Journal List > Korean J Lab Med > v.29(4) > 1011554

Nah and Lee: The Relationship between Thyroid Function and the Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease at Female Medical Checkups

Abstract

Background:

Thyroid hormones play an important role in regulating lipid and glucose metabolism. Thus this study was conducted to investigate the relationship between the thyroid hormone (FT4) or thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and the cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome in the individuals with subclinical thyroid dysfunction.

Methods:

The female health examinee with normal range of FT4 were classified into three groups according to the level of TSH; euthyroid group (n=4,410), subclinical hypothyroidism group (n=438) and subclinical hyperthyroidism group (n=66). Age, blood pressure, BMI, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, lipoprotein(a), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels of serum specimens were compared among the groups and association of FT4 or TSH with these parameters.

Results:

Fasting glucose was significantly higher in subclinical hyperthyroidism than in euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroidism groups (P=0.031), and total cholesterol was higher in subclinical hypothyroidism than in subclinical hyperthyroidism (P=0.011). But the other factors showed no difference among the groups. The level of TSH increased as triglyceride increased, while FT4 decreased as BMI or triglyceride increased. The FT4 also lowered when fasting glucose was above 126 mg/dL. TSH was not related with the metabolic syndrome, but the possibility of the syndrome was 1.3 times higher in the lowest quartile of the normal range of FT4 than in its highest quartile.

Conclusions:

For the interpretation of FT4, its reference interval needs to be divided into 4 quartiles, which can be used as one of the predicting factors of the metabolic syndrome.

REFERENCES

1.Canaris GJ., Manowitz NR., Mayor G., Ridgway EC. The colorado thyroid disease prevalence study. Arch Intern Med. 2000. 160:526–34.
crossref
2.Hollowell JG., Staehling NW., Flanders WD., Hannon WH., Gunter EW., Spencer CA, et al. Serum TSH, T(4), and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002. 87:489–99.
crossref
3.Duntas LH. Thyroid disease and lipids. Thyroid. 2002. 12:287–93.
crossref
4.Fommei E., Iervasi G. The role of thyroid hormone in blood pressure homeostasis: evidence from short-term hypothyroidism in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002. 87:1996–2000.
crossref
5.Bauer DC., Ettinger B., Browner WS. Thyroid functions and serum lipids in older women: a population-based study. Am J Med. 1998. 104:546–51.
6.Bell RJ., Rivera-Woll L., Davison SL., Topliss DJ., Donath S., Davis SR. Well-being, health-related quality of life and cardiovascular disease risk profile in women with subclinical thyroid disease-a community-based study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007. 66:548–56.
7.Stone NJ., Bilek S., Rosenbaum S. Recent national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III update: adjustments and options. Am J Cardiol. 2005. 96:53E–9E.
crossref
8.Kvetny J., Heldgaard PE., Bladbjerg EM., Gram J. Subclinical hypothyroidism is associated with a low-grade inflammation, increased triglyceride levels and predicts cardiovascular disease in males below 50 years. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004. 61:232–8.
crossref
9.Walsh JP., Bremner AP., Bulsara MK., O'leary P., Leedman PJ., Feddema P, et al. Thyroid dysfunction and serum lipids: a community-based study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005. 63:670–5.
crossref
10.Cavallo-Perin P., Bruno A., Boine L., Cassader M., Lenti G., Pagano G. Insulin resistance in Graves' disease: a quantitative in-vivo evaluation. Eur J Clin Invest. 1988. 18:607–13.
crossref
11.Malaisse WJ., Malaisse-Lagae F., McCraw EF. Effects of thyroid function upon insulin secretion. Diabetes. 1967. 16:643–6.
crossref
12.Feng X., Jiang Y., Meltzer P., Yen PM. Thyroid hormone regulation of hepatic genes in vivo detected by complementary DNA microarray. Mol Endocrinol. 2000. 14:947–55.
crossref
13.Yavuz DG., Yüksel M., Deyneli O., Ozen Y., Aydin H., Akalin S. Association of serum paraoxonase activity with insulin sensitivity and oxidative stress in hyperthyroid and TSH-suppressed nodular oitre patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004. 61:515–21.
14.Park HT., Cho GJ., Ahn KH., Shin JH., Hong SC., Kim T, et al. Thyroid stimulating hormone is associated with metabolic syndrome in euthyroid postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2009. 62:301–5.
crossref
15.Hak AE., Pols HA., Visser TJ., Drexhage HA., Hofman A., Witteman JC. Subclinical hypothyroidism is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction in elderly women: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Intern Med. 2000. 132:270–8.
crossref
16.Papanicolaou DA. Euthyroid sick syndrome and the role of cytokines. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2000. 1:43–8.
17.Yun KH., Jeong MH., Oh SK., Lee EM., Lee J., Rhee SJ, et al. Relationship of thyroid stimulating hormone with coronary atherosclerosis in angina patients. Int J Cardiol. 2007. 122:56–60.
crossref
18.Frederiksen L., Brodbaek K., Fenger M., Jorgensen T., Borch-Johnsen K., Madsbad S, et al. Comment: studies of the Pro12Ala polymorphism of the PPAR-γ gene in the Danish MONICA cohort: homozygosity of the Ala allele confers a decreased risk of the insulin resistance syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002. 87:3989–92.
19.Wang H., Chu WS., Lu T., Hasstedt SJ., Kern PA., Elbein SC. Uncoupling protein-2 polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004. 286:E1–7.
crossref
20.Liu YY., Schultz JJ., Brent GA. A thyroid hormone receptor alpha gene mutation (P398H) is associated with visceral adiposity and impaired catecholamine-stimulated lipolysis in mice. J Biol Chem. 2003. 278:38913–20.
21.al-Adsani H., Hoffer LJ., Silva JE. Resting energy expenditure is sensitive to small dose changes in patients with chronic thyroid hormone replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997. 82:1118–25.
22.Torrance CJ., Devente JE., Jones JP., Dohm GL. Effects of thyroid hormone on GLUT4 glucose transporter gene expression and NIDDM in rats. Endocrinology. 1997. 138:1204–14.
crossref
23.Eckel RH., Grundy SM., Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005. 365:1415–28.
crossref
24.Katzel LI., Busby-Whitehead MJ., Goldberg AP. Adverse effects of abdominal obesity on lipoprotein lipids in healthy older men. Exp Gerontol. 1993. 28:411–20.
crossref

