Journal List > Korean J Perinatol > v.24(4) > 1013692

Yun, Park, Shin, Lee, Kim, Kim, and Choi: Withholding Enteral Feeding and Its Clinical Consequences in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants during NICU Stay

Abstract

Purpose :

To evaluate the causes of nil per os (NPO) before reaching full enteral feeding and compare the clinical outcomes of extremely low birth weight infant (ELBWI) by NPO duration.

Methods :

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 92 ELBWI who were born and admitted to Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Seoul National University Children's Hospital from January 2009 to December 2011. We analyzed the perinatal factors and causes of NPO. To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes and growth, we used K-ASQ (Korean ages & stages questionnaires) and growth Z-score.

Results :

There were total 163 fasting episodes before reaching full enteral feeding. Mean NPO time was 6.7± 5.6 days and mean frequency of NPO was 1.8 episodes. Most common cause of NPO was the medication for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (47.5%) and the next was the feeding intolerance (25.3%). Longer NPO group (more than 7 days) showed longer time to full enteral feeding and hospital day. Incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis was significantly higher in the longer NPO group. But there was no difference between two groups in the incidence of sepsis, cholestasis, and osteopenia. Changes in height Z-score from birth to postmenstrual age 35 weeks were significantly higher in the longer NPO group. In longer NPO group, catch-up of weight Z-score at CA 8 months was poor. And number of patients with score under cutoff level in K-ASQ was higher.

Conclusion :

NPO duration seems to be related with long term growth and neurodevelopment. Effort to minimize fasting time is needed by keeping enteral feeding during PDA medication and active management for feeding intolerance.

