Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.59(5) > 1010907

Choi and Moon: A New Model of Extraocular Muscle Fibrosis by Thermal Cauterization in the Rats

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of cauterization on extraocular muscle (EOM) fibrosis in rats, and to develop a novel EOM fibrosis model.

Methods

Twenty-four eyes of 12 Sprague Dawley rats were assigned randomly to two groups. We exposed the superior rectus muscle (SRM) and performed thermal injury 2 mm behind the insertion site of the SRM using a cautery device in the experimental group. The thermal injuries were performed twice for 1 second, for a total of 2 seconds. In the control group, the same procedures except the thermal injury were performed. Two weeks after surgery, all eyes were enucleated and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome (MT).

Results

Staining with H&E and MT showed that thermal injury significantly increased inflammation and fibrosis in the experimental group (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Thermal injury using cauterization effectively induced fibrosis of EOM in the rat model. This simple model was effective in inducing fibrosis of SRM and will be useful for studying postoperative fibrosis after strabismus surgery.

References

1. Mora JS, Sprunger DT, Helveston EM, Evan AP. Intraoperative sponge 5-fluorouracil to reduce postoperative scarring in abdominal surgery. J AAPOS. 1997; 1:92–7.
2. Cruz OA. Evaluation of mitomycin to limit postoperative abdominal in strabismus surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1996; 33:89–92.
3. Minguini N, Monteiro de Carvalho KM, Akaishi PM, De Luca IM. Histologic effect of mitomycin C on strabismus surgery in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41:3399–401.
4. Jung KI, Choi JS, Kim HK, Shin SY. Effects of an abdominal growth factor-beta agent (pirfenidone) on strabismus abdominal in rabbits. Curr Eye Res. 2012; 37:770–6.
5. Ozkan SB, Kir E, Culhaci N, Dayanir V. The effect of Seprafilm on adhesions in strabismus surgery-an experimental study. J AAPOS. 2004; 8:46–9.
6. de Carvalho LE, Alves MR, da Silva MA, Gaal Vadas MF. Experimental strabismus surgery using triamcinolone: outcomes and effects on inflammatory response. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007; 70:209–15.
7. Frangouli O, Adams GG. The use of amniotic membrane for the management of fibrosis in complex strabismus surgery. Strabismus. 2013; 21:13–22.
crossref
8. Kirsch D, Lowen MS, Fialho Cronemberger MF, Sato EH. Amniotic membrane for reducing the formation of adhesions in strabismus surgery: experimental study in rabbits. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014; 51:341–7.
crossref
9. Kassem RR, Abdel-Hamid MA, Khodeir MM. Effect of lyophi-lized amniotic membrane on the development of adhesions and abdominal after extraocular muscle surgery in rabbits. Curr Eye Res. 2011; 36:1020–7.
10. Lee MJ, Jin SE, Kim CK, et al. Effect of slow-releasing all-transretinoic acid in bioabsorbable polymer on delayed adjustable strabismus surgery in a rabbit model. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 148:566–72.
crossref
11. Demirel S, Atilla H, Okcu Heper A, Erkam N. Effects of amniotic membrane on wound healing and adhesions in experimental abdominal surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19:899–904.
12. Cai EZ, Ang CH, Raju A, et al. Creation of consistent burn wounds: a rat model. Arch Plast Surg. 2014; 41:317–24.
crossref
13. Yaacobi Y, Hamed LM, Kaul KS, Fanous MM. Reduction of abdominal adhesions secondary to strabismus surgery in rabbits. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992; 23:123–8.
14. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an abdominal of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009; 37:1528–42.
15. Vindinský B, Gál P, Toporcer T, et al. Histological study of the first seven days of skin wound healing in rats. Acta Vet Brno. 2006; 75:197–202.
16. Tarran S, Langlois NE, Dziewulski P, Sztynda T. Using the abdominal cell infiltrate to estimate the age of human burn wounds: A review and immunohistochemical study. Med Sci Law. 2006; 46:115–26.
17. Gravante G, Palmieri MB, Delogu D, Montone A. Apoptotic cells in cutaneous adnexa of burned patients. Burns. 2007; 33:129–30.
crossref

Figure 1.
Demonstration of the operation procedure. (A) Exposure of the upper conjunctiva. (B) Subconjunctival injection of 0.1 mL of normal saline. (C) Limbal peritomy from 10 to 2 o'clock. (D) Isolation of the superior rectus muscle. (E) Thermal injury on superior rectus muscle (black arrow).
jkos-59-478f1.tif
Figure 2.
Photomicrographs showing inflammation of the superior rectus muscle two weeks after surgery in the rat model (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×100). (A) Grade 0. (B) Grade 1. (C) Grade 2. (D) Grade 3.
jkos-59-478f2.tif
Figure 3.
Bar graphs showing the degree of inflammation of superior rectus muscle two weeks after surgery. The grade of inflammation was statistically different between control and cauterization group (p = 0.002).
jkos-59-478f3.tif
Figure 4.
Photomicrographs showing fibrosis of the superior rectus muscle two weeks after surgery in the rat model (Masson's trichrome staining, ×100). (A) Grade 0. (B) Grade 1. (C) Grade 2. (D) Grade 3. (E) Grade 4.
jkos-59-478f4.tif
Figure 5.
Bar graphs showing the degree of fibrosis of superior rectus muscle two weeks after surgery. The grade of fibrosis was statistically different between control and cauterization group (p ≤ 0.001).
jkos-59-478f5.tif
Table 1.
Detailed description of grade of inflammation and fibrosis according to photomicrographic findings
  Grades Descriptions
Inflammation 0 Inflammatory infiltrate absent
  1 Mild inflammatory infiltrate (presence of lymphocytes)
  2 Moderate inflammatory infiltrate (presence of lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and scattered macrophages)
  3 Intense inflammatory infiltrate (presence of lymphocytes, plasmocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils)
Fibrosis 0 No fibrosis
  1 Mild perimuscular fibrotic reaction (stained collagen was detectable only in thin bands immediately adjacent to the muscle)
  2 Easily detected thick bands
  3 Well-developed, dense bands of collagen
  4 A severe fibrotic response replacing large areas
Table 2.
The grades of inflammation and fibrosis in each group two weeks after surgery
  Control* Cauterization* p-value
Inflammation 0.75 ± 0.62 1.83 ± 0.52 0.002
Fibrosis 0.83 ± 0.58 2.42 ± 0.90 <0.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

* Standard deviation

Kruskal-Wallis test.

TOOLS
Similar articles