Development of Immune Reaction Concept for Perinatology

Hee Sup Kim

doi:10.14734/kjp.2015.26.2.109

Journal List > Korean J Perinatol > v.26(2) > 1013742

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim: Development of Immune Reaction Concept for Perinatology

Review Article

Korean J Perinatol 2015;26(2):109-113.

Published online: 20 June 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14734/kjp.2015.26.2.109

Development of Immune Reaction Concept for Perinatology

Hee Sup Kim, M.D.

Department of Pediatrics, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Ilsan, Korea

Correspondence to: Hee Sup Kim, M.D. Department of Pediatrics, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, 27, Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 410-773, Korea Tel: +82-31-961-7181, Fax: +82-31-961-7188 E-mail: kimhs@dumc.or.kr

Received 16 June 2015 Revised 26 June 2015 Accepted 29 June 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Most of perinatological phenomenona and diseases are closely related with immune reaction. Most of initial immune responses occur through innate immunity and most causes, such as mechanical damage, hypoxia, and hyperoxia, are self and microorganisms are non-self, all of which are related with immune reaction concept. However, researches on perinatology are mainly focused on specific one or two causes of perinatal diseases, so often there is limitation to understand the basic concepts and phenomenona of the perinatal diseases. Through understanding of immune reaction concept, we can apply immune reaction theory to researches in perinatology and we can understand phenomenona in perinatology through knowledge of immune reaction. Therefore it is essential to understand historical development of immunology and concept of immune reaction for researches and treatment of perinatology.

Keywords: Innate immunity, One-signal theory, Two-signal theory, Danger theory

References

1. Burnet FM. Qualitative differences in the immune response. Can J Microbiol. 1956; 2:153–62.

2. Talmage DW. Diversity of antibodies. J Cell Physiol Suppl. 1957; 50(Suppl 1):229–46.

3. Jerne NK. The Natural-selection theory of antibody formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955; 41:849–57.

4. Burnet FM. The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity. Nashville (TN): Vandervilt Univ Press;1959.

5. Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar. Actively acquired tolerance of foreign cells. Nature. 1953; 172:603–6.

6. Lederberg J. Genes and antibodies. Science. 1959; 129:1649–53.

7. Dresser DW. Specific inhibition of antibody production. II. Paralysis induced in adult mice by small quantities of protein antigen. Immunology. 1962; 5:378–88.

8. Talmage DW, Pearlman DS. The antibody response: a model based on antagonistic actions of antigen. J Theor Biol. 1963; 5:321–39.

9. Mitchison NA. Recognition of antigen by cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1966; 16:3–14.

10. Bretscher PA, Cohn M. Minimal model for the mechanism of antibody induction and paralysis by antigen. Nature. 1968; 220:444–8.

11. Bretscher PA, Cohn M. A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science. 1970; 169:1042–9.

12. Claman HN, Chaperon EA, Triplett RF. Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966; 1224:1167–71.

13. Mitchell GF, Miller JF. Immunological activity of thymus and thoracic-duct lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1968; 591:296–303.

14. Lafferty KJ, Jones MA. Reactions of the graft versus host (GVH) type. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1969; 47:17–54.

15. Lafferty KJ, Misko IS, Cooley MA. Allogeneic stimulation modulates the in vitro response of T cells to transplantation antigen. Nature. 1974; 249:275–6.

16. Lanzavecchia A. Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells. Nature. 1985; 314:537–9.

17. Lafferty KJ, Cunningham AJ. A new analysis of allogeneic interactions. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1975; 53:27–42.

18. Zinkernagel RM, Doherty PC. Restriction of in vitro T cellmediated cytotoxicity in lymphocytic choriomeningitis within a syngeneic or semiallogeneic system. Nature. 1974; 248:701–2.

19. Cunningham AJ, Lafferty KJ. A simple conservative explanation of the H-2 restriction of interactions between lymphocytes. Scand J Immunol. 1977; 6:1–6.

20. Jenkins MK, Schwartz RH. Antigen presentation by chemically modified splenocytes induces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Med. 1987; 165:302–19.

21. Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994; 12:991–1045.

22. Janeway CA Jr. Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1989; 54(Pt 1):1–13.

23. Janeway CA Jr. The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self. Immunol Today. 1992; 13:11–6.

24. Fuchs E. Reply from Ephraim Fuchs. Immunlo Today. 1995; 14:236–7.

25. Ling N, Burgus R, Guillemin R. Isolation, primary structure, and synthesis of alpha-endorphin and gamma-endorphin, two peptides of hypothalamic-hypophysial origin with morphinomimetic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976; 73:3042–6.

26. Alberta B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson J. Molecular Biology of the Cel.l. 2nd ed.New York: Gariand Publishing;2006. p. 405–15.

27. Yi AK, Tuetken R, Redford T, Waldschmidt M, Kirsch J, Krieg AM. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA activate leukocytes through the pH-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. J Immunol. 1998; 160:4755–61.

28. Srivastav PK, Menoret A, Bas S, Binder RJ, McQuade KL. Heat shock proteins come of age: primitive functions acquire new roles in an adaptive world. Immunity. 1998; 8:657–65.

TOOLS

Similar articles