Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.57(1) > 1010530

Oh and Young-Hoon: Long-Term Results of Transscleral Fixation of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the long-term results of transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) for unstable pos-terior capsular supporting structure.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 67 patients (67 eyes) with unstable posterior capsular supporting structure who underwent transscleral fixation at Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital from March 2005 to January 2013. Transscleral fixation without scleral flap was performed by a single surgeon. We analyzed the causes of transscleral fixation and compared postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spherical diopter.

Results

Among the 67 eyes of 67 patients, the causes of transscleral fixation included IOL subluxation (33 cases, 49.2%), IOL dislocation (11 cases, 16.4%), intraoperative posterior capsule rupture (8 cases, 11.9%), aphakia associated with previous intra-ocular surgery (7 cases, 10.4%), crystalline lens disorder with zonular dialysis (4 cases, 5.9%) and IOL opacity (4 cases, 5.9%). The mean BCVA before surgery was 1.26 ± 0.94 (log MAR) and the visual acuity improved to 0.59 ± 0.71, 0.60 ± 0.69, 0.58 ±0.70, 0.55 ± 0.70, 0.60 ± 0.58 and 0.66 ± 0.70 (1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years, respectively, after the surgery; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Posterior chamber IOL transscleral fixation in unstable posterior capsular supporting structure is effective for in-creasing visual acuity and spherical diopter. Specifically, the most improvement was observed at one month after surgery. Transscleral fixation is an adequate surgical procedure for fast improvement of visual acuity with long-term effects.

References

1. Malbran ES, Malbran E Jr, Negri I. Lens guide suture for transport and fixation in secondary IOL implantation after intracapsular extraction. Int Ophthalmol. 1986; 9:151–60.
crossref
2. Holt DG, Young J, Stagg B, Ambati BK. Anterior chamber intra-ocular lens, sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens, or glued in-traocular lens: where do we stand? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23. 62–7.
3. Hannush SB. Sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses: in-dications and procedure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000; 11:233–40.
crossref
4. Hu BV, Shin DH, Gibbs KA, Hong YJ. Implantation of posterior chamber lens in the absence of capsular and zonular support. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988; 106:416–20.
crossref
5. Lewis JS. Ab externo sulcus fixation. Ophthalmic Surg 1991; 22. 692–5.
crossref
6. Stark WJ, Goodman G, Goodman D, Gottsch J. Posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in the absence of posterior capsular support. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988; 19:240–3.
crossref
7. Güell JL, Barrera A, Manero F. A review of suturing techniques for posterior chamber lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15:44–50.
8. Yang JY, Chu YK. Modified surgical technique for transscleral fix-ation of a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens in the absence of capsular support. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1794–800.
crossref
9. Jung MO, Koh JW. Clinical results of modified Ab Externo and one-knot technique. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1783–8.
crossref
10. Ma DJ, Kim MK, Wee WR. Knotless external fixation technique for posterior chamber intraocular lens transscleral fixation: a 5-case analysis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1609–14.
crossref
11. Duffey RJ, Holland EJ, Agapitos PJ, Lindstrom RL. Anatomic study of transsclerally sutured intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989; 108:300–9.
crossref
12. Smiddy WE, Sawusch MR, O'Brien TP, et al. Implantation of scler-al-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990; 16:691–6.
crossref
13. Kokame GT, Yamamoto I, Mandel H. Scleral fixation of dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lenses: temporary haptic external-ization through a clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1049–56.
14. Shin JH, Lee JE, Oum BS. Clinical outcomes of the surgical man-agement with dislocated posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:420–7.
crossref
15. Hayashi K, Hirata A, Hayashi H. Possible predisposing factors for in-the-bag and out-of-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation and out-comes of intraocular lens exchange surgery. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:969–75.
crossref
16. Michaeli A, Assia EI. Scleral and iris fixation of posterior chamber lenses in the absence of capsular support. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16:57–60.
crossref
17. Por YM, Lavin MJ. Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005; 50:429–62.
crossref
18. Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG. . Intraocular lens im-plantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:840–59.
19. Heilskov T, Joondeph BC, Olsen KR, Blankenship GW. Late en-dophthalmitis after transscleral fixation of a posterior chamber in-traocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:1427.
crossref
20. Lewis JS. Sulcus fixation without flaps. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100:1346–50.
crossref
21. Baykara M, Avci R. Prevention of suture knot exposure in posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation by 4-point scleral fixation technique. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2004; 35:379–82.
crossref
22. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. Scleral fixation without con-junctival dissection. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1907–12.
crossref
23. Szurman P, Petermeier K, Aisenbrey S. . Z-suture: a new knot-less technique for transscleral suture fixation of intraocular implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94:167–9.
crossref
24. Asadi R, Kheirkhah A. Long-term results of scleral fixation of pos-terior chamber intraocular lenses in children. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:67–72.
crossref
25. Vote BJ, Tranos P, Bunce C. . Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:308–12.
crossref

