Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.52(6) > 1013561

Ko, Kang, and Shin: The Proximal Approach in an Ultrasound-Guided Suprascapular Nerve Block

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze any effectiveness, advantages, and the procedure of an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block via the proximal approach in patients suffering from shoulder pain.

Materials and Methods

A total of 51 patients treated with nerve block between November 2015 and November 2016 were analyzed. We identified the suprascapular nerve that branches off the superior trunk of the brachial plexus, and found the suprascapular nerve, which is located in the fascial layer between the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle and the serratus anterior muscle. We then performed a nerve block. We evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pre- and post-nerve block, and the visualization of the nerve, depth from the skin to the nerve, angle of needle entry, as well as complications. Moreover, we measured the visualization of the nerve, depth from the skin to the nerve in a classic approach, and compared it with the proximal approach.

Results

There was significant improvement (p<0.05) in the mean VAS, from 7.1 to 3.4, without any major complications. Compared with the classic approach, we were able to identify the suprascapular nerve much better (classic 25.5%/proximal 96.1%), and the mean distance from the skin to the nerve (classic 38 mm/proximal 12 mm) was significantly short (p<0.05), and the mean angle of needle entry was 19 degrees in the proximal approach.

Conclusion

In an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block by proximal approach, the nerve and needle tip can be more easily identified, which increases accuracy; with a small amount of local anesthetic, more effective pain control can be achieved. Hence, this approach is an effective alternative pain control method for patients suffering from shoulder pain.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Scans tracing the suprascapular nerve. (A) C5 and C6 roots are shown between the anterior scalene muscle and middle scalene muscle. (B) C5 and C6 roots converge to form the superior (Sup.) trunk of the brachial plexus. (C) The suprascapular nerve, which is the first branch of the Sup. trunk, emerges out from the Sup. trunk (arrow). (D) The suprascapular nerve passes beneath the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle (arrow). (E) The suprascapular nerve is located in the fascial layer between the omohyoid muscle and the serratus anterior muscle (arrow).

jkoa-52-521-g001
Figure 2

Position of patient and placement of probe. (A) Patients are taken in a ‘crass position’ with the head rotated to the contralateral side. (B) The probe is placed just above the distal clavicle.

jkoa-52-521-g002
Figure 3

Anatomic relation between the suprascapular nerve and the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle at the supraclavicular fossa and placement of the probe (black bars, probe; arrows, needle). (A) Surface anatomy. The medial marking indicates jugular notch and lateral marking indicates mid shaft of the clavicle. (B) The probe is placed just above the distal clavicle to identify the suprascapular nerve passing beneath the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle.

jkoa-52-521-g003
Figure 4

A 25-gauge needle is inserted from the lateral side of the probe with an ‘in-plane’ technique until the needle tip reached the suprascapular nerve (arrow). Triangles indicate the needle.

jkoa-52-521-g004
Figure 5

A dotted line arrow is the depth from the skin to the suprascapular nerve via the proximal approach. The angle of needle entry is the angle between longitudinal axis of the needle (triangles) and the probe when the needle tip reaches the suprascapular nerve.

jkoa-52-521-g005
Figure 6

A dotted line arrow depicts the depth from the skin to the suprascapular nerve (suprascapular notch) via the classic approach.

jkoa-52-521-g006

References

1. Dahan TH, Fortin L, Pelletier M, Petit M, Vadeboncoeur R, Suissa S. Double blind randomized clinical trial examining the efficacy of bupivacaine suprascapular nerve blocks in frozen shoulder. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27:1464–1469.
2. Chang KV, Hung CY, Wang TG, Yang RS, Sun WZ, Lin CP. Ultrasound-guided proximal suprascapular nerve block with radiofrequency lesioning for patients with malignancy-associated recalcitrant shoulder pain. J Ultrasound Med. 2015; 34:2099–2105.
crossref
3. Lee SM, Park SE, Nam YS, et al. Analgesic effectiveness of nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy: comparison between interscalene, suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20:2573–2578.
crossref
4. Elsharkawy HA, Abd-Elsayed AA, Cummings KC 3rd, Soliman LM. Analgesic efficacy and technique of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve catheters after shoulder arthroscopy. Ochsner J. 2014; 14:259–263.
5. Moon YL, Kang JH, Kim HH. The effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided suprascapular nerve block in patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Korean Orthop Ultrasound Soc. 2014; 7:84–88.
6. Harmon D, Hearty C. Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block technique. Pain Physician. 2007; 10:743–746.
7. Peng PW, Wiley MJ, Liang J, Bellingham GA. Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block: a correlation with fluoroscopic and cadaveric findings. Can J Anesth. 2010; 57:143–148.
crossref
8. Vorster W, Lange CP, Briët RJ, et al. The sensory branch distribution of the suprascapular nerve: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17:500–502.
crossref
9. Siegenthaler A, Moriggl B, Mlekusch S, et al. Ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block, description of a novel supraclavicular approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012; 37:325–328.
crossref
10. Rothe C, Steen-Hansen C, Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Lange KH. Ultrasound-guided block of the suprascapular nerve: a volunteer study of a new proximal approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014; 58:1228–1232.
11. Hackworth RJ. A new and simplified approach to target the suprascapular nerve with ultrasound. J Clin Anesth. 2013; 25:347–348.
crossref
12. Chan CW, Peng PW. Suprascapular nerve block: a narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011; 36:358–373.
13. Taskaynatan MA, Ozgul A, Aydemir K, Koroglu OO, Tan AK. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block measured with neurostimulation. Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32:2125–2128.
crossref
14. Fernandes MR, Barbosa MA, Sousa AL, Ramos GC. Suprascapular nerve block: important procedure in clinical practice. Part II. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2012; 52:616–622.
15. Ritchie ED, Tong D, Chung F, Norris AM, Miniaci A, Vairavanathan SD. Suprascapular nerve block for postoperative pain relief in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a new modality. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84:1306–1312.
16. Neal JM, McDonald SB, Larkin KL, Polissar NL. Suprascapular nerve block prolongs analgesia after nonarthroscopic shoulder surgery but does not improve outcome. Anesth Analg. 2003; 96:982–986.
crossref
17. Singelyn FJ, Lhotel L, Fabre B. Pain relief after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a comparison of intraarticular analgesia, suprascapular nerve block, and interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99:589–592.
crossref
18. Jerosch J, Saad M, Greig M, Filler T. Suprascapular nerve block as a method of preemptive pain control in shoulder surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16:602–607.
crossref
19. Jeske HC, Kralinger F, Wambacher M, et al. A randomized study of the effectiveness of suprascapular nerve block in patient satisfaction and outcome after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27:1323–1328.
crossref
20. Lee JJ, Kim DY, Hwang JT, et al. Effect of ultrasonographically guided axillary nerve block combined with suprascapular nerve block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2014; 30:906–914.
crossref
21. Ozyuvaci E, Akyol O, Sitilci T, et al. Preoperative ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block for postthoracotomy shoulder pain. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2013; 74:44–48.
22. Aszmann OC, Dellon AL, Birely BT, McFarland EG. Innervation of the human shoulder joint and its implications for surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 330:202–207.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles