Journal List > Korean J Perinatol > v.24(2) > 1013701

Park, Oh, and Kim: The Issues in Obstetric No Fault Compensation Act and Suggestions for the Improvement

Abstract

As part of the medical dispute mediation act, no fault compensation legislation was enacted in 2011 and took effect from April 2013 in Korea. According to this law, obstetricians should share thirty percet of the compensation expenses with the government. Although the government argues that this law can contribute to the safe obstetric practice environment, most of obstetricians are concerning about the negative effects that can be exerted by the act, including decline in new OB/GYN residents’ applications, dropping number of delivering clinics and hospitals, and ultimately, devastating the obstetric practice in this country. In this review, we summarize the process and issues in no fault compensation. We also introduce no fault compensation system in Japan and compare it with ours. Finally, we will give suggestions for the improvement of the law.

REFERENCES

1). 로", 동아일보, Mar 11, 2011: A16.
2). 의료사고 피해구제 및 의료분쟁 조정 등에 관한 법률(2011.4.7 제정, 법률 제10566호).
3). 대한의사협회. "의료분쟁조정법인가? 의료분쟁조장법인가?", 보도자료, Nov 25, 2011.
4). 의료사고 피해구제 및 의료분쟁 조정 등에 관한 법률 제 46조 (2011.4.7 제정, 법률 제10566호).
5). 의료사고 피해구제 및 의료분쟁 조정 등에 관한 법률 시행령 (2012. 4.6, 제정, 대통령령 제 23708호).
6). 곽순헌, "불가항력 의료사고 보상제도". 국회토론회: 저출산 시 대의 안전한 분만환경 조성방안, 대한민국 국회, Mar 28, 2013,.
7). 이호용. 불가항력적 의료사고에 대한 국가보상의 공법적 검토. 의료법학 2010;11:59-84.
8). 현두륜, "무과실 의료사고 비용 전가는 '위헌'", 의협신문, Mar 12, 2012: 36.
9). 민혜영, 원서연, 선준구, 김소윤. 일본 산과 무과실의료보상제 도 고찰. 한국의료법학회지 2009;17:197-213.
10). 최승원, "불가항력 분만사고로 의원 한해 얼마 부담하나?", 의 협신문, Apr 9, 2012: 4.
11). OhSY, KwonJY, ShinJH, KimA. Theinfluenceofobstetric no-fault compensation act on future career of residents in obstetrics and gynecology. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 55:461-467.
12). 恩田裕之. 調査と情報 第575号 産科医療の問題点 [Internet]. 国立国会図書館; 2007. [cited 2013 Jun 9]. Available from: http://www.ndl.go.jp/jp/data/publication/issue/0575.pdf.
13). Unno N. Present status of obstetric and perinatal care and the action plan issued by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. JMAJ 2008;51:247-54.
14). 処置遅れて出産後に死亡 奈良の妊婦、転送拒否続き [Internet]. 共同通信; Oct 17, 2006. [cited 2013 Jun 9]. Available from: http://www.47news.jp/CN/200610/CN2006101701000363.html.
15). 신정호, "일본은 산부인과의 위기를 어떻게 극복하였나?: 일본 의 뇌성마비 무과실 보상제도의 소개". 국회토론회: 저출산 시 대의 안전한 분만환경 조성방안, 대한민국 국회, Mar 28, 2013,.
16). Summary of Japan obstetrics compensation system for cerebral palsy [Internet]. Japan Council for Quality Health Care; 2009. [cited 2013 Jun 12]. Available from: http://www.sanka-hp.jcqhc.or.jp/outline/index.html.
17). 産科医療補償制度再発防止に関する報告書 [Internet]. 日本 医療機能評価機構; 2011. [cited 2013 Jun 9]. Available from: http://www.sanka-hp.jcqhc.or.jp/pdf/Saihatsu_Report_01_ All.pdf.
18). 조명덕. 불가항력 의료사고 보상…산부인과 기피 가속화 [Internet]. 의협신문; 2013. [cited 2013 Jun 9]. Available from: http://www.doctorsnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html? idxno=86716.
19). Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, editors, Williams Obsteterics. 23rd eds. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2010.
20). Balayla J, Azoulay L, Abenhaim HA. Maternal marital status and the risk of stillbirth and infant death: a populationbased cohort study on 40 million births in the United States. Womens Health Issues 2011;21:361-5.

Fig. 1
불가항력 의료사고 보상 절차도.
kjp-24-65f1.tif
Fig. 2
불가항력 의료사고 보상 절차도.
kjp-24-65f2.tif
Fig. 3
일본 산과 의료보상제도 심사, 원인분석 재발방지의 흐름.
kjp-24-65f3.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles