Journal List > Korean J Lab Med > v.26(1) > 1011363

Cha, Yang, and Chae: Evaluation of Indigenously Manufactured Immunochromatographic Assay Systems for Rapid Detection of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen and Antibody

Abstract

Background

We evaluated three indigenously produced immunochromatography (ICA) kits for the rapid detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) by comparing them with a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA).

Methods

HBsAg and anti-HBs were tested by the ICA kits manufactured by three domestic companies, SD HBsAg and Anti-HBs (Standard Diagnostics, Inc., Yongin, Korea); Asan Easy Test® HBsAg and Anti-HBs (Asan Pharm Co., Ltd., Whasung, Korea); and GENEDIA® HBsAg Rapid Device and Anti-HBs Rapid Device (Green Cross MS, Inc., Yongin, Korea).

Results

Results by ICA agreed completely with those of MEIA in all the 20 HBsAg-negative sera and in all the anti-HBs-negative sera except one sample. Among the 20 HBsAg-positive sera by MEIA, 17 were positive by ICA using Green Cross MS, 16 using Asan Pharm Co., and 13 using SD and reverse passive hemagglutination. Among the 20 anti-HBs-positive sera by MEIA, 19 were positive by ICA using Green Cross MS and Asan Pharm Co., 17 using SD, and 18 by passive hemagglutination. Elapsed time for the control and test line to be visualized in ICA might be longer and the color of the lines lighter when using SD than Green Cross MS or Asan Pharm Co.

Conclusions

Three indigenously produced ICA kits are as sensitive as MEIA for the detection of anti-HBs, but are less sensitive than MEIA for HBsAg. The ICA kits for the rapid detection of HBsAg might be recommended for a limited use in the clinical laboratory.

References

1. Kashiwagi S, Hayashi J, Noguchi A, Nakashima K, Kishihara Y. Evaluation of immunochromatography assay technique for detection of hepatitis B surface antigen. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1994; 68:916–22.
crossref
2. Sato K, Ichiyama S, Iinuma Y, Nada T, Shimokata K, Nakashima N. Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay systems for rapid detection of hepatitis B surface antigen and antibody, Dainascreen HBsAg and Dainascreen Ausab. J Clin Microbiol. 1996; 34:1420–2.
crossref
3. Vaughn DW, Nisalak A, Kalayanarooj S, Solomon T, Dung NM, Cuzzubbo A, et al. Evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of dengue virus infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36:234–8.
crossref
4. Kashiwagi S, Hayashi J, Kakuda K, Yamaji K, Ueno K, Tani Y. Evaluation of immunochromatography assay technique for detection of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1995; 69:297–302.
crossref
5. Laitinen MP, Vuento M. Immunochromatographic assay for quantitation of milk progesterone. Acta Chem Scand. 1996; 50:141–5.
crossref
6. Habib MP, Schifman RB, Shon BY, Fiastro JF, Campbell SC. Evaluation of whole blood theophylline enzyme immunochromatography assay. Chest. 1987; 92:129–31.
crossref
7. Raj AA, Subramaniam T, Raghuraman S, Abraham P. Evaluation of an indigenously manufactured rapid immunochromatographic test for detection of HBsAg. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001; 44:413–4.
8. Lau DT, Ma H, Lemon SM, Doo E, Ghany MG, Miskovsky E, et al. A rapid immunochromatographic assay for hepatitis B virus screening. J Viral Hepat. 2003; 10:331–4.
crossref
9. Cha YJ, Kum DG, Kim SW, Kim TY, Kim JR, Kim HS, et al. Annual report on external quality assessment in immunoserology in Korea (2001). J Lab Med Quality Assurance. 2002; 24:27–38.
10. Cha YJ, Kum DG, Kim SW, Kim TY, Kim JR, Kim HS, et al. Annual report on external quality assessment in immunoserology in Korea (2002). J Lab Med Quality Assurance. 2003; 25:51–71.
11. Cha YJ, Kwon SY, Kum DG, Kim SW, Kim TY, Kim JR, et al. Annual report on external quality assessment in immunoserology in Korea (2003). J Lab Med Quality Assurance. 2004; 26:47–69.
12. Cha YJ, Kwon SY, Kum DG, Kim SW, Kim TY, Kim JR, et al. Annual report on external quality assessment in immunoserology in Korea (2004). J Lab Med Quality Assurance. 2005; 27:37–57.
13. Moerman B, Moons V, Sommer H, Schmitt Y, Stetter M. Evaluation of sensitivity for wild type and mutant forms of hepatitis B surface antigen by four commercial HBsAg assays. Clin Lab. 2004; 50:159–62.
14. Saito T, Shinzawa H, Uchida T, Kawamata O, Honma S, Watanabe H, et al. Quantitative DNA analysis of low-level hepatitis B viremia in two patients with serologically negative chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 1999; 58:325–31.
crossref
15. Sakugawa H, Kobashigawa K, Nakayoshi T, Yamashiro T, Maeshiro T, Tomimori K, et al. Monitoring low level hepatitis B virus by a newly developed sensitive test. Hepatol Res. 2003; 26:281–6.
crossref
16. Allain JP. Occult hepatitis B virus infection. Transfus Clin Biol. 2004; 11:18–25.
crossref
17. Whang DH, Um T. Comparison of immunochromatography assays and quantitative immunoassays for detecting HBsAg and anti-HBs. Korean J Lab Med. 2005; 25:186–91.
18. Zaaijer HL, Vrielink H, Koot M. Early detection of hepatitis B surface antigen and detection of HBsAg mutants: a comparison of five assays. Vox Sang. 2001; 81:219–21.
crossref
19. Dreier J, Kroger M, Diekmann J, Gotting C, Kleesiek K. Low-level viraemia of hepatitis B virus in an anti-HBc- and anti-HBs-positive blood donor. Transfus Med. 2004; 14:97–103.
crossref
20. Allain JP. Occult hepatitis B virus infection: implications in transfusion. Vox Sang. 2004; 86:83–91.
crossref

