PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Background
Clinical laboratories are selecting total solutions to point-of-care test (POCT) by handling all aspects of information management ranging from the ordering of the test to the reporting of verified results. Today, many POCT devices can be directly connected to the laboratory information system (LIS) via data management system (DMS). We report here our experience with the networking of POCT glucometers.
Methods
We set up computerization of POCT glucometer (Precision PCx, Abbott, USA) in August, 2004 and established a quality control (QC) system for the portable glucometers on 16 wards in Chung-Ang University Hospital. Precision of the glucometers was assessed by performing 28 replicate tests using quality control specimens containing 5 different glucose concentrations. Turnaround time (TAT) was calculated from the data of 17,796 glucose tests performed during a 5-month period in 2004 before computerization of the glucometers and 31,513 tests performed during the same 5-month period of 2005 after computerization.
Results
In the precision study, within-run and total-run CVs were within 10%. With the networking of POCT glucometers, the TAT from the collection of specimen to the specimen receipt to the LIS was 28.5±17.2 min compared to 43.6±17.5 without the networking (P<0.0001). A staff satisfaction survey received a high score (88%) for an overall satisfaction.
References
1. Handorf CR. Background-setting the stage for alternate-site laboratory testing. Clin Lab Med. 1994; 14:451–8.
2. Worth R, Home PD, Johnston DG, Anderson J, Ashworth L, Burrin JM, et al. Intensive attention improves glycaemic control in insulin dependent diabetes without further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring; results of a controlled trial. British Medical J. 1982; 285:1233–40.
3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices-2nd ed Teantative guideline. Document EP5-T2.Vilanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards;1992.
4. Kilgore ML, Steindel SJ, Smith JA. Evaluating stat testing options in an academic health center: therapeutic turnaround time and staff satisfaction. Clin Chem. 1998; 44:1597–603.
5. Lee SY, Lee SG, Kim JW, Min WK, Park HS. Evaluaion of precision Q.I.DR glucose testing system. Korean J Clin Pathol. 1999; 19:425–32.
6. Lewandrowski E, Mac Millan D, Misiano D, Tochka L, Lewandrowski K. Process improvement for bedside capillary glucose testing in a large academic medical center: the impact of new technology on point-of-care testing. Clin Chim Acta. 2001; 307:175–9.
7. Halpern NA, Brentjens T. Point of care testing informatics. Crit Care Clin. 1999; 15:577–91.
8. Blick KE. The essential role of information management in point-of-care/critical care testing. Clin Chim Acta. 2001; 307:159–68.
9. Cha CH, Lee WC, Lee YW, Kim YC, Kim YH, Chun SI, et al. Installation of data management system for point of care blood gas analyzers using local area network. Korean J Lab Med. 2005; 25:471–6.
Table 1.
Precision of QC results relative to the 5 different glucose concentrations (n=28)
XML Download