Abstract
Background
Bayer Rapidpoint 400 analyzer for point of care testing (POCT) uses fixed quality control (QC) range even when the lot number of a cartridge for quality control changes. To evaluate the fixed QC range recommended by the manufacturer, we analyzed internal QC data of 9 analyzers with Six Sigma metrics.
Materials and Methods
We investigated QC data of 9 analyzers over 5 months from May to September, 2004 for 8 parameters (pH, pCO2, pO2, Na+, K+, iCa++, Cl-, and glucose). One hundred eighty six groups of QC data were analyzed with capability index (Cp=total allowable error (TEa)/3 standard deviation (SD)) and capability index considering bias (Cpk,=(TEa-bias)/3 SD). Acceptability was evaluated with criteria of 1.33 Cpk, 4 sigma level or quality criteria of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA'88).
Results
In 80.7% (150 of 186 groups), both Cp and Cpk were at or above 1.33, which indicated that the use of fixed QC range was adequate. In 19.3% (36 of 186 groups), Cpk was below 1.33, which indicated the inadequacy of fixed QC range. Among them 14.5% (27 of 186 groups) showed Cp below 1.33, indicating that the errors had a random factor and 4.8% (9 of 186 groups) had Cp at or above 1.33, indicating that the errors had a systematic factor.
References
1. Handorf CR. Background-setting the stage for alternate-site laboratory testing. Clin Lab Med. 1994; 14:451–8.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
2. Sands VM, Auerbach PS, Birnbaum J, Green M. Evaluation of a portable clinical blood analyzer in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1995; 2:172–8.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
3. Aduen J, Bernstein WK, Khastgir T, Miller J, Kerzner R, Bhatiani A, et al. The use and clinical importance of a substrate-specific electrode for rapid determination of blood lactate concentrations. JAMA. 1994; 272:1678–85.
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
![crossref](/image/icon/bnr_ref_cross.gif)
4. Salem M, Chernow B, Burke R, Stacey JA, Slogoff M, Sood S. Bedside diagnostic testing: its accuracy, rapidity, and utility in blood conservation. JAMA. 1991; 266:382–9.
5. Laessig RH, Ehrmeyer SS. Automatic quality control: the rapid-point 400 approach to QA/AQC. Bayer Diagnostics.
6. Westgard JO, Klee GG. Quality management. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 4th ed.Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;2006. p. 488–9.
Table 1.
Total coefficient of variation of internal QC results of 8 test items for 5 months
Table 2.
Six Sigma metrics of internal QC results of 8 test items for 5 months
Abbreviations: TEa, total allowable error; SD, standard deviation; bias, assigned value minus mean; Cp, capability index, total allowable error (TEa)/3 SD; Cpk, capability index considering bias, (TEa – bias)/3 SD; PICU, pediatric intensive care unit; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; CSICU, cardiac surgery intensive care unit; MICU, internal medicine intensive care unit; ER, emergency room; OR, F4, ORF and C4, a kind of name for operating rooms; NT, not tested.
Table 3.
Acceptability of fixed QC range
Table 4.
Comparison of Cp level of fixed control limits between manufacturer's SD and averages of SD of internal QC results of 9 networked POCT gas analyzers over 5 months
Test item | QC materials | Target value | SD established by manufactures | SD of QC results of this hospitals | Fixed control limits | Cp* by SD of manufactures | Cp† by SD of QC results of this hospital | Difference of Cp between SD of manufactures and SD of QC results of this hospital |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | level 1 | 7.1500 | 0.005 | 0.00390 | 0.02 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.4 |
level 2 | 7.3500 | 0.005 | 0.00450 | 0.02 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.1 | |
level 3 | 7.5500 | 0.005 | 0.00650 | 0.02 | 1.3 | 1.0 | −0.3 | |
pCO2 | level 1 | 70.00 | 0.83 | 1.973 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 1.1 | −1.5 |
level 2 | 40.00 | 1.09 | 0.898 | 5 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.3 | |
level 3 | 20.00 | 0.52 | 0.759 | 3 | 1.9 | 1.3 | −0.6 | |
pO2 | level 1 | 150.00 | 1.62 | 1.966 | 11 | 2.3 | 2.0 | −0.4 |
level 2 | 100.00 | 0.81 | 1.778 | 7.8 | 3.2 | 1.5 | −1.7 | |
level 3 | 65.00 | 1.61 | 1.436 | 9.2 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.2 | |
Na | level 1 | 115.00 | 0.64 | 0.812 | 5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | −0.6 |
level 2 | 135.00 | 0.96 | 0.984 | 5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | |
level 3 | 155.00 | 0.85 | 1.315 | 7 | 2.7 | 1.8 | −1.0 | |
K | level 1 | 3.00 | 0.01 | 0.011 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 8.8 | −1.3 |
level 2 | 5.00 | 0.03 | 0.019 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 5.4 | 2.1 | |
level 3 | 7.00 | 0.04 | 0.031 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 0.7 | |
Cl | level 1 | 80.00 | 0.74 | 0.636 | 6 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 0.4 |
level 2 | 100.00 | 0.83 | 0.508 | 6 | 2.4 | 3.9 | 1.5 | |
level 3 | 120.00 | 0.76 | 0.580 | 6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 0.8 | |
Glucose | level 1 | 200.00 | 1.65 | 2.585 | 14 | 2.8 | 1.8 | −1.0 |
level 2 | 100.00 | 1.24 | 1.373 | 10 | 2.7 | 2.4 | −0.3 | |
level 3 | 50.00 | 1.07 | 1.408 | 10 | 3.1 | 2.4 | −0.7 | |
Ca | level 1 | 1.60 | 0.01 | 0.018 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 2.2 | −1.8 |
level 2 | 1.20 | 0.01 | 0.013 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 2.6 | −0.7 | |
level 3 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.012 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 2.8 | −0.5 |