Journal List > Korean J Lab Med > v.29(1) > 1011607

Cho, Park, Cho, and Kang: Comparing Two Diagnostic Laboratory Tests for Several Microdeletions Causing Mental Retardation Syndromes: Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Amplification vs Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization

Abstract

Background

Microdeletion syndromes not detectable by conventional cytogenetic analysis have been reported to occur in approximately 5% of patients with unexplained mental retardation (MR). Therefore, it is essential to ensure that patients with MR are screened for these microdeletion syndromes. Mental retardation syndrome multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MRS-MLPA) is a new technique for measuring sequence dosages that allows for the detection of copy number changes of several microdeletion syndromes (1p36 deletion syndrome, Williams syndrome, Smith-Magenis syndrome, Miller-Dieker syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome, Alagille syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and Sotos syndrome) to be processed simultaneously, thus significantly reducing the amount of laboratory work.

Methods

We assessed the performance of MLPA (MRC-Holland, The Netherlands) for the detection of microdeletion syndromes by comparing the results with those generated using FISH assays. MLPA analysis was carried out on 12 patients with microdeletion confirmed by FISH (three DiGeorge syndrome, four Williams syndrome, four Prader-Willi syndrome, and one Miller-Dieker syndrome).

Results

The results of MLPA analysis showed a complete concordance with FISH in 12 patients with microdeletion syndromes.

Conclusions

On the basis of these results, we conclude that MLPA is an accurate, reliable, and cost-effective alternative to FISH in the screening for microdeletion syndromes.

REFERENCES

1.Kirchhoff M., Bisgaard AM., Bryndorf T., Gerdes T. MLPA analysis for a panel of syndromes with mental retardation reveals imbalances in 5.8% of patients with mental retardation and dysmorphic features, including duplications of the Sotos syndrome and Williams-Beuren syndrome regions. Eur J Med Genet. 2007. 50:33–42.
crossref
2.Hunter AG. Outcome of the routine assessment of patients with mental retardation in a genetics clinic. Am J Med Genet. 2000. 90:60–8.
crossref
3.Sellner LN., Taylor GR. MLPA and MAPH: new techniques for detection of gene deletions. Hum Mutat. 2004. 23:413–9.
crossref
4.Rusu C., Sireteanu A., Puiu M., Skrypnyk C., Tomescu E., Csep K, et al. MLPA technique-principles and use in practice. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2007. 111:1001–4.
5.Rauch A., Hoyer J., Guth S., Zweier C., Kraus C., Becker C, et al. Diagnostic yield of various genetic approaches in patients with unexplained developmental delay or mental retardation. Am J Med Genet A. 2006. 140:2063–74.
crossref
6.Flint J., Knight S. The use of telomere probes to investigate sub-microscopic rearrangements associated with mental retardation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003. 13:310–6.
crossref
7.Shaffer LG., Bejjani BA. A cytogeneticist's perspective on genomic microarrays. Hum Reprod Update. 2004. 10:221–6.
crossref
8.Wehner M., Mangold E., Sengteller M., Friedrichs N., Aretz S., Friedl W, et al. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: pitfalls in deletion screening in MSH2 and MLH1 genes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005. 13:983–6.
crossref
9.Armour JA., Palla R., Zeeuwen PL., den Heijer M., Schalkwijk J., Hollox EJ. Accurate, high-throughput typing of copy number variation using paralogue ratios from dispersed repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. 35:e19.
crossref
10.White SJ., Vissers LE., Geurts van Kessel A., de Menezes RX., Kalay E., Lehesjoki AE, et al. Variation of CNV distribution in five different ethnic populations. Cytogenetic Genome Res. 2007. 118:19–30.
crossref
11.Janssen B., Hartmann C., Scholz V., Jauch A., Zschocke J. MLPA analysis for the detection of deletions, duplications and complex rearrangements in the dystrophin gene: potential and pitfalls. Neurogenetics. 2005. 6:29–35.
crossref
12.Redon R., Ishikawa S., Fitch KR., Feuk L., Perry GH., Andrews TD, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature. 2006. 444:444–54.
crossref
13.Shaikh TH., Kurahashi H., Saitta SC., O'Hare AM., Hu P., Roe BA, et al. Chromosome 22-specific low copy repeats and the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: genomic organization and deletion endpoint analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000. 9:489–501.
crossref

Fig. 1.
The positions of FISH probes compared to MLPA probes. (A) DiGeorge syndrome, (B) Williams syndrome, (C) Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome, (D) Miller-Dieker syndrome.
kjlm-29-71f1.tif

Abbreviation: MLPA, multiplex ligand-dependent probe amplification.

Fig. 2.
MLPA results were analyzed employing Genemarker version 1.6 software. The red dot indicates a probe of peak ratio less than 0.75 compared with normal control. The green dot indicates a probe of peak ratio 0.75-1.3 compared with normal control. (A) MLPA results of a patient with DiGeorge syndrome showed the deletions in five probes for CTCL1, CDC45L, CLDN5, ARVCF, and FLJ14360 genes. (B) MLPA results of normal control. (C) MLPA results of a patient with Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome showed the deletions in five probes of MKRN3, NDN, UBE3A, and GABRB3 genes. (D) MLPA results of a patient with Williams syndrome showed the deletions in six probes of FZD9, STX1A, ELN, LIMK1, and CYLN2 genes. (E) MLPA results of normal control. (F) MLPA results of Miller-Dieker syndrome showed the deletions in seven probes of HIC1, METT10D, PAFAH1B1, ASPA, and TRPV1 genes. (G) MLPA dosage histograms of Williams syndrome.
kjlm-29-71f2.tif

Abbreviation: MLPA, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Table 1.
Characteristics of MLPA probes used for detection of several microdeletion syndromes
Microdeletion syndrome Chromosomal position No. of probes Target genes
1p36 deletion syndrome 1p36.33 7 TNFRSF18, TNFRSF4, SCNN1D, GNB1, SKI, FLJ10782, TP73
Williams syndrome 7q11.23 6 FZD9, STX1A, ELN, LIMK1, CYLN2
Smith-Magenis syndrome 17p11.2 5 TACI/TNFRSF13B, LRRC48, LLGL1, PRPSAP2, MFAP4
Miller-Dieker syndrome 17p13.3 7 HIC1, METT10D, PAFAH1B1, ASPA, TRPV1
DiGeorge syndrome 22q11.21 6 CTCL1, CDC45L, CLDN5, ARVCF, FLJ14360, SNAP29
Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome 15q11.2 5 MKRN3, NDN, UBE3A, GABRB3
Alagille syndrome 20p12.2 2 JAG1
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome 7p21.2 2 TWIST, TWISTNB
Sotos syndrome 5q35.3 3 NSD1 exon4, NSD1 exon12, NSD1 exon 17
TOOLS
Similar articles