Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of repeated intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) on the thickness of the ganglion cell layer (GCL) in patients with retinal vein occlusion.
Methods
The present retrospective study included 60 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlu-sion who received more than 3 anti-VEGF injections. GCL thickness was measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. GCL thickness measurements were made at 9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid regions. We eval-uated correlations between changes in the GCL thickness and other factors such as intraocular pressure, times of injection, and changes in central macular thickness (CMT).
Results
As a result of multiple intravitreal anti-VEGF treatments, GCL thickness was significantly decreased from 42.99 ± 5.39 to 38.99 ± 5.53 ( p < 0.001). Changes in GCL thickness were correlated with CMT and the number of injections ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.048, respectively). However, multivariate analysis showed the change in mean GCL thickness in the retinal vein occlusion (RVO) was strongly associated only with CMT ( p < 0.001).
References
1. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR. . Age-specific preva-lence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:653–8.
2. Attebo K, Mitchell P, Smith W. Visual acuity and the causes of visu-al loss in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103:357–64.
3. The Korean Retina Society. Retina. 4th. Vol. 1. Seoul: Jin Printing and Communication;2015; 283–305.
4. Rehak J, Rehak M. Branch retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, visual prognosis, and treatment modalities. Curr Eye Res. 2008; 33:111–31.
5. Noma H, Funatsu H, Yamasaki M. . Pathogenesis of macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion and intraocular levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:256–61.
6. Yoshimura T, Sonoda KH, Sugahara M. . Comprehensive anal-ysis of inflammatory immune mediators in vitreoretinal diseases. PLoS One. 2009; 4:e8158.
7. Fujikawa M, Sawada O, Miyake T. . Correlation between vas-cular endothelial growth factor and nonperfused areas in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1497–501.
8. Hoeh AE, Ach T, Schaal KB. . Long-term follow-up of OCT-guided bevacizumab treatment of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 247:1635–41.
9. Prager F, Michels S, Kriechbaum K. . Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: 12-month results of a prospective clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:452–6.
10. Ehlers JP, Decroos FC, Fekrat S. Intravitreal bevacizumab for mac-ular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina. 2011; 31:1856–62.
11. Hikichi T, Higuchi M, Matsushita T. . Two-year outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:195–9.
12. Lee YS, Kim MS, Yu SY, Kwak HW. Two-year results of intra-vitreal bevacizumab injection in retinal vein occlusion. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:1039–47.
13. Carmeliet P, Ruiz de Almodovar C. VEGF ligands and receptors: implications in neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013; 70:1763–78.
14. Brar VS, Sharma RK, Murthy RK, Chalam KV. Evaluation of dif-ferential toxicity of varying doses of bevacizumab on retinal gan-glion cells, retinal pigment epithelial cells, and vascular endothe-lial growth factor–enriched choroidal endothelial cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 25:507–11.
15. Foxton RH, Finkelstein A, Vijay S. . VEGF-A is necessary and sufficient for retinal neuroprotection in models of experimental glaucoma. Am J Pathol. 2013; 182:1379–90.
16. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT. . Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:2305–14. e1-2.
17. Kim NR, Kim JH, Lee J. . Determinants of perimacular inner retinal layer thickness in normal eyes measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:3413–8.
18. Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL. . Optical coherence to-mography (OCT) macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber lay-er measurements and automated visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:218–25.
19. Nakatani Y, Higashide T, Ohkubo S. . Evaluation of macular thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for detection of early glaucoma using spectral domain optical coher-ence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20:252–9.
20. Cho JW, Sung KR, Lee S. . Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as meas-ured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51:6401–7.
21. Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT. . Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:2305–14. e1-2.
22. Takagishi M, Hirooka K, Baba T. . Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and visual field sensitivity. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20:383–7.
23. Park CH, Lee KI, Park HY. . Changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer after intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in glaucoma patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:693–701.
24. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Ruiz-Calvo A, Saenz-Frances F. . Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes in patients with age-re-lated macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53:6214–8.
25. Kim MJ, Woo SJ, Park KH, Kim TW. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is decreased in the fellow eyes of patients with unilateral retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:706–10.
26. Brar VS, Sharma RK, Murthy RK, Chalam KV. Bevacizumab neu-tralizes the protective effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on retinal ganglion cells. Mol Vis. 2010; 16:1848–53.
27. Iriyama A, Chen YN, Tamaki Y, Yanagi Y. Effect of anti-VEGF an-tibody on retinal ganglion cells in rats. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91:1230–3.
28. Shin HJ, Shin KC, Chung H, Kim HC. Change of retinal nerve fi-ber layer thickness in various retinal diseases treated with multiple intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55:2403–11.
29. Williamson TH. Central retinal vein occlusion: what's the story? Br J Ophthalmol. 1997; 81:698–704.
Table 1.
BRVO | CRVO | Total | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
No. of patients (eyes) | 35 | 25 | 60 | - |
Male/female | 14/21 | 13/12 | 27/33 | 0.434* |
Age (years) | 62.54 ± 8.52 | 64.28 ± 10.67 | 63.27 ± 9.43 | 0.509† |
Follow up period (months) | 19.54 ± 17.41 | 22.44 ± 17.16 | 20.75 ± 17.22 | 0.467† |
No. of injections | 5.26 ± 2.59 | 6.48 ± 10.67 | 5.77 ± 3.27 | 0.329† |
Initial IOP (mm Hg) | 14.02 ± 2.37 | 16.28 ± 2.59 | 14.97 ± 2.69 | 0.001† |
Initial CMT (μ m) | 385.83 ± 135.94 | 463.56 ± 158.92 | 418.22 ± 149.72 | 0.062† |
Initial average GCLT (μ m) | 42.30 ± 4.78 | 43.94 ± 6.12 | 42.99 ± 5.39 | 0.161† |
Table 2.
Total (BRVO + CRVO) |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | p-value* | |
GCLT | |||
Fovea (μ m) | 22.20 ± 10.02 | 18.25 ± 8.25 | 0.038 |
SC (μ m) | 54.47 ± 7.93 | 50.02 ± 9.97 | <0.001 |
SP (μ m) | 37.37 ± 5.95 | 34.42 ± 7.57 | 0.003 |
NC (μ m) | 54.97 ± 7.46 | 50.97 ± 8.18 | <0.001 |
NP (μ m) | 41.55 ± 5.48 | 40.43 ± 5.80 | 0.099 |
IC (μ m) | 54.15 ± 11.34 | 47.98 ± 13.24 | <0.001 |
IP (μ m) | 35.60 ± 6.46 | 33.20 ± 6.72 | 0.003 |
TC (μ m) | 49.85 ± 8.38 | 41.87 ± 8.59 | <0.001 |
TP (μ m) | 38.05 ± 6.72 | 33.78 ± 7.08 | <0.001 |
Average | 42.99 ± 5.39 | 38.99 ± 5.53 | <0.001 |
CMT (μ m) | 418.22 ± 149.72 | 306.93 ± 89.02 | <0.001 |
GCL = ganglion cell layer; CMT = central macular thickness; BRVO = branch retinal vein occlusion; CRVO = central retinal vein occlu-sion; GCLT = ganglion cell layer thickness; SC = superior-central; SP = superior-peripheral; NC = nasal-central; NP = nasal-peripheral; IC = inferior-central; IP = inferior-peripheral; TC = temporal-central; TP = temporal-peripheral.
Table 3.
Variables | r | p-value* |
---|---|---|
Age (years) | 0.129 | 0.326 |
Changes in IOP | 0.082 | 0.535 |
Changes in CMT | 0.392 | 0.002 |
No. of injections | 0.256 | 0.048 |