Journal List > Korean J Lab Med > v.26(3) > 1011319

Huh, Kim, Park, and Kim: Correlation of In-training Examination Score with the Residency Program or the Score of the Board Examination of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Background

An in-training examination is given annually to the all laboratory medicine residents of in Korea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the in-training examinations according to the examinees' postgraduate years, a number of teaching faculty members and hospital beds, and the score of the board examination.

Methods

A total number of examinees during the 5-year period from 2001 to 2005 were 311. All residents took the same in-training examinations given each year irrespective of the postgraduate year (PGY).

Results

The scores of in-training examinations increased with advance in the examinees' PGY (P<0.01). The scores were not different according to the size of teaching faculty or hospital beds (P>0.05). The correlation coefficients of each PGY scores were from 0.474 to 0.755 (P<0.01). The scores of the 4th PGY were correlated with those of the board examinations (r=0.627, P<0.001).

Conclusions

These results suggest that the scores of the in-training examinations may be a valid measure of knowledge acquired by residents during their training years and provide a useful information for improving the laboratory medicine residency training program.

References

1. Holzman GB, Downing SM, Power ML, Williams SB, Carpentieri A, Schulkin J. Resident performance on the Council on Resident education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) in-training examination: years 1996 through 2002. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191:359–63.
crossref
2. Replogle WH, Johnson WD. Assessing the predictive value of the American Board of Family Practice in-training examination. Fam Med. 2004; 36:185–8.
3. Garibaldi RA, Subhiyah R, Moore ME, Waxman H. The in-training examination in internal medicine: an analysis of resident performance over time. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137:505–10.
crossref
4. Garibaldi RA, Trontell MC, Waxman H, Holbrook JH, Kanya DT, Khoshbin S, et al. The in-training examination in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:117–23.
crossref
5. Baverstock RJ, MacNeily AE, Cole G. The American Urological Association in-service examination: performance correlates with Canadian and American specialty examinations. J Urol. 2003; 170:527–9.
crossref
6. Leigh TM, Johnson TP, Pisacano NJ. Predictive validity of the American Board of Family Practice in-training examination. Acad Med. 1990; 65:454–7.
crossref
7. Baumgartner BR, Peterman SB. Relationship between American College of Radiology in-training examination scores and American Board of Radiology written examination scores. Acad Radiol. 1996; 3:873–8.
crossref
8. Brill-Edwards P, Evans G, Hamilton P, Hramiak I, Megran D, Schmuck ML, et al. Predicting performance on the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada internal medicine written examination. CMAJ. 2001; 165:1305–7.
9. Kearney RA, Sullivan P, Skakun E. Performance on ABA-ASA in-training examination predicts success for RCPSC certification. American Board of Anesthesiology-American Society of Anesthesiologists. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Can J Anaesth. 2000; 47:914–8.
10. Shetler PL. Observations on the American Board of Surgery in-training examination, board results, and conference attendance. Am J Surg. 1982; 144:292–4.
crossref
11. Webb LC, Juul D, Reynolds CF 3rd, Ruiz B, Ruiz P, Scheiber SC, et al. How well does the psychiatry residency in-training examination predict performance on the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Part I. Examination? Am J Psychiatry. 1996; 153:831–2.
12. Song YM, Hwang IH, Byeon JJ. Evaluation of residency program using the result of in-training examination. Korean J Med Educ. 2001; 13:259–67.
crossref
13. Jeon SY, Chung MH, Kim KH, Hong WP. Validity of the intraining examinations and the board examinations – An experience in the Korean Society of Otolaryngology. Korean J Med Educ. 1997; 9:151–7.
14. Kim CY, Yoon SJ, Baek HJ, Lee JG, Baek SH, Park SK, et al. Environment and condition of graduate medical education. Korean J Med Educ. 1997; 9:55–63.
crossref
15. Kim HO. The assessment of residency program in laboratory medicine. Korean J Lab Med. 2005; 25(Supp 1):S188–98.

Fig. 1.
Comparison of scores according to the postgraduate year (PGY).
kjlm-26-227f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Correlation between scores of the 4th postgraduate year (PGY) and scores of board examination.
kjlm-26-227f2.tif
Table 1.
Number of examinees
Residency level Year
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001–2005
1 PGY 13 14 13 23 28 91
2 PGY 15 11 13 10 15 64
3 PGY 17 14 12 15 11 69
4 PGY 30 19 14 11 13 87
Overall 75 58 52 59 67 311

Abbreviation: PGY, postgraduate year.

Table 2.
Scores of examinees (mean±SD)
Residency level Year
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001–2005
1 PGY 42.3±6.4 45.1±10.1 44.4±12.6 46.9±6.5 48.0±6.3 46.0±8.2
2 PGY 49.1±9.4 52.7±8.3 55.5±8.7 51.7±8.3 50.8±6.7 51.8±8.4
3 PGY 53.8±7.8 54.8±12.5 59.6±10.9 60.4±8.6 51.6±6.1 56.1±9.7
4 PGY 60.8±9.4 62.2±11.9 63.1±12.0 65.9±10.4 60.1±6.7 62.0±10.2
Overall 53.7±10.9 54.6±12.6 55.7±12.8 54.7±11.0 51.6±7.7 54.0±11.0
P value <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Abbreviation: PGY, postgraduate year.

Table 3.
Comparison of standard scores (mean±SD) according to the number of teaching faculty
Residency level Number of teaching faculty
P value
2–3 4–5 6–7 >7
Overall          
Number 45 69 49 148  
Score 48.6±8.7 52.1±9.8 48.7±9.1 49.8±10.4 0.175
1 PGY          
Number 13 16 15 47  
Score 46.5±6.0 43.4±5.1 41.6±6.6 42.2±8.8 0.279
2 PGY          
Number 9 16 9 30  
Score 43.2±7.9 50.5±6.9 47.5±8.1 48.2±8.0 0.169
3 PGY          
Number 7 17 12 33  
Score 46.6±7.4 53.1±9.5 48.8±5.4 52.6±8.0 0.162
4 PGY          
Number 16 20 13 38  
Score 54.1±9.2 59.6±9.3 57.7±7.6 58.0±8.7 0.313

Abbreviation: PGY, postgraduate year.

Table 4.
Comparison of standard scores (mean±SD) according to the number of hospital bed
Residency level Number of hospital bed
P value
501–800 801–1,000 >1,000
Overall        
Number 66 92 153  
Score 50.3±10.3 49.8±8.7 49.9±10.4 0.946
1 PGY        
Number 17 25 49  
Score 41.4±6.0 44.0±5.5 42.9±9.0 0.583
2 PGY        
Number 15 19 30  
Score 48.2±7.5 47.6±8.0 48.2±8.3 0.960
3 PGY        
Number 16 21 32  
Score 52.9±9.6 49.8±6.5 51.8±8.3 0.478
4 PGY        
Number 18 27 42  
Score 58.1±9.6 56.7±8.6 57.9±8.7 0.836

Abbreviation: PGY, postgraduate year.

Table 5.
Correlation coefficients of standard scores according to the postgraduate year
Residency level 1 PGY 2 PGY 3 PGY 4 PGY
1 PGY 1      
2 PGY 0.478* 1    
3 PGY 0.655* 0.755* 1  
4 PGY 0.708* 0.519* 0.474* 1

* P<0.01.

Abbreviation: PGY, postgraduate year.

TOOLS
Similar articles