Abstract
Purpose
We reported relative risk of operation between patients who were diagnosed with lumbar far lateral disc herniation and posterolateral disc herniation after transforaminal epidural block.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective cohort study was performed on 295 patients (131 male and 164 female) who underwent transforaminal epidural block for unilateral radiculopathy caused by lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Among these 295 patients, 34 patients were diagnosed with far lateral disc herniation and 261 patients with posterolateral disc herniation. The median follow-up period was 23.9 months, with an average age of 55.7 years.
Results
Fifty-one patients underwent surgical treatment. Among them, 38 patients had posterolateral disc herniation and 13 patients had far lateral disc herniation. Patients with far lateral disc herniation, when compared with posterolateral disc herniation, had a relative risk of operation of 2.67 (1.59-4.48, 95% confidence interval) with statistical significance (p=0.0002). At the final follow-up, the average visual analogue scale (VAS) score for radicular pain in the surgical and non-surgical groups was 0.69 and 1.50, respectively; the average Korean-Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (K-ODI) score was 11.7 and 9.6, respectively. The difference of average VAS score showed a statistical significance (p=0.035), however, that of K-ODI showed no statistical significance (p=0.266).
Figures and Tables
References
1. Epstein NE. Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations: surgical alternatives and outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40:491–500.
2. Epstein NE. Evaluation of varied surgical approaches used in the management of 170 far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: indications and results. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83:648–656.
3. Ahn MW, Kim US, Kim GB. Usefulness of the ProSet MRI for diagnosis of the extraforaminal disc herniation. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2013; 20:28–33.
4. Epstein NE. Different surgical approaches to far lateral lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord. 1995; 8:383–394.
5. Rust MS, Olivero WC. Far-lateral disc herniations: the results of conservative management. J Spinal Disord. 1999; 12:138–140.
6. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall;1991.
7. Shin BJ, Lee JC, Lee HH, Jang HD. Conservative treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study of disc herniation encroaching more than one-third of spinal canal. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2011; 18:123–131.
8. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8:131–140.
9. Saal JA. Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21:2S–9S.
10. Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Foraminal injection for lateral lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79:804–807.
11. Kim MH, Suh KJ, Lee JY, Min SH, Yoo HY. Usefulness of coronal MR image in diagnosis of foraminal and extraforaminal disc herniation. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2008; 15:165–173.
12. Cho YW. Effect of intensive conservative treatment on extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: 1 year prospective follow-up study. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2009; 33:89–93.