Journal List > J Korean Surg Soc > v.77(4) > 1011019

TOOLS
Jun, Jung, Kim, Jun, Chin, Kim, and Park: The Comparative Analysis between Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair and Open Tissue Repair: Initial Experience of a Single Institute
Original Article
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2009; 77(4): 273-278.

Published online: 30 September 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2009.77.4.273

The Comparative Analysis between Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair and Open Tissue Repair: Initial Experience of a Single Institute

Kang-Woong Jun, M.D., Hun Jung, M.D.1, Sung-Jeep Kim, M.D., Kyong-Hwa Jun, M.D., Hyung-Min Chin, M.D., Jun-Gi Kim, M.D.1, Woo-Bae Park, M.D.

Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Suwon, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author (dkkwkh@catholic.ac.kr)

Received 2 June 2009       Accepted 13 July 2009

Copyright © 2009 The Korean Surgical Society

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has been recognized as one of the treatment options for inguinal hernia. This study compared the short-term results of two methods of repair: totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and open tissue based repair.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who underwent laparoscopic TEP repair (LH, 105 cases) and open repair (OH, 57 cases) at our hospital between September 2007 and December 2008. Posterior wall repairs in open technique follow as McVay (25 cases) and Bassini (32 cases). Demographic data, operation time, perioperative complications, consumption of analgesics, and hospital stay were compared.

Results

There was no significant difference in relation to patient characteristics; age, gender, BMI, medical and surgical history and hernia type. Also, there was no difference of operation time for both groups. Patients in the LH group consumed fewer analgesics (P=0.002). Intraoperative complications occurred more frequently in the LH group (P=0.036) but postoperative complications were similar. Hospital stay was shorter in LH (P<0.001). There was no difference of recurrence between LH group and OH group for 16 months.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic TEP repair shows similar postoperative complications and recurrences and with less postoperative pain and hospital stay, compared with open tissue based hernia repair. However, further study with longer follow up data is necessary.

Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, Open herniorrhaphy

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Learning curve of the laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.
jkss-77-273-g001
Table 1
Patient demographics
jkss-77-273-i001

NS = not significant.

Table 2
Clinical outcomes
jkss-77-273-i002

NS = not significant.

Table 3
Perioperative complications
jkss-77-273-i003

NS = not significant.

References

1. Bassini E. Nuovo metodo per la cura radicale hernia inguinale. Atti Conger Assoc Med. 1887. 2:179.
2. Kim YH, Shin JH, Park JJ, Sohn BH, Yoo CH, Park YR, et al. A clinical review of the advantages of laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Korean Surg Soc. 2001. 61:604–608.
3. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989. 157:188–193.
4. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Puri V. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg. 2006. 72:197–206.
5. Sanjay P, Woodward A. A survey of inguinal hernia repair in Wales with special emphasis on laparoscopic repair. Hernia. 2007. 11:403–407.
6. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003. 362:1561–1571.
7. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen FH, Wara P, et al. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet. 2001. 358:1124–1128.
8. Gould J. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2008. 88:1073–1081.
9. Ger R. The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra-abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communication. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1982. 64:342–344.
10. Ger R, Monroe K, Duvivier R, Mishrick A. Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac. Am J Surg. 1990. 159:370–373.
11. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 1995. 221:3–13.
12. Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg. 1995. 169:84–89.
13. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Ulrich M, Kraft K, Bittner R. Laparoscopic hernia repair -- the facts, but no fashion. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999. 384:302–311.
14. Ger R, Mishrick A, Hurwitz J, Romero C, Oddsen R. Management of groin hernias by laparoscopy. World J Surg. 1993. 17:46–50.
15. Youn SI, Kim BG, Cha SJ, Chang IT. The comparative analysis between laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and open inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Korean Surg Soc. 2005. 69:166–171.
16. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2007. 21:161–166.
17. Bowne WB, Morgenthal CB, Castro AE, Shah P, Ferzli GS. The role of endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: where do we stand in 2005? Surg Endosc. 2007. 21:707–712.
18. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg. 2000. 87:860–867.
19. Kim JS, Jang HJ, Cho YP, Kim YH, Choi YB, Han MS. A comparing study of herniorrhaphies laparoscopy, lichtenstein and conventional repairs. J Korean Surg Soc. 2002. 63:57–62.
20. Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ. 1998. 317:103–110.
21. Stoker DL, Spiegelhalter DJ, Singh R, Wellwood JM. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Lancet. 1994. 343:1243–1245.
22. Papachristou EA, Mitselou MF, Finokaliotis ND. Surgical outcome and hospital cost analyses of laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair. Hernia. 2002. 6:68–72.
23. Corbitt JD Jr. Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993. 3:328–332.
24. Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, et al. Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg. 1997. 225:422–431.
25. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004. 350:1819–1827.
TOOLS
Similar articles