Preoperative Templating in PACS for Total Hip Replacement

Myoung Soo Kim; Moo Chul Jeong; Nam Gu Ji; Jung Sub Lee; Jeung Il Kim; Kuen Tak Suh

doi:10.4055/jkoa.2011.46.6.472

Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.46(6) > 1013111

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim, Jeong, Ji, Lee, Kim, and Suh: Preoperative Templating in PACS for Total Hip Replacement

Original Article

Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association

Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2011; 46(6): 472-477.

Published online: 29 December 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2011.46.6.472

Preoperative Templating in PACS for Total Hip Replacement

Myoung Soo Kim, M.D., Moo Chul Jeong, M.D., Nam Gu Ji^*, Jung Sub Lee, M.D.^*, Jeung Il Kim, M.D.^*, Kuen Tak Suh, M.D.^*

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maryknoll Hospital, Busan, Korea.

^*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.

Correspondence to: Kuen Tak Suh, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Beomeo-ri, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 626-770, Korea. TEL: +82-55-360-2125, FAX: +82-55-360-2155, kuentak@pusan.ac.kr

Received 20 June 2011 Accepted 25 October 2011

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of our study was to compare preoperative "Monitor Templating" with postoperative results for total hip replacement and to investigate the accuracy of "Monitor Templating" that was carried out by monitoring with picture archiving communication system (PACS).

Materials and Methods

Forty five patients underwent primary cementless total hip replacements. For setting parameters, we located the 10cm rod placed in the medial thigh on anteroposterior view of both hips and in the anterior thigh on Lowenstein lateral view. We measured implant sizes and the predictive value of corrective change in leg length and horizontal offset, by using radiographs magnified 120% of the anteroposterior views of both hips and Lowenstein lateral view of PACS on 27 inch monitor. We examined the correlation between preoperative monitor templating and the actual implant size, postoperative leg length and horizontal offset difference.

Results

The preoperative monitor templating showed a high rate of coincidence with the actual implant size, the postoperative leg length, and the horizontal offset difference. The averages in accurate prediction were 98% in the acetabular cup, 98% in the femoral stem, 97% in the postoperative actual difference of leg length, and 97% in the horizontal offset. With regard to leg length discrepancy, the sick limb was on average 4.7 mm shorter and 0.5 mm longer postoperatively than the contralateral limb. The average ratio of horizontal offset of the sick limb to the contralateral limb was 94.6% preoperatively and increased to 97.8% postoperatively.

Conclusion

Preoperative "Monitor Templating" using PACS images on 26 inch monitor is an easy and effective method for predicting implant size, correcting leg length discrepancy and restoring horizontal offset.

Keywords: preoperative monitor templating, PACS, total hip replacement

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Preoperative "Monitor Templating" for measuring sizes of acetabular cup and femoral stem in 120% magnified radiograph of Lowenstein lateral view in picture archiving communication system on the 27 inch monitor.

Figure 2

Preoperative "Monitor Templating" for measuring sizes of acetabular cup and femoral stem and difference of leg length and horizontal offset in 120% magnified radiograph of anteroposterior view of both hips in picture archiving communication system on the 27 inch monitor.

Table 1

Exact Prediction between Preoperative Monitor Templating and Postoperative Results

Table 2

Accurate Prediction between Preoperative Monitor Templating and Postoperative Results

Table 3

Leg Length Discrepancy & Horizontal Offset Ratio

References

1. Suh KT, Cheon SJ, Kim DW. Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004. 75:40–44.

2. Unnanuntana A, Wagner D, Goodman SB. The accuracy of preoperative templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009. 24:180–186.

3. Eggli S, Pisan M, Müller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998. 80:382–390.

4. Müller ME. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992. (274):12–21.

5. Iorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Hartman A, Healy WL. A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty. 2009. 24:175–179.

6. Won YY, Cui WQ, Kim KK, Son SH. Comparison of digital templating with manual templating for total hip replacement. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2005. 40:929–934.

7. Eklund K, Jonsson K, Lindblom G, et al. Are digital images good enough? A comparative study of conventional film-screen vs digital radiographs on printed images of total hip replacement. Eur Radiol. 2004. 14:865–869.

8. White SP, Shardlow DL. Effect of introduction of digital radiographic techniques on pre-operative templating in orthopaedic practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005. 87:53–54.

9. Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Sakai T, Ochi T. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 1998. 3:320–324.

10. Suh KT, Lee JS. Preoperative planning for total hip replacement. J Korean Hip Soc. 2003. 15:273–279.

11. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968. 70:213–220.

12. Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, et al. Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2009. 52:6–11.

13. González Della Valle A, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2008. 32:289–294.

14. Hwang SK, Kang DH, Cho TY, Lee CH. Comparison of conventional and digital templating technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 2010. 22:73–78.

TOOLS

Similar articles