Figure 1.
Knot location of posterior chamber intraocular lens transscleral fixation. (A, B) A polypropylene is fixed in the outer one-third point of haptic.
jkos-57-43f1.tif
Figure 2.
Technique for the ab externo approach of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) transscleral fixation. (A) The long curved double-armed 10-0 polypropylene needle is passed through the sclera approximately 1.0 mm posterior to the limbus. A sec-ond hollow needle is passed from the opposite side of the eye. (B) A hook is used to pull the suture out through a superior scleral tunnel wound so that it can be tied to the intraocular lens. (C) Suture is cut, and each end is tied to a haptic of the intraocular lens. After the IOL is placed into position. (D) The scleral sutures must be anchored to the sclera.
jkos-57-43f2.tif
Figure 3.
BCVA and refractive indexes change after surgery. The mean BCVA before surgery was 1.26 ± 0.94 (log MAR) and the visual acuity improved to 0.66 ± 0.70 at 5 years after the surgery. The spherical diopter before surgery was 5.80 ±5.86 diopters and it improved to 0.56 ± 1.12 diopters at 5 years after the surgery. The cylindrical diopter change shows no significant value. BCVA = best corrected visual acuity.
jkos-57-43f3.tif
Figure 4.
IOP change after surgery. After surgery, there were 33 cases of transient ocular hypertension and 5 cases of tran-sient ocular hypotension. At first day after surgery, the aver-age of ocular hypertension was 33.0 ± 12.42 mm Hg and average of ocular hypotension was 7.8 ± 0.83 mm Hg. The abnormal range of intraocular pressure was controlled within 1 month by conservative treatment. IOP = intraocular pressure.
jkos-57-43f4.tif
Table 1.
Causes for scleral fixation of the posterior chamber IOL
Case (n)
Phakia Zonular dialysis with crystalline lens drop 2
Zonular dialysis without crystalline lens drop 2
Posterior capsule rupture during intraocular surgery 8
Pseudophakia IOL dislocation 11
IOL subluxation 33
IOL opacity 4
Aphakia Trauma 7

IOL = intraocular lens.

Table 2.
Patients’ characteristics
Age (years)
Sex ratio (male/female)
Follow-up period (months)
Mean ± SD Range Number Mean ± SD Range
65.56 ± 13.52 18-89 46/21 39.47 ± 27.47 10-105

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. SD = standard deviation.

Table 3.
BCVA and refractive indexes change after surgery
Preoperative (n = 67) 1 week after surgery (n = 67) 1 month after surgery (n = 67) 3 months after surgery (n = 67) 1 year after surgery (n = 66) 3 years after surgery (n = 27) 5 years after surgery (n = 15)
Mean BCVA (log MAR) 1.26 ± 0.94 0.59 ± 0.71 0.60 ± 0.69 0.58 ± 0.70 0.55 ± 0.70 0.60 ± 0.58 0.66 ± 0.70
p-value* <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Mean Sph (D) 5.80 ± 5.86 0.49 ± 1.70 0.18 ± 1.60 0.28 ± 1.36 0.26 ± 1.37 0.43 ± 1.64 0.56 ± 1.12
p-value* <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Mean Cyl (-D) 1.71 ± 2.95 2.61 ± 1.77 2.24 ± 1.21 2.18 ± 1.18 2.20 ± 1.12 1.95 ± 1.09 1.89 ± 1.34
p-value* <0.05 0.176 0.213 0.128 0.160 0.145

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; Sph = spherical refraction; Cyl = cylindrical refraction; D = diopter.

* Paired t-test.

Table 4.
Postoperative complications after surgery
Prevalence
Transient ocular hypertension 33 (49.25)
Transient ocular hypotension 5 (7.46)
Glaucoma 5 (7.46)
Retinal detachment 4 (5.97)
Knot exposure 3 (4.47)
Hyphema 2 (2.98)
IOL subluxation 2 (2.98)
Bullous keratopathy 1 (1.49)
Vitreous hemorrhage 1 (1.49)
Endophthalmitis 0 (0)

Values are presented as n (%). IOL = intraocular lens.

Table 5.
Intraocular pressure change after surgery
Preoperative 1 day after surgery 1 week after surgery 1 month after surgery
Transient ocular hypertension (mm Hg, n = 33) 15.93 ± 2.34 33.0 ± 12.42 18.81 ± 7.20 13.96 ± 2.98
p-value* <0.05 0.110 0.353
Transient ocular hypotension (mm Hg, n = 5) 15.20 ± 2.38 7.8 ± 0.83 14.8 ± 10.28 13.8 ± 1.92
p-value <0.05 0.500 0.416

Values are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

* Paired t-test;

Wilcoxon sign rank test.

TOOLS
Similar articles