Abstract
Purpose
To compare the therapeutic efficacy of vitrectomy plus intravitreal antibiotic injection (vitrectomy group) with intravitreal antibiotic injection alone (antibiotic group) for eyes with acute endophthalmitis developed after cataract surgery with visual acuity of hand motion or better.
Methods
In this retrospective chart review, we compared the visual acuities of 10 eyes of a vitrectomy group and 17 eyes of an antibiotic group.
Results
We found no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension), time of symptom onset, time of diagnosis, type of systemic antibiotic prescribed, or positive culture rate. Mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was similar in the two groups (2.17 vs. 1.96 logMAR; p = 0.60). Both groups exhibited significant improvements in mean BCVA after 2 months: from 2.17 to 0.81 logMAR in the vitrectomy group (p = 0.01) and from 1.96 to 0.76 logMAR in the antibiotic group (p = 0.002), but the final BCVA did not differ significantly between the two groups (0.81 vs. 0.76 logMAR, p = 0.75).
Conclusions
Both vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antibiotic injection and intravitreal antibiotic injection alone significantly improved visual acuity; the final BCVA did not differ between the two groups. Intravitreal antibiotic injection alone may be an effective first-line treatment for endophthalmitis in patients with initial visual acuity of hand motion or better.
Figures and Tables
Table 1
Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.
IVAI = intravitreal antibiotic injection; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (0: Snellen 20/20, 1: Snellen 20/200, 2: Finger-counting, 3: Hand-motion).
*Fisher's exact test; †Mann Whitney U-test.
References
1. Kim JH. Infectious Endophthalmitis, Cataract. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Seoul: Il Jo Kak;2002. p. 264–272.
2. Jung JY, Ko BY, Kim BY. Factors associated with a poor visual result in acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1242–1247.
3. Lee SB, Han JW, Chung SK, Baek NH. Factors associated with visual outcomes of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1618–1623.
4. Chung SE, Ham DI. Visual prognosis of culture-proven bacterial endophthalmitis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1292–1297.
5. Kang KT, Kim KS, Kim YC. Factors affecting final visual acuity in infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013; 54:1025–1031.
6. Kim WJ, Kweon EY, Lee DW, Cho NC. Postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery over an eight-year period. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1771–1778.
7. Lee NE, Park JM. Clinical results of bacterial endophthalmitis: Bacterial culture and visual acuity outcomes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:1173–1181.
8. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group. Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study: A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:1479–1496.
9. Ciulla TA, Starr MB, Masket S. Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:13–24.
10. Ou JI, Ta CN. Endophthalmitis prophylaxis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006; 19:449–456.
11. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, et al. Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123:613–620.
12. Jeon CY, Lee TG, Na SJ. The clinical outcomes of 23-Gauge Tranconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:1167–1172.