REFERENCES

1). Kliegman R., Nelson WE. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 19th ed.Philadelphia PA: Elsevier/Saunders;2011. lxvii, 2610 p.p. 560–2.
2). Morgan J., Young L., McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013. 5:CD001970.
crossref
3). Hernandez G., Velasco N., Wainstein C., Castillo L., Bugedo G., Maiz A, et al. Gut mucosal atrophy after a short enteral fasting period in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 1999. 14:73–7.
crossref
4). Zingg W., Tomaske M., Martin M. Risk of parenteral nutrition in neonates—an overview. Nutrients. 2012. 4:1490–503.
5). Ben XM. Nutritional management of newborn infants: practical guidelines. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. 14:6133–9.
crossref
6). Jobe AH., Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001. 163:1723–9.
crossref
7). Walsh MC., Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986. 33:179–201.
crossref
8). Volpe JJ. Intraventricular Hemorrhage in the Premature-Infant - Current Concepts.1. Ann Neurol. 1989. 25:3–11.
9). Venigalla S., Gourley GR. Neonatal cholestasis. Semin Peri-natol. 2004. 28:348–55.
crossref
10). Stephens BE., Walden RV., Gargus RA., Tucker R., McKinley L., Mance M, et al. First-week protein and energy intakes are associated with 18-month developmental outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009. 123:1337–43.
crossref
11). Fenton TR., Sauve RS. Using the LMS method to calculate z-scores for the Fenton preterm infant growth chart. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007. 61:1380–5.
crossref
12). Kansagra K., Stoll B., Rognerud C., Niinikoski H., Ou CN., Harvey R, et al. Total parenteral nutrition adversely affects gut barrier function in neonatal piglets. Am J Physiol Gastro-intest Liver Physiol. 2003. 285:G1162–70.
crossref
13). Hadfield RJ., Sinclair DG., Houldsworth PE., Evans TW. Effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition on gut mucosal permeability in the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995. 152:1545–8.
crossref
14). Jhaveri N., Soll RF., Clyman RI. Feeding practices and patent ductus arteriosus ligation preferences-are they related? Am J Perinatol. 2010. 27:667–74.
crossref
15). Van Bel F., Van Zoeren D., Schipper J., Guit GL., Baan J. Effect of indomethacin on superior mesenteric artery blood flow velocity in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 1990. 116:965–70.
16). Christmann V., Liem KD., Semmekrot BA., van de Bor M. Changes in cerebral, renal and mesenteric blood flow velocity during continuous and bolus infusion of indomethacin. Acta Paediatrica. 2002. 91:440–6.
crossref
17). Clyman RI., Couto J., Murphy GM. Patent ductus arteriosus: are current neonatal treatment options better or worse than no treatment at all? Semin Perinatol. 2012. 36:123–9.
crossref
18). Watterberg KL., Gerdes JS., Cole CH., Aucott SW., Thilo EH., Mammel MC, et al. Prophylaxis of early adrenal insufficiency to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a multicenter trial. Pediatrics. 2004. 114:1649–57.
crossref
19). Clyman R., Wickremasinghe A., Jhaveri N., Hassinger DC., Attridge JT., Sanocka U, et al. Enteral Feeding during Indomethacin and Ibuprofen Treatment of a Patent Ductus Arteriosus. J Pediatr. 2013. 163:406–11.
crossref
20). Bellander M., Ley D., Polberger S., Hellstrom-Westas L. Tolerance to early human milk feeding is not compromised by indomethacin in preterm infants with persistent ductus arteriosus. Acta Paediatrica. 2003. 92:1074–8.
crossref
21). Patole SK., Kumaran V., Travadi JN., Brooks JM., Doherty DA. Does patent ductus arteriosus affect feed tolerance in preterm neonates? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007. 92:F53–5.
crossref
22). Fanaro S. Strategies to improve feeding tolerance in preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012. 25(Suppl 4):54–6.
crossref
23). Patole S. Strategies for prevention of feed intolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005. 18:67–76.
crossref
24). Tyson JE., Kennedy KA. Minimal enteral nutrition for promoting feeding tolerance and preventing morbidity in parenterally fed infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. CD000504.
25). Ng E., Shah VS. Erythromycin for the prevention and treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. CD001815.
crossref
26). Oh S., Kim E-K., Neu J. Technologies for the Evaluation of Enteral Feeding Readiness in Premature Infants. Gastroenterology and Nutrition: Neonatology Questions and Contro- versies Series. 2012. 339.
crossref
27). Georgieff MK. Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007. 85:614S–20S.
28). Ehrenkranz RA., Das A., Wrage LA., Poindexter BB., Higgins RD., Stoll BJ, et al. Early nutrition mediates the influence of severity of illness on extremely LBW infants. Pediatr Res. 2011. 69:522–9.
crossref

Fig. 1
(A) Growth Z score changes from birth at PMA 35weeks (∗∗P=0.049) (B) Growth Z score changes from birth at CA 8 month (∗P=0.07, ∗∗P=0.04) Abbreviations : Bwt; body weight, Ht; height, Hc; head circumference, PMA; postmenstrual age, CA; corrected age
kjp-24-281f1.tif
Table 1.
Causes of NPO before Full Enteral Feeding
Causes of NPO (n=163) n (%)
Medication for PDA closure 77 (47.5)
feeding intolerance 41 (25.3)
Illness without apparent cause 30 (18.4)
Meconium obstruction 23 (14.2)
NEC (stage 1 & 2) 15 (9.3)
Sepsis 21 (12.9)
Culture proven sepsis 7 (4.3)
Clinical sepsis 14 (8.6)
Ileus on X-ray 13 (8.0)
Other GI problem (bleeding, vomiting) 7 (4.3)
Others∗ 4 (2.5)

∗Exchange transfusion: 3 patients, unknown cause: 1 patient Abbreviations : PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; NEC necrotizing enterocolitis; GI, gastrointestinal

