Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.58(2) > 1010700

Kim, Yoon, and Lee: Relationship between Palpebral Fissure Height and Corneal Astigmatism of Epiblepharon

Abstract

Purpose

To study the effect of plapebral fissure height on astigmatism in epiblepharon patients.

Methods

The study consisted of 68 eyes of 34 patients who were diagnosed with epiblepharon and 88 eyes of 44 patients who had normal eyelids from September 2012 to July 2013. Data on palpebral fissure height and refractive errors were compared be-tween the epiblepharon group and the control group. Epiblepharon patients were further divided into two subgroups depending on the degree of preoperative corneal erosion in order to study the effects of corneal erosion on corneal astigmatism.

Results

The mean age was 5.6 ± 2.2 years in the epiblepharon group and 6.1 ± 1.5 years in the control group ( p = 0.339). The mean astigmatism was 2.28 ± 1.54 D in the epiblepharon group and 0.91 ± 1.07 D in the control group. The epiblepharon group showed higher astigmatism than the control group ( p < 0.001). The mean palepebral fissure height was 6.70 ± 1.19 mm in the ep-iblepharon group and 7.63 ± 1.06 mm in the control group. The epiblepharon group exhibited smaller palpebral fissure height than the control group ( p < 0.001). In the palpebral fissure height subgroups of the epiblepharon group, the <7.0 mm group showed higher astigmatism than the ≥7.0 mm group ( p = 0.026). Higher astigmatism was associated with smaller palpebral fis-sure height ( p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Patients with epiblepharon had significantly higher corneal astigmatism, and higher astigmatism was associated with smaller palpebral fissure height.

References

1. Preechawai P, Amrith S, Wong I, Sundar G. Refractive changes in epiblepharon. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:835–9.
crossref
2. Noda S, Hayasaka S, Setogawa T. Epiblepharon with inverted eye-lashes in Japanese children. I. Incidence and symptoms. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989; 73:126–7.
crossref
3. Kim NM, Jung JH, Choi HY. The effect of epiblepharon surgery on visual acuity and with-the-rule astigmatism in children. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010; 24:325–30.
crossref
4. Lee DP, Kim SD, Hu YJ. Change of visual acuity and astigmatism after operation in epiblepharon children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:223–7.
5. Baek SH, Heo NH, Lee KS. Corneal topographic changes after sur-gery in epiblepharon children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:1841–6.
6. Hyun DW, Jeon CY, Jin SY, Ha MS. Visual acuity and astigmatism after simultaneous surgery for upper and lower eyelid epiblepharon in children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:272–6.
crossref
7. Jeoung JW, Kim NJ, Choung HK, Khwarg SI. Changes in astigma-tism after surgical repair of epiblepharon or ptosis: a vectorial-ana-lytic approach. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1429–34.
8. Khwarg SI, Lee YJ. Epiblepharon of the lower eyelid: classi-fication and association with astigmatism. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1997; 11:111–7.
crossref
9. Garcia ML, Huang D, Crowe S, Traboulsi EI. Relationship be-tween the axis and degree of high astigmatism and obliquity of pal-pebral fissure. J AAPOS. 2003; 7:14–22.
crossref
10. Read SA, Collins MJ, Carney LG. The influence of eyelid morphol-ogy on normal corneal shape. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:112–9.
crossref
11. Kang WS, Ahn M. The Effects of epiblepharon surgery on the im-provement of astigmatism. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:343–7.
crossref

Figure 1.
Mean astigmatism with palpebral fissure height in the control group and the epiblepharon group. Within both the control group and the epiblepharon group, the smaller palpe-bral fissure height group showed higher astigmatism ( p = 0.073, 0.026, respectively). Mann-Whitney test.
jkos-58-192f1.tif
Table 1.
Demographic features of the epiblepharon group and the control group
Epiblepharon group (n = 68) Control group (n = 88) p-value
Age at baseline (years) 5.6 ± 2.2 6.1 ± 1.5 0.339*
Sex (male:female) 1:1 1.4:1 0.423
Astigmatism at baseline (D) 2.28 ± 1.54 0.91 ± 1.07 <0.001*
Palpebral fissure height (mm) 6.70 ± 1.19 7.63 ± 1.06 <0.001*

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

* p-value was calculated by unpaired t-test;

p-value was calculated by Chi-square test.

Table 2.
Distribution of the corneal erosion in the epiblepharon group
Degrees of corneal erosion Astigmatism (D) Simultaneous component analysis by ANOVA
Subgroup p-value
Grade 0 1.88 ± 1.29 Grade 1 0.292*
Grade 2 0.033*
Grade 1 1.33 ± 1.01 Grade 0 0.292*
Grade 2 <0.001*
Grade 2 3.03 ± 1.60 Grade 0 0.033*
Grade 1 <0.001*
Total <0.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

ANOVA = analysis of variance.

* p-value was calculated by post-hoc analysis by Scheffe

p-value was calculated by simultaneous component analysis by ANOVA.

TOOLS
Similar articles