Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.58(9) > 1010628

Kim and Kim: Comparison of Corneal Higher-order Aberration before and after Excision of Pterygium

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the types of corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) induced by pterygium, residual corneal HOA after pterygium surgery, and correlations between corneal HOA and the length of the pterygium.

Methods

Fifty-three patients who underwent pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft were enrolled. Corneal HOA was measured by Pentacam® (Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in the 6-mm optical zone. Preoperative and postoperative HOAs of eyes with pterygium were compared with HOAs of the fellow eye to evaluate HOAs induced by pterygium and residual HOAs after pterygium surgery. Partial correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between HOAs and the length of pterygium. A postoperative HOA less than 0.35 µm in size was defined as a favorable surgical outcome and the surgical indications were estimated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

Horizontal coma, root mean square (RMS) of coma, oblique trefoil, horizontal trefoil, RMS of trefoil, and total HOA were significantly greater in the eye with preoperative pterygium. Three months after pterygium excision, only RMS of coma and total HOA remained significantly greater in eyes with pterygium. Vertical coma, horizontal coma, RMS of coma, and oblique tetrafoil were correlated with pterygium length. Pterygium excision when pterygium length was less than 1.6 mm led to favorable surgical outcomes.

Conclusion

Pterygium induced greater than third-order corneal HOAs and these HOAs were corrected via pterygium surgery. Longer pterygium length was associated with larger RMS of coma and larger coma RMS persisted after pterygium surgery. A pterygium length of 1.6 mm should be considered the cutoff for pterygium excision for reducing postoperative corneal HOA.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Preoperative slit-lamp photograph of the pterygium. Gray dashed lines were added to the image analysis for the measurement of length of pterygium. Length of pterygium (double-headed arrow): distance between the two vertical lines to the horizontal line passing through the corneal center (a), one line (b) tangent to the pterygium head and second line (c) tangent to the corneal limbus.

jkos-58-1023-g001
Figure 2

Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for postoperative higher-order aberration under 0.35 µm versus length of pterygium. Std. = standard; Sig. = significance.

jkos-58-1023-g002
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of subjects who received excision of pterygium

jkos-58-1023-i001

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

Table 2

Bilateral comparison of higher-order aberration in pterygium eyes and control eyes before pterygium surgery

jkos-58-1023-i002

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

HOA = higher-order aberration.

Table 3

Bilateral comparison of higher-order aberration in pterygium eyes following pterygium surgery and control eyes

jkos-58-1023-i003

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

HOA = higher-order aberration.

Table 4

Higher-order aberration of pterygium eyes before and after pterygium surgery

jkos-58-1023-i004

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

HOA = higher-order aberration.

Table 5

Partial correlation analysis between higher-order aberration and length of pterygium

jkos-58-1023-i005

Controlled by age and sex.

HOA = higher-order aberration; Induced HOA = preoperative HOA of pterygium eyes – HOA of control eyes; Remained HOA = postoperative HOA of pterygium eyes – HOA of control eyes.

Table 6

Partial correlation analysis between higher-order aberration and width of pterygium

jkos-58-1023-i006

Controlled by age and sex.

HOA = higher-order aberration; Induced HOA = preoperative HOA of pterygium eyes – HOA of control eyes; Remained HOA = postoperative HOA of pterygium eyes – HOA of control eyes.

Table 7

Specificity, sensitivity identified by cutoff points of lengh of pterygium

jkos-58-1023-i007

Notes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

1. Dushku N, John MK, Schultz GS, Reid TW. Pterygia pathogenesis: corneal invasion by matrix metalloproteinase expressing altered limbal epithelial basal cells. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:695–706.
2. Threlfall TJ, English DR. Sun exposure and pterygium of the eye: a dose-response curve. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 128:280–287.
3. Hansen A, Norn M. Astigmatism and surface phenomena in pterygium. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1980; 58:174–181.
4. Yasar T, Ozdemir M, Cinal A, et al. Effects of fibrovascular traction and pooling of tears on corneal topographic changes induced by pterygium. Eye (Lond). 2003; 17:492–496.
5. Cinal A, Yasar T, Demirok A, Topuz H. The effect of pterygium surgery on corneal topography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001; 32:35–40.
6. Ozdemir M, Cinal A. Early and late effects of pterygium surgery on corneal topography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005; 36:451–456.
7. Lin A, Stern G. Correlation between pterygium size and induced corneal astigmatism. Cornea. 1998; 17:28–30.
8. Stern GA, Lin A. Effect of pterygium excision on induced corneal topographic abnormalities. Cornea. 1998; 17:23–27.
9. Fong KS, Balakrishnan V, Chee SP, Tan DT. Refractive change following pterygium surgery. CLAO J. 1998; 24:115–117.
10. Tomidokoro A, Miyata K, Sakaguchi Y, et al. Effects of pterygium on corneal spherical power and astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:1568–1571.
11. Tomidokoro A, Oshika T, Amano S, et al. Quantitative analysis of regular and irregular astigmatism induced by pterygium. Cornea. 1999; 18:412–415.
12. Lindsay RG, Sullivan L. Pterygium-induced corneal astigmatism. Clin Exp Optom. 2001; 84:200–203.
13. Mohammad-Salih PA, Sharif AF. Analysis of pterygium size and induced corneal astigmatism. Cornea. 2008; 27:434–438.
14. Oner FH, Kaderli B, Durak I, Cingil G. Analysis of the pterygium size inducing marked refractive astigmatism. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2000; 10:212–214.
15. Villegas EA, Alcón E, Artal P. Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49:4688–4696.
16. Pesudovs K, Figueiredo FC. Corneal first surface wavefront aberrations before and after pterygium surgery. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:921–925.
17. Gumus K, Erkilic K, Topaktas D, Colin J. Effect of pterygia on refractive indices, corneal topography, and ocular aberrations. Cornea. 2011; 30:24–29.
18. Zare M, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Ansari-Astaneh MR, et al. Effects of pterygium on ocular aberrations. Cornea. 2010; 29:1232–1235.
19. Kwon SM, Lee DJ, Jeung WJ, Park WC. Power ector and aberrations using corneal topographer and wavefront aberrometer before and after pterygium surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1737–1745.
20. Gumus K, Topaktas D, Göktaş A, et al. The change in ocular higher-order aberrations after pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft: a 1-year prospective clinical trial. Cornea. 2012; 31:1428–1431.
21. Miranda MA, Radhakrishnan H, O'Donnell C. Repeatability of oculus pentacam metrics derived from corneal topography. Cornea. 2009; 28:657–666.
22. Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007; 18:325–333.
23. Levy Y, Segal O, Avni I, Zadok D. Ocular higher-order aberrations in eyes with supernormal vision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139:225–228.
24. Han HC, Kim JH, Lee DH. The changes of corneal higher-order aberrations after surgery according to pterygium size. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:32–39.
25. Oie Y, Maeda N, Kosaki R, et al. Characteristics of ocular higher-order aberrations in patients with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1928–1934.
26. Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44:4676–4681.
TOOLS
Similar articles