Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.58(3) > 1010718

Lee, Shin, Seong, Cho, and Kang: Evaluation of the Relationship between Incision Location and Change of Posterior Corneal Astigmatism

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if there is a difference in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of the posterior corneal surface between superior and temporal incision and its effect on total corneal power in patients who underwent clear corneal incision cataract surgery.

Methods

A retrospective study of 81 patients (84 eyes) who underwent clear corneal incision phacoemulsification by one surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups according to the steep axis: the temporal and superior groups. Anterior, posterior and total corneal SIA (simulated keratometry [Sm K], posterior keratometry [PK] and total corneal power [TCP] respectively) were measured using autorefractive keratometry (ARK) and dual Scheimpflug imaging before and after surgery.

Results

There were 61 eyes with temporal incision and 23 eyes with superior incision. The mean SIA was larger in the superior incision group than in the temporal incision group according to ARK, Sm K, PK and TCP (p < 0.05). There were no significant cylindrical changes in ARK in the temporal incision group, however, there was a significant decrease in the superior incision group before and after the operation (p < 0.05). Change in the amount and axis of PK before and after operation were not significantly different, for both incision groups. There was a significant correlation between post-operative TCP and both pre-operative ARK and Sm K for both groups. However, there was no correlation between post-operative TCP and pre-operative PK. In all patients, when pre-operative PK was more than 0.5 D, SIA-ARK, SIA-Sm K and SIA-TCP were all significantly larger than when pre-operative PK was less than 0.5 D, whereas SIA-PK was not. When pre-operative PK was more than 0.5 D, there were no significant differences in SIA-ARK, SIA-Sm K, SIA-PK or SIA-TCP in the temporal incision group. However, SIA-ARK was significantly larger in the superior incision group.

Conclusions

There was no significant cylindrical change in PK before and after operation in both the temporal and superior incision groups. Therefore, when predicting post-operative TCP, it might be meaningful to consider SIA-ARK and SIA-Sm K.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Pre- and post-operative astigmatism, and axis and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of autorefractive keratometry (ARK) according to the incision locations

jkos-58-283-i001

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

Pre-Op = pre-operative; Post-Op = post-operative.

*Mann-Whitney U-test, statistically significant between temporal and superior incision p < 0.05.

Table 2

Pre- and post-operative astigmatism, axis and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of simulated keratometry (Sm K) according to the incision locations

jkos-58-283-i002

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

Pre-Op = pre-operative; Post-Op = post-operative.

*Mann-Whitney U-test, statistically significant p < 0.05.

Table 3

Pre- and post-operative astigmatism, axis and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of posterior keratometry (PK) according to the incision locations

jkos-58-283-i003

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

Pre-Op = pre-operative; Post-Op = post-operative.

*Mann-Whitney U-test, statistically significant p < 0.05.

Table 4

Pre- and post-operative astigmatism, axis and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of total corneal power (TCP) according to the incision locations

jkos-58-283-i004

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

Pre-Op = pre-operative; Post-Op = post-operative.

*Mann-Whitney U-test, statistically significant p < 0.05.

References

1. Tejedor J, Murube J. Choosing the location of corneal incision based on preexisting astigmatism in phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139:767–776.
2. Khokhar S, Lohiya P, Murugiesan V, Panda A. Corneal astigmatism correction with opposite clear corneal incisions or single clear corneal incision: comparative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1432–1437.
3. Bayramlar H, Dağlioğlu MC, Borazan M. Limbal relaxing incisions for primary mixed astigmatism and mixed astigmatism after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:723–728.
4. Barequet IS, Yu E, Vitale S, et al. Astigmatism outcomes of horizontal temporal versus nasal clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:418–423.
5. Kaufmann C, Peter J, Ooi K, et al. Limbal relaxing incisions versus on-axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:2261–2265.
6. Wang Li, Misra M, Koch DD. Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions combined with cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:712–722.
7. Whang WJ, Byun YS, Joo CK. Steep axis incision versus temporal incision in microcoaxial cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:29–33.
8. Altan-Yaycioglu R, Akova YA, Akca S, et al. Effect on astigmatism of the location of clear corneal incision in phacoemulsification of cataract. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:515–518.
9. Hill W. Expected effects of surgically induced astigmatism on AcrySof toric intraocular lens results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:364–367.
10. Morlet N, Minassian D, Dart J. Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:1127–1138.
11. Pfleger T, Skorpik C, Menapace R, et al. Long-term course of induced astigmatism after clear corneal incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22:72–77.
12. Park SH, Song IS, Seong MC, et al. Astigmatic correlation between the automated refractometry and dual scheimpflug analyzer in pseudophakic eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2016; 57:361–368.
13. Koch DD, Jenkins RB, Weikert MP, et al. Correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses: effect of posterior corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1803–1809.
14. Cheng LS, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ, et al. Estimation accuracy of surgically induced astigmatism on the cornea when neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011; 89:417–422.
15. Ho JD, Tsai CY, Liou SW. Accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:788–795. 795.e1–795.e2.
16. Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, et al. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:2080–2087.
17. Nemeth G, Berta A, Smalai E, et al. Analysis of surgically induced astigmatism on the posterior surface of the cornea. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:604–608.
18. Hachemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Soroush S, et al. The location of incision in cataract surgery and its impact on induced astigmatism. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016; 27:58–64.
19. Royston JM, Dunne MC, Marnes DA. Measurement of posterior corneal surface toricity. Optom Vis Sci. 1990; 67:757–763.
20. Royston JM, Dunne MC, Barnes DA. Measurement of the posterior corneal radius using slit lamp and Purkinje image techniques. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990; 10:385–388.
21. Dunne MC, Royston JM, Barnes DA. Posterior corneal surface toricity and total corneal astigmatism. Optom Vis Sci. 1991; 68:708–710.
TOOLS
Similar articles