Table 1.
Difference of variables among euthyroid and subclinical thyroid dysfunction groups
  Subclinical hyperthyroidism (n=66) Euthyroid (n=4,410) Subclinical hypothyroidism (n=438) P value
TSH (μIU/mL) 0.050±0.08 1.978±0.89 5.912±2.32 <0.001
FT4 (ng/dL) 1.406±0.24 1.198±0.15 1.127±0.16 <0.001
Age (yr) 47.1±12.8 43.7±12.9 43.8±13.3 NS
BMI 22.6±3.0 22.7±3.2 22.5±3.2 NS
Systolic BP (mmHg) 119.7±15.8 116.7±16.1 117.6±15.9 NS
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 71.0±9.4 69.2±10.3 70.1±9.9 NS
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 94.7±20.7 90.3±14.0 89.8±15.4 0.031
T. Cholesterol (mg/dL) 170.3±31.7 178.7±33.1 181.4±32.9 0.029
LDL-C (mg/dL) 106.3±28.9 113.1±31.9 115.7±31.9 NS
HDL-C (mg/dL) 53.6±10.9 54.4±9.2 54.4±8.8 NS
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 86.0±48.4 91.1±57.9 95.2±52.0 NS
Lp(a) (mg/dL) 13.4±12.6 16.1±18.1 15.9±17.4 NS
hs-CRP (mg/dL) 0.09±0.14 0.15±0.63 0.13±0.26 NS

P value derived from one-way ANOVA that used to evaluate differences in the 3 groups;

P<0.05 from the posthoc comparisons (Dunnett t) of the investigated variables between euthyroid and subclinical hyperthyroidism

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; T. cholesterol, total cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL-cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); hsCRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; NS, not significant.

