinberger J, Amols H, Ennis RD, Schwartz A, Wiedermann JG, Marboe CM. Intracoronary irradiation: dose response for the prevention of restenosis in swine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996; 36:767–75.
crossref
26. Zempo N, Kenagy RD, Au YP, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases of vascular wall cells are increased in balloon-injured rat carotid artery. J Vasc Surg. 1994; 20:209–17.
crossref
27. Ge J, Shen C, Liang C, Chen L, Qian J, Chen H. Elevated matrix metalloproteinase expression after stent implantation is associated with restenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 112:85–90.
crossref
28. Kim YJ, Beak SH, Jin SW, et al. Effect of low dose external radiation on MMP-2 expression in rat carotid artery injury model. Korean Circ J. 2002; 32:1091–9.
29. Jenkins GM, Crow MT, Bilato C, et al. Increased expression of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase and preferential localization of matrix metalloprotenase-2 to the neointima of balloon-injured rat carotid arteries. Circulation. 1998; 97:82–90.

Fig. 1.
Photomicrographs from rat carotid artery stained with hematoxylin-eosin(×40). There is a marked increasing neointimal formation at 8 days (A), 14 days (C), and 28 days (E) after injury in control group. There is a nearly absence of neointimal area at 8 days (B), 14 days (D), and 28 days (F) after injury in irradiated group. Arrows indicate borderline of neointima.
kcj-38-212f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Effect of 20 Gy external irradiation on neointimal hyperplasia from rat carotid artery. A: percent area stenosis is nearly completely inhibited in irradiated group compared with control group at 14 days and 28 days after injury (p<0.01). B: intima/media ratio is also significantly inhibited in irradiated group compared with control group at 14 days and 28 days after injury (p<0.01). ∗Compared with control group at 14 days after injury (p<0.01),Compared with control group at 28 days after injury (p<0.01). CTL: control group, RT: irradiated group.
kcj-38-212f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Effect of 20 Gy external irradiation on western blot for MMP-2 in the balloon-injured rat carotid artery. A: representative western blot for MMP-2. Three micrograms of total protein extracted from a single vessel at each time point was loaded in each lane. B: graph of combined data for MMP-2 protein levels. The ratio is the representative O.D. data compared with the O.D. of sham operation. Data represent results from five separate determinations. ∗Statistically significant from sham operation group (p<0.05). PC: positive control for MMP-2 (lung tissue of rat), S: sham operation group, CTL: control group, RT: irradiated group, O.D.: optical density, MMP-2: matrix metalloprotease-2.
kcj-38-212f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Effect of 20 Gy external irradiation on gelatin zymogram in the balloon-injured rat carotid artery. A: representative gelatin zymogram for latent and active MMP-2. Three micrograms of total protein extracted from a single vessel at each time point was loaded in each lane. B: relative activation of MMP-2 as a function of time after artery injury. Graph of combined data for MMP-2 protein levels. Data represent results from five separate determinations. ∗Statistically significant from sham operation group (p<0.05). Statistically significant from unirradiated group (p<0.05). S: sham operation group, PC: positive control for MMP-2 (media of concanavalin-treated HT 1080 cell), CTL: control group, RT: irradiated group, MMP-2: matrix metalloprotease-2.
kcj-38-212f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Photomicrographs from rat carotid arteries stained with immunohistochemistry of MMP-2. MMP-2 positivity is found in neointima area at 14 days (A) and 28 days (C) after balloon injury in control group. Cells with dark brown staining in the intima indicate MMP-2 positive cells. There is no neointimal area no MMP-2 positive cell at 14 days (B) and 28 days (D) after balloon injury in irradiated group. MMP-2: matrix metalloprotease-2.
kcj-38-212f5.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles