Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.59(4) > 1010887

Ha, Lee, Sung, and Park: Comparison of the Efficacy of Topical Steroids after Trabeculectomy in Patients with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the surgical outcomes and intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after trabeculectomy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) according to treatment with three different postoperative topical steroids.

Methods

A total of 84 eyes of 84 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy for POAG and were followed-up at least 1 year were included in this study. According to the postoperative topical steroid treatment, the patients were divided into three groups involving 0.5% loteprednol etabonate (LE), 1% rimexolone (RMX), and 1% prednisolone acetate (PDA). The mean IOP change, mean number of topical anti-glaucoma medication changes, 1-year success rate, and complication percentage were compared among the three groups.

Results

There were significant reductions in the IOP and number of anti-glaucoma medications during the postoperative 1-year follow-up in all of the groups (all, p < 0.05), but there were no differences among the three groups. Postoperative 1-year success rates (68.2% in the LE group, 67.0% in the RMX group, and 65.9% in the PDA group; p = 0.88) and complication percentages of trabeculectomy were not significantly different among the three groups.

Conclusions

There were no statistical differences in the 1-year success rate, complication percentage, visual acuity, IOP, and number of anti-glaucoma medications among treatment regimens. LE and RMX were as effective and safe as PDA after trabeculectomy in patients with POAG.

REFERENCES

1). Friedman DS, Wilson MR, Liebmann JM, et al. An evidence based assessment of risk factors for the progression of ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:S19–31.
2). Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 66:673–9.
3). Khaw PT, Occleston NL, Schultz G, et al. Activation and suppression of fibroblast function. Eye (Lond). 1994; 8(Pt 2):188–95.
crossref
4). Hu CY, Matsuo H, Tomita G, et al. Clinical characteristics and leakage of functioning blebs after trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C in primary glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:345–52.
crossref
5). Sugar HS. Clinical effect of corticosteroids on conjunctival filtering blebs; a case report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965; 59:854–60.
6). Nguyen KD, Lee DA. Effect of steroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents on human ocular fibroblast. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33:2693–701.
7). Araujo SV, Spaeth GL, Roth SM, Starita RJ. A ten-year follow-up on a prospective, randomized trial of postoperative corticosteroids after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102:1753–9.
crossref
8). Starita RJ, Fellman RL, Spaeth GL, et al. Short-and long-term effects of postoperative corticosteroids on trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1985; 92:938–46.
9). Amon M, Busin M. Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5%: efficacy and safety for postoperative anti-inflammatory use. Int Ophthalmol. 2012; 32:507–17.
crossref
10). Kavuncu S, Horoz H, Ardagil A, Erbil HH. Rimexolone 1% versus prednisolone acetate in preventing early postoperative inflammation after cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2008; 28:281–5.
crossref
11). Pleyer U, Ursell PG, Rama P. Intraocular pressure effects of common topical steroids for post-cataract inflammation: are they all the same? Ophthalmol Ther. 2013; 2:55–72.
crossref
12). Huang P, Shi Y, Wang X, et al. Interocular asymmetry of the visual field defects in newly diagnosed normal-tension glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, and chronic angle-closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2014; 23:455–60.
crossref
13). Heuer DK, Barton K, Grehn F, et al. Consensus on definitions of success. Shaarawry TM, Sherwood MB, Grehn F, editors. Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. 1st. Amsterdam: Kugler publications;2009. chap. 2.
14). Palanca-Capistrano AM, Hall J, Cantor LB, et al. Long-term outcomes of intraoperative 5-fluorouracil versus intraoperative mitomycin C in primary trabeculectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:185–90.
crossref
15). Skuta GL, Parrish RK 2nd. Wound healing in glaucoma filtering surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 1987; 32:149–70.
crossref
16). Palmer SS. Mitomycin as adjunct chemotherapy with trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98:317–21.
crossref
17). Kang SH, Kim JW. Effects of prednisolone and loteprednol eyedrops on the proliferation of human tenon's capsule fibroblasts. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013; 54:1423–8.
crossref
18). Yuki K, Shiba D, Kimura I, et al. Trabeculectomy with or without intraoperative sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in treating secondary glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:1055–60. 1060.e1-2
crossref
19). Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Sanderson JP. Attenuation of ocular hypertension with the use of topical loteprednol etabonate 0.5% in steroid responders after corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2009; 28:1139–43.
crossref
20). Thomas R, Jay JL. Raised intraocular pressure with topical steroids after trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988; 226:337–40.
crossref
21). Wilensky JT, Snyder D, Gieser D. Steroid-induced ocular hypertension in patients with filtering blebs. Ophthalmology. 1980; 87:240–4.
crossref
22). Spaeth GL, Joseph NH, Fernandes E. Trabeculectomy: a reevaluation after three years and a comparison with Scheie's procedure. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975; 79:OP349–61.
23). Foster CS, Alter G, DeBarge LR, et al. Efficacy and safety of rimexolone 1% ophthalmic suspension vs 1% prednisolone acetate in the treatment of uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996; 122:171–82.
24). Loteprednol Etabonate US Uveitis Study Group. Controlled evaluation of loteprednol etabonate and prednisolone acetate in the treatment of acute anterior uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127:537–44.

