Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using the mini-midvastus approach through analyzing the short-term clinical outcomes.
Materials and Methods
Seventy-seven consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed with the mini-midvastus surgical technique from August 2005 to February 2006 and were followed for more than 1 year after the procedure. All operations were performed with the Nexgen LPS-flex total knee system using a MIS quad-sparing instrument. The evaluation included preoperative and postoperative clinical data, surgical and radiological outcomes.
Results
The length of skin incision was average 8.4±0.6 cm and the operation time was average 95.5±15.7 minutes. The blood loss was average 727.5±315.5 cc. The tibial component alignment angles averaged 0.2±1.3° varus and the tibiofemoral angles averaged 5.8±1.8°. The mean ROM and the mean HSS score was 117±10° and 120±11°, 88.9±7.1 and 96.2±4.5 at eight weeks and one year after surgery respectively.
References
1. Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics. 2003. 26:899–903.
2. Cooper RE Jr, Trinidad G, Buck WR. Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a description and a cadaveric study determining the distance of the popiteal artery from the patella margin of the incision. J Arthroplasty. 1999. 14:505–508.
3. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005. 440:77–81.
4. Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE. Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003. 18(7):Suppl 1. S2–S8.
5. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. 428:68–73.
6. Haas SB, Manitta MA, Burdick P. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the mini midvastus approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006. 452:112–116.
7. Ha CW, Ha HC. Minimally invasive vs. standard total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparison study. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006. 41:841–849.
8. Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. 86:506–511.
9. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee replacement using a mini-midvastus incision technique and result. Surg Technol Int. 2004. 13:231–238.
10. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. 428:74–81.
11. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999. 8:20–27.
12. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow up. J Knee Surg. 2002. 15:17–22.
13. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. 428:61–67.
14. Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003. 416:185–190.
15. Yoo JH, Han CD, Lee YT, et al. Quad-Sparing minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Knee Soc. 2005. 17:225–233.