PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
There are various types of foreign body reactions, such as inflammation, edema, fluid collection, hematoma, infection, abscess and granulomas. There are various imaging findings according to types of foreign bodies and depending on the lapse of time. Therefore, correct diagnosis of a foreign body reaction is difficult and easily confused with soft tissue neoplasm. The MRI is ideal for the detection of foreign bodies regardless of radiolucency or acoustic impedance. It is especially very useful in the evaluation of the surrounding tissue reaction. The authors report a case of a 26-year-old female patient with both forearm swelling due to self-injection of a mixture of powdered tablets and saline. The lesion shows numerous internal T1 and T2 dark signal intensity micro-spots with surrounding fluid collection, which are diagnosed as foreign bodies with surrounding inflammatory changes during an operation.
Figures and Tables
Fig. 1
A 26-year-old woman with foreign body injection in both forearms.
In the lateral view of plain radiography of the right forearm (a), there is no evidence of radiopaque foreign body material in the ventral portion. MR images of the right forearm T2 axial (b), T1 axial (c), and T1 fat suppressed (FS) enhanced coronal images (d) demonstrate T1 low- and T2 high signal intensity (SI), elongated shaped fluid collection with surrounding irregular T2 high SI, and heterogeneous enhancement (arrows) of the lesion. The lesion is in a deep portion of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle, which is directly adjacent to the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and muscles. The conglomeration of the numerous T1 and T2 dark SI micro-spots (*) is also noted in the lesion. The conglomerated lesion shows chemical shift artifacts around it, which suggests that the lesion has different tissue character with the fluid collection around it.
References
1. Ando A, Hatori M, Hagiwara Y, Isefuku S, Itoi E. Imaging features of foreign body granuloma in the lower extremities mimicking a soft tissue neoplasm. Ups J Med Sci. 2009; 114:46–51.
2. Reiner B, Siegel E, McLaurin T, et al. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167:141–144.
3. Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ. Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178:557–562.
4. Gu DH, Yoon DY, Chang SK, et al. CT features of foreign body granulomas after cosmetic paraffin injection into the cervicofacial area. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010; 16:125–128.
5. Karim RB, Hage JJ, van Rozelaar L, Lange CA, Raaijmakers J. Complications of polyalkylimide 4% injections (Bio-Alcamid): a report of 18 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59:1409–1414.
6. Shiels WE 2nd, Babcock DS, Wilson JL, Burch RA. Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990; 155:1277–1281.
7. Bode KS, Haggerty CJ, Krause J. Latent foreign body synovitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46:291–296.
8. Johnston C, Keogan MT. Imaging features of soft-tissue infections and other complications in drug users after direct subcutaneous injection ("Skin Popping"). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182:1195–1202.
XML Download