Figure 1.
The changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and mean number of anti-glaucoma medication in the three groups during the 1-year follow-up. (A) BCVA was remained stable during the follow-up in the three groups. (B, C) IOP and mean number of glaucoma medication were significantly reduced after trabeculectomy through the 1-year follow up. There were no significant differences in BCVA, IOP, or mean number of glaucoma medication among the three groups. mon = month(s); LE = loteprednol etabonate; RMX = rimexolone; PDA = prednisolone acetate.
jkos-59-362f1.tif
Figure 2.
Cumulative probabilities of success of trabeculectomy in the three groups. The success rates at 1 year was 68.2% in loteprednol etabonate (LE) group, 67.0% in rimexolone (RMX) group, and 65.9% in prednisolone acetate (PDA) Group, which was not significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.877, log-rank test). mon = month(s).
jkos-59-362f2.tif
Table 1.
Demographic and baseline characteristics of the three groups
LE RMX PDA p-value
Number of patients/eyes 22/22 28/28 34/34 -
Age (years)* 60.25 ± 11.51 58.91 ± 17.01 61.26 ± 14.97 0.721
Sex (male:female) 11:11 19:9 20:14 0.438
BCVA (logMAR)* 0.58 ± 0.89 0.60 ± 0.98 0.64 ± 1.05 0.744
IOP (mmHg)* 30.94 ± 8.95 (20–41) 29.52 ± 7.75 (18–37) 27.07 ± 7.23 (19–36) 0.272
Glaucoma medication (n)* 2.94 ± 0.44 3.04 ± 0.37 2.85 ± 0.46 0.312
Visual field
   MD (dB)* −18.58 ± 8.64 −24.83 ± 7.08 −18.84 ± 8.96 0.605
   PSD (dB)* 8.92 ± 3.24 8.32 ± 4.22 8.15 ± 4.67 0.879
Cup-to-disc ratio* 0.81 ± 0.07 0.85 ± 0.11 0.86 ± 0.07 0.818
Corneal ECC (cells/mm2)* 2,355.88 ± 353.41 2,250.70 ± 581.57 2,087.08 ± 616.03 0.316

Values are presented as mean ± SD (range) or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

LE = loteprednol etabonate; RMX = rimexolone; PDA = prednisolone acetate; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarthim of the minimum angle of resolution; IOP = intraocular pressure; MD = mean deivation; PSD = pattern standard deviation; ECC = endothelial cell count.

* Kruskall-wallis test;

Chi-square test.

Table 2.
Postoperative interventions and complications in the three groups
LE (n = 22) RMX (n = 28) PDA (n = 34) p-value*
Interventions (eyes, [n, %])
   Releasable suture removal 22 (100) 28 (100) 34 (100) 0.99
   5-FU augmented needling 4(18.2) 4 (14.3) 5 (14.7) 0.21
Complications (eyes, [n, %])
   Hypotony 4(18.2) 4 (14.3) 4 (11.8) 0.16
   Bleb leakage 2 (0.09) 2 (0.07) 1 (0.03) 0.34
   Bleb infection 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.99
   Choroidal effusion 1 (4.5) 1 (3.5) 2 (5.9) 0.67

Values are presented as n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

LE = loteprednol etabonate; RMX = rimexolone; PDA = prednisolone acetate; 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil.

* Chi-square test.

TOOLS
Similar articles