Femoral Revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem

Chang Dong Han; Ick Whan Yang; Jin Park

doi:10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.2.241

Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.42(2) > 1012646

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Han, Yang, and Park: Femoral Revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem

Original Article

Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association

Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2007; 42(2): 241-248.

Published online: 30 April 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.2.241

Femoral Revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem

Chang Dong Han, M.D., Ick Whan Yang, M.D., Jin Park, M.D.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to Chang Dong Han, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. Tel: +82.2-2228-2193, Fax: +82.2-363-1139, cdhan@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a Wagner SL revision stem.

Materials and Methods

This study reviewed 56 revisions of the femoral component performed using a Wagner stem in 55 patients between 1992 and 2001. The mean age of the patients at the time of the revision was 50 years. The mean follow up duration was 8.4 years (range, 5 to 12.5 years). The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in fifty-two hips, septic loosening in two and periprosthetic fractures in two. The pre-revisional femoral defects were classified according to the Paprosky classification system. A clinical evaluation and radiological assessment were performed.

Results

The mean Harris hip score improved from 47 points preoperatively to 87 points at the latest follow-up. There were 5, 20, 22 and 9 hips of type I, II, IIIA and IIIB according to the Paprosky classification system. Fifty two hips (93%) showed stable stems at the latest follow-up radiographs. The mean vertical subsidence of the stem was 6.2 mm (range, 0 to 21 mm). Severe progressive vertical subsidence in three hips and an infection in one occurred requiring repeat revision.

Conclusion

For severe proximal femoral bone loss, the conical femoral revision stem with a fully grit-blasted surface produced satisfactory results with distal press-fit fixation. We can expect a decrease in the rate of mechanical failure rate of the stem by reducing the subsidence derived from the stem design itself.

Keywords: Hip, Femoral revision, Wagner stem

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Available lengths and diameters of the Wagner SL revision uncemented stem in the preoperative planning are ranging from 190 mm to 385 mm, from 14 mm to 25 mm respectively.

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve for the Wagner revision stem with failure defined as removal for any cause demonstrated that the cumulative survival rate was 91.2% (95% confidence interval, 86.5% to 96.0%) at 12.4 years.

Fig. 3

(A) Radiograph of 48 year old man showed aseptic loosening after primary total hip arthroplasty due to avascular necrosis of femoral head. (B) Radiograph demonstrated stable fixation of the Wagner stem and osseous restoration of proximal femur with allograft 13 years after revisional total hip arthroplasty.

Table 1

Results of Proximal Femoral Restoration Classified as A, B, C with or without Allograft Inserted at Femoral Bone Defects according to the Comparison between Immediate Postoperative Radiographs and the Latest Follow-up One

^*Numbers mean the number of cases.

References

1. Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 Years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. 83:1023–1031.

2. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973. 55:1629–1632.

3. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. 85:1–6.

4. Engelbrecht DJ, Weber FA, Sweet MB, Jakim I. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990. 72:41–45.

5. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990. 257:107–128.

6. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Sloof TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993. 75:14–21.

7. Gorab RS, Covino BM, Borden LS. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993. 24:627–633.

8. Gross AE, Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, Oakeshott RD. Revision arthroplasty of the proximal femur using allograft bone. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993. 24:705–715.

9. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Mode of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979. 141:17–27.

10. Grunig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997. 116:187–197.

11. Han HJ, Kim SS, Choi SH. The use of the Wagner cementless revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1999. 11:161–167.

12. Hartwig CH, Bohm P, Czech U, Reize P, Kusswetter W. The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996. 115:5–9.

13. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985. 67:517–526.

14. Ko PS, Lam JJ, Tio MK, Lee OB, Ip FK. Distal fixation with Wagner revision stem in treating Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients. J Arthroplasty. 2003. 18:446–452.

15. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996. 67:541–544.

16. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1997. 12:839–847.

17. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994. 76:965–973.

18. Lyu SR. Use of Wagner cementless self-locking stems for massive bone loss in hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg. 2003. 11:43–47.

19. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995. 319:141–150.

20. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999. 369:230–242.

21. Roberson JR. Proximal femoral bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992. 23:291–302.

22. Stoffelen DV, Broos PL. The use of the Wagner revision prosthesis in complex (post) traumatic conditions of the hip. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995. 61:135–139.

23. Wagner H. Revision prosthesis for the hip joint in severe bone loss. Orthopade. 1987. 16:295–300.

24. Wagner H. A revision prosthesis for the hip joint. Orthopade. 1989. 18:438–453.

25. Wagner H. Revision of femoral stem with important loss of bone stock. Post graduate lectures of the first European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT). 1993. Paris: Masson;64–74.

26. Wagner H, Wagner M. Hip prosthesis revision with the non-cemented femoral revision stem-10 years experience. Med Orth Tech. 1997. 117:138–148.

TOOLS

Similar articles