Table 2.
Mean FT4 according to age
Age N Mean FT4 P value
20-29 557 1.223±0.165 <0.001
30-39 1,930 1.209±0.155  
40-49 750 1.173±0.155  
50-59 939 1.175±0.158  
60-69 608 1.182±0.162  
70- 130 1.171±0.162  
Total 4,914 1.194±0.159  
Table 3.
TSH levels according to the levels of each cardiovascular risk factor
BMI TSH (mean±SD) P value
<23 2.331±1.825 NS
23 to <25 2.479±4.000  
25 to <30 2.359±2.880  
≥30 3.766±2.086  
BP   NS
SBP <130 or DBP <85 2.289±1.528  
SBP ≥130 or DBP ≥85 2.354±1.779  
Fasting glucose   NS
<100 2.413±3.140  
100-125 2.149±1.468  
≥126 2.961±7.495  
T. Cholesterol   NS
200> 2.379±2.830  
200-240 2.497±4.441  
>240 2.316±1.479  
LDL-C   NS
≤100 2.272±2.332  
100 to 130 2.392±2.563  
≥130 2.576±4.602  
Triglyceride   0.008
<150 2.283±1.586  
≥150 2.463±1.586  
HDL-C   NS
≥50 2.399±3.428  
<50 2.400±2.539  

Abbreviations: See Table 1.

Table 4.
FT4 levels according to the levels of each cardiovascular risk factor
BMI FT4 (mean±SD) P value
<23 1.217±0.212 <0.001
23 to <25 1.182±0.201  
25 to <30 1.187±0.363  
≥30 1.151±0.188  
BP   NS
SBP <130 or DBP <85 1.197±0.159  
SBP ≥130 or DBP ≥85 1.186±0.158  
Fasting glucose   <0.001
<100 1.201±0.248  
100-125 1.219±0.238  
≥126 1.176±0.184  
T. Cholesterol   NS
<200 1.209±0.268  
200-240 1.179±0.162  
>240 1.185±0.171  
LDL-C   NS
≤100 1.227±0.328  
100 to 130 1.191±0.187  
≥130 1.180±0.166  
Triglyceride   <0.001
<150 1.199±0.158  
≥150 1.156±0.158  
HDL-C   NS
≥50 1.201±0.180  
<50 1.204 ±0.351  

Abbreviations: See Table 1.

Table 5.
Independent associations between FT4 level and metabolic syndrome
FT4 (ng/dL) People (N) MS (%) OR (95% CI) for MS P value
Q1 (0.800-1.088) 1,185 12.4 1 0.204
Q2 (1.089-1.190) 1,339 10.5 0.927 (0.716-1.200) 0.564
Q3 (1.191-1.300) 1,149 9.2 0.883 (0.668-1.165) 0.378
Q4 (1.301-1.900) 1,138 7.8 0.732 (0.548-0.979) 0.035

Abbreviations: Q, quartile; MS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 6.
Prevalence and odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for each component of metabolic syndrome according to serum FT4 quartiles
Variables   Q1 (lowest) Q2 Q3 Q4 (highest)
  Prevalence (%) 26.9 22.3 18.8 18.1
Obesity OR (95% CI) 1 0.78 (0.65-0.94) 0.63 (0.52-0.77) 0.60 (0.49-0.78)
  OR (95% CI) 1 0.84 (0.70-1.02) 0.73 (0.59-0.89) 0.70 (0.57-0.86)
  Prevalence (%) 24.0 22.5 20.5 19.9
Increased OR (95% CI) 1 0.92 (0.76-1.10) 0.81 (0.67-0.99) 0.79 (0.65-0.96)
BP OR (95% CI) 1 1.07 (0.87-1.31) 1.05 (0.84-1.30) 1.01 (0.81-1.26)
  Prevalence (%) 11.0 11.5 11.2 13.1
Increased OR (95% CI) 1 1.06 (0.83-1.35) 1.02 (0.79-1.32) 1.22 (0.95-1.57)
Fasting glucose OR (95% CI) 1 1.22 (0.94-1.57) 1.27 (0.97-1.66) 1.56 (1.20-2.03)
  Prevalence (%) 15.9 12.5 9.9 8.1
Increased OR (95% CI) 1 0.76 (0.61-0.94) 0.59 (0.46-0.75) 0.47 (0.36-0.61)
Triglyceride OR (95% CI) 1 0.83 (0.66-1.04) 0.68 (0.53-0.87) 0.54 (0.41-0.71)
  Prevalence (%) 32.2 32.3 31.2 26.5
Decreased OR (95% CI) 1 1.00 (0.85-1.18) 0.95 (0.80-1.13) 0.76 (0.63-0.90)
HDL-C OR (95% CI) 1 1.01 (0.85-1.19) 0.96 (0.81-1.14) 0.77 (0.64-0.91)

P<0.05 in logistic regression analysis;

Non-adjusted;

Age-adjusted.

Abbreviations: See Table 5.

TOOLS
Similar articles