Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.52(3) > 1013515

Jung, Jang, Cho, and Lee: Hip Screening in Infants Presenting with Asymmetricity of Lower Extremity

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of congenital postural deformities and lower extremity asymmetry with respect to the presence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in infants with a discrepancy of the limb length referred for suspected DDH.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs of 150 infants who visited Korea University Anam Hospital Orthopedic Clinic for suspected DDH between March 2013 and March 2015.

Results

There were greater numbers of infants with a shorter lower extremity on the left side (n=86, 57.3%) than the right. Plagiocephaly was present in 62 infants and trunk curvature in 124 infants (82.7%). Pelvic tilting—indirectly assessed by a skewed direction of the external genitalia in female infants—was present in 62 infants (63.3%). None of the 139 infants with normal physical examination of the hip were diagnosed with DDH. Of those 11 infants with abnormal findings from the hip physical examination, a total of 6 infants were diagnosed with DDH.

Conclusion

Regardless of the associated findings of congenital postural deformation, all infants diagnosed with DDH had abnormal findings from the physical examination of the hip joint. Thus, we conclude that the hip examination is important as the primary clinical screening in aiding the diagnosis of DDH.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

(A) Right sided truncal curvature and shortened left leg is apparent in a 4-month-old boy. (B) Plagiocephaly is apparent with asymmetric flattening of the occiput either on the right or left. (C) The genital direction may indicate pelvic obliquity in girl.

jkoa-52-205-g001
Figure 2

(A) A 4-month-old girl diagnosed as developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with left leg shortening. (B) Galeazzi sign showing limb-length discrepancy was present. (C) Elevated left pelvic obliquity was suspected due to genital deviation to the left. (D) Limited range of hip abduction with inguinal fold asymmetry was seen. (E) Plain radiograph revealed DDH on the left side. (F) On ultrasonography, left hip dysplasia Graf type IV was shown with an α angle of 41° and a β angle of 55°.

jkoa-52-205-g002
Table 1

Summary of the Cases with Positive Findings from the Hip Physical Examination

jkoa-52-205-i001

All patients are female infants. DDH, developmental dysplasia of hip; LLD, leg length discrepancy.

Table 2

Comparison of Characteristics between Normal Infants and Infants with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

jkoa-52-205-i002

Values are presented as number (%). DDH, developmental dysplasia of hip.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

1. Choi IH, Chung CY, Cho TJ, Yoo WJ, Park MS, Lee DY. Pediatric orthopaedics. 3rd ed. Seoul: Koonja;2009. p. 340–350.
2. Fitch RD. Ultrasound for screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip. N C Med J. 2014; 75:142–145.
crossref
3. Good C, Walker G. Moulded baby syndrome and unilateral “tight” hips. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983; 287:1675–1676.
crossref
4. Good C, Walker G. The hip in the moulded baby syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984; 66:491–492.
crossref
5. Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73:423–429.
crossref
6. Sewell MD, Eastwood DM. Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here? Int Orthop. 2011; 35:1359–1367.
crossref
7. Shorter D, Hong T, Osborn DA. Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (9):CD004595.
crossref
8. Talbot CL, Paton RW. Screening of selected risk factors in developmental dysplasia of the hip: an observational study. Arch Dis Child. 2013; 98:692–696.
crossref
9. Cha SM, Shin HD, Lee SH, Kim BK. An analysis of cases referred from the primary healthcare institution with suspected developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective study. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2011; 46:501–506.
crossref
10. Narayanan U, Mulpuri K, Sankar WN, Clarke NM, Hosalkar H, Price CT. Reliability of a new radiographic classification for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015; 35:478–484.
crossref
11. Rubio AS, Griffet JR, Caci H, Bérard E, El Hayek T, Boutté P. The moulded baby syndrome: incidence and risk factors regarding 1,001 neonates. Eur J Pediatr. 2009; 168:605–611.
crossref
12. Watson GH. Relation between side of plagiocephaly, dislocation of hip, scoliosis, bat ears, and sternomastoid tumours. Arch Dis Child. 1971; 46:203–210.
crossref
13. Hamanishi C, Tanaka S. Turned head--adducted hip--truncal curvature syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1994; 70:515–519.
crossref
14. Seringe R, Langlais J, Bonnet JC. Congenital asymmetrical pelvis. Clinical, radiological study and outcome. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1992; 78:65–73.
15. Screening for the detection of congenital dislocation of the hip. Arch Dis Child. 1986; 61:921–926.
16. Paton RW, Choudry Q. Neonatal foot deformities and their relationship to developmental dysplasia of the hip: an 11-year prospective, longitudinal observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91:655–658.
17. Graf R. The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980; 97:117–133.
crossref
18. Graf R. Hip sonography: diagnosis and managment of infant hip dysplasia. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg;2006.
19. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Ultrasound in the early diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip: the significance of hip stability versus acetabular morphology. Pediatr Radiol. 1992; 22:430–433.
crossref
20. Holen KJ, Tegnander A, Bredland T, et al. Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound? A prospective, randomised trial of 15,529 newborn infants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84:886–890.
21. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. Pediatrics. 1994; 94:47–52.
22. Omeroğlu H, Koparal S. The role of clinical examination and risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a prospective study in 188 referred young infants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001; 121:7–11.
23. Buxton RA, Macnicol MF. Infantile skeletal skew: the use of ultrasound in management. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2004; 13:75–80.
crossref
24. Dunn PM. Congenital postural deformities. Br Med Bull. 1976; 32:71–76.
crossref
25. Lloyd-roberts GC, Pilcher MF. Structural idiopathic scoliosis in infancy: a study of the natural history of 100 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965; 47:520–523.
26. Green NE, Griffin PP. Hip dysplasia associated with abduction contracture of the contralateral hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64:1273–1281.
crossref
27. Ando M, Gotoh E. Significance of inguinal folds for diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip in infants aged three to four months. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990; 10:331–334.
crossref
28. Jones DA. Importance of the clicking hip in screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. Lancet. 1989; 1:599–601.
crossref
29. Paton RW. Screening for hip abnormality in the neonate. Early Hum Dev. 2005; 81:803–806.
crossref
30. Jari S, Paton RW, Srinivasan MS. Unilateral limitation of abduction of the hip. A valuable clinical sign for DDH? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84:104–107.
TOOLS
Similar articles