Abstract
The locking plate is used for osteoporotic long bone fracture because of the ability to affect a lock between the plate and locking screws that prevents reduction loss, angular deformity and axial deformity. However, it has been reported that locked plating can increase the periprosthetic fracture risk in osteoporotic bone compared with conventional plating. We report 3 cases of periprosthetic fracture after the use of locked plating in osteoporotic long bone fracture and a review of the relevant literatures.
References
2. Sommer C, Gautier E, Müller M, Helfet DL, Wagner M. First clinical results of the locking compression plate (LCP). Injury. 2003. 34:Suppl 2. B43–B54.
3. Bottlang M, Doornink J, Byrd GD, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM. A nonlocking end screw can decrease fracture risk caused by locked plating in the osteoporotic diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. 91:620–627.
4. Fulkerson E, Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Liporace F, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques. J Trauma. 2006. 60:830–835.
5. Haidukewych GJ. Innovations in locking plate technology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004. 12:205–212.