Table 2.
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Study Population
Demographics NPO ≤7 days (n=56) NPO ≥8 days (n=36) P value
Gestational age at birth, mean±SD wk 28.1±2.3 27.4±1.9 0.100
<27 wk, n (%) 23 (41.1) 19 (52.8) 0.271
27+0-29+6 wk, n (%) 17 (30.4) 12 (33.3) 0.764
≥30 wk, n (%) 16 (28.6) 5 (13.9) 0.102
Birth weight, mean±SD, g 829.3±136.2 774.9±162.4 0.087
SGA, n (%) 28 (50.0) 18 (50.0) 1.000
AS at 1 min, mean±SD 3.6±1.9 3.1±2.1 0.309
AS at 5 min, mean±SD 6.0±1.5 5.4±2.1 0.102
Male, n (%) 24 (42.9) 16 (44.4) 0.881
Singleton, n (%) 30 (53.6) 14 (38.9) 0.169
Cesarean section, n (%) 37 (66.1) 23 (63.9) 0.830
Chorioamnionitis, n (%) 26 (46.4) 17 (47.2) 0.941
RDS, n (%) 15 (26.8) 19 (52.8) 0.012∗

Abbreviations : AS, Apgar score; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; SD, standard deviation ∗Denotes statistical significance (P value <0.05)

Table 3.
Clinical Outcomes according to NPO Duration
  NPO ≤7 days (n=56) NPO ≥8 days (n=36) P value
Duration of NPO, mean±SD, day 3.6±2.0 11.6±6.0 <0.01∗∗
Frequency of NPO, mean±SD 1.4±0.8 2.3±1.2 <0.01∗∗
Time to full enteral feeding, mean±SD, day 17.2±5.3 26.9±8.9 <0.01∗∗
TPN duration, mean±SD, day 19.6±11.6 26.4±8.8 0.040∗
Hospital stay, mean±SD, day 71.8±24.0 86.3±24.0 <0.01∗∗
PMA at discharge, mean±SD, wk 38.4±2.3 39.6±2.2 0.013∗
Medication for PDA closure, n (%) 43 (76.8) 34 (94.4) 0.025∗
Culture proven sepsis, n (%) 15 (26.8) 11 (30.6) 0.695
NEC (≥stage 2), n (%) 1 (1.8) 5 (13.9) 0.032∗
BPD (≥moderate), n (%) 15 (26.8) 17 (47.2) 0.107
Cholestasis, n (%) 14 (30.4) 14 (40.0) 0.370
Osteopenia, n (%) 23 (41) 21 (58) 0.106
IVH (Gr≥3), n (%) 0 (0) 3 (8.3) 0.057
Cerebral palsy, n (%) 1 (1.9) 4 (11.4) 0.079

Two cases of expire patients during hospital stay were excluded in this analysis.

The number of NPO ≤7 day group was 52 patients and the number of NPO ≥8 day group was 31 patients

Table 4.
Calorie and Protein Intake during the First Week
  NPO ≤7 days (n=56) NPO ≥8 days (n=36) P value
Total Calorie, Kcal/kg/wk 437.81±93.07 403.40±72.22 0.063
  PN Calorie 403.11±88.50 396.98±71.98 0.729
  EN Calorie 34.71±30.45 6.41±7.50 <0.01∗
Total Protein, g/kg/wk 17.74±2.91 16.25±3.94 0.041∗
  PN protein 16.90±2.96 16.07±3.88 0.252
  EN protein 0.84±0.89 0.18±0.30 <0.01∗

Abbreviations : PN, parenteral nutrition; EN, enteral nutrition ∗Denotes statistical significance (P value <0.05)

Table 5.
Number of Patients under the Cutoff Scor e in K-ASQ
  NPO ≤7days (n=46) NPO ≥8days (n=31) Pvalue
Communication 0 0 -
Gross motor 1 (2.2) 6 (19.4) 0.015∗
Fine motor 0 2 (6.5) 0.159
Problem solving 0 1 (3.2) 0.405
Personal/Social 1 (2.2) 3 (9.7) 0.297
Any delay ≥1 1 (2.2) 7 (23.3) 0.006∗

∗Denotes statistical significance

TOOLS
Similar articles