Table 1.
Comparison of the results of HBsAg assayed by immunochromatography (ICA) with those by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) and reverse passive hemagglutination (RPHA)
  MEIA
Negative (n=20) S/N<2.0 Positive (n=20) S/N≥2.0
ICA1 (SD) 20/20* Negative 13/20 Positive
ICA2 (Asan) 20/20 Negative 16/20 Positive
ICA3 (Green Cross) 20/20 Negative 17/20 Positive
RPHA (Asan) 20/20 Negative 13/20 Positive

* Negative in 20 out of 20 samples,

Positive in 13 out of 20 samples.

Table 2.
Distribution of HBsAg results according to the S/N value measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA)
Sample No. ICA1 (SD) ICA2 (Asan) ICA3 (Green Cross) RPHA (Asan) HBsAg S/N value
N1-N20 Neg Neg Neg Neg 0.27–1.41
P1 Neg Neg Neg Neg 6.25
P2 Neg Neg Neg Neg 12.55
P3 Neg Neg Neg Neg 23.66
P4 Neg Neg + Neg 59.94
P5 Neg + + Neg 81.25
P6 Neg + + Neg 127.15
P7 Neg + + Neg 129.58*
P8 + + + + 136.88*
P9 + + + + 157.82
P10 + + + + 168.96*
P11 + + + + 171.25
P12 + + + + 182.35
P13 + + + + 195.45
P14 + + + + 201.54
P15 + + + + 245.58
P16 + + + + 278.54
P17 + + + + 301.25
P18 + + + + 325.17
P19 + + + + 336.87
P20 + + + + 345.58

* Samples diluted with negative serum.

N1-N20, Numbers for the HBsAg-negative samples by the MEIA; P1-P20, Numbers for the HBsAg-positive samples by the MEIA.

Abbreviations: ICA, immunochromatography; RPHA, reverse passive hemagglutination.

Table 3.
Comparison of the results of anti-HBs assayed by immunochromatography (ICA) with those by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) and passive hemagglutination (PHA)
  Anti-HBs by MEIA
Negative (n=20) <10 mIU/mL Positive (n=20) ≥10 mIU/mL
ICA1 (SD) 20/20* Negative 17/20 Positive
ICA2 (Asan) 19/20 Negative 19/20 Positive
ICA3 (Green Cross) 19/20 Negative 19/20 Positive
PHA (Asan) 20/20 Negative 18/20 Positive

* Negative in 20 out of 20 samples;

Positive in 17 out of 20 samples.

Table 4.
Distribution of anti-HBs results according to the antibody titer measured by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA)
Sample No. ICA1 (SD) ICA2 (Asan) ICA3 (Green Cross) PHA (Asan) Anti-HBs Titer (mIU/mL)
N1-N19 Neg Neg Neg Neg 0.0–9.5
N20 Neg + + Neg 9.7
P1 Neg + + Neg 10.1
P2 Neg + + + 10.9
P3 Neg Neg Neg Neg 14.1
P4 + + + + 14.5
P5 + + + + 15.1
P6 + + + + 15.3
P7 + + + + 15.7*
P8 + + + + 16.2
P9 + + + + 16.8*
P10 + + + + 23.5*
P11 + + + + 29.8
P12 + + + + 40.6
P13 + + + + 45.5
P14 + + + + 47.9
P15 + + + + 59.9
P16 + + + + 67.6
P17 + + + + 88.6
P18 + + + + 112.5
P19 + + + + 158.5
P20 + + + + >1,000

* Samples diluted with negative serum.

N1-N20, Numbers for the anti-HBs negative samples by the MEIA; P1-P20, Numbers for the anti-HBs positive samples by the MEIA.

Abbreviations: ICA, immunochromatography; PHA, passive hemagglutination.

TOOLS
Similar articles