Abstract
In an atypical diaphyseal femoral fracture with marked anterior and lateral bowing, there are some obstacles in fixation of the fracture, such as difficulty in insertion of the intramedullary nail (IM nail) due to mismatch of the IM nail with the bow of the femur, iatrogenic fracture, nonunion due to angulation, and leg length discrepancy. We experienced a good result, which was achieved after fixation of the counterlateral curved IM nail; therefore, we report on this case with a review of the literature.
References
1. Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2014; 29:1–23.
2. Sasaki S, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Kasukawa Y, Shimada Y. Low-energy diaphyseal femoral fractures associated with bisphosphonate use and severe curved femur: a case series. J Bone Miner Metab. 2012; 30:561–567.
3. Egol KA, Chang EY, Cvitkovic J, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18:410–415.
4. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Tang WM, Ng TP. Coronal bowing of the femur and tibia in Chinese: its incidence and effects on total knee arthroplasty planning. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2007; 15:32–36.
5. Lo JC, Huang SY, Lee GA, et al. Clinical correlates of atypical femoral fracture. Bone. 2012; 51:181–184.
6. Giusti A, Hamdy NA, Papapoulos SE. Atypical fractures of the femur and bisphosphonate therapy: a systematic review of case/case series studies. Bone. 2010; 47:169–180.
7. Saita Y, Ishijima M, Mogami A, et al. Association between the fracture site and the mechanical axis of lower extremities in patients with atypical femoral fracture[Internet]. Washington, DC(NW): American Society for Bone and Mineral Research;cited 2014 Jan 28. Available from: http://www.asbmr.org/Meetings/AnnualMeeting/AbstractDetail.aspx?aid=3a44dce8-4774-4995-9be3-151791ddca7a.